| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"dedanoe" |
| Date: |
08 Sep 2006 10:34:19 PM |
| Object: |
Einstein had to be right even for dedanoe |
taken from: http://dedanoe.tripod.com/Chang-Jiang-Physics.html
Infinity is not that BIG! It appears in your calculus because you omit
the extra dimension. Say you have two-dimensional interaction in an (F,
D)=(Force, Distance) metrics. Then you need to introduce the dimension
Z such as:
I^2-Z^2=(I')^2 where I is Imbalance. Further, from my imbalance
thesis comes that F^2+D^2=I^2. And that's how we come to Einstein's
Relativity:
In neutral interaction we have:
F'=Fcos(a)+Dsin(-a) and
D'=Fsin(a)+Dcos(-a) =>
I^2=(I')^2 => Z=0;
this type of interaction neither contracts nor expands.
In attraction towards zero we have:
F' = (Fcos(a)+Dsin(a)) * Sqrt(|cos(2a)|) and
D' = (Fsin(a)+Dcos(a)) * Sqrt(|cos(2a)|) =>
(I')^2 = I^2|cos(2a)| =>
(I')^2 = I^2 - Z^2 =>
I' = I * Sqrt(1-(Z/I)^2) =>
Z^2 = I^2 * (1-|cos(2a)|);
It's sort of space contraction.
In attraction towards infinity we have:
F' = (Fcos(a)+Dsin(a)) / Sqrt(|cos(2a)|) and
D' = (Fsin(a)+Dcos(a)) / Sqrt(|cos(2a)|) =>
(I')^2 = I^2 / |cos(2a)|
In this type of interaction the Z dimension is more likely to be
reciprocal like in the lenses. Therefore it is:
1/(I')^2 = 1/I^2 - 1/Z^2 =>
I' = I / Sqrt(1-(I/Z)^2) =>
Z^2 = I^2 / (1 - |cos(2a)|);
It's sort of space expansion.
.
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Einstein had to be right even for dedanoe |
08 Sep 2006 11:22:52 PM |
|
|
dedanoe wrote:
taken from: http://dedanoe.tripod.com/Chang-Jiang-Physics.html
[snip poor attempt at doing something interesting]
Since nobody is going to your site and reading your tripe, it means
NOBODY WANTS TO READ IT. So stop posting it here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dedanoe" |
|
| Title: Re: Einstein had to be right even for dedanoe |
09 Sep 2006 08:36:05 AM |
|
|
that's not my concer. i have something i want to share with the group
and i am doing so. i don't require them to pay me even though i need
money very badly. i still know someone is visiting my pages. tripod has
hit counter like any other host.
now i want to say that back in 2000 my first attempt to get to know
physics was understanding Einstein's relativity. bad mistake. i shoud
have learn the simpler things first. and so i became very confused/went
that much out of control that i stabed my mother. and so today i am
schizo-paranoid psycho. but after long 6 years circling around the
lever i am coming back to that very sense that got me out of control. i
know my mathematic formulation might be poor. i am just beginning to
formulate the idea. but the figure at the bottom of this page:
http://dedanoe.tripod.com/Chang-Jiang-Physics.html shows best what i
have in mind. it's about a recurrent micro-macro black-hole-star and
the attractions in the sun-part continue at the black-hole-part as
repulsions recurrently as well. i get those trajectories exclusively
with my dynamic law of lever for attraction and repulsion. i probably
need to multiply them two to get where i wanna be. i don't know i'll
just see what will happen from here.
Eric Gisse =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B0:
dedanoe wrote:
taken from: http://dedanoe.tripod.com/Chang-Jiang-Physics.html
[snip poor attempt at doing something interesting]
Since nobody is going to your site and reading your tripe, it means
NOBODY WANTS TO READ IT. So stop posting it here.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
