| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"brian a m stuckless" |
| Date: |
28 Feb 2006 03:15:05 AM |
| Object: |
Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved. |
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
$$ Electric CHARGE is NOT "perfectly conserved" ..it changes sign.
$$ There's no AC (i.e. alternating DC), if + current is conserved.
$$ Clearly the CHARGE must "fall" to zero between the + & - signs.
$$ Hope this helps, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
$$ Go-go Gooble GROUP SEARCH < My BiGGER bang.!! >< ascii iSS GUESS >.
CLOSE: Brian A M Stuckless, over, over, over & OUT.
$$ ^.
GUESS (RESTmass)*c^4=(iNTRiNSiC energy e)*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter.
$$ My GUESS iSS STANDARD
$$ < The STANDARD set. >
$$ /\
$$ __ _\/_ __
$$ \_\/_/\_\/_/
$$ /\_\/_/\ ("`-/")_.-'"``-._
$$ _\/_/\_\/_ \. . `; -._ )-;-, `)
$$ /_/\_\/_/\_\ \ / (v_,) _ )`-.\ ``-'
$$ /\ - O - _ .- _..-_/ / ((.'
$$ \/ / \ ((,.-' ((,/ By: Toe.!
$$ By deeds ye know them.!! >><> >><> >><> >><> >><>
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM hath circumcised the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!
$$ :-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'`
$$ ____ _ _ _ _
$$ | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | |
$$ | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | |
$$ My _ENORMOUS_ | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | < _ |_| |_|
$$ |_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
$$
$$ :*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM WHOLLY WHOLLY WHOLLY He ..and NO MORE is MORE.!!
FrediFizzx wrote: -=-
There is a theoretical prediction that depends on the mass of a
photon being zero. That electric charge is perfectly conserved.
-=-
FrediFizzx
Re: is there a "theoretical" mass for a photon ???
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
Re: Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}.
Re: SiGNETiC mass.
.
|
|
| User: "Daniel Pitts" |
|
| Title: Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved. |
01 Mar 2006 09:54:38 AM |
|
|
brian a m stuckless wrote:
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
$$ Electric CHARGE is NOT "perfectly conserved" ..it changes sign.
$$ There's no AC (i.e. alternating DC), if + current is conserved.
$$ Clearly the CHARGE must "fall" to zero between the + & - signs.
$$ Hope this helps, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
$$ Go-go Gooble GROUP SEARCH < My BiGGER bang.!! >< ascii iSS GUESS >.
CLOSE: Brian A M Stuckless, over, over, over & OUT.
$$ ^.
GUESS (RESTmass)*c^4=(iNTRiNSiC energy e)*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter.
$$ My GUESS iSS STANDARD
$$ < The STANDARD set. >
$$ /\
$$ __ _\/_ __
$$ \_\/_/\_\/_/
$$ /\_\/_/\ ("`-/")_.-'"``-._
$$ _\/_/\_\/_ \. . `; -._ )-;-, `)
$$ /_/\_\/_/\_\ \ / (v_,) _ )`-.\ ``-'
$$ /\ - O - _ .- _..-_/ / ((.'
$$ \/ / \ ((,.-' ((,/ By: Toe.!
$$ By deeds ye know them.!! >><> >><> >><> >><> >><>
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM hath circumcised the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!
$$ :-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'`
$$ ____ _ _ _ _
$$ | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | |
$$ | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | |
$$ My _ENORMOUS_ | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | < _ |_| |_|
$$ |_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
$$
$$ :*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM WHOLLY WHOLLY WHOLLY He ..and NO MORE is MORE.!!
FrediFizzx wrote: -=-
There is a theoretical prediction that depends on the mass of a
photon being zero. That electric charge is perfectly conserved.
-=-
FrediFizzx
Re: is there a "theoretical" mass for a photon ???
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
Re: Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}.
Re: SiGNETiC mass.
What, are you on crack?
AC has nothing to do with particle charge.
Alternating current is CURRENT flow, A.K.A electron flow. Electrons
have negative charge. The +/- alternation simply has to deal with the
directon of electron flow.
The voltage is simply a measure of the pressure which is pushing on the
electrons.
.
|
|
|
| User: "brian a m stuckless" |
|
| Title: Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved. |
02 Mar 2006 03:20:14 AM |
|
|
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
$$ The CHARGE SiGN of a battery terminal can be COMPLETELY reversed
$$ ..by COMPLETELY discharging the battery and STARTiNG to reCHARGE.
$$ [Note the point of zero (0) FLOW where the CHARGE reverses SiGN].
$$ Net CHARGE isN'T conserved in any system with NET CHARGE of zero.
$$
$$ CHARGE is NOT "perfectly" conserved where the NET CHARGE is zero.
$$
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved where it's NOT (+) ..OR (-).
$$
$$ PERHAPs this will help, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
Daniel Pitts wrote: > > brian a m stuckless wrote:
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
$$ Electric CHARGE is NOT "perfectly conserved" ..it changes sign.
$$ There's no AC (i.e. alternating DC), if + current is conserved.
$$ Clearly the CHARGE must "fall" to zero between the + & - signs.
$$ Hope this helps, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
FrediFizzx wrote: -=-
There is a theoretical prediction that depends on the mass of a
photon being zero. That electric charge is perfectly conserved.
-=-
FrediFizzx
Re: is there a "theoretical" mass for a photon ???
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
Re: Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}.
Re: SiGNETiC mass.
What, are you on crack?
AC has nothing to do with particle charge.
Alternating current is CURRENT flow, A.K.A electron flow. Electrons
have negative charge. The +/- alternation simply has to deal with the
directon of electron flow.
The voltage is simply a measure of the pressure which is pushing on the
electrons.
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
.
|
|
|
| User: "brian a m stuckless" |
|
| Title: Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved. |
05 Mar 2006 03:51:25 AM |
|
|
Daniel Pitts wrote: > > brian a m stuckless wrote:
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
$$ Giorgi SI MKSA and GUESS tell us that UNiT charge is 1 Amp*sec.
$$ Giorgi SI MKSA and GUESS tell us QUANTUM charge is {e} Amp*sec.
$$
$$ You woN'T dispute this ..again, regardless of GR "predictions".
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved where it's NOT (+) OR (-).
$$
$$ Quantitatively speaking, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
| > FrediFizzx wrote: -=-
| > There is a theoretical prediction that depends on the mass of a
| > photon being zero. That electric charge is perfectly conserved.
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved where it's NOT (+) OR (-).
Re: Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}.
Re: SiGNETiC mass.
AC has nothing to do with particle charge.
Alternating current is CURRENT flow, A.K.A electron flow. Electrons
have negative charge. The +/- alternation simply has to deal with the
directon of electron flow.
$$ ^.
$$ [ ].
$$ [ ].
$$ [No +or- No charge].
$$ [Flow STOPs ONCE each way].
$$ [Charge SiGN is 0 ONCE each way].
I really believe you are getting your concepts confused. In a "closed
system" charge (and energy) are conserved. A battery has a "+" and a
"-" end, which cancel out (to 0)
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved where it's NOT (+) OR (-).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Pitts" |
|
| Title: Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved. |
04 Mar 2006 10:49:52 AM |
|
|
brian a m stuckless wrote:
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
$$ The CHARGE SiGN of a battery terminal can be COMPLETELY reversed
$$ ..by COMPLETELY discharging the battery and STARTiNG to reCHARGE.
$$ [Note the point of zero (0) FLOW where the CHARGE reverses SiGN].
$$ Net CHARGE isN'T conserved in any system with NET CHARGE of zero.
$$
$$ CHARGE is NOT "perfectly" conserved where the NET CHARGE is zero.
$$
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved where it's NOT (+) ..OR (-).
$$
$$ PERHAPs this will help, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
Daniel Pitts wrote: > > brian a m stuckless wrote:
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
$$ Electric CHARGE is NOT "perfectly conserved" ..it changes sign.
$$ There's no AC (i.e. alternating DC), if + current is conserved.
$$ Clearly the CHARGE must "fall" to zero between the + & - signs.
$$ Hope this helps, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
FrediFizzx wrote: -=-
There is a theoretical prediction that depends on the mass of a
photon being zero. That electric charge is perfectly conserved.
-=-
FrediFizzx
Re: is there a "theoretical" mass for a photon ???
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
Re: Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}.
Re: SiGNETiC mass.
What, are you on crack?
AC has nothing to do with particle charge.
Alternating current is CURRENT flow, A.K.A electron flow. Electrons
have negative charge. The +/- alternation simply has to deal with the
directon of electron flow.
The voltage is simply a measure of the pressure which is pushing on the
electrons.
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
I really believe you are getting your concepts confused. In a "closed
system" charge (and energy) are conserved. A battery has a "+" and a
"-" end, which cancel out (to 0)
.
|
|
|
| User: "brian a m stuckless" |
|
| Title: Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved. |
04 Mar 2006 02:04:55 PM |
|
|
Daniel Pitts wrote: > > brian a m stuckless wrote:
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
$$ Giorgi SI MKSA and GUESS tell us that UNiT charge is 1 Amp*sec.
$$ Giorgi SI MKSA and GUESS tell us QUANTUM charge is {e} Amp*sec.
$$
$$ You woN'T dispute this ..again, regardless of GR "predictions".
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved where it's NOT (+) OR (-).
$$
$$ Quantitatively speaking, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
| > FrediFizzx wrote: -=-
| > There is a theoretical prediction that depends on the mass of a
| > photon being zero. That electric charge is perfectly conserved.
$$ Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved where it's NOT (+) OR (-).
Re: Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}.
Re: SiGNETiC mass.
AC has nothing to do with particle charge.
Alternating current is CURRENT flow, A.K.A electron flow. Electrons
have negative charge. The +/- alternation simply has to deal with the
directon of electron flow.
$$ ^.
$$ [ ].
$$ [ ].
$$ [No +or- No charge].
$$ [Flow STOPs ONCE each way].
$$ [Charge SiGN is 0 ONCE each way].
I really believe you are getting your concepts confused. In a "closed
system" charge (and energy) are conserved. A battery has a "+" and a
"-" end, which cancel out (to 0)
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved.
Re: Electric charge SiGN isN'T conserved where it's NOT (+) OR (-).
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
