Elevating U(1) to SU(2) Gauge Symmetry & Magnetic Monopoles



 Science > Physics > Elevating U(1) to SU(2) Gauge Symmetry & Magnetic Monopoles

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Kyle"
Date: 01 Sep 2005 03:03:47 AM
Object: Elevating U(1) to SU(2) Gauge Symmetry & Magnetic Monopoles
Hi,
What would happen if you elevate the U(1) gauge symmetry
of a region to SU(2) gauge? A researcher said the magnetic
monopoles only occur if the region is SU(2) so to detect
magnetic monopoles the region must first be elevated from
the EM default U(1) to SU(2).
Also what is the corresponding temperature in the U(1)
and SU(2) gauge. Is it related to the phase transitions
occuring after the Big Bang. Can you elevate U(1) to
SU(2) gauge in a region without changing the temperature??
Thanks.
Kyle
.

User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: Elevating U(1) to SU(2) Gauge Symmetry & Magnetic Monopoles 01 Sep 2005 04:51:47 AM
Kyle wrote:

Hi,

What would happen if you elevate the U(1) gauge symmetry
of a region to SU(2) gauge?

What exactly do you mean with "region" here, and how is this
"elevation" supposed to work?

A researcher said the magnetic
monopoles only occur if the region is SU(2) so to detect
magnetic monopoles the region must first be elevated from
the EM default U(1) to SU(2).

You probably talk about the recent paper by Jay R. Yablon. And
your account of what the paper actually says is quite garbled.

Also what is the corresponding temperature in the U(1)
and SU(2) gauge.

Huh? What temperature do you mean???

Is it related to the phase transitions
occuring after the Big Bang. Can you elevate U(1) to
SU(2) gauge in a region without changing the temperature??

Wow. You really have no clue what you are talking about.
Bye,
Bjoern
.
User: "Kyle"

Title: Re: Elevating U(1) to SU(2) Gauge Symmetry & Magnetic Monopoles 01 Sep 2005 07:11:21 AM
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:

Kyle wrote:

Hi,

What would happen if you elevate the U(1) gauge symmetry
of a region to SU(2) gauge?


What exactly do you mean with "region" here, and how is this
"elevation" supposed to work?


A researcher said the magnetic
monopoles only occur if the region is SU(2) so to detect
magnetic monopoles the region must first be elevated from
the EM default U(1) to SU(2).


You probably talk about the recent paper by Jay R. Yablon. And
your account of what the paper actually says is quite garbled.


Also what is the corresponding temperature in the U(1)
and SU(2) gauge.


Huh? What temperature do you mean???


Is it related to the phase transitions
occuring after the Big Bang. Can you elevate U(1) to
SU(2) gauge in a region without changing the temperature??


Wow. You really have no clue what you are talking about.


Bye,
Bjoern

Well. Jay Yablon has very similar idea with Dr. Tiller.
I remember Dr. Tiller mentioning about how he thought
magnetic monopoles can exist in SU(2) gauge symmetry
state and how thought magnetic monopoles can act like
charges. In fact. He modified Maxwell equations to
accomodate the changes as in:
http://www.pbase.com/image/48544826/original
http://www.pbase.com/image/48544653/original
Something wrong with the equations?
Anyway. Dr. Tiller hypothesized that the Bohm Pilot wave
(that's right he believes in the de Broglie/Bohm
QM interpretations) are composed of the SU(2)
gauge magnetic monopoles and how elevating the
normal EM U(1) symmetry in say a room or particular
locality to SU(2) symmetry can bring up the monopoles.
Dr. Tiller wrote thus:
"As mentioned in Chapter 1, during the Minnesota
phase of hte experimentation, we discovered that
a DC magnetic field polarity effect on the pH of
water was one of the signature characteristics of
an IIED (Intention Imprinted Electrical Device)-
conditioned space. This behavior should not be
present in a normal, U(1) EM gauge symmetry space
because, in that state, only magnetic dipole behavior
should be exhibited by materials, and reversing the
sign of the magnetic field for materials in such a
state does not change the thermodynamic potential
energy for any atom or molecule, whether they are
electrically neutral or electricaly charged. From
this experimental observation, we deduced that an
IIED-conditioned space must be in an elevated
EM gauge symmetry (inner symmetry) state wherein
magnetic monopoles were now experimentally accessible
by our detection equipment. From theoretical
considerations, we supposed that an IIED-conditioned
space would have an inner symmetry state approaching
the SU(2) state where both the electric and magnetic
monopoles had been predicted to naturally coexist.
Certainly, the imprinting process itself was thought
to raise the inner symmetry state of a UED (umimprinted
electric device) from the U(1) state to the SU(2)
state for the IIED (Intention Imprinted Electric Device)."
Anyway the following details about how the IIED
experiments works and the overwhelming data:
http://www.tillerfoundation.com/ConActsCreation.pdf
Anyway. Let's just focus on this U(1) and SU(2) thing.
Do you think it is possible to elevate say a room
space from U(1) to SU(2) gauge?? I thought the Big
Bang has phase transitions wherein the temperature
decrease in amount say from SU(2) to U(1) so to
reverse the process, won't we have to increase the
temperature or do you think temperature has nothing
to do with it?
Kyle
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER