followup to Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat



 Science > Physics > followup to Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Autymn D. C."
Date: 04 Jan 2007 08:52:18 PM
Object: followup to Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat
a precedent for my better conductor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strained_silicon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_engineering
-Aut
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.materials/browse_frm/thread/d9458084a5a7ae5a/bdef6df4311428c4?#bdef6df4311428c4
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Autymn D. C.
Date: 27 Oct 2006 15:33:21 -0700
Subject: Re: Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat
To:
hanson wrote:

" Dr. Yehiel Porat's theory predicts that if you alloy Fe with Xy
you will obtain a metal that is not brittle but flexible at -150F
and has a better conductivity than Silver"

Dr. -> dr.
For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to behave a
better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded by a positive
field to relieve the conductional charges so that they match silver's
in configuration.
Trim yeir posts!
-Aut
.

User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: followup to Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 05 Jan 2007 03:22:09 AM
Autymn D. C. wrote:

a precedent for my better conductor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strained_silicon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_engineering

-Aut

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.materials/browse_frm/thread/d9458084a5a7ae5a/bdef6df4311428c4?#bdef6df4311428c4
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Autymn D. C.
Date: 27 Oct 2006 15:33:21 -0700
Subject: Re: Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat
To:

hanson wrote:

" Dr. Yehiel Porat's theory predicts that if you alloy Fe with Xy
you will obtain a metal that is not brittle but flexible at -150F
and has a better conductivity than Silver"

-----------------------------------
Hi Auty
i wonder how is it that you recalled somethuing of me
aftersuch a long time
thanks anyway for remembering me ..... (:-)
2
i cant say just now that i can predict all of the above predictions
that you
presented in my name
i only said that my model is a good base for further advance about all
ther
above predictions and uses
yet it is not as simple as just to draw it out of your sleeves- just
like that simple
**it needs much more investment based on that model*
th eworld of matter is a huge ocean that needs a lot of work to folow
it
all we can do try and crack it step by step and a bit after a bit**
and certainly it is not a one man s job !!
now AFAIR
from my investment in my research
i dwelled quite lenghtly on irin and steel (as a structural engineer
who was dealing with that material at my 40 years of day job
one of the important characteristics of irin and even steel
is ductility!
that makes stell ans iron a wonderful amterial for building
because it is very ductile
tothose who dont know:ductility is the property of metal (or any
material)
to get streched before it breaks!!
it is very important for a building matreial to ....
prevent sudded disasters!!
ie
before of insatnce that your ciling is colpasing- it gives you a lot of
alarm rings
for instance you see crackes that become bigger and bigger
iow
it does not collaps at once in surprise as say pure concrete or
ceramics
it is because steel has a good property
ie
it can be streched about 20 percent of its orriginal lenght befotre
breraking!!
btw gold is much more impressive in that sense !!
(but muchweaker )so i was looking at my model of iron
nuclear Atomic
and not least its crystaline (metal latice) structure)
and i could find and explained why is that ductility property
it is depending onj its edge chain of orbitald of iron
(back one proton and neutron cahin of orb.
and at teh front pole deuteron ones
in addition while looking at its metal latice i noticed that iron
connections
fromone atom to its neighbours are not all of them connected
some of them are free from connection
and that is exactly the plcae (accoding to my guess) in wich thr
additional
metals of steel are added tofillther gup of connection between
neighbours
i even made a calculation (a quantitive one)
to explain why is the optimal avrage addition of about 4 percent of
Carbon
is an optimal amount (of carbon addition
or another instance
why is it more than 10 percent of nickel to iron to make the allooy
a rust free aloy!!
it filles up all those free palces in whichj Oxygen can get it and blow
thw iron
in corrosion!!
you atke the weight of iron the weight of Nickel and the number of
each sort in a latice unit
and you get the resuly of something more than 10 percent to fillthe
gups
tha twas jusr one example to show the use and the big potential of that
model
i could as well expalin why semi conductors are as they are etc etc
ps
excuse not spe;; chaking it is too long.......yet i am sure people
whith some
patiance could get it thouhg the spelling mistakes
ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------


Dr. -> dr.

For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to behave a
better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded by a positive
field to relieve the conductional charges so that they match silver's
in configuration.

Trim yeir posts!

-Aut

.
User: "hanson"

Title: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 05 Jan 2007 10:30:32 AM
Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson


"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1167988929.035292.3240@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com...


Autymn D. C. wrote:

a precedent for my better conductor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strained_silicon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_engineering
-Aut

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.materials/browse_frm/thread/d9458084a5a7ae5a/bdef6df4311428c4?#bdef6df4311428c4

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Autymn D. C.
Date: 27 Oct 2006 15:33:21 -0700
Subject: Re: Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat
To:

hanson wrote:

" Dr. Yehiel Porat's theory predicts that if you alloy Fe with Xy
you will obtain a metal that is not brittle but flexible at -150F
and has a better conductivity than Silver"

-----------------------------------

[Yehi]

Hi Auty
i wonder how is it that you recalled somethuing of me
aftersuch a long time thanks anyway for remembering me.

2
i cant say just now that i can predict all of the above predictions
that you presented in my name i only said that my model is a
good base for further advance about all ther above predictions
and uses yet it is not as simple as just to draw it out of your
sleeves- just like that simple

**it needs much more investment based on that model*
th eworld of matter is a huge ocean that needs a lot of
work to folow it all we can do try and crack it step by step
and a bit after a bit** and certainly it is not a one man s job !!

now AFAIR from my investment in my research
i dwelled quite lenghtly on irin and steel (as a structural engineer
who was dealing with that material at my 40 years of day job
one of the important characteristics of irin and even steel
is ductility! that makes stell ans iron a wonderful amterial for
building because it is very ductile to those who dont know:
ductility is the property of metal (or any material)
to get streched before it breaks!! it is very important for a
building matreial to .... prevent sudded disasters!!
ie
before of insatnce that your ciling is colpasing- it gives you
a lot of alarm rings for instance you see crackes that become
bigger and bigger iow it does not collaps at once in surprise
as say pure concrete or ceramics it is because steel has a
good property ie it can be streched about 20 percent of
its orriginal lenght befotre breraking!!

btw gold is much more impressive in that sense !!
(but muchweaker )so i was looking at my model of iron
nuclear Atomic and not least its crystaline (metal latice)
structure) and i could find and explained why is that ductility
property it is depending onj its edge chain of orbitald of iron
(back one proton and neutron cahin of orb.
and at teh front pole deuteron ones in addition while looking
at its metal latice i noticed that iron connections from one
atom to its neighbours are not all of them connected some
of them are free from connection and that is exactly the
plcae (accoding to my guess) in wich thr additional metals
of steel are added tofillther gup of connection between
neighbours

i even made a calculation (a quantitive one) to explain why is the
optimal avrage addition of about 4 percent of Carbon is an
optimal amount (of carbon addition or another instance
why is it more than 10 percent of nickel to iron to make the allooy
a rust free aloy!! it filles up all those free palces in whichj
Oxygen can get it and blow thw iron in corrosion!!
you atke the weight of iron the weight of Nickel and the number of
each sort in a latice unit and you get the resuly of something
more than 10 percent to fill the gups

tha twas jusr one example to show the use and the big potential
of that model i could as well expalin why semi conductors are
as they are etc etc

ps
excuse not spe;; chaking it is too long.......yet i am sure people
whith some patiance could get it thouhg the spelling mistakes
ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------


For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to
behave a better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded
by a positive field to relieve the conductional charges so that
they match silver's in configuration.
-Aut


.
User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 06 Jan 2007 04:29:14 AM
hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!
i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**
TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------


"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1167988929.035292.3240@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com...


Autymn D. C. wrote:

a precedent for my better conductor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strained_silicon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_engineering
-Aut

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.materials/browse_frm/thread/d9458084a5a7ae5a/bdef6df4311428c4?#bdef6df4311428c4

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Autymn D. C.
Date: 27 Oct 2006 15:33:21 -0700
Subject: Re: Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat
To:

hanson wrote:

" Dr. Yehiel Porat's theory predicts that if you alloy Fe with Xy
you will obtain a metal that is not brittle but flexible at -150F
and has a better conductivity than Silver"

-----------------------------------

[Yehi]

Hi Auty
i wonder how is it that you recalled somethuing of me
aftersuch a long time thanks anyway for remembering me.

2
i cant say just now that i can predict all of the above predictions
that you presented in my name i only said that my model is a
good base for further advance about all ther above predictions
and uses yet it is not as simple as just to draw it out of your
sleeves- just like that simple

**it needs much more investment based on that model*
th eworld of matter is a huge ocean that needs a lot of
work to folow it all we can do try and crack it step by step
and a bit after a bit** and certainly it is not a one man s job !!

now AFAIR from my investment in my research
i dwelled quite lenghtly on irin and steel (as a structural engineer
who was dealing with that material at my 40 years of day job
one of the important characteristics of irin and even steel
is ductility! that makes stell ans iron a wonderful amterial for
building because it is very ductile to those who dont know:
ductility is the property of metal (or any material)
to get streched before it breaks!! it is very important for a
building matreial to .... prevent sudded disasters!!
ie
before of insatnce that your ciling is colpasing- it gives you
a lot of alarm rings for instance you see crackes that become
bigger and bigger iow it does not collaps at once in surprise
as say pure concrete or ceramics it is because steel has a
good property ie it can be streched about 20 percent of
its orriginal lenght befotre breraking!!

btw gold is much more impressive in that sense !!
(but muchweaker )so i was looking at my model of iron
nuclear Atomic and not least its crystaline (metal latice)
structure) and i could find and explained why is that ductility
property it is depending onj its edge chain of orbitald of iron
(back one proton and neutron cahin of orb.
and at teh front pole deuteron ones in addition while looking
at its metal latice i noticed that iron connections from one
atom to its neighbours are not all of them connected some
of them are free from connection and that is exactly the
plcae (accoding to my guess) in wich thr additional metals
of steel are added tofillther gup of connection between
neighbours

i even made a calculation (a quantitive one) to explain why is the
optimal avrage addition of about 4 percent of Carbon is an
optimal amount (of carbon addition or another instance
why is it more than 10 percent of nickel to iron to make the allooy
a rust free aloy!! it filles up all those free palces in whichj
Oxygen can get it and blow thw iron in corrosion!!
you atke the weight of iron the weight of Nickel and the number of
each sort in a latice unit and you get the resuly of something
more than 10 percent to fill the gups

tha twas jusr one example to show the use and the big potential
of that model i could as well expalin why semi conductors are
as they are etc etc

ps
excuse not spe;; chaking it is too long.......yet i am sure people
whith some patiance could get it thouhg the spelling mistakes
ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------


For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to
behave a better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded
by a positive field to relieve the conductional charges so that
they match silver's in configuration.
-Aut


.
User: "Helmut Wabnig .... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 06 Jan 2007 06:53:38 AM
On 6 Jan 2007 02:29:14 -0800, "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------

haha, you'r takin' hanson serious.
Don't do that, because, as hanson said,
"we are here for fun"
GrrEeTz,
w.
.
User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 06 Jan 2007 09:25:08 AM
Helmut Wabnig wrote:

On 6 Jan 2007 02:29:14 -0800, "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------


haha, you'r takin' hanson serious.
Don't do that, because, as hanson said,
"we are here for fun"

GrrEeTz,
w.

----------------------------------
so Hey Hanson !!
that is waht you do to your old Budy??
you bothered to raise again that thread **of yours** just to make fun
of me ??
do you consider my model a joke ??
what do you know about my model ??
do you consider that behaviour of yours as a responsible one ??
do you consider the exsiting situation of connon scince
as satisfactory ??
no need for some revision
no need for some advance ?
or may be you think that everything is under control'
may be you think that the existing knowledge is godd enough
for making our everyday life better??
may be you think that all our life is just a big joke ??
TIA only to Hanson
Y.Porat
-------------------------------
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 06 Jan 2007 04:58:20 PM
Cheezus-H-Fucking-Kriste, Yehi, ... Why and what the ***** are
you arguing with me for? Direct your questions and arguments
below to Helmut Wabnig. I did my share for you, earlier and now!
I did what I could for you. NOW, go make friends with Wabnig.
Have Wabbie help you. It's HIS turn to help you! - Good luck, Yehi!
hanson


"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168097107.977672.88010@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...


Helmut Wabnig wrote:

On 6 Jan 2007 02:29:14 -0800, "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------


haha, you'r takin' hanson serious.
Don't do that, because, as hanson said,
"we are here for fun"

GrrEeTz,
w.

----------------------------------
so Hey Hanson !!
that is waht you do to your old Budy??
you bothered to raise again that thread **of yours**
just to make fun of me ??

do you consider my model a joke ??
what do you know about my model ??
do you consider that behaviour of yours as a responsible one ??
do you consider the exsiting situation of connon scince
as satisfactory ??
no need for some revision
no need for some advance ?
or may be you think that everything is under control'
may be you think that the existing knowledge is godd enough
for making our everyday life better??
may be you think that all our life is just a big joke ??

TIA only to Hanson
Y.Porat
-------------------------------

.


User: "hanson"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 06 Jan 2007 04:58:21 PM
Wabbnigger, this is not about me, you pitiful chicken *****!
Help Yehi, you fucking loud mouth, instead of being a coward!
Or at least tell Yehi that you don't know what YOU are talking
about. Come clean, Wabnigger, you miserable *****!


"Helmut Wabnig" <.... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -> wrote in
message news:9q6vp2dct00oeluo7c5vcb51qfr6e7cm8p@4ax.com...

On 6 Jan 2007 02:29:14 -0800, "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------


[Wabnigger playing coy]

haha, you'r takin' hanson serious.
Don't do that, because, as hanson said,
"we are here for fun"

GrrEeTz,
w.

[hanson]
What is this "we" *****?!
Wabbnigger you will not be included into this
"we.. for fun" .... until you have HELPED YEHI
Go HELP YEHI. Don't play coy, you chicken *****!
Cheeeze... this is like pulling teeth!
hanson
.


User: "hanson"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 06 Jan 2007 04:58:20 PM
Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson


"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168079354.070380.248220@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------

[hanson]
Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson




"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1167988929.035292.3240@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com...


Autymn D. C. wrote:

a precedent for my better conductor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strained_silicon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_engineering
-Aut

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.materials/browse_frm/thread/d9458084a5a7ae5a/bdef6df4311428c4?#bdef6df4311428c4

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Autymn D. C.
Date: 27 Oct 2006 15:33:21 -0700
Subject: Re: Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat
To:

hanson wrote:

" Dr. Yehiel Porat's theory predicts that if you alloy Fe with Xy
you will obtain a metal that is not brittle but flexible at -150F
and has a better conductivity than Silver"

-----------------------------------

[Yehi]

Hi Auty
i wonder how is it that you recalled somethuing of me
aftersuch a long time thanks anyway for remembering me.

2
i cant say just now that i can predict all of the above predictions
that you presented in my name i only said that my model is a
good base for further advance about all ther above predictions
and uses yet it is not as simple as just to draw it out of your
sleeves- just like that simple

**it needs much more investment based on that model*
th eworld of matter is a huge ocean that needs a lot of
work to folow it all we can do try and crack it step by step
and a bit after a bit** and certainly it is not a one man s job !!

now AFAIR from my investment in my research
i dwelled quite lenghtly on irin and steel (as a structural engineer
who was dealing with that material at my 40 years of day job
one of the important characteristics of irin and even steel
is ductility! that makes stell ans iron a wonderful amterial for
building because it is very ductile to those who dont know:
ductility is the property of metal (or any material)
to get streched before it breaks!! it is very important for a
building matreial to .... prevent sudded disasters!!
ie
before of insatnce that your ciling is colpasing- it gives you
a lot of alarm rings for instance you see crackes that become
bigger and bigger iow it does not collaps at once in surprise
as say pure concrete or ceramics it is because steel has a
good property ie it can be streched about 20 percent of
its orriginal lenght befotre breraking!!

btw gold is much more impressive in that sense !!
(but muchweaker )so i was looking at my model of iron
nuclear Atomic and not least its crystaline (metal latice)
structure) and i could find and explained why is that ductility
property it is depending onj its edge chain of orbitald of iron
(back one proton and neutron cahin of orb.
and at teh front pole deuteron ones in addition while looking
at its metal latice i noticed that iron connections from one
atom to its neighbours are not all of them connected some
of them are free from connection and that is exactly the
plcae (accoding to my guess) in wich thr additional metals
of steel are added tofillther gup of connection between
neighbours

i even made a calculation (a quantitive one) to explain why is the
optimal avrage addition of about 4 percent of Carbon is an
optimal amount (of carbon addition or another instance
why is it more than 10 percent of nickel to iron to make the allooy
a rust free aloy!! it filles up all those free palces in whichj
Oxygen can get it and blow thw iron in corrosion!!
you atke the weight of iron the weight of Nickel and the number of
each sort in a latice unit and you get the resuly of something
more than 10 percent to fill the gups

tha twas jusr one example to show the use and the big potential
of that model i could as well expalin why semi conductors are
as they are etc etc

ps
excuse not spe;; chaking it is too long.......yet i am sure people
whith some patiance could get it thouhg the spelling mistakes
ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------


For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to
behave a better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded
by a positive field to relieve the conductional charges so that
they match silver's in configuration.
-Aut



.
User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 07 Jan 2007 02:25:32 AM
hanson wrote:

Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson


"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168079354.070380.248220@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------

[hanson]

Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson

-----------------------------
1
i never saw a response of Waningger to me
2
what is common to wabingger and me in detailes?
and not by general hand wavings like
'he is the man of physics etc etc'
i never saied that 'i am **the man of physics*
i said that there is a nitch of physics(an important one !!)
in which i know better than others
got it Hansen ??
3
do you consider me a joke ??
if yes just say it loud and clear!!
ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 09 Jan 2007 01:35:54 AM
In a certain state of aggravation or perhaps encroaching senile
paranoia my Israeli friend Yehi "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
wrote below:


[Yehi]
"do you consider me a joke ?? -- if yes just say it loud and clear!!


[hanson]
AHAHAHAHA.. no, no, no, but you are making so many of them!
Now, if your 1-liner above is a serious concern of yours, then I will
refrain from promoting your theory any longer. But consider too,
Yehi, that this will let Helmut off the hook. Your loss, Yehi -- and to
Wabnigger's great relief. --- What can I tell you? --- or even better,
WHAT DO YOU WANT TO HEAR, Yehi?... ahahahaha.... ahaha...
ahaha.... ahahahanson


----------------
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168158331.937618.15690@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


hanson wrote:

Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson


"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168079354.070380.248220@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------

[hanson]

Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson

-----------------------------
1
i never saw a response of Waningger to me

2
what is common to wabingger and me in detailes?
and not by general hand wavings like
'he is the man of physics etc etc'
i never saied that 'i am **the man of physics*
i said that there is a nitch of physics(an important one !!)
in which i know better than others
got it Hansen ??

3
do you consider me a joke ??
if yes just say it loud and clear!!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------

.
User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 09 Jan 2007 03:11:16 AM
hanson wrote:

In a certain state of aggravation or perhaps encroaching senile
paranoia my Israeli friend Yehi "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
wrote below:


[Yehi]
"do you consider me a joke ?? -- if yes just say it loud and clear!!


[hanson]
AHAHAHAHA.. no, no, no, but you are making so many of them!
Now, if your 1-liner above is a serious concern of yours, then I will
refrain from promoting your theory any longer. But consider too,
Yehi, that this will let Helmut off the hook. Your loss, Yehi -- and to
Wabnigger's great relief. --- What can I tell you? --- or even better,
WHAT DO YOU WANT TO HEAR, Yehi?... ahahahaha.... ahaha...
ahaha.... ahahahanson

--------------------------------------
Hi Hanson
if you are sincere about promoting my theories
than
THANK YOU !!
and i apologize if i misunderstood your real intentions.
yet
it seems to me strange that you are involving me with Wabingger
who is Wabinger at all??
who ever heard about him??
what is his reputation
my intention is to enter into the 'common society' of physics
first priority to universities !!
i what to get into the 'consensus' though of course
it is not simple !!
it is not a once 'stroke ' job
it seems that it will take years
so if possible to shorten that process
now about prediction of mine
i dd some
and some are in my book
for instance:
that Gold cannot be produced (by ordinary means surely not
spontaneously
so it cannot be produced from say Platinum
because they have a different unclear skeleton
it should be easier from rather Mercury!
though mercury is a liquid!!
2
fluorine cannot be made from Oxygen
and vice verse though the are immediate neighbors!!
fluorine is the first 'rectangular pipe'
while oxygen is a tetraheder!!
3
and unprecedented explanation why
calcium Potassium and Argon are the Geologic clock
ie a closed family in which it is easy to exchange then
4
why Mg Si Al and P
are a closed family
btw i had a dispute with some people here in past
who tried to contradict me
by showing some very rare isotopes with a very short life time
but my claim is that those very short life time
isotopes are not real elements like the common one but
'impostors '
ie look only partially as the nominal elements
ATB and TIA
Yehi
----------------------------
etc etc


----------------
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168158331.937618.15690@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


hanson wrote:

Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson


"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168079354.070380.248220@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------

[hanson]

Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson

-----------------------------
1
i never saw a response of Waningger to me

2
what is common to wabingger and me in detailes?
and not by general hand wavings like
'he is the man of physics etc etc'
i never saied that 'i am **the man of physics*
i said that there is a nitch of physics(an important one !!)
in which i know better than others
got it Hansen ??

3
do you consider me a joke ??
if yes just say it loud and clear!!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------

.
User: "Helmut Wabnig .... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 09 Jan 2007 03:26:40 AM
On 9 Jan 2007 01:11:16 -0800, "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:
Ahahaha, hanson things start to become interesting,
hahaha, never noticed how funny that Porat stuff is until now.
Thanks for the laugh, hanson.
w.


hanson wrote:

In a certain state of aggravation or perhaps encroaching senile
paranoia my Israeli friend Yehi "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
wrote below:


[Yehi]
"do you consider me a joke ?? -- if yes just say it loud and clear!!


[hanson]
AHAHAHAHA.. no, no, no, but you are making so many of them!
Now, if your 1-liner above is a serious concern of yours, then I will
refrain from promoting your theory any longer. But consider too,
Yehi, that this will let Helmut off the hook. Your loss, Yehi -- and to
Wabnigger's great relief. --- What can I tell you? --- or even better,
WHAT DO YOU WANT TO HEAR, Yehi?... ahahahaha.... ahaha...
ahaha.... ahahahanson

--------------------------------------
Hi Hanson
if you are sincere about promoting my theories
than
THANK YOU !!
and i apologize if i misunderstood your real intentions.

yet
it seems to me strange that you are involving me with Wabingger
who is Wabinger at all??
who ever heard about him??
what is his reputation
my intention is to enter into the 'common society' of physics
first priority to universities !!
i what to get into the 'consensus' though of course
it is not simple !!
it is not a once 'stroke ' job
it seems that it will take years
so if possible to shorten that process
now about prediction of mine
i dd some
and some are in my book
for instance:
that Gold cannot be produced (by ordinary means surely not
spontaneously
so it cannot be produced from say Platinum
because they have a different unclear skeleton
it should be easier from rather Mercury!
though mercury is a liquid!!
2
fluorine cannot be made from Oxygen
and vice verse though the are immediate neighbors!!
fluorine is the first 'rectangular pipe'
while oxygen is a tetraheder!!
3
and unprecedented explanation why
calcium Potassium and Argon are the Geologic clock
ie a closed family in which it is easy to exchange then

4
why Mg Si Al and P
are a closed family

btw i had a dispute with some people here in past
who tried to contradict me
by showing some very rare isotopes with a very short life time
but my claim is that those very short life time
isotopes are not real elements like the common one but
'impostors '
ie look only partially as the nominal elements

ATB and TIA
Yehi
----------------------------

etc etc







----------------
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168158331.937618.15690@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


hanson wrote:

Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson


"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168079354.070380.248220@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


hanson wrote:

Yehi, old buddy! -- Happy 2007 to you!
Go prod Helmut Wabnig for further promotional help on
your endeavor here. So, just break into/respond to one of
his posts. Copy and post THIS here post as your response
to a number of his posts, and keep doing so until he
reacts and responds to YOU.
Helmut will respond sooner or later since he does not
wanna be known as a coward or worse, especially since
Wabnig always likes to play big-n-hot shot in physics.
Good luck, Yehi, go sic'em!
hanson

----------------------------------
Hi hanson old budy
and happy new year!!

i realy dont know what and why do you suggest
i am not sure if you are serious or joking
and i know nothing about Helmuth
who is he ???
**and why do you suggest that from all the scintific world i have to
address just him??**

TIA to hansen
Y.Porat
----------------------------------

[hanson]

Well ,Yehi, see!.. on the very first try Helmut responded to
you! THAT IS GOOD!... even if he plays "hard-to-get" and
makes an evasive "fun excuse". Yehi, go prod Wabbie,
make friends with him. Helmut always portrays himself as
"the man-in-the-know about physics". You don't need to
"know him" personally. Go after his physics expertise he
claims to have. Good luck, Yehi. Wabnigger HELP YEHI!
hanson

-----------------------------
1
i never saw a response of Waningger to me

2
what is common to wabingger and me in detailes?
and not by general hand wavings like
'he is the man of physics etc etc'
i never saied that 'i am **the man of physics*
i said that there is a nitch of physics(an important one !!)
in which i know better than others
got it Hansen ??

3
do you consider me a joke ??
if yes just say it loud and clear!!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------

.
User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 09 Jan 2007 05:55:58 AM
Helmut Wabnig wrote:

On 9 Jan 2007 01:11:16 -0800, "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:


Ahahaha, hanson things start to become interesting,
hahaha, never noticed how funny that Porat stuff is until now.
Thanks for the laugh, hanson.

--------------------
so Hanson
do you see whom you want to invlove me with ??
i have no time to wast ......
Y.Porat
-----------------------------
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 10 Jan 2007 03:36:31 PM
My friend Yehiel "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> from Israel wrote in
news:1168343758.811520.265150@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
and my friend from Germany/Austria, Helmut Wabnig wrote:


[Wabbie]

Ahahaha, hanson things start to become interesting,
hahaha, never noticed how funny that Porat stuff is until now.
Thanks for the laugh, hanson.


[Yehi]

--------------------

"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:

so Hanson, do you see whom you want to invlove me with ??
i have no time to wast ......
Y.Porat
-----------------------------

[hanson]
..... ahahaha... Guys, grow up, you 2 old farts.
Can't you guys have fun, tease and work together at
the same time. Is that asked too much from you?
Now get at it, or is your mutual disdain that your
(grand)fathers had towards each other inherited
by both of you?
== Wabbie: Enjoy yourself with/over Yehi quirks while
you help Yehi to promote his theory. Your school-
teacher like methodology will come in very handy.
You are good for Yehi. Here are the starters for it:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/33082c606ed857a0
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/50168ababafda86d


== Yehi: Listen to Wabbie. Do not jump onto Wabbie's *****,
the very first time he utters an opinion, view or comments
that do not exactly jive with your own. After all HE is going
to help you. Listen to him. Be judicial but not emotional.
The name of the game for you is to collect info that is helpful
to disseminate YOUR splendid theory but NOT to whine
about a KZ that you never were in.
Take care guys. I'll be watching and cranking you.
ahahahaha... ahahahanson
.



User: "Autymn D. C."

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 09 Jan 2007 10:25:23 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_noble_metals#Gold
.
User: "Helmut Wabnig .... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 10 Jan 2007 04:56:02 AM
On 9 Jan 2007 20:25:23 -0800, "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_noble_metals#Gold

They don't mention the date of the first successful experiments,
must have been before 1960 IIRC
w.
.
User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 11 Jan 2007 07:24:53 AM
Helmut Wabnig wrote:

On 9 Jan 2007 20:25:23 -0800, "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_noble_metals#Gold


They don't mention the date of the first successful experiments,
must have been before 1960 IIRC

w.

-----------------
fo rthe first time i see your link that deals with creation og Gold
from mercury
it is an old prediction of mine!!
it is documented and i never saw that link befiore my prediction
my prediction goes even firther
it is
that you cant make Gold from say Platinum!!
though they are immediate neighbours !!!
that is beyound the inforamtion you brought there in your link!!
so my prediction is
from waht you could make Gold and from waht not even Platinum
seems to be a candidate
it is only my model that could predict it
anyone who has my book can see it and understand it clearly
they have a substantial difference in their nuclear skeleton
thoughthey are immediate neighbours!!
and that is just one of many prediction that i can do
and no one else can do!
a btw to hanson:
you mingle my model and my unprecedentee simple proof that
the photon has a nonzero mass
that proof of muine is just small cash' compared to me nuclear
and Atomic model
my oroof is (just to remind you ) in a thread called
an unprecedented proof of nonzero mass for the photon
(or something like that i just quote from free memory)
the poof is very simple and based on the **experimental formuls
E=hf
i showed that if E and f are nonzero(as found by eldless experiemntal
casses
than h must be nonzero !!
now if you zoom into that h
you find there the mass dimension
and the meaning of a dimension is 1.00 times that unit
a kg dimension in a formula means 1.00 kh
it is the factirs attache dtoit that can multiply it by anything
relevant
bu tthe 1.00kg is there
and nothing will change it
the second claim is that it is rest mass
because relativistic mass is deadlong ago
soplease dont minglw my model
with my photon nonzero mass proof
there is nothing common in it
it is two differnt 'Operas'
ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------------------------------
ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------------------------
.
User: "Autymn D. C."

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 12 Jan 2007 11:10:03 AM
Y.Porat wrote:

Helmut Wabnig wrote:

On 9 Jan 2007 20:25:23 -0800, "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_noble_metals#Gold


They don't mention the date of the first successful experiments,
must have been before 1960 IIRC

w.

-----------------
fo rthe first time i see your link that deals with creation og Gold
from mercury
it is an old prediction of mine!!

it is documented and i never saw that link befiore my prediction
my prediction goes even firther
it is
that you cant make Gold from say Platinum!!
though they are immediate neighbours !!!

And you were wrong again.

E=hf
i showed that if E and f are nonzero(as found by eldless experiemntal
casses
than h must be nonzero !!
now if you zoom into that h
you find there the mass dimension

You can't show that algebraicly. h is then in the open set, includent
anything.

and the meaning of a dimension is 1.00 times that unit
a kg dimension in a formula means 1.00 kh
it is the factirs attache dtoit that can multiply it by anything
relevant
bu tthe 1.00kg is there
and nothing will change it

All h is is Et. That's not a dimension but a conversion of two
dimensions. As is the other conversion hc which is Es.

the second claim is that it is rest mass
because relativistic mass is deadlong ago
soplease dont minglw my model
with my photon nonzero mass proof
there is nothing common in it
it is two differnt 'Operas'

Yet you mungel dimensions.
-Aut
.
User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 13 Jan 2007 02:39:16 AM
Autymn D. C. wrote:

Y.Porat wrote:

Helmut Wabnig wrote:

On 9 Jan 2007 20:25:23 -0800, "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_noble_metals#Gold


They don't mention the date of the first successful experiments,
must have been before 1960 IIRC

w.

-----------------
fo rthe first time i see your link that deals with creation og Gold
from mercury
it is an old prediction of mine!!

it is documented and i never saw that link befiore my prediction
my prediction goes even firther
it is
that you cant make Gold from say Platinum!!
though they are immediate neighbours !!!


And you were wrong again.

E=hf
i showed that if E and f are nonzero(as found by eldless experiemntal
casses
than h must be nonzero !!
now if you zoom into that h
you find there the mass dimension


You can't show that algebraicly. h is then in the open set, includent
anything.

and the meaning of a dimension is 1.00 times that unit
a kg dimension in a formula means 1.00 kh
it is the factirs attache dtoit that can multiply it by anything
relevant
bu tthe 1.00kg is there
and nothing will change it


All h is is Et. That's not a dimension but a conversion of two
dimensions. As is the other conversion hc which is Es.

the second claim is that it is rest mass
because relativistic mass is deadlong ago
soplease dont minglw my model
with my photon nonzero mass proof
there is nothing common in it
it is two differnt 'Operas'


Yet you mungel dimensions.

-Aut

-----------------------
??????????????
please be more specific beyond slogans
Y.Porat
--------------------
.



User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: Helmut Wabnig for Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat 15 Feb 2007 10:40:21 AM
On Jan 10, 12:56 pm, Helmut Wabnig <.... .-- .- -... -. .. --.
@ .- --- -. DOT .- -> wrote:

On 9 Jan 2007 20:25:23 -0800, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_noble_metals#Gold


They don't mention the date of the first successful experiments,
must have been before 1960 IIRC

w.

-------------------
can someone bring experimental evidence
that Gold has beed produced in a nuclear proccess
from Platinum???
TIA
Y.Porat
-------------------
.











  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Followup to the Bogdanov Affair
Followup to magnetic lines question: standing waves
Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat
The Smart Model Theory - Note about E= hf and E=mc^2
A Correct Aether Theory
String Theory or CPH Theory
The Doppler - Hubble Big Bang theory is done for.
Re: Pentagon 9/11 Fraud was Re: No Second Engine at the Pentagon was Re: The Ultimate Pentagon 9/11 Question Andy Carol couldn't answer. was Re: Flight 175 WAS a FUEL TANKER, for REAL. This is not a "theory".
Re: A Vortex inside a Vortex--- Forget Vortex Theory For Now What AboutThe Loss Of The Funny Beer Commercials?
Theory of gravitation
The Creation of the Universe and the One Fact (Formerly known as the Unified Theory). On creating Economic Heaven on Earth and nuking Hell (the Capitalists / Religionists) back to Hell. On Creating Critical Mass. On the conditions for world revolutio
New theory Proves Mass exists, Part I
The Dave Evans Theory Of Gravitation
Re: TRADITION vs THEORY
A Theory of Everything that explains Gravity, Magnetisim, Electrostatic force
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER