EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES , Between Stars / Systems



 Science > Physics > EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES , Between Stars / Systems

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: ""
Date: 27 Dec 2007 07:08:54 PM
Object: EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES , Between Stars / Systems
5>
EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES Between Stars
Contrary to currently-accepted theory, stars do NOT
follow simple free orbits around the center of a galaxy
(around the mass inside each orbit). According to the
comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical
Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B.
Larson, stars (lone stars, solar systems, binary star
systems, or multiple star systems) occupy EQUILIBRIUM
DISTANCES between each other LIKE MOLECULES IN A LIQUID,
and with a certain amount of VISCOSITY.
Each star (system) has a GRAVITATIONAL LIMIT (again
contrary to currently-accepted theory) which depends on
its mass. Each star (system) is OUTSIDE the
gravitational limits of its neighbors, and therefore it
tends to MOVE AWAY from them because of the OUTWARD
SCALAR MOTION inherent in the universe, [which is the
REAL CAUSE of its expansion]. At the same time, each
star is INSIDE the gravitational limit of the galaxy as
a whole, which allows the INWARD SCALAR MOTION of
gravitation to pull the stars together toward the
galactic center or disc.
Likewise, in globular star clusters, each star is
OUTSIDE the gravitational limits of its neighbors, but
INSIDE the gravitational limit of the AGGREGATE globular
cluster, so EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES are maintained. [Note
that globular star clusters show little or NO ROTATION
that would prevent all the stars from falling into one
big mass at the center.]
Globular clusters are NOT in orbits around the
center of their galaxy, but are instead FALLING INTO the
galaxy from intergalactic space where they were formed
relatively RECENTLY. (They contain the YOUNGEST stars
in the Universe, NOT the oldest.) As they fall, they
tend to lose stars and break-up into OPEN star clusters,
because of the aggregate galaxy's disruptive
gravitational effect on them as they get closer.
Observation has shown that the closer a globular cluster
is to the disc or center of our galaxy, the FEWER stars
it has. And it is NO more possible for a globular
cluster to pass thru the disc or center of a galaxy than
it is for a drop of water falling into a pail of water
to pass INTACT to the bottom of the pail.
A WEALTH of Information about the GENERAL UNIFIED
Theory of the Physical Universe developed by the late
Physicist Dewey B. Larson can be found at the web site
http://www.rstheory.com .
See also:
http://members.aol.com/GalactcFed/universe.txt .
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
ALSO http://www.geocities.com/remspiral7/
P.S.: PASS IT ON !
"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."




.

User: "Double-A"

Title: Re: EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES , Between Stars / Systems 28 Dec 2007 02:52:00 PM
On Dec 27, 5:08=A0pm,
wrote:

5>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES Between Star=

s


=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Contrary to currently-accepted theory, star=

s do NOT

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 follow simple free orbits around the center of a galax=

y

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 (around the mass inside each orbit). =A0According to t=

he

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B.
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Larson, stars (lone stars, solar systems, binary star
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 systems, or multiple star systems) occupy EQUILIBRIUM
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 DISTANCES between each other LIKE MOLECULES IN A LIQUI=

D,

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 and with a certain amount of VISCOSITY.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Each star (system) has a GRAVITATIONAL LIMI=

T (again

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 contrary to currently-accepted theory) which depends o=

n

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 its mass. =A0Each star (system) is OUTSIDE the
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 gravitational limits of its neighbors, and therefore i=

t

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 tends to MOVE AWAY from them because of the OUTWARD
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 SCALAR MOTION inherent in the universe, [which is the
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 REAL CAUSE of its expansion]. =A0At the same time, eac=

h

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 star is INSIDE the gravitational limit of the galaxy a=

s

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 a whole, which allows the INWARD SCALAR MOTION of
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 gravitation to pull the stars together toward the
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 galactic center or disc.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Likewise, in globular star clusters, each s=

tar is

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 OUTSIDE the gravitational limits of its neighbors, but=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 INSIDE the gravitational limit of the AGGREGATE globul=

ar

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 cluster, so EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES are maintained. =A0[=

Note

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 that globular star clusters show little or NO ROTATION=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 that would prevent all the stars from falling into one=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 big mass at the center.]

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Globular clusters are NOT in orbits around =

the

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 center of their galaxy, but are instead FALLING INTO t=

he

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 galaxy from intergalactic space where they were formed=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 relatively RECENTLY. =A0(They contain the YOUNGEST sta=

rs

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 in the Universe, NOT the oldest.) =A0As they fall, the=

y

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 tend to lose stars and break-up into OPEN star cluster=

s,

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 because of the aggregate galaxy's disruptive
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 gravitational effect on them as they get closer.
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Observation has shown that the closer a globular clust=

er

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 is to the disc or center of our galaxy, the FEWER star=

s

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 it has. =A0And it is NO more possible for a globular
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 cluster to pass thru the disc or center of a galaxy th=

an

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 it is for a drop of water falling into a pail of water=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 to pass INTACT to the bottom of the pail.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0A WEALTH of Information about the GENERAL U=

NIFIED

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Theory of the Physical Universe developed by the late
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Physicist Dewey B. Larson can be found at the web site=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://www.rstheory.com.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0See also:
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://members.aol.com/GalactcFed/universe.txt.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Robert E. McEl=

waine

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 B.S., Physics =

and Astronomy, UW-EC

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://members.aol.com/rem5=

47PLUS

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://members.aol.com/rem4=

60

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Preserve BOTH on CD-R and P=

RINT-OUTS

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ALSOhttp://www.geocities.co=

m/remspiral7/


=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 P.S.: PASS IT ON !

"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."


Free Dewey!
Double-A
.

User: "appu"

Title: Re: EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES , Between Stars / Systems 28 Dec 2007 04:06:12 AM
http://www.createthefuturecontest.com/pages/view/entriesdetail.html?entryID=798
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES Between Stars / Systems
EQUILIBRIUM DISTANCES Between Stars - Systems
Re: difference between momentum and kinetic energy
I am looking for articals on the difference between Newtonian and quantum physics
Inconsistency between Lorentz force and SR?
There is no gap between philosophy and physics (was: Science and philosophy)
The Fundamental Difference Between Mathematicians and Physicists
Re: Are there asteroids between the sun and mercury?
EM wave - phase relationship between mag. and elect. fields?
Link between single particle states and full wavefunction?
What's the difference between fulcrum and weight in your common understanding of you know what?
Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?
Found the answer for difference between Manometer and Hydraulic Press
please explain contradiciton between higher spatial dimension and light
Synchronization Between Pendulums
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER