Firstly I would like to congratulate the author on his wholly developed
and astounding imagination(which really shows in the way he expresses
himself/herself) . Which century do you live in? Medieval bosnia? I'm
just writing this to tell you that you have either written this
because1) you just want to have some fun or you're too stupid for your
own good. Update yourself bro. make yourself a useful person to society
or not, its none of my business.
Thank you

In article <1141713711.162201.323760@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> wrote:

The speed of light depends on the speed of the light source or
receiver.

Wrong.

If photons leave the light source with speed c=300000km/s
(relative to the source) and if the source and the receiver have
relative speed v, the receiver measures the speed of coming photons to
be c+v.

Wrong.

This physical fact

It is not a fact.

is independent of any ideology and will
sooner or later destroy the malignant growth called theory of
relativity.

Were you dropped on your head as an infant?

For the moment however discussing the affairs of Einstein's
criminal cult is unavoidable.

I've heard of criminal stupidity...

In Chapter 22 in his "Relativity" Einstein finds it suitable to inform
the zombie world that, in a gravitational field, the speed of light
"varies with position". This means that, although the light source has
emitted photons with initial speed c=300000km/s (relative to the
source), the gravitational field accelerates them so that the receiver
measures their speed to be different, e.g. 300400km/s. Einstein admits
the failure of his principle of constancy of the speed of light but
only for the case in which a gravitational field is present - in this
field, according to Einstein, the speed of light "varies with
position". In the absence of a gravitational field the speed of light
by no means "varies with position" and therefore Einstein's second
postulate - the principle of constancy of the speed of light - remains
valid. DOES NOT VARY = CONSTANT : what can be clearer than that? The
idiocy is so exciting that zombies go into convulsions any time they
remember it.

In a different world different people would say: No, the speed of light
does not vary with position in the absence of a gravitational field but
this has nothing to do with the validity or invalidity of the principle
of constancy of the speed of light. If the speed of light is measured
to be e.g. c+v, Einstein's second postulate is violated although c+v
may not vary with position. Different people would also know that, if
the speed of light "varies with position" in a gravitational field,
then the speed of light is c+v in the absence of a gravitational field
(one should only apply the equivalence principle). In other words, if
the speed of light "varies with position" in a gravitational field, the
theory of relativity is an idiocy.

Sooner or later Bryan Wallace's prophecy will come true:

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm :

"I expect that the scientists of the future will consider the dominant
abstract physics theories of our time in much the same light as we now
consider the Medieval theories of how many angels can dance on the head
of a pin or that the Earth stands still and the Universe moves around
it."

Well, I'm fairly certain gibberish like yours will fall by the wayside.