Flowing space nonsense - lets see the money



 Science > Physics > Flowing space nonsense - lets see the money

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Phineas T Puddleduck"
Date: 24 May 2007 12:32:20 PM
Object: Flowing space nonsense - lets see the money
In article <3845-4655C336-73@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net>,
(oldcoot) wrote:


Nope, the Void-Space Paradijjm is entrenched for the long haul, likely
to remain so for the foreseeable future.

The issue is that you and Painius are posterboys for "unskilled and unaware".
You bounce between polite and rude, where your rudeness is directly
proportional to how out of depth your physics knowledge is. Painius himself
called my derivation of the equations of motion from the Lagrangian (giving the
motion of a free particle) nonsense and an oversimplification - whereas the
truth is neither of you is aware of the importance of the principle of least
action in physics.
As a result, lets put the boot on the other foot. Your claim is that the
velocity of light is a direct consequence of the pressure, density and
temperature of your flowing space.
Lets see the derivation.
I'll be the first to note my GR knowledge isn't as comprehensive as some (!) as
my (wannabe) speciality is astrophysics (and more precisely high-z stuff) and
so it will be interesting to see what your defense is.
You insist that flowing space is consistent with GR, but yet any attempt to ask
in what way is met with silence. You also insist that the strong nuclear force
is gravity, from flowing space flowing into matter and energising it.
But yet any attempt to explain to you the singularities involved in this model,
particularly when it seems your model can see mass shielding space and gravity
(although once again you flip flop as to whether this is the case), is also met
with silence or abuse before one or the other of you runs off again. Your
ignorance is so bad you have a bunch of looneys following every post I make
making insults, blissfully unaware they are kill-filed ;-)
You break thermodynamics by claiming the inrush of space into matter is powered
by some external to the universe pump that pumps the fluid back in.
You also insist on pushing your Sagean model of gravity (denying it is Sagean
by even more nonsense) as truth and decry the physics cabal (tinpc) as
surpressing your ideas - when any request for experimental evidence is met with
"IT JUST IS". This is tied into your frankly laughable notion that the fact
that all photons travel at c is somehow magical and nonsense......
You continually cry for answers, and I have provided them several times. The
answer I meet from you is ignorance, and a request to repeat them.
I've outlined the answers, and you no longer wish to see them. You are not
scientist's, you are evangelical missionaries for an idea that is centuries out
of date.
I'm interested to see how you defend these ideas outside your little bolthole,
as your continual abuse of real scientists as evil people surpressing your
ideas is an affront to real scientists everywhere.
The audience grows silent, the spotlight grows bright and there is your spot -
lets see your science.
--
COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite
poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command).
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.
.

User: "John \C"

Title: "Coward The Duck" Kwacked with a lisp #29 24 May 2007 07:41:13 PM
"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:phineaspuddleduck-DD1C76.18322024052007@news.octanews.com...

In article <3845-4655C336-73@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net>,
oldcoot@webtv.net (oldcoot) wrote:


Nope, the Void-Space Paradijjm is entrenched for the long haul, likely
to remain so for the foreseeable future.


The issue is that you and Painius are posterboys for "unskilled and

unaware".


You bounce between polite and rude, where your rudeness is directly
proportional to how out of depth your physics knowledge is. Painius

himself

called my derivation of the equations of motion from the Lagrangian

(giving the

motion of a free particle) nonsense and an oversimplification - whereas

the

truth is neither of you is aware of the importance of the principle of

least

action in physics.

As a result, lets put the boot on the other foot. Your claim is that the
velocity of light is a direct consequence of the pressure, density and
temperature of your flowing space.

Lets see the derivation.

I'll be the first to note my GR knowledge isn't as comprehensive as some

(!) as

my (wannabe) speciality is astrophysics (and more precisely high-z stuff)

and

so it will be interesting to see what your defense is.

You insist that flowing space is consistent with GR, but yet any attempt

to ask

in what way is met with silence. You also insist that the strong nuclear

force

is gravity, from flowing space flowing into matter and energising it.

But yet any attempt to explain to you the singularities involved in this

model,

particularly when it seems your model can see mass shielding space and

gravity

(although once again you flip flop as to whether this is the case), is

also met

with silence or abuse before one or the other of you runs off again. Your
ignorance is so bad you have a bunch of looneys following every post I

make

making insults, blissfully unaware they are kill-filed ;-)

You break thermodynamics by claiming the inrush of space into matter is

powered

by some external to the universe pump that pumps the fluid back in.

You also insist on pushing your Sagean model of gravity (denying it is

Sagean

by even more nonsense) as truth and decry the physics cabal (tinpc) as
surpressing your ideas - when any request for experimental evidence is met

with

"IT JUST IS". This is tied into your frankly laughable notion that the

fact

that all photons travel at c is somehow magical and nonsense......

You continually cry for answers, and I have provided them several times.

The

answer I meet from you is ignorance, and a request to repeat them.

I've outlined the answers, and you no longer wish to see them. You are not
scientist's, you are evangelical missionaries for an idea that is

centuries out

of date.

I'm interested to see how you defend these ideas outside your little

bolthole,

as your continual abuse of real scientists as evil people surpressing your
ideas is an affront to real scientists everywhere.

The audience grows silent, the spotlight grows bright and there is your

spot -

lets see your science.

FROTH....FROTH....FROTH....FROTH!
.

User: "OG"

Title: Re: Flowing space nonsense - lets see the money 24 May 2007 01:23:37 PM
"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:phineaspuddleduck-DD1C76.18322024052007@news.octanews.com...

In article <3845-4655C336-73@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net>,
oldcoot@webtv.net (oldcoot) wrote:


Nope, the Void-Space Paradijjm is entrenched for the long haul, likely
to remain so for the foreseeable future.


The issue is that you and Painius are posterboys for "unskilled and
unaware".

Oh please Phinn, there's no need to invite the inhabitants of a.a into s.p
and s.p.r

.

User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Flowing space nonsense - lets see the money 25 May 2007 12:44:07 AM
On May 24, 8:32 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
wrote:

In article <3845-4655C336...@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net>,

oldc...@webtv.net (oldcoot) wrote:

Nope, the Void-Space Paradijjm is entrenched for the long haul, likely
to remain so for the foreseeable future.


The issue is that you and Painius are posterboys for "unskilled and unaware".

You bounce between polite and rude, where your rudeness is directly
proportional to how out of depth your physics knowledge is. Painius himself
called my derivation of the equations of motion from the Lagrangian (giving the
motion of a free particle) nonsense and an oversimplification - whereas the
truth is neither of you is aware of the importance of the principle of least
action in physics.

As a result, lets put the boot on the other foot. Your claim is that the
velocity of light is a direct consequence of the pressure, density and
temperature of your flowing space.

Lets see the derivation.

I'll be the first to note my GR knowledge isn't as comprehensive as some (!) as
my (wannabe) speciality is astrophysics (and more precisely high-z stuff) and
so it will be interesting to see what your defense is.

You insist that flowing space is consistent with GR, but yet any attempt to ask
in what way is met with silence. You also insist that the strong nuclear force
is gravity, from flowing space flowing into matter and energising it.

But yet any attempt to explain to you the singularities involved in this model,
particularly when it seems your model can see mass shielding space and gravity
(although once again you flip flop as to whether this is the case), is also met
with silence or abuse before one or the other of you runs off again. Your
ignorance is so bad you have a bunch of looneys following every post I make
making insults, blissfully unaware they are kill-filed ;-)

You break thermodynamics by claiming the inrush of space into matter is powered
by some external to the universe pump that pumps the fluid back in.

You also insist on pushing your Sagean model of gravity (denying it is Sagean
by even more nonsense) as truth and decry the physics cabal (tinpc) as
surpressing your ideas - when any request for experimental evidence is met with
"IT JUST IS". This is tied into your frankly laughable notion that the fact
that all photons travel at c is somehow magical and nonsense......

You continually cry for answers, and I have provided them several times. The
answer I meet from you is ignorance, and a request to repeat them.

I've outlined the answers, and you no longer wish to see them. You are not
scientist's, you are evangelical missionaries for an idea that is centuries out
of date.

I'm interested to see how you defend these ideas outside your little bolthole,
as your continual abuse of real scientists as evil people surpressing your
ideas is an affront to real scientists everywhere.

The audience grows silent, the spotlight grows bright and there is your spot -
lets see your science.

--
COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite
poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command).

Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

--------------
you know Pinni
waht is the sentece which that most impressed
me in your above post ??
here it is :
'I'll be the first to note my GR knowledge isn't as comprehensive as
some (!) as
my (wannabe) speciality is astrophysics ''(and
now at least i satrt to appreciate
your honesty
9and may be it is a beginning of some
sighn for intelligence
btw
since you are an expert of astophysics:
is GR much useful in astrophysics??
we aheared before that
pGS could not do without GR
later in last dsicussions
we realized that that was a masterpiece
of(self (:-)) OVERESTIMATION ...
to say it in underestiamtion (:-)!!
ATB
Y.Porat
-------------------
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER