| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
| Date: |
21 Sep 2005 04:46:50 PM |
| Object: |
For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that Saddam Hussein
killed
more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
.
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
21 Sep 2005 06:07:46 PM |
|
|
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
[hanson]
Andro, everybody knows these facts & answer over here. So, your
Limey politician is a bit slow in coming. But, neither it nor why does
matter now, nor does it matter who did what to whom since none
of the dead will come back. And uncle Al Schwartz didn't have
anything to do with it except that he had voiced his Jewish interests
on the subject... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... It's a free country!
In defense of your BBC/Politician though it's a long and intertwined
story. However, a chief reason for Hussein's removal was that he had
lobed a few missiles into Israel, a thing that had upset the US Jewry
greatly, since a large portion of the Settlers and Israel's upper class
come from the US (the "Jew first / US citizen second", type).
Hence, ever since the since Gulf war 1 the so-called Neocons (a code
word for Jews) began in the Cinton administration to agitate to bring
about regime change in Iraq. Finally, a bunch of these Neocons, like
Paul Wolfowitz, (now rewarded for it with the Chair at the World Bank),
Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and
Meyrav Wurmser and others in the Bush administration were successful
in goading the president to go into/after Iraq. Once that had taken place,
the pressure from Saddam onto Israel was gone,... and now these
Neocons are nowhere to be seen nor heard from, leaving Bush (and
Tony Blair) dangling in the wind.... ahahaha.... AHAHA.... and neither do
we/you see much enthusiasm any longer for the war by the Jewish
community... ahaha... After all.....The deed was done!... AHAHAHAHA....
Then there were oil interests, nefarious or otherwise, like with Kuwait
and the Saudis. Then there was the obligatory rite (not right) for/of/by
any president to make a war, big or small to prove that he has clankers.
There were & are the evangelicals who waited for the Second Coming
as soon as Samaria and Judea was "settled" by Jews. Then there were
revenge and get-even factors reaching back in history for generations,
but intensifying ever since WWII with Jews & Arabs being at each others
throats and dragging US into the fucking game of the annual $3billion
foreign aid (with political kickback payoffs)... Then there was the growth
of religion and fundamentalism in all beliefs in retort to globalization and
growing secularization... etc. == The whole thing is really just the usual
"SNAFU" (situation normal, all fucked up) ... but now for the first time
with the vast real time communication spread... it hits home a bit louder
and immediately... ahaha... but otherwise, it's nothing new under the sun.
To make the long story short: "Mankind is a vast herd of swine!"...
and WE ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THAT HERD".... oink! oink! oink!
AHAHAHA... ahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ole D. Rughede" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
23 Sep 2005 09:24:20 PM |
|
|
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:6JlYe.1480$zQ3.844@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
[hanson]
Andro, everybody knows these facts & answer over here. So, your
Limey politician is a bit slow in coming. But, neither it nor why does
matter now, nor does it matter who did what to whom since none
of the dead will come back. And uncle Al Schwartz didn't have
anything to do with it except that he had voiced his Jewish interests
on the subject... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... It's a free country!
In defense of your BBC/Politician though it's a long and intertwined
story. However, a chief reason for Hussein's removal was that he had
lobed a few missiles into Israel, a thing that had upset the US Jewry
greatly, since a large portion of the Settlers and Israel's upper
class
come from the US (the "Jew first / US citizen second", type).
Hence, ever since the since Gulf war 1 the so-called Neocons (a code
word for Jews) began in the Cinton administration to agitate to bring
about regime change in Iraq. Finally, a bunch of these Neocons, like
Paul Wolfowitz, (now rewarded for it with the Chair at the World
Bank),
Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and
Meyrav Wurmser and others in the Bush administration were successful
in goading the president to go into/after Iraq. Once that had taken
place,
the pressure from Saddam onto Israel was gone,... and now these
Neocons are nowhere to be seen nor heard from, leaving Bush (and
Tony Blair) dangling in the wind.... ahahaha.... AHAHA.... and neither
do
we/you see much enthusiasm any longer for the war by the Jewish
community... ahaha... After all.....The deed was done!...
AHAHAHAHA....
Then there were oil interests, nefarious or otherwise, like with
Kuwait
and the Saudis. Then there was the obligatory rite (not right)
for/of/by
any president to make a war, big or small to prove that he has
clankers.
There were & are the evangelicals who waited for the Second Coming
as soon as Samaria and Judea was "settled" by Jews. Then there were
revenge and get-even factors reaching back in history for generations,
but intensifying ever since WWII with Jews & Arabs being at each
others
throats and dragging US into the fucking game of the annual $3billion
foreign aid (with political kickback payoffs)... Then there was the
growth
of religion and fundamentalism in all beliefs in retort to
globalization and
growing secularization... etc. == The whole thing is really just the
usual
"SNAFU" (situation normal, all fucked up) ... but now for the first
time
with the vast real time communication spread... it hits home a bit
louder
and immediately... ahaha... but otherwise, it's nothing new under the
sun.
To make the long story short: "Mankind is a vast herd of swine!"...
and WE ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THAT HERD".... oink! oink! oink!
AHAHAHA... ahaha... ahahanson
I may say!
Did you ever get rid of the drum?
Best regards, Ole
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Y.Porat" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
24 Sep 2005 01:04:46 AM |
|
|
Good for you Hansen!!
now i know you are a great scientist.
(and that you are not drunk from time to time)
keep on like that and you will become even a bigger scientist.
ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Real Name EmailAddress" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 02:40:24 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:07:46 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
[hanson]
Andro, everybody knows these facts & answer over here.
......
To make the long story short: "Mankind is a vast herd of swine!"...
and WE ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THAT HERD".... oink! oink! oink!
AHAHAHA... ahaha... ahahanson
Forget the Saudis?
Saud Arabia owns 20% of USA already.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Real Name EmailAddress" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 02:42:59 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:07:46 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
[hanson]
Andro, everybody knows these facts & answer over here.
......
To make the long story short: "Mankind is a vast herd of swine!"...
and WE ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THAT HERD".... oink! oink! oink!
AHAHAHA... ahaha... ahahanson
Forget the Saudis?
Saud Arabia owns 20% of USA already.
And, hanson, they are SEMITES, hanson, are your FRieNdS.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
21 Sep 2005 08:40:32 PM |
|
|
hanson wrote:
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
[hanson]
Andro, everybody knows these facts & answer over here. So, your
Limey politician is a bit slow in coming. But, neither it nor why does
matter now, nor does it matter who did what to whom since none
of the dead will come back. And uncle Al Schwartz didn't have
anything to do with it except that he had voiced his Jewish interests
on the subject... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... It's a free country!
In defense of your BBC/Politician though it's a long and intertwined
story. However, a chief reason for Hussein's removal was that he had
lobed a few missiles into Israel, a thing that had upset the US Jewry
greatly, since a large portion of the Settlers and Israel's upper class
come from the US (the "Jew first / US citizen second", type).
Hence, ever since the since Gulf war 1 the so-called Neocons (a code
word for Jews) began in the Cinton administration to agitate to bring
about regime change in Iraq. Finally, a bunch of these Neocons, like
Paul Wolfowitz, (now rewarded for it with the Chair at the World Bank),
Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and
Meyrav Wurmser and others in the Bush administration were successful
in goading the president to go into/after Iraq. Once that had taken place,
the pressure from Saddam onto Israel was gone,... and now these
Neocons are nowhere to be seen nor heard from, leaving Bush (and
Tony Blair) dangling in the wind.... ahahaha.... AHAHA.... and neither do
we/you see much enthusiasm any longer for the war by the Jewish
community... ahaha... After all.....The deed was done!... AHAHAHAHA....
Then there were oil interests, nefarious or otherwise, like with Kuwait
and the Saudis. Then there was the obligatory rite (not right) for/of/by
any president to make a war, big or small to prove that he has clankers.
There were & are the evangelicals who waited for the Second Coming
as soon as Samaria and Judea was "settled" by Jews. Then there were
revenge and get-even factors reaching back in history for generations,
but intensifying ever since WWII with Jews & Arabs being at each others
throats and dragging US into the fucking game of the annual $3billion
foreign aid (with political kickback payoffs)... Then there was the growth
of religion and fundamentalism in all beliefs in retort to globalization and
growing secularization... etc. == The whole thing is really just the usual
"SNAFU" (situation normal, all fucked up) ... but now for the first time
with the vast real time communication spread... it hits home a bit louder
and immediately... ahaha... but otherwise, it's nothing new under the sun.
Hanson neglects the primary reason for war in Iraq.
hint: petrodollar hegemony.
To make the long story short: "Mankind is a vast herd of swine!"...
and WE ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THAT HERD".... oink! oink! oink!
AHAHAHA... ahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 09:44:25 AM |
|
|
"Schoenfeld" <schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127353232.808660.89620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
[hanson]
Andro, everybody knows these facts & answer over here. So, your
Limey politician is a bit slow in coming. But, neither it nor why does
matter now, nor does it matter who did what to whom since none
of the dead will come back. And uncle Al Schwartz didn't have
anything to do with it except that he had voiced his Jewish interests
on the subject... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... It's a free country!
In defense of your BBC/Politician though it's a long and intertwined
story. However, a chief reason for Hussein's removal was that he had
lobed a few missiles into Israel, a thing that had upset the US Jewry
greatly, since a large portion of the Settlers and Israel's upper class
come from the US (the "Jew first / US citizen second", type).
Hence, ever since the since Gulf war 1 the so-called Neocons (a code
word for Jews) began in the Cinton administration to agitate [1] to bring
about regime change in Iraq. Finally, a bunch of these Neocons, like
Paul Wolfowitz, (now rewarded for it with the Chair at the World Bank),
Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and
Meyrav Wurmser and others in the Bush administration were successful
in goading the president to go into/after Iraq. Once that had taken place,
the pressure from Saddam onto Israel was gone ,... and now these
Neocons are nowhere to be seen nor heard from, leaving Bush (and
Tony Blair) dangling in the wind.... ahahaha.... AHAHA.... and neither do
we/you see much enthusiasm any longer for the war by the Jewish
community [1] ... ahaha... After all...The deed was done!... AHAHAHA...
Then there were oil interests, nefarious or otherwise, like with Kuwait
and the Saudis. Then there was the obligatory rite (not right) for/of/by
any president to make a war, big or small to prove that he has clankers.
There were & are the evangelicals who waited for the Second Coming
as soon as Samaria and Judea was "settled" by Jews. Then there were
revenge and get-even factors reaching back in history for generations,
but intensifying ever since WWII with Jews & Arabs being at each others
throats and dragging US into the fucking game of the annual $3billion
foreign aid (with political kickback payoffs)... Then there was the growth
of religion and fundamentalism in all beliefs in retort to globalization and
growing secularization... etc. == The whole thing is really just the usual
"SNAFU" (situation normal, all fucked up) ... but now for the first time
with the vast real time communication spread... it hits home a bit louder
and immediately... ahaha... but otherwise, it's nothing new under the sun.
[Schoenfeld]
Hanson neglects the primary reason for war in Iraq.
hint: petrodollar hegemony.[3]
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... don't be so loud about that, Schoenfeld.
Trying to lay blame onto some nebulous concept [3] is a time
proven way that neocons use (after the fact) to shirk and shift
responsibility for their deeds. Of course, neocons would like
you to believe, in their white wash attempts, anything to cover up
THEIR instigation [1], about which they know only all too well that
their machinations are gonna come back to haunt'em... AHAHAHA...
Hint: Don't forget, Schoenfeld, there is no option in this game to
be chosen or not to be... YOU are a member of said herd [2] too...
Nice try, though, Schoenfeld.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... hahahaha...
[hanson]
To make the long story short: "Mankind is a vast herd of swine!"...
and WE ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THAT HERD" [2]... oink! oink! oink!
AHAHAHA... ahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 10:16:11 AM |
|
|
hanson wrote:
"Schoenfeld" <schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127353232.808660.89620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
[hanson]
Andro, everybody knows these facts & answer over here. So, your
Limey politician is a bit slow in coming. But, neither it nor why does
matter now, nor does it matter who did what to whom since none
of the dead will come back. And uncle Al Schwartz didn't have
anything to do with it except that he had voiced his Jewish interests
on the subject... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... It's a free country!
In defense of your BBC/Politician though it's a long and intertwined
story. However, a chief reason for Hussein's removal was that he had
lobed a few missiles into Israel, a thing that had upset the US Jewry
greatly, since a large portion of the Settlers and Israel's upper class
come from the US (the "Jew first / US citizen second", type).
Hence, ever since the since Gulf war 1 the so-called Neocons (a code
word for Jews) began in the Cinton administration to agitate [1] to bring
about regime change in Iraq. Finally, a bunch of these Neocons, like
Paul Wolfowitz, (now rewarded for it with the Chair at the World Bank),
Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and
Meyrav Wurmser and others in the Bush administration were successful
in goading the president to go into/after Iraq. Once that had taken place,
the pressure from Saddam onto Israel was gone ,... and now these
Neocons are nowhere to be seen nor heard from, leaving Bush (and
Tony Blair) dangling in the wind.... ahahaha.... AHAHA.... and neither do
we/you see much enthusiasm any longer for the war by the Jewish
community [1] ... ahaha... After all...The deed was done!... AHAHAHA...
Then there were oil interests, nefarious or otherwise, like with Kuwait
and the Saudis. Then there was the obligatory rite (not right) for/of/by
any president to make a war, big or small to prove that he has clankers.
There were & are the evangelicals who waited for the Second Coming
as soon as Samaria and Judea was "settled" by Jews. Then there were
revenge and get-even factors reaching back in history for generations,
but intensifying ever since WWII with Jews & Arabs being at each others
throats and dragging US into the fucking game of the annual $3billion
foreign aid (with political kickback payoffs)... Then there was the growth
of religion and fundamentalism in all beliefs in retort to globalization and
growing secularization... etc. == The whole thing is really just the usual
"SNAFU" (situation normal, all fucked up) ... but now for the first time
with the vast real time communication spread... it hits home a bit louder
and immediately... ahaha... but otherwise, it's nothing new under the sun.
[Schoenfeld]
Hanson neglects the primary reason for war in Iraq.
hint: petrodollar hegemony.[3]
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... don't be so loud about that, Schoenfeld.
Trying to lay blame onto some nebulous concept [3]
It's not nebulous, it's well known. US treasury screws the entire world
with their monetary policies. Just think, last year oil was
USD$25/barrel now it is at USD$67. This means the worlds oil bill has
increased 3 fold in the last year. This of course means the world needs
to buy 3 times more US dollars to purchase thatoil. For example, the
world was paying last year $2.3billion/day for oil and today it's
paying over $6 billion. The sudden increase in price obviously benefits
oil producers (OPEC, etc), oil companies but also the US economy. This
is how the US administration decided to pay for their disastrous
mistakes - let the global economy pay.
This type of activity is called an "oil shock" and this is the 3rd time
in history that the US has done this. The first oil shock was in the
70's when Nixon floated the dollar. The first oil shock was to force
foreign central banks to horde USD currency reserves to facilitiate
their countries oil transactions. This forced the world to adopt USD as
the defacto currency - this is known as "dollar hegemony". The second
oil shock was in the 80's to boost the US economy.
Because of this, the USA is the only country able to massively fund
major projects (military, nasa, etc) for virtually free. All they need
to do is borrow and borrow and borrow in their own currency. The value
of the dollar never declines (as would happen with any other currency)
for the simple reason that the demand for USD is ALWAYS there (due to
global oil transactions).
It's a beautiful setup, until OPEC denominates oil in Euros. When this
happens (and make no mistake, it will) the currency crisis will start
and the stampede to dump USD for Euro's will absolutely decimate the US
economy. Hussein tried to do this and was removed few months before
coming online. Now Iran wants to implement their euro-denominated oil
bourse by spring 2006. You think Uncle Sam is gonna sit around and let
that happen? We shall see!
The ultimate neocon game was to force America into the untennable
situation where massive trade imbalances and unrealistic reliance on
foreign oil FORCES it to secure dollar hegemony at all costs - forces
US into imperialist actions in the middle-east - forces their agenda (I
wonder what that is).
Their plan has succeeded, but the end-game was very poorly thought out.
is a time
proven way that neocons use (after the fact) to shirk and shift
responsibility for their deeds. Of course, neocons would like
you to believe, in their white wash attempts, anything to cover up
THEIR instigation [1], about which they know only all too well that
their machinations are gonna come back to haunt'em... AHAHAHA...
Hint: Don't forget, Schoenfeld, there is no option in this game to
be chosen or not to be...
YOU are a member of said herd [2] too...
Nice try, though, Schoenfeld.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... hahahaha...
Assuming you characteristically blundered your referencing, I am not
Jewish.
[hanson]
To make the long story short: "Mankind is a vast herd of swine!"...
and WE ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THAT HERD" [2]... oink! oink! oink!
AHAHAHA... ahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 11:45:28 AM |
|
|
"Schoenfeld" <schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127402171.774904.36870@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
news:1127353232.808660.89620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
Why did we want to remove him?
Androcles
[hanson]
Andro, everybody knows these facts & answer over here. So, your
Limey politician is a bit slow in coming. But, neither it nor why does
matter now, nor does it matter who did what to whom since none
of the dead will come back. And uncle Al Schwartz didn't have
anything to do with it except that he had voiced his Jewish interests
on the subject... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... It's a free country!
In defense of your BBC/Politician though it's a long and intertwined
story. However, a chief reason for Hussein's removal was that he had
lobed a few missiles into Israel, a thing that had upset the US Jewry
greatly, since a large portion of the Settlers and Israel's upper class
come from the US (the "Jew first / US citizen second", type).
Hence, ever since the since Gulf war 1 the so-called Neocons (a code
word for Jews) began in the Cinton administration to agitate [1] to bring
about regime change in Iraq. Finally, a bunch of these Neocons, like
Paul Wolfowitz, (now rewarded for it with the Chair at the World Bank),
Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and
Meyrav Wurmser and others in the Bush administration were successful
in goading the president to go into/after Iraq. Once that had taken place,
the pressure from Saddam onto Israel was gone ,... and now these
Neocons are nowhere to be seen nor heard from, leaving Bush (and
Tony Blair) dangling in the wind.... ahahaha.... AHAHA.... and neither do
we/you see much enthusiasm any longer for the war by the Jewish
community [1] ... ahaha... After all...The deed was done!... AHAHAHA...
Then there were oil interests, nefarious or otherwise, like with Kuwait
and the Saudis. Then there was the obligatory rite (not right) for/of/by
any president to make a war, big or small to prove that he has clankers.
There were & are the evangelicals who waited for the Second Coming
as soon as Samaria and Judea was "settled" by Jews. Then there were
revenge and get-even factors reaching back in history for generations,
but intensifying ever since WWII with Jews & Arabs being at each others
throats and dragging US into the fucking game of the annual $3billion
foreign aid (with political kickback payoffs)... Then there was the growth
of religion and fundamentalism in all beliefs in retort to globalization
and
growing secularization... etc. == The whole thing is really just the
usual
"SNAFU" (situation normal, all fucked up) ... but now for the first time
with the vast real time communication spread... it hits home a bit louder
and immediately... ahaha... but otherwise, it's nothing new under the sun.
[Schoenfeld]
Hanson neglects the primary reason for war in Iraq.
hint: petrodollar hegemony.[3]
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... don't be so loud about that, Schoenfeld.
Trying to lay blame onto some nebulous concept [3].....
[Schoenfeld]
It's not nebulous, it's well known. US treasury screws the entire world
with their monetary policies. Just think, last year oil was
USD$25/barrel now it is at USD$67. This means the worlds oil bill has
increased 3 fold in the last year. This of course means the world needs
to buy 3 times more US dollars to purchase thatoil. For example, the
world was paying last year $2.3billion/day for oil and today it's
paying over $6 billion. The sudden increase in price obviously benefits
oil producers (OPEC, etc), oil companies but also the US economy. This
is how the US administration decided to pay for their disastrous
mistakes - let the global economy pay.
This type of activity is called an "oil shock" and this is the 3rd time
in history that the US has done this. The first oil shock was in the
70's when Nixon floated the dollar. The first oil shock was to force
foreign central banks to horde USD currency reserves to facilitiate
their countries oil transactions. This forced the world to adopt USD as
the defacto currency - this is known as "dollar hegemony". The second
oil shock was in the 80's to boost the US economy.
Because of this, the USA is the only country able to massively fund
major projects (military, nasa, etc) for virtually free. All they need
to do is borrow and borrow and borrow in their own currency. The value
of the dollar never declines (as would happen with any other currency)
for the simple reason that the demand for USD is ALWAYS there (due to
global oil transactions).
It's a beautiful setup, until OPEC denominates oil in Euros. When this
happens (and make no mistake, it will) the currency crisis will start
and the stampede to dump USD for Euro's will absolutely decimate the US
economy. Hussein tried to do this and was removed few months before
coming online. Now Iran wants to implement their euro-denominated oil
bourse by spring 2006. You think Uncle Sam is gonna sit around and let
that happen? We shall see!
The ultimate neocon game was to force America into the untennable
situation where massive trade imbalances and unrealistic reliance on
foreign oil FORCES it to secure dollar hegemony at all costs - forces
US into imperialist actions in the middle-east - forces their agenda (I
wonder what that is).
Their plan has succeeded, but the end-game was very poorly thought out.
[hanson]
ahahaha... Schoenfeld, you are too loud about it... and only convincing
yourself but no-one else... ahahaha... But then that's you... AHAHAHA...
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... don't be so loud about that, Schoenfeld.
Trying to lay blame onto some nebulous concept [3] is a time
proven way that neocons use (after the fact) to shirk and shift
responsibility for their deeds. Of course, neocons would like
you to believe, in their white wash attempts, anything to cover up
THEIR instigation [1], about which they know only all too well that
their machinations are gonna come back to haunt'em... AHAHAHA...
Hint: Don't forget, Schoenfeld, there is no option in this game to
be chosen or not to be...
YOU are a member of said herd [2] too...
Nice try, though, Schoenfeld.... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... hahahaha...
[Schoenfeld]
Assuming you characteristically blundered your referencing,
I am not Jewish.
[hanson]
..... ahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahahaha... You not only talk too much...
you assume too much... ahahaha... Nice try, though, Schoenfeld.
BTW, Schoenfeld, there's nothing wrong with being Jewish.....
ahahaha... ahahaha....
[hanson]
To make the long story short: "Mankind is a vast herd of swine!"...
and WE ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THAT HERD" [2]... oink! oink! oink!
AHAHAHA... ahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 12:00:43 PM |
|
|
[hanson]
ahahaha.AHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ahahaha... ahahaha.
****************
Nice to see someone so lively and cheerful with such a sophisticated
sense of humor!
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 06:07:28 PM |
|
|
<donstockbauer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127408443.422244.252900@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[hanson]
ahahaha.AHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ahahaha... ahahaha.
****************
[Don]
Nice to see someone so lively and cheerful with such a sophisticated
sense of humor!
[hanson]
Aye, thank you, Don. Kindly remember though, hopefully, those certain
implications that your note of accolades does carries with it... ahahahaha....
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/25c29a8e8432d0aa
But more importantly, "yours is one of the funnier posts that appeared
here for some time". ..... that's how our last exchange began. So, how is
your "Global Brain" developing. You have been so quiet about it lately.
You should confer with & consult the grand master about its development.
No, not uncle Al, but with Gergy/Gorgy/Georgy Hammond...
and here's the reference to above said post:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/e579d31683df8815
Best regards and my sincerest "awes" to all you large brains, like you Don
with your Global Brian and uncle Al with his Hydrocephalous here in.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/uncleal.jpg
I am impressed and envious, you guys.... ahahhaha... AHAHA... AHAHA
ahahaha... ahahahanson
PS: Don, check the reference to "mooch" in the mentioned post ... ahahaha....
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/25c29a8e8432d0aa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ole D. Rughede" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
26 Sep 2005 06:53:51 PM |
|
|
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:QOGYe.2284$0m6.1787@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<donstockbauer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127408443.422244.252900@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[hanson]
ahahaha.AHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ahahaha... ahahaha.
****************
[Don]
Nice to see someone so lively and cheerful with such a sophisticated
sense of humor!
[hanson]
Aye, thank you, Don. Kindly remember though, hopefully, those certain
implications that your note of accolades does carries with it...
ahahahaha....
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/25c29a8e8432d0aa
But more importantly, "yours is one of the funnier posts that appeared
here for some time". ..... that's how our last exchange began. So, how
is
your "Global Brain" developing. You have been so quiet about it
lately.
You should confer with & consult the grand master about its
development.
No, not uncle Al, but with Gergy/Gorgy/Georgy Hammond...
and here's the reference to above said post:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/e579d31683df8815
Best regards and my sincerest "awes" to all you large brains, like you
Don
with your Global Brian and uncle Al with his Hydrocephalous here in.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/uncleal.jpg
I am impressed and envious, you guys.... ahahhaha... AHAHA... AHAHA
ahahaha... ahahahanson
PS: Don, check the reference to "mooch" in the mentioned post ...
ahahaha....
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/25c29a8e8432d0aa
Hello, and ha ha hanson!
Still busy with DDT and uncle Al's hydrocephalous - Is hypothalamous
then swimming or gone to the bottom? - or have you got lost in
"Aethertheory and GUT"?
Ole D. Rughede
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 01:09:48 AM |
|
|
"Schoenfeld" <schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127353232.808660.89620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
|
| hanson wrote:
| > "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
| > news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > > I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
| > > Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
| > > Why did we want to remove him?
| > > Androcles
| hint: petrodollar hegemony.
Wouldn't pay his protection money?
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
22 Sep 2005 07:22:31 AM |
|
|
Androcles wrote:
"Schoenfeld" <schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127353232.808660.89620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
|
| hanson wrote:
| > "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
| > news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > > I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
| > > Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
| > > Why did we want to remove him?
| > > Androcles
| hint: petrodollar hegemony.
Wouldn't pay his protection money?
Hussein was months away from denominating his oil sales in the
oil-for-food programme in Euros.
Americans could live with Hussein until he tried to sell his oil in
Euros - then the Europeans could live with him.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
23 Sep 2005 03:30:27 PM |
|
|
"Schoenfeld" <schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127391751.349311.97490@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Androcles wrote:
| > "Schoenfeld" <schoenfeld1@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1127353232.808660.89620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | hanson wrote:
| > | > "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
| > | > news:exkYe.2079$WV1.1608@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > | > > I've just heard on BBC from a British politician that
| > | > > Saddam Hussein killed more Moslems than any man alive.
| > | > > Why did we want to remove him?
| > | > > Androcles
| > | hint: petrodollar hegemony.
| >
| > Wouldn't pay his protection money?
|
| Hussein was months away from denominating his oil sales in the
| oil-for-food programme in Euros.
|
| Americans could live with Hussein until he tried to sell his oil in
| Euros - then the Europeans could live with him.
So the mob sent the boys round to sort him out, huh?
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: For Uncle Alan Schwartz |
21 Sep 2005 07:55:01 PM |
|
|
To install a puppet government favorable to extracting their oil to
keep the world economy going so that a few billion people don't die?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
