Y.Porat wrote:
To whom who still dont know:
Eric Gisse that was nominated (by whom?) as a noderator of this ng-
is a student of 22 years old
that is acording to his own testimony
so here is a quote from the young genious :
i was asking in what cases E=mc^2 is refuted
and here is his answer
quote from Gisse :
now what the hell is here the evidence that E=mc^2
is not valid in a gravitational field ?? (Y.P)
Wow you actually looked it up, thats more effort than I expected you to
expend.
If you integrate over a hypersurface that extends to infinity, you get
an expression for energy that isn't even fucking close to E=mc^2
end of quote
-----------------
(please note the 'hypersurface that extends to infinity -
that is actually the new punch line - earthquak in physics ...!!!!
and here is just the point in which E=mc^2 is fefuted in a
gravitational field !!)
so the 22 years old student eric Gisse is going to get the Nobel
and from now on you must take him
much much more seriously
I could scan the pages from Sean Carroll's "Spacetime and Geometry"
(Specifically, pages 248-253) that I believe support what I'm saying
but it would be totally lost on you.
ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------
.
