FLRW metric related (pseudosphere )



 Science > Physics > FLRW metric related (pseudosphere )

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Barrow"
Date: 14 May 2007 09:34:49 AM
Object: FLRW metric related (pseudosphere )
Dear all,
I'm reading the FLRW metric of the big bang cosmology. In order to
understand the homogeneous and isotropic metrics of the 3 dimensional
space, I try to find and work out the homogeneous and isotropic ones
in 2 dimensional space.
I found from the book that the homogeneous and isotropic metrics in
2 D can be written as:
ds^2 = a^2 [ dr^2/(1-k r^2) + r^2d\theta^2 ] ---(1)
I know the cases k = 0, 1 corresponding to plane and 2-sphere
respectively. I also found that the k = -1 case is the pseudosphere
which is the revolution of the tractrix. I worked out the metric to
be:
ds^2 = a^2 [ cot^2(u)du^2 + sin^2u dv^2] ---(2)
The problem is, I tried to transform the line element eq(2) to the
line element eq(1) with k = -1 by coordinate transformation, but in
vain. I have tried several change of variables, but they just didn't
work. I am wondering whether the line element of eq(1) with k = -1
equals to line element of eq(2).
I searched so many sites and some differential geometry books, like
do Carmo and O'neill, but they didn't mention about it. Any help will
be appreciated much!
.

User: "Barrow"

Title: Re: FLRW metric related (pseudosphere ) 15 May 2007 06:25:53 AM
On 5=A4=EB14=A4=E9, =A4U=A4=C810=AE=C934=A4=C0, Barrow <GRsemi...@gmail.com=

wrote:
Dear all,
I'm reading the FLRW metric of the big bang cosmology. In order to
understand the homogeneous and isotropic metrics of the 3 dimensional
space, I try to find and work out the homogeneous and isotropic ones
in 2 dimensional space.

I found from the book that the homogeneous and isotropic metrics in
2 D can be written as:

ds^2 =3D a^2 [ dr^2/(1-k r^2) + r^2d\theta^2 ] ---(1)

I know the cases k =3D 0, 1 corresponding to plane and 2-sphere
respectively. I also found that the k =3D -1 case is the pseudosphere
which is the revolution of the tractrix. I worked out the metric to
be:

ds^2 =3D a^2 [ cot^2(u)du^2 + sin^2u dv^2] ---(2)

The problem is, I tried to transform the line element eq(2) to the
line element eq(1) with k =3D -1 by coordinate transformation, but in
vain. I have tried several change of variables, but they just didn't
work. I am wondering whether the line element of eq(1) with k =3D -1
equals to line element of eq(2).

I searched so many sites and some differential geometry books, like
do Carmo and O'neill, but they didn't mention about it. Any help will
be appreciated much!

I found that the following article about the relation of nanotech. and
Hawking radiation (I'm surprised that they are related...) mentioned
about the line elements of my eq(1) and eq(2).
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0510/0510743v2.pdf (check
eq(3) and eq(6))
The author said that the coordinates of my eq(2) is a global angular
coordinates whlie the coordinates in eq(1) is local angular ones. But
I still can't figure out the transformation between line element eq(1)
and eq(2).
By the way, Thanks for Jim Black's help!
Sincerely Barrow
.

User: "Jim Black"

Title: Re: FLRW metric related (pseudosphere ) 14 May 2007 06:25:36 PM
On May 14, 9:34 am, Barrow <GRsemi...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear all,
I'm reading the FLRW metric of the big bang cosmology. In order to
understand the homogeneous and isotropic metrics of the 3 dimensional
space, I try to find and work out the homogeneous and isotropic ones
in 2 dimensional space.

I found from the book that the homogeneous and isotropic metrics in
2 D can be written as:

ds^2 = a^2 [ dr^2/(1-k r^2) + r^2d\theta^2 ] ---(1)

I know the cases k = 0, 1 corresponding to plane and 2-sphere
respectively. I also found that the k = -1 case is the pseudosphere
which is the revolution of the tractrix.

Sort of. The pseudosphere has an edge, whereas the k=-1 universe does
not. Also, it has a different topology because there are loops on the
pseudosphere that you can't continuously deform to a point, whereas
there are no such loops in a k=-1 universe. It appears that the
pseudosphere is to your 2-dimensional k=-1 universe as half of an
infinitely long cylinder is to the Euclidean plane.

I worked out the metric to
be:

ds^2 = a^2 [ cot^2(u)du^2 + sin^2u dv^2] ---(2)

The problem is, I tried to transform the line element eq(2) to the
line element eq(1) with k = -1 by coordinate transformation, but in
vain. I have tried several change of variables, but they just didn't
work. I am wondering whether the line element of eq(1) with k = -1
equals to line element of eq(2).

Your equations (1) and (2) appear to be correct.
Despite the difference in topology, there ought to be a coordinate
transformation from a section of the k=-1 universe to the
pseudosphere. It just won't be one-to-one; an infinite number of
points on the k=-1 universe will be mapped to the same point on the
pseudosphere. But it might not be something you'd get by guessing.
I haven't solved the problem myself yet, but my strategy would be as
follows. We know that rotating the pseudosphere leaves the u=constant
lines unchanged. So to find these lines on the k=-1 universe, we look
for the corresponding isometric transformation of the k=-1 universe.
This isometry should not change the point at infinity on the k=-1
universe that corresponds to the point at infinity on the
pseudosphere.
What do we know about isometries in the k=-1 universe? Turns out we
know a lot! That's because the k=-1 universe has the same line
element as the slice of 2+1 spacetime that satisfies dt^2 - dx^2 -
dy^2 = a positive constant and t>0. You can check this for yourself
-- it should be a great deal easier than checking the pseudosphere.
And the isometries of this space are just the Lorentz transformations!
If we look at our dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 = const. space as the space of
unit 4-vectors, we see that a point at infinity corresponds to a light
ray. So the transformation we're looking for is composed of a boost
that causes aberration of the light ray, followed by a rotation to put
the light ray back where it started.
--
Hope this helps,
Jim E. Black
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Quantum Gravity 176.0: Second Mixed Partial Derivative is Causation-Related
A question related to "Acoustic Damping Rate Measurements"
Earth wobble related earthquake triggering Sept. 4, 2003
#9# new book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics and Setting...." (10) Perfect Numbers and other related Conjectures proven
Elemental question about time periods related to nature
Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related
Quantum Gravity 160.1: Sine-Gordon Equation Related To Cyclic Acceleration-Constant-Deceleration Universe By PI
Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation
Non-EM related Observation of QM Angular Momentum
Ghost-related TV going mainstream
modes harmonically related
White Holes Related to Spheres, Acceleration, Expansion of Universe 2: NASA Bureaucrats
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 31.1: Probability Densities Related to Exponential Function Embodies Causation
3 dimensions related to 3 light sensors in our eyes?
Re: Ghost-related TV going mainstream `~
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER