Science > Physics > Entangled particles and chemical reactions. Calling All Geese.
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Huang" |
| Date: |
06 Nov 2007 09:11:37 PM |
| Object: |
Entangled particles and chemical reactions. Calling All Geese. |
Looking for any known results on what happens to entangled pairs if
they are subjected to chemical reaction or other alteration.
Any major experiments been done in this area ?
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Entangled particles and chemical reactions. Calling All Geese. |
07 Nov 2007 01:35:12 PM |
|
|
Huang wrote:
Looking for any known results on what happens to entangled pairs if
they are subjected to chemical reaction or other alteration.
Any major experiments been done in this area ?
You'd instantly decohere the two groups. Simpler...
www.quantum.univie.ac.at/research/matterwave/c60/
Use semibullvalene, fabricate the diffraction barrier from alternating
Peltier microheaters/coolers, and use cryogenic temps via vacuum
supersonic expanded molecular beam (the stuff is volatile, C8H8 and
spherical). The duration of passage of one molecule through the
thickness of adjacent slits can easily be longer than the
rearrangement kinetics. Diverging structure at the different temps.
What goes in the front is phase-shfited vs. what comes out the back.
How do the wavefunctions recombine into observables?
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
| User: "Huang" |
|
| Title: Re: Entangled particles and chemical reactions. Calling All Geese. |
07 Nov 2007 09:18:41 PM |
|
|
On Nov 7, 1:35 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
Huang wrote:
Looking for any known results on what happens to entangled pairs if
they are subjected to chemical reaction or other alteration.
Any major experiments been done in this area ?
You'd instantly decohere the two groups. Simpler...
www.quantum.univie.ac.at/research/matterwave/c60/
Use semibullvalene, fabricate the diffraction barrier from alternating
Peltier microheaters/coolers, and use cryogenic temps via vacuum
supersonic expanded molecular beam (the stuff is volatile, C8H8 and
spherical). The duration of passage of one molecule through the
thickness of adjacent slits can easily be longer than the
rearrangement kinetics. Diverging structure at the different temps.
What goes in the front is phase-shfited vs. what comes out the back.
How do the wavefunctions recombine into observables?
--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
There are two ways to approach this which come to mind.
[1] Start with an entangled pair and do chemistry on the pair.
or
[2] Start with some chemical reaction where entanglement might be
occuring anyway as a natural consequence of existing mechanics, and go
from there.
Clearly, anytime one does x-ray diffraction of a crystal or shoots a
beam of light through a beam splitter you must be creating a situation
where entangled pairs are proliferating.
Yeah,....come to think of it........seems like the whole mess will be
steeped in paradox unless one starts with a fresh approach. Otherwise
Copenhagen interpretation would imply that you can just burn yoru CRC
handbook and simply observe everything into existence. :)
Lets say that you set up the double slit experiment with chemical
films instead of photomultiplier detectors. I dont know if the signal
is strong enough to register on photographic film, but that might make
an interesting approach to the problem. If you could get a bell curve
on one negative and wave interference on the other, that would be
interesting.
Maybe you could do something with a chromatography type of apparatus.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tenifer" |
|
| Title: Re: Entangled particles and chemical reactions. Calling All Geese. |
07 Nov 2007 05:52:25 AM |
|
|
On Nov 7, 11:11 am, Huang <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Looking for any known results on what happens to entangled pairs if
they are subjected to chemical reaction or other alteration.
Any major experiments been done in this area ?
Entangled pairs are so because they are made isolated
from environmental interactions which include chemical
reactions. By just photons interacting with the pairs.
The entanglement would be lost.
This is convensional believed.
Unconvensionally. The superposition is still there
but lost amidst environmental decoherence. Now
the 64 thousand dollar question. Can you make it
home to its pair non-locally in spite of lost of
coherence?
Teni
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
