| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Don1" |
| Date: |
14 Jul 2005 09:30:21 PM |
| Object: |
Entropy |
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Don
.
|
|
| User: "Steve Ralph" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 05:36:16 AM |
|
|
"Don1" <dcshead@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1121394621.477711.305140@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Idiot.
sr
Don
.
|
|
|
| User: "Timothy Murphy" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 07:58:17 AM |
|
|
Steve Ralph wrote:
"Don1" <dcshead@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1121394621.477711.305140@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Idiot.
Why?
It seemed a reasonable question to me.
The Third Law actually says that heat cannot flow in the opposite direction,
which is not quite the same thing.
I guess when put in this way one would have to add some proviso
for quantum theory, since there is a small but non-zero probability
that heat will flow in the "wrong" direction.
But why did you think it was a stupid question?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 04:48:30 AM |
|
|
Again sHead talks about matters of defined physics as if they were
articles of faith.
Personally, I believe sHead is a boring troll, but then I have much
empirical data to support that belief.
The trolling of sHead is as quantitatively predictable as the
thermodynamics of a heat engine.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Spriggs" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 05:21:14 PM |
|
|
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things;
Entropy and that hot things lose heat to cooler things are two different
concepts, neither of which is a mathematical one. If you must troll can
you please troll in appropriate newsgroups only?
--
I don't know who you are Sir, or where you come from,
but you've done me a power of good.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
14 Jul 2005 09:40:28 PM |
|
|
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Dumb Donny ***** doesn't know the differences among entropy,
enthalpy, and free energy. Dumb Donny ***** wouldn't know a
Boltzmann distribution if it came up and bit him in the *****.
Hey Dumb Donny *****, do you know that NMRs, MRIs, EPRs, and lasers
have negative temps kelvin? Adiabatic demagnetization of paramagnetic
salts, too, Dumb Donny ***** - negative temps kelvin. Is that low
enough for you, Dumb Donny *****?
Boring idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "pete" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 12:52:57 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
Dumb Donny ***** doesn't know the differences among entropy,
enthalpy, and free energy.
In Kill Bill part one,
The Bride didn't know the difference between entropy and atrophy.
--
pete
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Ralph" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 12:59:13 PM |
|
|
"pete" <pfiland@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:42D7F7F9.71F8@mindspring.com...
Uncle Al wrote:
Dumb Donny ***** doesn't know the differences among entropy,
enthalpy, and free energy.
In Kill Bill part one,
The Bride didn't know the difference between entropy and atrophy.
Yes, but I would hesitate to laugh at her on a newsgroup!
sr
pete
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Uncle Al the ***** |
15 Jul 2005 08:09:09 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Dumb Donny ***** doesn't know the differences among entropy,
enthalpy, and free energy. Dumb Donny ***** wouldn't know a
Boltzmann distribution if it came up and bit him in the *****.
Hey Dumb Donny *****, do you know that NMRs, MRIs, EPRs, and lasers
have negative temps kelvin? Adiabatic demagnetization of paramagnetic
salts, too, Dumb Donny ***** - negative temps kelvin. Is that low
enough for you, Dumb Donny *****?
Boring idiot.
Answer the question, deluded illiterate RETARD. Those have negative
VECTOR temperature, which is irrelevant to the subject, a yes or no
question. I should find you, AL, and beat your head in to show what
little you understand differently. If you can't READ and GRASP a
subject, then shut up or I'll follow your threads and shut you up
individually.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
16 Jul 2005 10:14:49 PM |
|
|
"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1121476148.948289.151730@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Uncle Al wrote:
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Dumb Donny ***** doesn't know the differences among entropy,
enthalpy, and free energy. Dumb Donny ***** wouldn't know a
Boltzmann distribution if it came up and bit him in the *****.
Hey Dumb Donny *****, do you know that NMRs, MRIs, EPRs, and lasers
have negative temps kelvin? Adiabatic demagnetization of paramagnetic
salts, too, Dumb Donny ***** - negative temps kelvin. Is that low
enough for you, Dumb Donny *****?
Boring idiot.
Answer the question, deluded illiterate RETARD. Those have negative
VECTOR temperature, which is irrelevant to the subject, a yes or no
question.
Uncle Al effectively disqualified the question by making reference to
well-documented phenomena that lie outside the purview of sHead's
assumptions.
sHead's question only applies in the macroscopic world of classical physics
and in situations wherein the separate bodies involved *can* thermally
equilibrate.
"Vector temperature" is an undefined quantity - it isn't even wrong - it is
simple nonsense.
If you understood what a Boltzmann factor is, you would no have exposed your
own ignorance so blatantly.
Temperature is a scalar statistical quantity, calculated by averaging the
energy states of a large number of similar systems. The population
inversions involved in the examples given by Uncle Al are all physically
described by negative absolute temperatures of electronic or magnetic energy
states. Energy is NOT a vector.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
17 Jul 2005 05:45:56 AM |
|
|
They were not assumptions but conditions. Misread at your own risk.
When /can't/ they equilibrate, eventually?
How temperature (spinwise rather than speedwise) and energy (waywise
rather than workwise) are put and written by "authorities" are abuses
of the still-undeveloped and thus-ambiguous mechanical semiotics, that
they would conflate what is essentially a 1-vector--that does no more
than conserve rotations in repeated applications of an arbitrary
operation in the property's output--with a scalar that comes with its
own field that does not associate with the operations represented by
the former. They nonsensically apply positive and negative to spin
temperature, or thermochemical reactions, or to a mechanical state,
when they meant no more than divergent and convergent; and they give
their numbers a + or - sign idiotically rather than to do as the
electricians wisely did for a source and sink, giving them o and x. If
scientists were any stupider, they'd be calling magnetic poles + and -
too. I describe these abuses of scientists within:
http://advancedphysics.org/viewthread.php?tid=1312#pid6915
http://advancedphysics.org/viewthread.php?tid=1416#pid7178.
Sometimes energy /should/ be a vector. Taking only the magnitude loses
information about the states and kinetics. The dot product arbitrarily
drops the direction of both vectors, and is not inherently without a
direction as chosen from the more important factor. The kinetic energy
and momentum expressions are very alike, and it wouldn't suffer anyone
if the former behaved like it had an aim. Otherwise, dumbasses would
put a scalar sign in front of it to look good before the work function
which smokes the same. It's in and out, not less and more!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
17 Jul 2005 07:13:06 AM |
|
|
As for the Boltzmann factor, that is irrelevant to my screed. One
would, and should, take the energy as a vector and divide by the
freedom coefficient--which should be another, mean-pointing,
vector--and extract the temperature as a third vector in an arbitrary
direction within the domain described by both vector inputs of the
thermal sample. Such a beast, if wrangled, is a nice step toward a
demon, obfuscated by professional fools who think that averages are not
subjective.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
17 Jul 2005 12:04:32 PM |
|
|
"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1121602386.417392.113750@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
...my screed.
...take the energy as a vector
...divide by the freedom coefficient
...--which should be another, mean-pointing, vector
...the temperature as a third vector
...in an arbitrary direction
...within the domain described by both vector inputs of the thermal
sample.
NOOOOWWW I understand.
*plonk*
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
17 Jul 2005 09:17:16 AM |
|
|
Reality is it must be very hard for Uncle Al with his superior IQ to be
a member of sci physic and be are critic for so many years. He has been
there for all of us,and like it or not has been right most of the time.
When we criticize our best and fairest critic(he has no favorites) we
are only hurting ourselves. We must take his heat,and hope he never
leaves us. Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
17 Jul 2005 10:55:19 AM |
|
|
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:2313-42DA686C-281@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net...
Reality is it must be very hard for Uncle Al with his superior IQ to be
a member of sci physic and be are critic for so many years. He has been
there for all of us,and like it or not has been right most of the time.
When we criticize our best and fairest critic(he has no favorites) we
are only hurting ourselves. We must take his heat,and hope he never
leaves us. Bert
[hanson]
ahahahaha.... Al, uncleAl.... hey!, yo!, urinAl.... ahahaha... wow!
*** Did you see these accolades from high places for you here? ***
You must show official gratitude to Herbie for the kudos he gave you.
Be polite with him & not "socially maladroit" as you have characterized
yourself"..... ahahahaha.... AHAHAHA....
Hebrie, listen. It is true when you said "Reality is it must be very hard
for Uncle Al"... for it was Al himself who said in his state of urinAl that:
"You cannot imagine what it is like for the Gifted to be immersed in a
society of people like yourself." .... urinAl continued in his same post with:
"Orange County Mensa (top 2% for entry) has at least two members with
IQs in excess of 190. One is a slumbunny elementary school teacher,
the other is an unemployed programmer."....and then there is you, Herbie.
Thanks for the laughs....... AHAHAHAHAHHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA
ahahaha.... ahahahanson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
17 Jul 2005 09:58:00 PM |
|
|
Critics must know what they're talking about. Al is a cynic, not a
critic. You must look that word up. It's preferable to challenge
people with questions than groundless counterclaims.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Will Janoschka" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
17 Jul 2005 11:09:56 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:58:00, "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
Critics must know what they're talking about. Al is a cynic, not a
critic. You must look that word up. It's preferable to challenge
people with questions than groundless counterclaims.
You are truly an *****. Sorry to the folks that say "don't feed the
trools.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
18 Jul 2005 01:36:45 AM |
|
|
No one, including you, knows what a trool is.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
16 Jul 2005 12:20:26 PM |
|
|
"Autymn D. C." wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Dumb Donny ***** doesn't know the differences among entropy,
enthalpy, and free energy. Dumb Donny ***** wouldn't know a
Boltzmann distribution if it came up and bit him in the *****.
Hey Dumb Donny *****, do you know that NMRs, MRIs, EPRs, and lasers
have negative temps kelvin? Adiabatic demagnetization of paramagnetic
salts, too, Dumb Donny ***** - negative temps kelvin. Is that low
enough for you, Dumb Donny *****?
Boring idiot.
Answer the question, deluded illiterate RETARD. Those have negative
VECTOR temperature,
[snip crap]
Temperature is a scalar quantity. Magnitude only. Learn some
thermodynamics.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
15 Jul 2005 09:41:24 PM |
|
|
Angry "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1121476148.948289.151730@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose
heat to cooler things; until everything will eventually reach
a constant temperature?
[urinAl aka Uncle Al wrote:]
Dumb Donny ***** doesn't know the differences among entropy,
enthalpy, and free energy. Dumb Donny ***** wouldn't know a
Boltzmann distribution if it came up and bit him in the *****.
Hey Dumb Donny *****, do you know that NMRs, MRIs, EPRs,
and lasers have negative temps kelvin? Adiabatic
demagnetization of paramagnetic salts, too, Dumb Donny *****
- negative temps kelvin. Is that low enough for you, Dumb Donny
*****?
[Angry "Autymn D. C."]
Answer the question, deluded illiterate RETARD. Those have negative
VECTOR temperature, which is irrelevant to the subject, a yes or no
question [#1]. I should find you, AL, and beat your head in [#2] to show
what little you understand differently. If you can't READ and GRASP a
subject, then shut up [#3] or I'll follow your threads and shut you up
individually.
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA....
#1 urinAl always posts stuff "irrelevant to the subject" and
carefully precedes it with "idiot", referring to himself, urinAl.
#2 urinAl will respond to your "beat your head in" threat with
loading every gun in his collection and lay in wait for you
in his urinAl.
#3 urinAl cannot shut up. He will stay noisy like his porcelain
fixture that has a leaky faucet.
#4 begets #5, #5 beget #6 etc....
Al, listen: ... AHAHAHA..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA.....
Did this crank you like it cranks lesser idiots... ahahaha...
[urinAl to Don1]
Boring idiot.
[hanson]
ahahaha... to urinAl such posts are NEVER boring nor
idiotic enough for urinAl not to respond..... ahahahaha...
urinAl is incontinent, socially and professionally, hence
he needs to validate himself.... in his urinAl.... ahahaha..
But urinAl is eminently funny & entertaining.... ahahaha....
Thanks for all the laughs guys. I love it when folks become
real serious and lively at this 24/7 crazy cyber party...AHAHA...
ahahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Helmut Wabnig " |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
16 Jul 2005 02:03:21 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:41:24 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
Angry "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1121476148.948289.151730@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose
heat to cooler things; until everything will eventually reach
a constant temperature?
[urinAl aka Uncle Al wrote:]
Dumb Donny ***** doesn't know the differences among entropy,
enthalpy, and free energy. Dumb Donny ***** wouldn't know a
Boltzmann distribution if it came up and bit him in the *****.
Hey Dumb Donny *****, do you know that NMRs, MRIs, EPRs,
and lasers have negative temps kelvin? Adiabatic
demagnetization of paramagnetic salts, too, Dumb Donny *****
- negative temps kelvin. Is that low enough for you, Dumb Donny
*****?
[Angry "Autymn D. C."]
Answer the question, deluded illiterate RETARD. Those have negative
VECTOR temperature, which is irrelevant to the subject, a yes or no
question [#1]. I should find you, AL, and beat your head in [#2] to show
what little you understand differently. If you can't READ and GRASP a
subject, then shut up [#3] or I'll follow your threads and shut you up
individually.
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA....
#1 urinAl always posts stuff "irrelevant to the subject" and
carefully precedes it with "idiot", referring to himself, urinAl.
#2 urinAl will respond to your "beat your head in" threat with
loading every gun in his collection and lay in wait for you
in his urinAl.
#3 urinAl cannot shut up. He will stay noisy like his porcelain
fixture that has a leaky faucet.
#4 begets #5, #5 beget #6 etc....
Al, listen: ... AHAHAHA..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA.....
Did this crank you like it cranks lesser idiots... ahahaha...
[urinAl to Don1]
Boring idiot.
[hanson]
ahahaha... to urinAl such posts are NEVER boring nor
idiotic enough for urinAl not to respond..... ahahahaha...
urinAl is incontinent, socially and professionally, hence
he needs to validate himself.... in his urinAl.... ahahaha..
But urinAl is eminently funny & entertaining.... ahahaha....
Thanks for all the laughs guys. I love it when folks become
real serious and lively at this 24/7 crazy cyber party...AHAHA...
ahahaha... ahahanson
Boring idiot.
hanson, the psychopath:
http://www.purgatory.net/merits/delusional.htm
w.
--
On the Internet nobody knows that I am a dog.
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
16 Jul 2005 09:19:06 AM |
|
|
ahahahah... AHAHAHAHA........
<Helmut Wabnig> was Wabniggering again and wrote:
hanson, [referred] the psychopath Wabnig to:
http://www.purgatory.net/merits/delusional.htm
[since Tollwut Helmut Wabnig asserted that]
"On the Internet nobody knows that I, [Wabnig] am a dog."
ahahaha.... Thanks for the laughs, Helmut,
AHAHAHA...... ahahaha... ahahanson
PS: You bark too much in your Tollwut, Helmut.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
16 Jul 2005 12:24:03 PM |
|
|
hanson wrote:
[snip]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA....
... AHAHAHA..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA.....
... ahahaha...
.... ahahaha..
...AHAHA...
ahahaha... ahahanson
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
http://www.purgatory.net/merits/delusional.htm
<http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
16 Jul 2005 03:10:32 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" the <Unclean0@hate.spam.net> aka urinAL SCHWARTZ
had farts & he cranked himself grieveously as he became engrossed
& fascinated by
hanson [who laughed at Al because:]
[snip]
[urinAl is captivated & in total awe and admiration of]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA....
... AHAHAHA..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA.....
... ahahaha...
.... ahahaha..
...AHAHA...
ahahaha... ahahanson
Al, listen: ... AHAHAHA..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA.....
Did this crank you like it cranks lesser idiots?... ahahaha
[hanson]
Idiot. It apparently did, urinAL, didn't it....... AHAHAHAHA!!!
That urinAL memory of yours must be going decrepit. That's
the 3rd time that you have landed on my same sticky flypaper.
Here it is again, for your personal benefit.... and so that I can
have another good laugh at your expense......ahahahaha...
news:Uyque.7820$hK3.4124@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
wherein it says:
In *** FAQ: about ahahaha.... AHAHAHA.... ***
it said in the original post and in about 20 follow-ups:
---- start quote----->
" Whenever you see someone commenting about "ahaha...
AHAHAHA" you know right off the bat that you've got a real
stupid fool & uptight mooch on your hands worth having big
time fun with".
<--- end quote -----
.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA....
I didn't mean to crank you, but you were so fucking funny,
you having turned in urinAl. I just couldn't help laughing.
ahahaha.... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Math Freak" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
16 Jul 2005 07:07:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:24:03 -0700, Uncle Al wrote:
http://www.purgatory.net/merits/delusional.htm
Which one do you think _I_ fall under :)
--
"godAkht jAn ke shavad kAr tamAmo nashod
besukhtim darin Arezuye khAmo nashod
faghAn ke dar talabe ganjnAmeye maghsud
shodam kharAbe jahAni ze gham tamAmo nashod
bekuye eshgh maneh bidalile rAh ghadam
ke man bekhish nemudam sad ehtemAmo nashod"
- Hafez
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "RichD" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Al the ***** |
16 Jul 2005 04:42:50 PM |
|
|
Autymn D. C. wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
....
Boring idiot.
Answer the question, deluded illiterate RETARD.
I should find you, AL, and beat your head in to show what
little you understand differently. If you can't READ
and GRASP a subject, then shut up or I'll follow your
threads and shut you up individually.
"If they don't threaten to kill you, kid, you ain't
getting to them." - Paul Newman, to Redford, in "The Sting"
--
Rich
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "RichD" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 01:51:45 PM |
|
|
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things
lose heat to cooler things; until everything will eventually
reach a constant temperature?
No, but everyone has to say they believe it, to
get a passing grade.
--
Rich
True unbeliever
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don1" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 08:00:20 AM |
|
|
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Don
Here's what I think:
Entropy is based on the premise that the sun is cooling off, losing its
energy by radiating heat to cooler objects such as Earth; but the fact
is the sun's energy output is increasing, because it contiuously
creates energy of fusion, and will never burn-out because it has an
unlimited source of fuel.
Don
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Henry" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 01:00:17 PM |
|
|
"Don1" <dcshead@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1121432420.304486.160580@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Don
Here's what I think:
Entropy is based on the premise that the sun is cooling off, losing its
energy by radiating heat to cooler objects such as Earth; but the fact
is the sun's energy output is increasing, because it contiuously
creates energy of fusion, and will never burn-out because it has an
unlimited source of fuel.
What unlimits it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don1" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 02:19:25 PM |
|
|
Richard Henry wrote:
"Don1" <dcshead@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1121432420.304486.160580@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Don1 wrote:
Does anyone really believe in entropy, that hot things lose heat to
cooler things; until everything will eventually reach a constant
temperature?
Don
Here's what I think:
Entropy is based on the premise that the sun is cooling off, losing its
energy by radiating heat to cooler objects such as Earth; but the fact
is the sun's energy output is increasing, because it contiuously
creates energy of fusion, and will never burn-out because it has an
unlimited source of fuel.
What unlimits it?
The sun is in a 'gravity well'. You know, it curves spacetime, and that
funnels everything into it. That's why its not about to run out of
fuel. You've seen those funnel like machines where you put a coin in
for charity, where the coin goes around and around and eventually drops
to the bottom. Well that's how the sun keeps up its unlimited fuel
supply(;^)
Would you believe _that_(;^?
Don
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Entropy |
15 Jul 2005 03:38:29 PM |
|
|
"Don1" <dcshead@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1121455165.676835.101950@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The sun is in a 'gravity well'. You know, it curves spacetime, and that
funnels everything into it. That's why its not about to run out of
fuel. You've seen those funnel like machines where you put a coin in
for charity, where the coin goes around and around and eventually drops
to the bottom. Well that's how the sun keeps up its unlimited fuel
supply(;^)
Would you believe _that_(;^?
Don
No.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
