Science > Physics > Experimental Verification for =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=93The?= Unification of Physics
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"winstonlee" |
| Date: |
31 Mar 2005 03:34:15 AM |
| Object: |
Experimental Verification for =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=93The?= Unification of Physics |
Experimental Verification for “The Unification of Physics”
and “Sequel of the Unification of Physics”
The core concept of “The Unification of Physics” and “Sequel of the
Unification of Physics” is matter weak field, so the core of
experimental verification for “The Unification of Physics” and
“Sequel of the Unification of Physics” is the experimental
verification for matter weak field.
The unification of physics is the unification of physics theory, which
includes Newton mechanics, thermodynamics, electrodynamics,
relativity, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, normal field
theory etc. Newton mechanics, thermodynamics and electrodynamics fall
into the category of classical physics while relativity, quantum
mechanics, quantum electrodynamics and normal field theory fall into
the category of modern physics. In essence the latter surpasses and
differentiates from the former. For example, Einstein relativity
(Note: The relativity in this text refers to Einstein relativity)
surpasses Newton mechanics and expresses as the law of matter motion
over Newton mechanics, such as clock slowing down and Mercury
perihelion moving etc., on which Einstein put forward time-space
theory of relativity. On the one hand, physics theory can explain
experimental phenomenon, for example, Einstein theory can explain
clock slowing down and Mercury perihelion moving etc. On the other
hand, the uniformity and compatibility of physics theory, i.e. the
unification of physics, is the direction of a struggle for
theoretical physics. If a kind of physics theory can only explain a
kind or several kinds of phenomena and is limited in some level or
field, this means that this kind of theory has limitation and defect.
In explaining the observing fact of corresponding phenomena, my theory
of matter weak field has consistency with Einstein relativity. I have
emphasized this point in “The Unification of Physics”, i.e. the
corresponding experimental verification in relativity can be taken
for the experimental verification of matter weak field. The
experimental phenomena, explained by Einstein relativity, can also be
explained by the theory of matter weak field. The theory and
experimental phenomena not involved or not compatible in relativity
can also be explained by the theory of matter weak field. The theory
of matter weak field has compatibility with the theory of quantum
mechanics, i.e. the experimental phenomena explained by the theory of
quantum mechanics can also be explained by the theory of matter weak
field, and correspondingly, the experiment verified the theory of
quantum mechanics can be used for verifying the theory of matter weak
field. Quantum electrodynamics and normal field theory are also like
that. Science lays particular stress on experiment and
classification, which is the characteristic of thinking of western
people or scientific personnel. My “The Unification of Physics”,
developing a subject of my own, lays particular stress on
comprehension, unification and relation between things. The
unification of physics and matter weak field actually clarify the
relations of relativity, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics
and normal field theory etc. This point, which can easily be ignored
by somebody, is really not easy and also very important achievement.
At the same time of unifying the theory of modern physics, the theory
matter weak field returns again to the category of classical physics,
which is the modification for thermodynamics theory, i.e.
thermodynamics theory needs to be modified from the viewpoint of the
unification of physics and the theory of matter weak field. As
introduced in the article of “Property Right Status for ‘The
Unification of Physics’ and ‘Sequel of the Unification of Physics’”,
corresponding experimental verification stems from the experimental
verification of nonlinear problem, dissipative structure and
synergetics. “The Unification of Physics” and “Sequel of the
Unification of Physics” simultaneously proved the relations between
matter weak field and these theories as well as compatibility, which
have in essence acquired the verification and support of
corresponding experiments and facts.
If people stay on the special understanding for the relation between
experiment and theory now, such as the relation between
Michelson-Morley experiment and Einstein relativity and the relation
between the experiment of weak interaction CP violation and the
corresponding paper of weak interaction CP violation by Mr. Tsung-Dao
Lee and Mr. Chen Ning Yang. On the one hand, nowadays there are a lot
of discussions, which said that Einstein did not know
Michelson-Morley experiment when creating relativity so there is not
inevitable relation between Michelson-Morley experiment and Einstein
relativity. On the other hand, there is this kind of relatively
certain correspondence, for example, the paper of weak interaction CP
violation by Mr. Tsung-Dao Lee and Mr. Chen Ning Yang and the
experiment of weak interaction CP violation are one of numerous
fruitful physics theories. At that time there is not any certain
experiment to verify the paper of matter wave by Louis Victor due de
Broglie, the winner of Nobel Prize, which has been gradually verified
by numerous physical phenomena and facts during the developing process
of theory, showing the correctness of this kind of theory. I, having
great respect for Mr. Tsung-Dao Lee and Mr. Chen Ning Yang, have
handed over my paper to Mr. Tsung-Dao Lee, who told me to deliver Mr.
Feng Sunqi for transmitting. So I ask Mr. Feng Sunqi to pass on to Mr.
Tsung-Dao Lee at that time and later, and the books published by me
were transferred to Mr. Tsung-Dao Lee. I have ever been to the Higher
Research Center of Tsing Hua University to hand over the book to Mr.
Guo Quanguo, the secretary of Mr. Chen Ning Yang, for transmitting to
Mr. Chen Ning Yang, and to present one book to Mr. Guo Quanguo.
However, to be exact, the paper of weak interaction CP violation by
Mr. Tsung-Dao Lee and Mr. Chen Ning Yang is not a kind of theory, but
the fact of weak interaction CP violation geniusly found by Mr.
Tsung-Dao Lee and Mr. Chen Ning Yang through the analysis of
experiment phenomena.
I have ever studied classical electrodynamics but did not write
relating paper all along, so some problems are revealed here. Matter
weak field is in essence hidden in classical electrodynamics, which
introduces quadratic partial differential equation, complex
dielectric constant and complex wave number vector etc. The meaning
of complex number phase dynamics is matter weak field, i.e. classical
electrodynamics hides the action of matter weak field expressed by
quadratic partial differential equation and complex number, which is
just the meaning of electrodynamics as theoretical physics exceeding
electromagnetics. Afterwards quantum electrodynamics occurred to
explain the problem of atom energy level, and corresponding physics
action actually existed in classical electrodynamics and is the cause
of classical electrodynamics.
Nonlinear problem and modern physics should be two independent parts.
Although there is the statement of nonlinear physics, nonlinearity
does not belong to physics but studied from the viewpoint of
mechanics and mathematics. I creatively unify nonlinearity with
physics, and explain and solve the essential dynamics cause of
nonlinear problem with matter weak field. Like Newton explaining the
law of planet motion with universal gravitation, it is no doubt
important discovery and creation, which is the great contribution for
mankind.
The structure character of system or static structure corresponds to
nonlinear problem solved by matter weak field, which is interaction
of long-range. Because of the existence system of matter weak field,
has ordering character, character structure and static structure. The
long-range action or nonlinear action has many examples in “Sequel of
the Unification of Physics”. Experiments and facts, such as
long-range ordering character of weather system and
Belousov-zhabotinski reaction, have verified the long-range action
(matter weak field), which are not made and discovered by me, or not
specialized for me and not discovered for my theory. Vast experiments
and facts have verified the existence of long-range matter weak field.
So many experiments and facts are enough to verify the correctness of
matter weak field. It is of little importance for increasing or
decreasing an experiment and for increasing or decreasing some
experiments, which has no influence on the correctness of matter weak
field theory.
Somebody may put forward the problem of relationship between theory
and experiment, which is really very important, but itself is the
problem of theory. The very important and crucial problem is
different from the narrow viewpoint about experiment, which is what I
lay particular emphasis on. Somebody subconsciously considers if there
is the experiment getting instant results. Just verifying the theory
of matter weak field can explain its correctness. For the broad and
profound theory of the unification of physics and matter weak field,
it is very difficult to design an experiment for verifying. Even if
there is such an experiment, it can also verify the theory equivalent
to matter weak field in the sphere. Furthermore, mankind is so
complicated that somebody may say that the experiment has verified
the contrary theory. Thus it goes back the original place again,
which corresponds to the discussion for current experiment and theory
relationship. Of course I don’t deny that obvious difference for
estimating some fact will occur with the lapse of time. Both sides
think that if some experiment result proves his theory correct, the
contrary experiment will prove his theory wrong. However, this
situation has very little probability, because it is very difficult
to confirm or deny the broad and profound theory with a simple
experiment. Difference may only some fact, for example, Pauli held a
contrary opinion for weak interaction CP violation at that time, but
can we say that Pauli Incompatible Principle and the other
theoretical viewpoints of Pauli are wrong?
I am in a times and environment emphasizing practice and experiment.
After experiencing long-term mistake, somebody thinks that making
mistake results from no emphasizing for practice and experiment, so
practice and experiment should be started to be emphasized from now
on. I don’t deny that it includes the progressing factor and
knowledge improvement, but at the same time it is also from one
extreme to another extreme. It is to be known that mistake is the
cause of interest, which is made by someone to uphold their economic
interest and political interest of monopoly. Who can guarantee that
current viewpoint is not wrong? If the viewpoint of “man can conquer
nature” is not correct, will the viewpoint of “nature can conquer
man” be correct? If ignoring practice and experiment is wrong, the
narrow viewpoint for practice and experiment will also be mistake,
which has become the tool and method for someone to uphold his
special interest.
Of course I by no means say that my theory is absolute correct and no
need to be improved and developed. Newton mechanics and Newton
calculus has been improved for over hundred years, could it be said
that Newton should not publish his papers and books and that the vast
contribution to mankind by Newton can be denied?
I have met many actual factors, such as the problem that hot water
cools faster than cold water, which can be found in a magazine of
Chinese Academy of Science. When “The Unification of Physics”
published, I knew that this experiment had not been reported but I
didn’t cancel it because the condition was not allowed. People may
not realize that any cancellation to the book would affect the
publication of “The Unification of Physics”, whether a sentence or a
punctuation. It was just like in the battlefield, any slight cough or
movement may result in extremely bad consequence. I made no move
without careful thought. I met a lot of resistances. Related
personnel could not blame me because their magazine and their leaders
published the problem, so they should blame themselves first. Any book
and magazine has errors, without exception for “The Unification of
Physics” and “Sequel of the Unification of Physics”. For example, I
only found several mistakes in these two books, such as the
misplacing of very few formulas and symbols or the omitting of
exceptional words. For the editing work of “Sequel of the Unification
of Physics”, I completely accepted when editor handed it over to me
after editing and proofreading. It is well known that the publication
of “Sequel of the Unification of Physics” was just like a war. Here I
express my sincere thanks to the persons who have made hardworking
for the publication of the book. Please forgive me for my mistakes in
proofreading because I had too big pressure at that time. If the books
and papers can not be published, vast creative achievement resulted
from my efforts for over decade will be wasted and carved up by other
people. How can my property right protected.
I remembered that a general had described his experience in
battlefield as follows: when a fierce battle in progress, he was so
nervous in tent that he seated with his back towards the battlefield.
During the publication of “Sequel of the Unification of Physics”, I
had a similar state of mind to the general. I was so pressed that I
only roughly read my manuscript twice or three times for more than a
year.
In order to meet the requirement for experimental verification from
someone, especially the requirement for newest experimental
verification, I specially went to Beijing Library to look up Science
Times in recent two years. There were only two articles for
introducing the physics experiment in both China and abroad. In one
article “Magnetic Field and Light: Physics chemistry of chiral
molecule” published in June 27, 2000, there was the following words:
“When light passing through a solution, the absorbed amount of light
with the light direction parallel to magnetic field is slightly
different from the one with the light direction opposite to magnetic
field” and “There is no relationship between magnetic polar-light and
matter left or right chiral nature” followed by “In 1997, the
discovery of Ryken and Laupake in high magnetic field laboratory in
Grenoble has confirmed this theoretical hypothesis”. Generally
speaking, magnetic field is not expressed as chiral matter or chiral
matter not expressed as magnetic field, but magnetic field can really
affect chiral matter, which is expressed by different absorbed amount
in different light direction when passing through the chiral solution
with magnetic field. As mentioned in “The Unification of Physics, any
matter has the nature of weak field, including photon and the matter
of chiral solution, i.e. although magnetic field can not directly or
strongly “induce the creation of product of chiral structure”, it
really affects the orientation of chiral solution, which is just the
nature of matter weak field. Of course photon has weak field and the
absorbed amount will be different due to the different direction when
light passing through chiral solution with magnetic solution. What I
issue here is that I think the chiral nature in natural world
interlinks with the nature of matter weak field, or I have found that
the cause of chiral in natural world is matter weak field. By the way,
Mr. Tsung-Dao Lee and Mr. Chen Ning Yang have found weak interaction
CP violation. Why CP has violation? If there exists with the
mechanism of motive force in weak interaction CP violation, it must
be matter weak field; or the meaning of dynamics of weak interaction
CP is matter weak field, or I have found that the cause of weak
interaction CP violation is matter weak field.
There is an article “There exists ‘flowing liquid’ in solid” in
Science Times published in November 1, 2001, which has the following
content: “There exists oscillating motion along three-dimension
directions in some tiny zone of Yuhua Stone, which sometimes
disappears and sometimes appears, like a flowing liquid” and “The
existence of fluidity in solid is a kind of natural nonlinear
oscillating phenomenon existed in solid, which has not yet known by
people”. The existence of fluidity, to be exact, the existence of
fluidity oscillation has no doubt the deeper cause of dynamics, i.e.
matter weak field. Otherwise system has only single-oriented process
and will not exist with periodic oscillating process. Because matter
weak field is like electromagnetic field, there is dynamics mechanism
of periodic oscillating process of random problem in Chapter VIII of
Part I in “Sequel of the Unification of Physics”. For “Introducing
the research of ‘fluidoid’ objective dynamics into the research of
earthquake, the natural hazard, which has great influence on mankind
and can not be directly observed” mention in that article, it can
directly apply my theory of matter weak field and the discussion on
random problem. There is similar content in “Sequel of the
Unification of Physics”, such as corresponding content in Chapter I
“Long-range field” of Part II. Research on this aspect can be further
made.
Today is January 6, 2002, it is impossible for me to finish the
research and application work for unification of physics and matter
weak field over decades and hundreds of years today. It is just as
that Newton could not complete the total work of universal
gravitation and calculus at the beginning. Any nitpicking thinking
and practice are not compatible with the laws of science, academy and
development of mankind society.
Wenli Li
January 6, 2002
The Unification of Physics, Wenli Li, Beijing, Meteorology Press, June
of 1999
Sequel of the Unification of Physics, Wenli Li, Beijing, Ocean Press,
Sept. of 2001
THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS WENLI LI HongKong Tranfor Publishing Co.,
Limited 2001
SEQUEL OF THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS WENLI LI HongKong Tranfor
Publishing Co., Limited 2001
I am LiWenli, I am in Beijing, I want to go abroad to work for the
world, I need to be helped to go abroad.
Phone 8610 89833812 13621299421
8624 24215899
43 Hucheng Guajiatun Haidian Beijing China 100091
friendliwenli@hotmail.com, daweli@msn.com,
http://267696852.home.icq.com/
http://friendwenlili.myrice.com/
http://295220039.home.icq.com
http://www.freewebs.com/winstonlee
Posted at: http://www.groupsrv.com
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Experimental Verification for =?iso-8859-1?Q?=93The?= Unification ofPhysics |
31 Mar 2005 10:25:33 AM |
|
|
winstonlee wrote:
Experimental Verification for “The Unification of Physics”
and “Sequel of the Unification of Physics”
[snip crap]
Posted this ***** again, did you, idiot?
Somebody may put forward the problem of relationship between theory
and experiment, which is really very important, but itself is the
problem of theory.
[snip crap]
Furthermore, mankind is so
complicated that somebody may say that the experiment has verified
the contrary theory. Thus it goes back the original place again,
which corresponds to the discussion for current experiment and theory
relationship. Of course I don’t deny that obvious difference for
estimating some fact will occur with the lapse of time.
[snip crap]
Generally
speaking, magnetic field is not expressed as chiral matter or chiral
matter not expressed as magnetic field, but magnetic field can really
affect chiral matter, which is expressed by different absorbed amount
in different light direction when passing through the chiral solution
with magnetic field.
[snip crap]
The existence of fluidity, to be exact, the existence of
fluidity oscillation has no doubt the deeper cause of dynamics, i.e.
matter weak field. Otherwise system has only single-oriented process
and will not exist with periodic oscillating process.
[snip crap]
Usenet's cloaca,
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
