| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Raktizer Omheit" |
| Date: |
24 May 2005 12:27:27 AM |
| Object: |
Electromagnetic Weapons |
There are also particularly disturbing web sites concerning the use of
electromagnetic weapons at these addresses: Electromagnetic Weapons and Mind
Control: from CNN'S Special Assignment, about 1985, at
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/cnn-mc.htm ,by Chuck DeCaro, CNN Special
Assignments, and List of mind control symptoms, whether the related
technology is scientifically proven and if there is military interest or
funding of the related technology, by Cheryl Welsh, March, 2003, in
http://www.mindjustice.org/symptoms.htm, and 2005 update: The convergence of
the cold war history of mind control and electromagnetic weapons with new
post cold war government neuroscience research programs, by Cheryl Welsh,
Director, Mind Justice, January, 2005, at
http://www.mindjustice.org/2005update.htm
Also, there is an interesting article called "Brain wave technology could
change lives: Imagine controlling a computer using only your thoughts." This
technology already exists in the civilian economy as a means of playing
video games, for example. See this link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6661974/ The article was written by Robert
Bazell, correspondent for NBC News, and was updated at 7:31p.m., December 6,
2004. Another web site concerned with gaining information on the electrical
activity of brainwaves, and by means of wireless technology, can be found in
the Sunday, 17 November, 2002, 00:41 GMT BBC NEWS World Edition article
called Remote control brain sensor, at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2361987.stm
See these following web sites for faster-than-light travel:
Faster-than-light, inWikipedia, the free encyclopedia, in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light
and Speed of light broken with basic lab kit, by Charles Choi, in
NewScientist.com news service, in
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2796
If they can do this with a basic lab kit, imagine what they can do with
highly advanced, top secret laboratory equipment at the N.S.A. headquarters
in Fort George Gordon Meade, located in the U.S. state of Maryland. See
National Security Agency in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency, Central Security
Service in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Security_Service, Echelon in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON, Defense Intelligence Agency in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Intelligence_Agency, and Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Advanced_Research_Projects_Agency.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Electromagnetic Weapons |
24 May 2005 01:14:45 PM |
|
|
Raktizer Omheit wrote:
There are also particularly disturbing web sites concerning the use of
electromagnetic weapons at these addresses: Electromagnetic Weapons and Mind
Control:
[snip crap]
Idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Raktizer Omheit" |
|
| Title: Re: Electromagnetic Weapons |
24 May 2005 08:23:53 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:42936F15.331F1586@hate.spam.net...
Raktizer Omheit wrote:
There are also particularly disturbing web sites concerning the use of
electromagnetic weapons at these addresses: Electromagnetic Weapons and
Mind
Control:
[snip crap]
Idiot.
Then CNN, and the U.S. military, are also idiots for declassifying this
once top secret technology to the American and global general public. And
you are an idiot too for ignoring declassified information.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Baugh" |
|
| Title: Re: Electromagnetic Weapons |
24 May 2005 08:41:48 AM |
|
|
Raktizer Omheit wrote:
....
and Speed of light broken with basic lab kit, by Charles Choi, in
NewScientist.com news service, in
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2796
...
The key segment in that article is:
"They hooked this hybrid cable up to two signal generators, one of which
broadcast a fast wave, the other a slow one. The waves interfere with
each other to produce electric pulses"
They've created traveling waves with group velocity > c but that's not
hard. You can do the same much cheeper by lining up a row of people
with their watches synchronized and each told to raise their hands
at a certain instant. Time it right and the "wave pulse" can travel
at any speed you like. Including "instantaneously" in the case where
each person raises his hands at same time.
But this wave is not propagating information FTL. This is not a new
discovery but a demonstration of an old well known and well understood
phenomenon.
There is a big difference between a sequence of phenomena which you
may point to where the location at which the phenomena occur moves
FTL and the causal propagation of a signal or material object FTL.
--
Regards,
James Baugh
.
|
|
|
| User: "Raktizer Omheit" |
|
| Title: Re: Electromagnetic Weapons |
24 May 2005 08:18:28 PM |
|
|
"Baugh" <baconbaugh@charter.net> wrote in message
news:_aGke.13157$cP2.8656@fe06.lga...
Raktizer Omheit wrote:
....
and Speed of light broken with basic lab kit, by Charles Choi, in
NewScientist.com news service, in
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2796
...
The key segment in that article is:
"They hooked this hybrid cable up to two signal generators, one of which
broadcast a fast wave, the other a slow one. The waves interfere with each
other to produce electric pulses"
They've created traveling waves with group velocity > c but that's not
hard. You can do the same much cheeper by lining up a row of people
with their watches synchronized and each told to raise their hands
at a certain instant. Time it right and the "wave pulse" can travel
at any speed you like. Including "instantaneously" in the case where
each person raises his hands at same time.
But this wave is not propagating information FTL. This is not a new
discovery but a demonstration of an old well known and well understood
phenomenon.
There is a big difference between a sequence of phenomena which you
may point to where the location at which the phenomena occur moves
FTL and the causal propagation of a signal or material object FTL.
--
Regards,
James Baugh
Thanks for the clarification. I wonder if they will ever prove or disprove
the existence of tachyons?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
