| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Pentcho Valev" |
| Date: |
08 Dec 2007 01:59:20 AM |
| Object: |
EINSTEINIANA: THE BEGINNING OF THE END |
There are a lot of confusions, unfounded statements etc. in the
following paper but the tendency is clear: Einstein's idiocies are
coming to an end:
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=44738
Was Einstein wrong about Special Relativity?
Darrell Williams, December 5, 2007
One or two years ago the appearance of a paper of this kind in
American Chronicle would have been absolutely impossible.
Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: EINSTEINIANA: THE BEGINNING OF THE END |
27 Dec 2007 01:46:05 PM |
|
|
On Dec 8, 2:59=A0am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
There are a lot of confusions, unfounded statements etc. in the
following paper but the tendency is clear: Einstein's idiocies are
coming to an end:
Well, since Einstein was one of the first to say, SR is a
special model, what obviously still hasn't
sunk into the crank minds of QMers, is Einstein seemed
to call it a model of electodynamics, and the morons
in QM, still seem to think that he called it a model of eye-balls.
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=3D4...=
Was Einstein wrong about Special Relativity?
Darrell Williams, December 5, 2007
One or two years ago the appearance of a paper of this kind in
American Chronicle would have been absolutely impossible.
Pentcho Valev
pva...@yahoo.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: EINSTEINIANA: THE BEGINNING OF THE END |
27 Dec 2007 03:27:54 PM |
|
|
On Dec 27, 2:46=A0pm, "zzbun...@netscape.net" <zzbun...@netscape.net>
wrote:
On Dec 8, 2:59=A0am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
There are a lot of confusions, unfounded statements etc. in the
following paper but the tendency is clear: Einstein's idiocies are
coming to an end:
=A0 Well, since Einstein was one of the first to say, SR is a
=A0 special model, what obviously still hasn't
=A0 sunk into the crank minds of QMers, is Einstein seemed
=A0 to call it a model of electodynamics, and the morons
=A0 in QM, still seem to think that he called it a model of eye-balls.
Which STILL only proves that Maxwell was the last great
mathematician,
Van Neumann was the first great Logician, Turing was the first
great Composer,
Cantor was the only person who ever understood Calculus,
Newton was the only person who ever understand Science Fiction,
Darwin was the only person who ever understood rocks,
and Physics is still what Washington Wanks do.
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=3D4..=
..
Was Einstein wrong about Special Relativity?
Darrell Williams, December 5, 2007
One or two years ago the appearance of a paper of this kind in
American Chronicle would have been absolutely impossible.
Pentcho Valev
pva...@yahoo.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "conducter" |
|
| Title: Re: EINSTEINIANA: THE BEGINNING OF THE END |
08 Dec 2007 05:05:59 AM |
|
|
Pentcho Valev wrote:
There are a lot of confusions, unfounded statements etc. in the
following paper but the tendency is clear: Einstein's idiocies are
coming to an end:
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=44738
Was Einstein wrong about Special Relativity?
Darrell Williams, December 5, 2007
One or two years ago the appearance of a paper of this kind in
American Chronicle would have been absolutely impossible.
Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
looks like my woerds pentcho, thanks
" Many notable scientists such as the French mathematician, Henri
Poincare rejected Einstein's Theory of Relativity due to it's lack of
sound mathematical procedures, absence of clearness of vision or
rigorous arguments."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "conducter" |
|
| Title: Re: EINSTEINIANA: THE BEGINNING OF THE END |
08 Dec 2007 05:07:54 AM |
|
|
Pentcho Valev wrote:
There are a lot of confusions, unfounded statements etc. in the
following paper but the tendency is clear: Einstein's idiocies are
coming to an end:
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=44738
Was Einstein wrong about Special Relativity?
Darrell Williams, December 5, 2007
One or two years ago the appearance of a paper of this kind in
American Chronicle would have been absolutely impossible.
Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
this one is cool too
"Even though 99% of the audience didn't have the slightest idea what
he had said in his mysterious presentation, he still got a standing
ovation. Was this good science or just a popular fad? Should populism
be the basis for accepting or rejecting a scientific theory?"
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
