| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"REM460" |
| Date: |
07 Oct 2004 02:11:16 AM |
| Object: |
FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
FREE ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, Physicist
At the beginning of the twentieth century, everybody
"knew" that a heavier-than-air machine could not possibly
fly. It would violate the "laws" of physics. All of the
"experts" and "authorities" said so.
For example, Simon Newcomb declared in 1901: "The
demonstration that no possible combination of known
substances, known forms of machinery and known forms of
force, can be united in a practical machine by which man
shall fly long distances through the air, seems to the writer
as complete as it is possible for the demonstration of any
physical fact to be."
Fortunately, a few SMART people such as the Wright
Brothers did NOT accept such pronouncements as the final
word. Now we take airplanes for granted, (except when they
crash).
Today, orthodox physicists and other "scientists" are
saying similar things against several kinds of 'Free Energy'
Technologies, using negative terms such as "pseudo-science"
and "perpetual motion", and citing so-called "laws" which
assert that "energy cannot be created or destroyed" ("1st law
of thermodynamics") and "there is always a decrease in useful
energy" ("2nd law of thermodynamics"). The physicists do not
know how to do certain things, so they ARROGANTLY declare
that those things cannot be done. Such PRINCIPLES OF
IMPOTENCE are COMMON in orthodox modern physics and help to
cover up INCONSISTENCIES and CONTRADICTIONS in orthodox
modern theories.
The "laws" of "thermodynamics" and "conservation of
energy" ASSUME that the physical universe that we see around
us is a "CLOSED SYSTEM". It is NOT.
Free Energy Inventions are devices which can tap a
seemingly UNLIMITED supply of energy from the universe, or
from hyper-dimensional sources, with-OUT burning any kind of
fuel, making them the PERFECT SOLUTION to the world-wide
energy crisis and its associated pollution, degradation, and
depletion of the environment.
Most Free Energy Devices probably do not create energy,
but rather tap into EXISTING natural or hyper-dimensional
energy sources by various forms of induction. UNLIKE solar
or wind devices, they need little or no energy storage
capacity, because they can tap as much energy as needed WHEN
needed. Solar energy has the DIS-advantage that the sun is
often blocked by clouds, trees, buildings, or the earth
itself, or is reduced by haze or smog or by thick atmosphere
at low altitudes and high latitudes. Likewise, wind speed is
WIDELY VARIABLE and often non-existent. Neither solar nor
wind power are suitable to directly power cars and airplanes.
Properly designed Free Energy Devices do NOT have such
limitations.
For example, at least three U.S. patents (#3,811,058,
#3,879,622, and #4,151,431) have so far been awarded for
motors that run EXCLUSIVELY on permanent MAGNETS, seemingly
tapping into energy circulating through the earth's magnetic
field, or from some hyper-dimensional source. The first two
require a feedback network in order to be self-running. The
third one, as described in detail in "Science & Mechanics"
Magazine, Spring 1980, ("Amazing Magnet-Powered Motor", by
Jorma Hyypia, pages 45-48, 114-117, and front cover),
requires critical sizes, shapes, orientations, and spacings
of magnets, but NO feedback. Such a motor could drive an
electric generator or reversible heatpump in one's home, YEAR
ROUND, FOR FREE.
[Complete descriptive copies of U.S. patents are $3.00 each
from the U.S. Patent Office, 2021 Jefferson Davis Hwy.,
Arlington, VA 22202; correct 7-digit patent numbers
required. Or try getting copies of BOTH the article AND the
Patents via your local public or university library's inter-
library loan dept..]
See also http://www.hsv.com/writers/bearden/mageng .
A second type of free-energy device, such as the 'Gray
Motor' (U.S. Patent #3,890,548), the 'Tesla Coil', and the
motor of inventor Joseph Newman [see SCIENCE, 2-10-84, pages
571-2.], taps ELECTRO-MAGNETIC energy by INDUCTION from
'EARTH RESONANCE' (about 12 cycles per second and harmonics).
They typically have a 'SPARK GAP' in the circuit which serves
to SYNCHRONIZE the energy in the coils with the energy being
tapped. It is important that the total 'inductance' and
'capacitance' of the Device combine to 'RESONATE' at the same
frequency as 'EARTH RESONANCE' in order to maximize the power
output. This output can also be increased by centering the
SPARK GAP at the 'NEUTRAL CENTER' of a strong U-shaped
permanent magnet. In the case of a Tesla Coil, slipping a
'TOROID CHOKE COIL' around and about halfway down the
secondary coil will enhance output power. ["Earth Energy:
Fuelless Propulsion & Power Systems", by John Bigelow, 1976,
Health Research, P.O. Box 70, Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245.]
During the 1930's, an Austrian civil engineer named
Viktor Schauberger invented and partially developed an
'IMPLOSION TURBINE' (German name, 'ZOKWENDLE'), after
analyzing erosion, and lack of erosion, in differently shaped
waterways, and developing sophisticated mathematical
equations to explain it. As described in the book "A
Breakthrough to New Free-Energy Sources", by Dan A. Davidson,
1977, water is pumped by an IMPELLER pump through a
LOGARITHMIC-SPIRAL-shaped coil of tubing until it reaches a
CRITICAL VELOCITY. The water then IMPLODES, no longer
touching the inside walls of the tubing, and drives the pump,
which then converts the pump's motor into an ELECTRIC
GENERATOR. The device seems to be tapping energy from that
of the earth's rotation, via the 'Coriolis effect', LIKE A
TORNADO; or perhaps the energy source is again HYPER-
DIMENSIONAL. [ It can also NEUTRALIZE GRAVITY ! ]
A fourth type of Free Energy Device is the 'McClintock
Air Motor' (U.S. Patent #2,982,261), which is a cross between
a diesel engine (it has three cylinders with a compression
ratio of 27 to 1) and a rotary engine (with solar and
planetary gears). It burns NO FUEL, but becomes self-running
by driving its own air compressor. This engine also
generates a lot of heat, which could be used to heat
buildings; and its very HIGH TORQUE makes it ideal for large
trucks, preventing their slowing down when climbing hills.
Crystals may someday be used to supply energy, as shown
in the Star Trek shows, perhaps by inserting each one between
metal capacitor plates, bombarding it with a beam of
particles from a small radioactive source like that used in a
common household smoke detector, and repeatedly drawing off
the charge on the plates after very short time intervals;
and/or by surrounding the crystal with one or more coils of
wire of particular sacred-geometric shapes.
One other energy source should be mentioned here,
despite the fact that it does not fit the definition of Free
Energy. A Bulgarian-born American Physicist named Joseph
Maglich has invented and partially developed an atomic FUSION
reactor which he calls 'Migma', which uses NON-radioactive
deuterium as a fuel [available in nearly UN-LIMITED
quantities from sea water], does NOT produce radioactive
waste, can be converted DIRECTLY into electricity (with-OUT
energy-wasting steam turbines), and can be constructed small
enough to power a house or large enough to power a city. And
UNLIKE the "Tokamaks" and laser fusion MONSTROSITIES that we
read about, Migma WORKS, already producing at least three
watts of power for every watt put in. ["New Times" (U.S.
version), 6-26-78, pages 32-40.]
And then there are the 'cold fusion' experiments that
were in the news a few years ago, originally conducted by
University of Utah researchers B. Stanley Pons and Martin
Fleischmann. Some U.S. Navy researchers at the China Lake
Naval Weapons Center in California, under the direction of
chemist Melvin Miles, finally took the trouble to collect the
bubbles coming from such an apparatus, had them analyzed with
mass-spectrometry techniques, and found HELIUM 4, which
PROVES that atomic FUSION did indeed take place, and enough
of it to explain the excess heat generated.
There are GOOD INDICATIONS that the so-called "laws" of
thermodynamics are NOT so "absolute". For example, the late
Physicist Dewey B. Larson developed a comprehensive GENERAL
UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe, which he called the
'Reciprocal System', (which he describes in detail in several
books such as "Nothing But Motion" (1979) and "The Universe
of Motion" (1984)), in which the Physical Universe has TWO
DISTINCT HALVES, the material half and an anti-matter half,
with a CONTINUOUS CYCLE of matter and energy passing between
them, with-OUT the "heat death" predicted by thermodynamic
"laws". His Theory explains the Physical Universe MUCH
BETTER than modern orthodox theories, including phenomena
that orthodox physicists and astronomers are still scratching
their heads about, and is SELF-CONSISTENT in every way. Some
Free Energy Devices might be tapping into that energy flow,
seemingly converting "low-quality energy" into "high-quality
energy".
[ See the web site http://www.rsystem.org/isus/index.htm .]
Also, certain religious organizations such as 'Eckankar'
[1-800-568-3463, http://www.eckankar.org ] and 'Sant Mat'
teach their Initiates that the physical universe is only the
LOWEST of at least a DOZEN major levels of existence, like
parallel universes, or analogous to TV channels, as described
in books like "The Path of the Masters", by Dr. Julian
Johnson, 1939, and "Eckankar: The Key to Secret Worlds", by
Sri Paul Twitchell, 1969. For example, the next level up
from the physical universe is commonly called the 'Astral
Plane'. Also, each major level or 'plane', possibly even the
physical plane, is SUB-DIVIDED into NUMEROUS SUB-planes.
Long-time Initiates of these groups have learned to 'Soul
Travel' into these higher worlds and report on conditions
there. It seems plausible that energy could flow down from
these higher levels into our physical universe, or be created
at the boundary between them, given the right configurations
and motions of matter to channel it. This is supported by
many successful laboratory-controlled experiments in PSYCHO-
KINESIS throughout the world, such as those described in the
book "Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain".
In terms of economics, the market has FAILED. Inventors
do not have enough money and other resources to fully develop
and mass-produce Free Energy Equipment, and the conventional
energy producer$ have no desire to do so because of their
VE$TED INTERE$T$. The government is needed to intervene. If
the government does not intervene, then the total supply of
energy resources from the earth will continue to decline and
will soon run out, prices for energy will increase, and
pollution and its harmful effects (including the 'GREENHOUSE
EFFECT', acid rain, smog, radioactive contamination, oil
spills, rape of the land by strip mining, etc.) will continue
to increase.
The government should SUBSIDIZE research and development
of Free Energy by Inventors and universities, subsidize
private production (until the producers can make it on their
own), and subsidize consumption by low-income consumers of
Free Energy Hardware.
For more information, answers to your questions, etc.,
please consult my CITED SOURCES.
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
P.S.1:
FARADAY'S DISC and DePALMA'S N-MACHINE
"The 'N-machine.'
"This device is an offshoot of a 150-year-old mystery in
physics initially discovered by Michael Faraday in England in
1831, that has remained unexplained for well over a century
and a half. The mystery is this: that a ROTATING MAGNETIC
FIELD, relative to A CONDUCTOR ROTATING AT THE SAME SPEED
(which means the field is STATIONARY relative to the rotating
conducting elements), can ALSO create an electric current!
"About twenty years ago, another physicist, Dr. Bruce
DePalma, formerly of MIT, began a series of basic mechanical
experiments with 'rotating frames'--culminating in a device
he termed the 'N-Machine', which above a critical RPM
[27,000?] (revolutions per minute), APPEARS TO GENERATE MORE
ELECTRICAL CURRENT OUT OF A SPINNING 'FARADAY DISC' THAN THE
INPUT ENERGY REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ITS MECHANICAL ROTATION!
"It is our growing belief that Dr. DePalma's 'N-
machine'--if it IS successfully producing more energy than
required for its input--MUST be operating according to the
Cydonia 'hyperdimensional physics' we have been so graciously
'bequeathed'...by someone."
The paragraphs above are quoted from pages 371-2 of the
1992 Edition of "THE MONUMENTS OF MARS: A CITY ON THE EDGE OF
FOREVER", by Richard C. Hoagland.
Richard C. Hoagland's web site is
http://www.enterprisemission.com .
See also http://www.depalma.pair.com .
P.S.2: It has been rumored that the United States federal
government has ALREADY SECRETLY DEVELOPED Free-Energy
generators but has WITHHELD them from the public! This
includes FUELLESS electric generators the size of semi-truck
trailers that can EACH power a large city! This COVER-UP
should be INVESTIGATED ! FULL DISCLOSURE from the government
should be DEMANDED !
See the web pages at http://www.disclosureproject.org .
P.S.3: PASS IT ON !
"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS stranger than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
12 Oct 2004 04:16:14 PM |
|
|
FREE ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, Physicist
At the beginning of the twentieth century, everybody
"knew" that a heavier-than-air machine could not possibly
fly. It would violate the "laws" of physics. All of the
"experts" and "authorities" said so.
For example, Simon Newcomb declared in 1901: "The
demonstration that no possible combination of known
substances, known forms of machinery and known forms of
force, can be united in a practical machine by which man
shall fly long distances through the air, seems to the writer
as complete as it is possible for the demonstration of any
physical fact to be."
Fortunately, a few SMART people such as the Wright
Brothers did NOT accept such pronouncements as the final
word. Now we take airplanes for granted, (except when they
crash).
Today, orthodox physicists and other "scientists" are
saying similar things against several kinds of 'Free Energy'
Technologies, using negative terms such as "pseudo-science"
and "perpetual motion", and citing so-called "laws" which
assert that "energy cannot be created or destroyed" ("1st law
of thermodynamics") and "there is always a decrease in useful
energy" ("2nd law of thermodynamics"). The physicists do not
know how to do certain things, so they ARROGANTLY declare
that those things cannot be done. Such PRINCIPLES OF
IMPOTENCE are COMMON in orthodox modern physics and help to
cover up INCONSISTENCIES and CONTRADICTIONS in orthodox
modern theories.
The "laws" of "thermodynamics" and "conservation of
energy" ASSUME that the physical universe that we see around
us is a "CLOSED SYSTEM". It is NOT.
Free Energy Inventions are devices which can tap a
seemingly UNLIMITED supply of energy from the universe, or
from hyper-dimensional sources, with-OUT burning any kind of
fuel, making them the PERFECT SOLUTION to the world-wide
energy crisis and its associated pollution, degradation, and
depletion of the environment.
Most Free Energy Devices probably do not create energy,
but rather tap into EXISTING natural or hyper-dimensional
energy sources by various forms of induction. UNLIKE solar
or wind devices, they need little or no energy storage
capacity, because they can tap as much energy as needed WHEN
needed. Solar energy has the DIS-advantage that the sun is
often blocked by clouds, trees, buildings, or the earth
itself, or is reduced by haze or smog or by thick atmosphere
at low altitudes and high latitudes. Likewise, wind speed is
WIDELY VARIABLE and often non-existent. Neither solar nor
wind power are suitable to directly power cars and airplanes.
Properly designed Free Energy Devices do NOT have such
limitations.
For example, at least three U.S. patents (#3,811,058,
#3,879,622, and #4,151,431) have so far been awarded for
motors that run EXCLUSIVELY on permanent MAGNETS, seemingly
tapping into energy circulating through the earth's magnetic
field, or from some hyper-dimensional source. The first two
require a feedback network in order to be self-running. The
third one, as described in detail in "Science & Mechanics"
Magazine, Spring 1980, ("Amazing Magnet-Powered Motor", by
Jorma Hyypia, pages 45-48, 114-117, and front cover),
requires critical sizes, shapes, orientations, and spacings
of magnets, but NO feedback. Such a motor could drive an
electric generator or reversible heatpump in one's home, YEAR
ROUND, FOR FREE.
[Complete descriptive copies of U.S. patents are $3.00 each
from the U.S. Patent Office, 2021 Jefferson Davis Hwy.,
Arlington, VA 22202; correct 7-digit patent numbers
required. Or try getting copies of BOTH the article AND the
Patents via your local public or university library's inter-
library loan dept..]
See also http://www.hsv.com/writers/bearden/mageng .
A second type of free-energy device, such as the 'Gray
Motor' (U.S. Patent #3,890,548), the 'Tesla Coil', and the
motor of inventor Joseph Newman [see SCIENCE, 2-10-84, pages
571-2.], taps ELECTRO-MAGNETIC energy by INDUCTION from
'EARTH RESONANCE' (about 12 cycles per second and harmonics).
They typically have a 'SPARK GAP' in the circuit which serves
to SYNCHRONIZE the energy in the coils with the energy being
tapped. It is important that the total 'inductance' and
'capacitance' of the Device combine to 'RESONATE' at the same
frequency as 'EARTH RESONANCE' in order to maximize the power
output. This output can also be increased by centering the
SPARK GAP at the 'NEUTRAL CENTER' of a strong U-shaped
permanent magnet. In the case of a Tesla Coil, slipping a
'TOROID CHOKE COIL' around and about halfway down the
secondary coil will enhance output power. ["Earth Energy:
Fuelless Propulsion & Power Systems", by John Bigelow, 1976,
Health Research, P.O. Box 70, Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245.]
During the 1930's, an Austrian civil engineer named
Viktor Schauberger invented and partially developed an
'IMPLOSION TURBINE' (German name, 'ZOKWENDLE'), after
analyzing erosion, and lack of erosion, in differently shaped
waterways, and developing sophisticated mathematical
equations to explain it. As described in the book "A
Breakthrough to New Free-Energy Sources", by Dan A. Davidson,
1977, water is pumped by an IMPELLER pump through a
LOGARITHMIC-SPIRAL-shaped coil of tubing until it reaches a
CRITICAL VELOCITY. The water then IMPLODES, no longer
touching the inside walls of the tubing, and drives the pump,
which then converts the pump's motor into an ELECTRIC
GENERATOR. The device seems to be tapping energy from that
of the earth's rotation, via the 'Coriolis effect', LIKE A
TORNADO; or perhaps the energy source is again HYPER-
DIMENSIONAL. [ It can also NEUTRALIZE GRAVITY ! ]
A fourth type of Free Energy Device is the 'McClintock
Air Motor' (U.S. Patent #2,982,261), which is a cross between
a diesel engine (it has three cylinders with a compression
ratio of 27 to 1) and a rotary engine (with solar and
planetary gears). It burns NO FUEL, but becomes self-running
by driving its own air compressor. This engine also
generates a lot of heat, which could be used to heat
buildings; and its very HIGH TORQUE makes it ideal for large
trucks, preventing their slowing down when climbing hills.
Crystals may someday be used to supply energy, as shown
in the Star Trek shows, perhaps by inserting each one between
metal capacitor plates, bombarding it with a beam of
particles from a small radioactive source like that used in a
common household smoke detector, and repeatedly drawing off
the charge on the plates after very short time intervals;
and/or by surrounding the crystal with one or more coils of
wire of particular sacred-geometric shapes.
One other energy source should be mentioned here,
despite the fact that it does not fit the definition of Free
Energy. A Bulgarian-born American Physicist named Joseph
Maglich has invented and partially developed an atomic FUSION
reactor which he calls 'Migma', which uses NON-radioactive
deuterium as a fuel [available in nearly UN-LIMITED
quantities from sea water], does NOT produce radioactive
waste, can be converted DIRECTLY into electricity (with-OUT
energy-wasting steam turbines), and can be constructed small
enough to power a house or large enough to power a city. And
UNLIKE the "Tokamaks" and laser fusion MONSTROSITIES that we
read about, Migma WORKS, already producing at least three
watts of power for every watt put in. ["New Times" (U.S.
version), 6-26-78, pages 32-40.]
And then there are the 'cold fusion' experiments that
were in the news a few years ago, originally conducted by
University of Utah researchers B. Stanley Pons and Martin
Fleischmann. Some U.S. Navy researchers at the China Lake
Naval Weapons Center in California, under the direction of
chemist Melvin Miles, finally took the trouble to collect the
bubbles coming from such an apparatus, had them analyzed with
mass-spectrometry techniques, and found HELIUM 4, which
PROVES that atomic FUSION did indeed take place, and enough
of it to explain the excess heat generated.
There are GOOD INDICATIONS that the so-called "laws" of
thermodynamics are NOT so "absolute". For example, the late
Physicist Dewey B. Larson developed a comprehensive GENERAL
UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe, which he called the
'Reciprocal System', (which he describes in detail in several
books such as "Nothing But Motion" (1979) and "The Universe
of Motion" (1984)), in which the Physical Universe has TWO
DISTINCT HALVES, the material half and an anti-matter half,
with a CONTINUOUS CYCLE of matter and energy passing between
them, with-OUT the "heat death" predicted by thermodynamic
"laws". His Theory explains the Physical Universe MUCH
BETTER than modern orthodox theories, including phenomena
that orthodox physicists and astronomers are still scratching
their heads about, and is SELF-CONSISTENT in every way. Some
Free Energy Devices might be tapping into that energy flow,
seemingly converting "low-quality energy" into "high-quality
energy".
[ See the web site http://www.rsystem.org/isus/index.htm .]
Also, certain religious organizations such as 'Eckankar'
[1-800-568-3463, http://www.eckankar.org ] and 'Sant Mat'
teach their Initiates that the physical universe is only the
LOWEST of at least a DOZEN major levels of existence, like
parallel universes, or analogous to TV channels, as described
in books like "The Path of the Masters", by Dr. Julian
Johnson, 1939, and "Eckankar: The Key to Secret Worlds", by
Sri Paul Twitchell, 1969. For example, the next level up
from the physical universe is commonly called the 'Astral
Plane'. Also, each major level or 'plane', possibly even the
physical plane, is SUB-DIVIDED into NUMEROUS SUB-planes.
Long-time Initiates of these groups have learned to 'Soul
Travel' into these higher worlds and report on conditions
there. It seems plausible that energy could flow down from
these higher levels into our physical universe, or be created
at the boundary between them, given the right configurations
and motions of matter to channel it. This is supported by
many successful laboratory-controlled experiments in PSYCHO-
KINESIS throughout the world, such as those described in the
book "Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain".
In terms of economics, the market has FAILED. Inventors
do not have enough money and other resources to fully develop
and mass-produce Free Energy Equipment, and the conventional
energy producer$ have no desire to do so because of their
VE$TED INTERE$T$. The government is needed to intervene. If
the government does not intervene, then the total supply of
energy resources from the earth will continue to decline and
will soon run out, prices for energy will increase, and
pollution and its harmful effects (including the 'GREENHOUSE
EFFECT', acid rain, smog, radioactive contamination, oil
spills, rape of the land by strip mining, etc.) will continue
to increase.
The government should SUBSIDIZE research and development
of Free Energy by Inventors and universities, subsidize
private production (until the producers can make it on their
own), and subsidize consumption by low-income consumers of
Free Energy Hardware.
For more information, answers to your questions, etc.,
please consult my CITED SOURCES.
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
P.S.1:
FARADAY'S DISC and DePALMA'S N-MACHINE
"The 'N-machine.'
"This device is an offshoot of a 150-year-old mystery in
physics initially discovered by Michael Faraday in England in
1831, that has remained unexplained for well over a century
and a half. The mystery is this: that a ROTATING MAGNETIC
FIELD, relative to A CONDUCTOR ROTATING AT THE SAME SPEED
(which means the field is STATIONARY relative to the rotating
conducting elements), can ALSO create an electric current!
"About twenty years ago, another physicist, Dr. Bruce
DePalma, formerly of MIT, began a series of basic mechanical
experiments with 'rotating frames'--culminating in a device
he termed the 'N-Machine', which above a critical RPM
[27,000?] (revolutions per minute), APPEARS TO GENERATE MORE
ELECTRICAL CURRENT OUT OF A SPINNING 'FARADAY DISC' THAN THE
INPUT ENERGY REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ITS MECHANICAL ROTATION!
"It is our growing belief that Dr. DePalma's 'N-
machine'--if it IS successfully producing more energy than
required for its input--MUST be operating according to the
Cydonia 'hyperdimensional physics' we have been so graciously
'bequeathed'...by someone."
The paragraphs above are quoted from pages 371-2 of the
1992 Edition of "THE MONUMENTS OF MARS: A CITY ON THE EDGE OF
FOREVER", by Richard C. Hoagland.
Richard C. Hoagland's web site is
http://www.enterprisemission.com .
See also http://www.depalma.pair.com .
P.S.2: It has been rumored that the United States federal
government has ALREADY SECRETLY DEVELOPED Free-Energy
generators but has WITHHELD them from the public! This
includes FUELLESS electric generators the size of semi-truck
trailers that can EACH power a large city! This COVER-UP
should be INVESTIGATED ! FULL DISCLOSURE from the government
should be DEMANDED !
See the web pages at http://www.disclosureproject.org .
P.S.3: PASS IT ON !
"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS stranger than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. 4X" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
13 Oct 2004 04:58:30 PM |
|
|
wrote in message
news:950b61b3.0410121316.4f00b8d8@posting.google.com:
FREE ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, Physicist
Not to mention a cultist and a fucking kook.
<*******FLUSH********>
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
19 Jan 2005 06:38:42 AM |
|
|
"Not to mention a cultist and a fucking kook."-Mr. 4X
You better smile when you say that boy....
Nothing wrong being a Kook, no worse than the rest of humanity...
Here is a list of research materials for kooks and cultists:
http://www.borderlands.com
SOME FREE ENERGY DEVICES
Jorge Resines.
Here is a "free energy" tour by one of today's most prolific writers
on the subject. Part 1, The Hubbard Coil. Part 2, Hendershot: Analysis
of WHY and HOW the Hendershot generator works; Part 3, Using the
conceptions of the late Dr. William J. Hooper to indicate a DC motor
powered by a combination of electricity and gravity that has no
commutator. Part 4, A free-energy device powered by atmospheric
electricity. Part 5, Improved Faraday Homopolar Generator. Part 6,
Analysis of the saucer drive proposed by Otis Carr in the late 50s;
mistakes existing in the publicly-available data and its correction.
Part 7, Data on the Schappeller Sphere Part 8, Analysis, comment and
criticism of the works of Joseph Newman and the Methernita group of
Switzerland. Part 9, Free Energy work of Nikola Tesla.
#B0089, Illustrated, 108pp, staples ... $17.50
MAGNETIC CURRENT
Edward Leedskalnin
A rare manuscript by the builder of the famous Coral Castle. Along with
presenting his most curious viewpoint on the fluid, flowing force of
Magnetism, Leedskalnin gives the reader various experiments to try in
order to understand the incredible forces he tapped to build his
enigmatic structure.
#B0054, 27pp, staples ... $5.95
ASSORTED IDEAS ON TECHNOLOGY
Jorge Resines
Contents: The Electromagnetic Pyramid, Low and High Voltage models; The
Tesla Radionic Machine with list of parts and working procedure (with
Rate Atlas); Semiautomatic Radionic Devices, Vacuum-Tube and
Transistorized.
#B0088, Illustrated, 48pp, staples ... $7.95
THE HENDERSHOT MOTOR MYSTERY
Compiled by Tom Brown
Lester Hendershot developed a device that would draw usable energy from
the ethers and convert it to electricity. Hendershot's secret died
with him, but here are our files on this mysterious inventor. Included
are the research notes of Jerry Gallimore who claimed to get several
watts of power from his design.
#B0046, 55 pp, staples ... $9.96
THE COMPLEX SECRET OF DR. T. HENRY MORAY
Jorge Resines
Contents: Fundamentals, comparison with Dr. Le Bon & Dr. Sagnac, old
radio & TV circuits from 1928 applied to Moray's discoveries; special
tubes of Dr. Moray; Moray's stolen ideas in use; Altered Substances,
Healing Tubes to treat substances, Radiant Energy Detector; The Secret
of Dr. Moray, reconstruction of Radiant Energy Detector, Improving the
Radiant Energy Detector, more.
#B0017, 64 pp, staples ... $11.95
RADIANT ENERGY
T. Henry Moray
If you're following the elusive trail of free energy, or
investigating electrotherapeutics, this is a book you should read. Dr.
Moray developed an unusual radiant energy receiver and he also worked
on specialized electrotherapeutic tubes.
#B0069, 22pp, ... $4.95
TALK ON RADIANT ENERGY
Given by T. Henry Moray
In the Speech and Drama Building, Valley State College, Jan. 23, 1962
Northridge, California. Research paper by this great scientific
explorer.
#B0315, staples, 12pp ... $2.95
FINAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE TESLA Magnifying Transmitter
Jorge Resines.
Includes: Differences between the Magnifier Transmitter and the Tesla
Coil; different usages of the Archimedean Spiral; Why the building is
shaped and sized in the manner it was, internal features and sizes for
each. Regeneration as main feature for this transmitter; Reasons for
the metallic hemisphere at both ends of the TMT; Internal Radio
Devices: Apparatus placed within the Magnifier Transmitter to broadcast
and receive voice and visual.
#B0309, 66pp, staples ... $10.95
INDUCTION COILS - HOW TO MAKE, USE, AND REPAIR THEM
T. Edwin Lowell & H.S. Norrie, 1904
Here several old and hard-to-find books have been compiled on the
construction and use of Induction Coils.
#B0048, 90pp, staples ... $13.95
ELECTRIC DISCHARGES, WAVES, IMPULSES and OTHER TRANSIENTS
Charles Proteus Steinmetz.
This is a vital book for the electrical engineer pursuing the lost
science of electricity as developed by Tesla and other pioneers.
Steinmetz was hired by General Electric to decipher the Tesla Patents.
#B0026, 156pp, illus., staples ... $22.95
MODERN HIGH-SPEED INFLUENCE MACHINES
V. E. Johnson, M.A.
If you are into electrostatics and related phenomena you will find this
a fascinating, useful handbook.
#B0266, 278pp, staples ... $24.95
THE CALCULATION & MEASUREMENT OF INDUCTANCE & CAPACITY
W.H. Nottage, 1916.
An essential handbook for experimenting with Tesla coils and amateur
radio gear.
#B0012, 137pp, staples ... $9.95
POLYTUBES
Jorge Resines.
Interesting work on fully conductive vacuum tubes. Contains info on the
Farnsworth Multipactor Tubes, and has a wealth of diagrams and patent
drawings. Excellent resource for the serious researcher!
#B0308, 46pp, staples ... $7.95
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kelly" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
20 Jan 2005 11:35:19 PM |
|
|
An interesting compedium of fact and fiction. Most of the references (those
dealing with the free energy aspects and devices) are in the latter
category.
Steinmetz is good - but there are far better books on the subject in any
University bookstore. He was hired by GE, not to deal with Tesla's ideas but
for his own ideas and development of AC theory.
It really is an insult to what either Steinmetz or Tesla actually
accomplished to associate either one with "free energy"
--
Don Kelly
dhky@peeshaw.ca
remove the urine to answer
<christitan718@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1106138322.555970.198180@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
"Not to mention a cultist and a fucking kook."-Mr. 4X
You better smile when you say that boy....
Nothing wrong being a Kook, no worse than the rest of humanity...
Here is a list of research materials for kooks and cultists:
http://www.borderlands.com
SOME FREE ENERGY DEVICES
Jorge Resines.
Here is a "free energy" tour by one of today's most prolific writers
on the subject. Part 1, The Hubbard Coil. Part 2, Hendershot: Analysis
of WHY and HOW the Hendershot generator works; Part 3, Using the
conceptions of the late Dr. William J. Hooper to indicate a DC motor
powered by a combination of electricity and gravity that has no
commutator. Part 4, A free-energy device powered by atmospheric
electricity. Part 5, Improved Faraday Homopolar Generator. Part 6,
Analysis of the saucer drive proposed by Otis Carr in the late 50s;
mistakes existing in the publicly-available data and its correction.
Part 7, Data on the Schappeller Sphere Part 8, Analysis, comment and
criticism of the works of Joseph Newman and the Methernita group of
Switzerland. Part 9, Free Energy work of Nikola Tesla.
#B0089, Illustrated, 108pp, staples ... $17.50
MAGNETIC CURRENT
Edward Leedskalnin
A rare manuscript by the builder of the famous Coral Castle. Along with
presenting his most curious viewpoint on the fluid, flowing force of
Magnetism, Leedskalnin gives the reader various experiments to try in
order to understand the incredible forces he tapped to build his
enigmatic structure.
#B0054, 27pp, staples ... $5.95
ASSORTED IDEAS ON TECHNOLOGY
Jorge Resines
Contents: The Electromagnetic Pyramid, Low and High Voltage models; The
Tesla Radionic Machine with list of parts and working procedure (with
Rate Atlas); Semiautomatic Radionic Devices, Vacuum-Tube and
Transistorized.
#B0088, Illustrated, 48pp, staples ... $7.95
THE HENDERSHOT MOTOR MYSTERY
Compiled by Tom Brown
Lester Hendershot developed a device that would draw usable energy from
the ethers and convert it to electricity. Hendershot's secret died
with him, but here are our files on this mysterious inventor. Included
are the research notes of Jerry Gallimore who claimed to get several
watts of power from his design.
#B0046, 55 pp, staples ... $9.96
THE COMPLEX SECRET OF DR. T. HENRY MORAY
Jorge Resines
Contents: Fundamentals, comparison with Dr. Le Bon & Dr. Sagnac, old
radio & TV circuits from 1928 applied to Moray's discoveries; special
tubes of Dr. Moray; Moray's stolen ideas in use; Altered Substances,
Healing Tubes to treat substances, Radiant Energy Detector; The Secret
of Dr. Moray, reconstruction of Radiant Energy Detector, Improving the
Radiant Energy Detector, more.
#B0017, 64 pp, staples ... $11.95
RADIANT ENERGY
T. Henry Moray
If you're following the elusive trail of free energy, or
investigating electrotherapeutics, this is a book you should read. Dr.
Moray developed an unusual radiant energy receiver and he also worked
on specialized electrotherapeutic tubes.
#B0069, 22pp, ... $4.95
TALK ON RADIANT ENERGY
Given by T. Henry Moray
In the Speech and Drama Building, Valley State College, Jan. 23, 1962
Northridge, California. Research paper by this great scientific
explorer.
#B0315, staples, 12pp ... $2.95
FINAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE TESLA Magnifying Transmitter
Jorge Resines.
Includes: Differences between the Magnifier Transmitter and the Tesla
Coil; different usages of the Archimedean Spiral; Why the building is
shaped and sized in the manner it was, internal features and sizes for
each. Regeneration as main feature for this transmitter; Reasons for
the metallic hemisphere at both ends of the TMT; Internal Radio
Devices: Apparatus placed within the Magnifier Transmitter to broadcast
and receive voice and visual.
#B0309, 66pp, staples ... $10.95
INDUCTION COILS - HOW TO MAKE, USE, AND REPAIR THEM
T. Edwin Lowell & H.S. Norrie, 1904
Here several old and hard-to-find books have been compiled on the
construction and use of Induction Coils.
#B0048, 90pp, staples ... $13.95
ELECTRIC DISCHARGES, WAVES, IMPULSES and OTHER TRANSIENTS
Charles Proteus Steinmetz.
This is a vital book for the electrical engineer pursuing the lost
science of electricity as developed by Tesla and other pioneers.
Steinmetz was hired by General Electric to decipher the Tesla Patents.
#B0026, 156pp, illus., staples ... $22.95
MODERN HIGH-SPEED INFLUENCE MACHINES
V. E. Johnson, M.A.
If you are into electrostatics and related phenomena you will find this
a fascinating, useful handbook.
#B0266, 278pp, staples ... $24.95
THE CALCULATION & MEASUREMENT OF INDUCTANCE & CAPACITY
W.H. Nottage, 1916.
An essential handbook for experimenting with Tesla coils and amateur
radio gear.
#B0012, 137pp, staples ... $9.95
POLYTUBES
Jorge Resines.
Interesting work on fully conductive vacuum tubes. Contains info on the
Farnsworth Multipactor Tubes, and has a wealth of diagrams and patent
drawings. Excellent resource for the serious researcher!
#B0308, 46pp, staples ... $7.95
.
|
|
|
| User: "ring_theory" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
29 Jan 2005 03:54:45 AM |
|
|
Most? You have got soft in your old age. 5 years ago you would have said
all. lol
But the reality of the situation is that the scientific society has
blindfolds on in regards to truly innovative technology. They are not going
to put any funding into research in nothing that isn't accredited by atleast
one educational instatution such as a university.
Truth is that the universities
are not interested in new energies technology. I took my theory/device to a
professor of UND
he listened to me than we discussed the device as i described it and
presented the images i had created no mathmatics and he didn't ask me for
any either. I was strictly there to see if my device was plausable and if i
should devote any more thought and time in it. I got my answers and was
ready to leave. The professor said i should wait he wanted to present it to
the projects director.
He returned about 5 minutes later and directed me to a waiting area. the
projects director spoke to me and i covered the basics with him and he said
that they wasn't accepting new projects.
This wasn't a dissapointment i wasn't there to start a project. I was there
to get answers.
Plausable: yes I'll say, The old professor was so excited he had to present
it to his superior
and didn't want me to leave till he did.
That was 10 years ago. the last 5 years or so i have been willing to present
it to anyone that would listen including the yahoo's in this group. I have a
website with images and descriptions.
I've all but given this innovative technology away for mankind to do with as
they please.
No one has the balls to dedicate any time for research and development of
this device.
I never claimed free energy and despise the term as energy isn't free.
there is a cost. but there is a process to overcome the depletion of energy
in a closed system. But the biggest thing to overcome is a closed mind.
The scientific society is full of them.
Ring
"Don Kelly" <dhky@peeshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:rw0Id.134360$Xk.32427@pd7tw3no...
An interesting compedium of fact and fiction. Most of the references
(those
dealing with the free energy aspects and devices) are in the latter
category.
Steinmetz is good - but there are far better books on the subject in any
University bookstore. He was hired by GE, not to deal with Tesla's ideas
but
for his own ideas and development of AC theory.
It really is an insult to what either Steinmetz or Tesla actually
accomplished to associate either one with "free energy"
--
Don Kelly
dhky@peeshaw.ca
remove the urine to answer
<christitan718@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1106138322.555970.198180@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
"Not to mention a cultist and a fucking kook."-Mr. 4X
You better smile when you say that boy....
Nothing wrong being a Kook, no worse than the rest of humanity...
Here is a list of research materials for kooks and cultists:
http://www.borderlands.com
SOME FREE ENERGY DEVICES
Jorge Resines.
Here is a "free energy" tour by one of today's most prolific writers
on the subject. Part 1, The Hubbard Coil. Part 2, Hendershot: Analysis
of WHY and HOW the Hendershot generator works; Part 3, Using the
conceptions of the late Dr. William J. Hooper to indicate a DC motor
powered by a combination of electricity and gravity that has no
commutator. Part 4, A free-energy device powered by atmospheric
electricity. Part 5, Improved Faraday Homopolar Generator. Part 6,
Analysis of the saucer drive proposed by Otis Carr in the late 50s;
mistakes existing in the publicly-available data and its correction.
Part 7, Data on the Schappeller Sphere Part 8, Analysis, comment and
criticism of the works of Joseph Newman and the Methernita group of
Switzerland. Part 9, Free Energy work of Nikola Tesla.
#B0089, Illustrated, 108pp, staples ... $17.50
MAGNETIC CURRENT
Edward Leedskalnin
A rare manuscript by the builder of the famous Coral Castle. Along with
presenting his most curious viewpoint on the fluid, flowing force of
Magnetism, Leedskalnin gives the reader various experiments to try in
order to understand the incredible forces he tapped to build his
enigmatic structure.
#B0054, 27pp, staples ... $5.95
ASSORTED IDEAS ON TECHNOLOGY
Jorge Resines
Contents: The Electromagnetic Pyramid, Low and High Voltage models; The
Tesla Radionic Machine with list of parts and working procedure (with
Rate Atlas); Semiautomatic Radionic Devices, Vacuum-Tube and
Transistorized.
#B0088, Illustrated, 48pp, staples ... $7.95
THE HENDERSHOT MOTOR MYSTERY
Compiled by Tom Brown
Lester Hendershot developed a device that would draw usable energy from
the ethers and convert it to electricity. Hendershot's secret died
with him, but here are our files on this mysterious inventor. Included
are the research notes of Jerry Gallimore who claimed to get several
watts of power from his design.
#B0046, 55 pp, staples ... $9.96
THE COMPLEX SECRET OF DR. T. HENRY MORAY
Jorge Resines
Contents: Fundamentals, comparison with Dr. Le Bon & Dr. Sagnac, old
radio & TV circuits from 1928 applied to Moray's discoveries; special
tubes of Dr. Moray; Moray's stolen ideas in use; Altered Substances,
Healing Tubes to treat substances, Radiant Energy Detector; The Secret
of Dr. Moray, reconstruction of Radiant Energy Detector, Improving the
Radiant Energy Detector, more.
#B0017, 64 pp, staples ... $11.95
RADIANT ENERGY
T. Henry Moray
If you're following the elusive trail of free energy, or
investigating electrotherapeutics, this is a book you should read. Dr.
Moray developed an unusual radiant energy receiver and he also worked
on specialized electrotherapeutic tubes.
#B0069, 22pp, ... $4.95
TALK ON RADIANT ENERGY
Given by T. Henry Moray
In the Speech and Drama Building, Valley State College, Jan. 23, 1962
Northridge, California. Research paper by this great scientific
explorer.
#B0315, staples, 12pp ... $2.95
FINAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE TESLA Magnifying Transmitter
Jorge Resines.
Includes: Differences between the Magnifier Transmitter and the Tesla
Coil; different usages of the Archimedean Spiral; Why the building is
shaped and sized in the manner it was, internal features and sizes for
each. Regeneration as main feature for this transmitter; Reasons for
the metallic hemisphere at both ends of the TMT; Internal Radio
Devices: Apparatus placed within the Magnifier Transmitter to broadcast
and receive voice and visual.
#B0309, 66pp, staples ... $10.95
INDUCTION COILS - HOW TO MAKE, USE, AND REPAIR THEM
T. Edwin Lowell & H.S. Norrie, 1904
Here several old and hard-to-find books have been compiled on the
construction and use of Induction Coils.
#B0048, 90pp, staples ... $13.95
ELECTRIC DISCHARGES, WAVES, IMPULSES and OTHER TRANSIENTS
Charles Proteus Steinmetz.
This is a vital book for the electrical engineer pursuing the lost
science of electricity as developed by Tesla and other pioneers.
Steinmetz was hired by General Electric to decipher the Tesla Patents.
#B0026, 156pp, illus., staples ... $22.95
MODERN HIGH-SPEED INFLUENCE MACHINES
V. E. Johnson, M.A.
If you are into electrostatics and related phenomena you will find this
a fascinating, useful handbook.
#B0266, 278pp, staples ... $24.95
THE CALCULATION & MEASUREMENT OF INDUCTANCE & CAPACITY
W.H. Nottage, 1916.
An essential handbook for experimenting with Tesla coils and amateur
radio gear.
#B0012, 137pp, staples ... $9.95
POLYTUBES
Jorge Resines.
Interesting work on fully conductive vacuum tubes. Contains info on the
Farnsworth Multipactor Tubes, and has a wealth of diagrams and patent
drawings. Excellent resource for the serious researcher!
#B0308, 46pp, staples ... $7.95
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DrPostman" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
20 Jan 2005 05:02:11 PM |
|
|
On 19 Jan 2005 04:38:42 -0800, in accordance
with The Prophecy scribed:
"Not to mention a cultist and a fucking kook."-Mr. 4X
You better smile when you say that boy....
Nothing wrong being a Kook, no worse than the rest of humanity...
Here is a list of research materials for kooks and cultists:
Free Energy, even if it existed, doesn't seem very free going by this
list.
--
DrPostman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors, afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULTŪ #15-51506-253.
AFA-B Official Pollster & Hammer of Thor winner - August 2004
You can email me at: DrPostman(at)gmail.com
"Nothing compares to the complicated futility of ignorance."
-Kurt Vonnegut
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr Clarke" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
20 Jan 2005 06:31:40 PM |
|
|
How old is the term "Free Energy"?
I make it about 2 or 3 years.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley Clarke
-------------------------------------------------------
"DrPostman" <Looky@mysig.foremail> wrote in message
news:iu4uu0ts5nt7kj52rjr6hhko00egjgt0do@4ax.com...
On 19 Jan 2005 04:38:42 -0800, in accordance
with The Prophecy scribed:
"Not to mention a cultist and a fucking kook."-Mr. 4X
You better smile when you say that boy....
Nothing wrong being a Kook, no worse than the rest of humanity...
Here is a list of research materials for kooks and cultists:
Free Energy, even if it existed, doesn't seem very free going by this
list.
--
DrPostman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors, afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULTŪ #15-51506-253.
AFA-B Official Pollster & Hammer of Thor winner - August 2004
You can email me at: DrPostman(at)gmail.com
"Nothing compares to the complicated futility of ignorance."
-Kurt Vonnegut
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vendicar Decarian" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
30 Jan 2005 11:48:46 AM |
|
|
"Mr Clarke" <ashley@UNBOGUSa-clarke.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cspikh$qc4$1$830fa17d@news.demon.co.uk...
How old is the term "Free Energy"?
I make it about 2 or 3 years.
From 1987... Course the term go's back a lot further than this....
Colloquium on
Free Energy Perturbation:
Theory and Practice
Sponsored by
Alliant Computer Systems Corporation
December 16-18 * Scanticon * Princeton, NJ
Organized by
Dr. Paul Weiner
Alliant Computer Systems
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speakers:
Paul Bash - Harvard University
Free Energy Simulations Using a Combined
Quantum and Molecular Mechanics Potential
David Beveridge - Wesleyan University
Introduction to Free Energy Models
Charles Brooks - Carnegie Mellon University
Thermodynamic Calculations on Biological Systems
William A. Goddard, III - Caltech
Simulations of Biological and Polymeric Systems
W. F. van Gunsteren - University of Groningren
Sucesses and Problems in Calculating Binding Constants
Arnie Hagler - BIOSYM
Potential Energy Functions for Computer Simulations
Bill Jorgensen - Purdue University
Free Energies in Solution -
The Aquae Vitae of Computer Simulations
Martin Karplus - Harvard University
Free Energy Simulations: Applications to Macromolecules
Peter Kollman - UCSF
Free Energy Calculations on Nucleic Acid Systems
Terry Lybrand - University of Minnesota
Free Energy Calculations: Uses in Drug Design
Monte Petit - University of Houston
Successes and Failures of Free Energy Methods
U. C. Singh - Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation
The Uses of Free Energy Simulations in Protein Design
.
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
30 Jan 2005 03:12:12 PM |
|
|
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:QZ8Ld.2166$Sx6.166507@read2.cgocable.net...
"Mr Clarke" <ashley@UNBOGUSa-clarke.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cspikh$qc4$1$830fa17d@news.demon.co.uk...
How old is the term "Free Energy"?
I make it about 2 or 3 years.
From 1987... Course the term go's back a lot further than this....
J. Willard Gibbs introduced the term. Gibbs died in 1903, if I
remember correctly. It is still in use as a term in thermodynamics.
It has nothing to do with the crank efforts to break the first law of
thermodynamics or the principle of conservation of energy.
Franz
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vendicar Decarian" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
30 Jan 2005 10:49:04 PM |
|
|
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctjijc$jc0$2@sparta.btinternet.com...
J. Willard Gibbs introduced the term. Gibbs died in 1903, if I
remember correctly. It is still in use as a term in thermodynamics.
It has nothing to do with the crank efforts to break the first law of
thermodynamics or the principle of conservation of energy.
Well we all know that the first law of thermodynamics is not a law at all,
just a very good generalization that has had to be modified over the years
on those occasions when it was observed to be violated.
You did know that didn't you Franz?
The universe was pretty adept at breaking these laws when the universe was
created wouldn't you agree Franz?
Since they were so massively violated once, why would anyone presume that
they are not violated more regularly?
In fact Franz, you should already know that the mainstream physics
community recognizes that energy has been extracted from the vacuum and work
performed with that energy. This was done in 1958 when measuring the
strength of the Casimir force.
You silly boy you...
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/9/6
The attractive force between two surfaces in a vacuum - first predicted by
Hendrik Casimir over 50 years ago - could affect everything from
micromachines to unified theories of nature.
What happens if you take two mirrors and arrange them so that they are
facing each other in empty space? Your first reaction might be "nothing at
all". In fact, both mirrors are mutually attracted to each other by the
simple presence of the vacuum. This startling phenomenon was first predicted
in 1948 by the Dutch theoretical physicist Hendrik Casimir while he was
working at Philips Research Laboratories in Eindhoven on - of all things -
colloidal solutions (see box). The phenomenon is now dubbed the Casimir
effect, while the force between the mirrors is known as the Casimir force.
For many years the Casimir effect was little more than a theoretical
curiosity. But interest in the phenomenon has blossomed in recent years.
Experimental physicists have realized that the Casimir force affects the
workings of micromachined devices, while advances in instrumentation have
enabled the force to be measured with ever-greater accuracy.
....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
31 Jan 2005 06:03:13 AM |
|
|
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:NEiLd.1888$m22.357@read1.cgocable.net...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctjijc$jc0$2@sparta.btinternet.com...
J. Willard Gibbs introduced the term. Gibbs died in 1903, if I
remember correctly. It is still in use as a term in
thermodynamics.
It has nothing to do with the crank efforts to break the first law
of
thermodynamics or the principle of conservation of energy.
Well we all know that the first law of thermodynamics is not a law
at all,
just a very good generalization that has had to be modified over the
years
on those occasions when it was observed to be violated.
You did know that didn't you Franz?
No. I did not.
The law of conservation of energy has never, never been violated.
The universe was pretty adept at breaking these laws when the
universe was
created wouldn't you agree Franz?
No.
Has it occured to you that potentialgravitational energy is negative
and that there are those who aver that the universe is the biggest
free lunch ever?
Since they were so massively violated once, why would anyone
presume that
they are not violated more regularly?
Who says they were?
Zero energy produced equal and opposite amounts of positive energy and
negative garvitational energy.
In fact Franz, you should already know that the mainstream physics
community recognizes that energy has been extracted from the vacuum
and work
performed with that energy.
This was done in 1958 when measuring the
strength of the Casimir force.
I suggest that you familiarise yourself with the nature of the Casimir
force before committing yourself so publicly.
The Casimir effect does not involve the violation of conservation of
energy.
Have you ever familiarised yourself with Noether's theorem?
You silly boy you...
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/9/6
The attractive force between two surfaces in a vacuum - first
predicted by
Hendrik Casimir over 50 years ago - could affect everything from
micromachines to unified theories of nature.
Not so. The Casimir force does not violate any conservation laws.
The Casimir force was predicted by using the laws of quantum
mechanics. The laws of quantum mechanics do not violate energy
conservation.
Read all about Noether's theorem.
Your knowledge of the situation is too superficial to enable you to
comment.
What happens if you take two mirrors and arrange them so that they
are
facing each other in empty space? Your first reaction might be
"nothing at
all". In fact, both mirrors are mutually attracted to each other by
the
simple presence of the vacuum. This startling phenomenon was first
predicted
in 1948 by the Dutch theoretical physicist Hendrik Casimir while he
was
working at Philips Research Laboratories in Eindhoven on - of all
things -
colloidal solutions (see box). The phenomenon is now dubbed the
Casimir
effect, while the force between the mirrors is known as the Casimir
force.
For many years the Casimir effect was little more than a theoretical
curiosity. But interest in the phenomenon has blossomed in recent
years.
Experimental physicists have realized that the Casimir force affects
the
workings of micromachined devices, while advances in instrumentation
have
enabled the force to be measured with ever-greater accuracy.
Good for them
Franz
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vendicar Decarian" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
31 Jan 2005 09:16:40 AM |
|
|
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:NEiLd.1888$m22.357@read1.cgocable.net...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctjijc$jc0$2@sparta.btinternet.com...
J. Willard Gibbs introduced the term. Gibbs died in 1903, if I
remember correctly. It is still in use as a term in
thermodynamics.
It has nothing to do with the crank efforts to break the first law
of
thermodynamics or the principle of conservation of energy.
Well we all know that the first law of thermodynamics is not a law
at all,
just a very good generalization that has had to be modified over the
years
on those occasions when it was observed to be violated.
You did know that didn't you Franz?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
No. I did not.
Illustrating that you are ignorant of science past the high school level.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
The law of conservation of energy has never, never been violated.
It's violated all the time Fraz. It is a tenant of modern quantum physics
that the energy level of particles is indeterminate because their energy
levels are constantly in flux, Without this flux, the very transistors in
the computer you use to read this message would not function.
Indeed the very energy needed to create the universe is, according to
modern phyiscs the result of just such an energy fluctuation in empty space.
The universe was pretty adept at breaking these laws when the
universe was
created wouldn't you agree Franz?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
No.
Has it occured to you that potentialgravitational energy is negative
and that there are those who aver that the universe is the biggest
free lunch ever?
As the universe expands that gravitational poteltial energy is increasing
now isn't it Franz? From whence is this energy coming from? Thin air?
Empty space?
Since they were so massively violated once, why would anyone
presume that
they are not violated more regularly?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
Who says they were?
Zero energy produced equal and opposite amounts of positive energy and
negative garvitational energy.
Is this the gravitational potential that isn't sufficiently strong to stop
the universe from accelerating outward and therefore gaining energy?
Snicker...
In fact Franz, you should already know that the mainstream physics
community recognizes that energy has been extracted from the vacuum
and work
performed with that energy.
This was done in 1958 when measuring the
strength of the Casimir force.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
I suggest that you familiarise yourself with the nature of the Casimir
force before committing yourself so publicly.
The Casimir effect does not involve the violation of conservation of
energy.
Then neither do any of proposed mechanisms for extracting "free energy"
from the vacuum, as the Casimir experiments have.
Still Laughing at Franz.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
31 Jan 2005 10:21:56 AM |
|
|
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:4RrLd.2310$Sx6.203320@read2.cgocable.net...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:NEiLd.1888$m22.357@read1.cgocable.net...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in
message
news:ctjijc$jc0$2@sparta.btinternet.com...
J. Willard Gibbs introduced the term. Gibbs died in 1903, if
I
remember correctly. It is still in use as a term in
thermodynamics.
It has nothing to do with the crank efforts to break the first
law
of
thermodynamics or the principle of conservation of energy.
Well we all know that the first law of thermodynamics is not a
law
at all,
just a very good generalization that has had to be modified over
the
years
on those occasions when it was observed to be violated.
You did know that didn't you Franz?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
No. I did not.
Illustrating that you are ignorant of science past the high school
level.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
The law of conservation of energy has never, never been violated.
It's violated all the time Fraz.
No. That is an impossibility. Familiarise yourself with Noether's
theorem, which i this isnstance sats that if energy conservation
fails, then the laws of physics would not be the same tomorrow as they
are today.
It is a tenant of modern quantum physics
that the energy level of particles is indeterminate because their
energy
levels are constantly in flux, Without this flux, the very
transistors in
the computer you use to read this message would not function.
Your undersdtanding of the physics of condensed matter is seriously
flawed. I take it that you are an engineer.
Indeed the very energy needed to create the universe is, according
to
modern phyiscs the result of just such an energy fluctuation in
empty space.
That is what I said. It does not necessarily require the creation of
any energy ab initio.
The universe was pretty adept at breaking these laws when the
universe was
created wouldn't you agree Franz?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
No.
Has it occured to you that potentialgravitational energy is
negative
and that there are those who aver that the universe is the biggest
free lunch ever?
As the universe expands that gravitational poteltial energy is
increasing
now isn't it Franz?
No.
Your knowledge of GR is also sadly cracked.
From whence is this energy coming from? Thin air?
Empty space?
Since they were so massively violated once, why would anyone
presume that
they are not violated more regularly?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
Who says they were?
Zero energy produced equal and opposite amounts of positive energy
and
negative garvitational energy.
Is this the gravitational potential that isn't sufficiently strong
to stop
the universe from accelerating outward and therefore gaining energy?
Snicker...
Well you may. You seem not to be able to sustain any more serious
conversation satisfactorily.
In fact Franz, you should already know that the mainstream
physics
community recognizes that energy has been extracted from the
vacuum
and work
performed with that energy.
This was done in 1958 when measuring the
strength of the Casimir force.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
I suggest that you familiarise yourself with the nature of the
Casimir
force before committing yourself so publicly.
The Casimir effect does not involve the violation of conservation
of
energy.
Then neither do any of proposed mechanisms for extracting "free
energy"
from the vacuum, as the Casimir experiments have.
Whereby you have declared yourself well and truly on the side of the
cranks.
Still Laughing at Franz.
Franz
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kelly" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
31 Jan 2005 11:00:54 PM |
|
|
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:4RrLd.2310$Sx6.203320@read2.cgocable.net...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:NEiLd.1888$m22.357@read1.cgocable.net...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in
message
---------Snip------------
Your undersdtanding of the physics of condensed matter is seriously
flawed. I take it that you are an engineer.
-----------
Hey, please don't insult engineers- we have no more use for kooks than you
have (and we too believe in conservation of energy) :)
--
Don Kelly
dhky@peeshaw.ca
remove the urine to answer
-----snip------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
01 Feb 2005 01:21:47 PM |
|
|
"Don Kelly" <dhky@peeshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:a2ELd.240436$8l.195802@pd7tw1no...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:4RrLd.2310$Sx6.203320@read2.cgocable.net...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:NEiLd.1888$m22.357@read1.cgocable.net...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in
message
---------Snip------------
Your undersdtanding of the physics of condensed matter is
seriously
flawed. I take it that you are an engineer.
-----------
Hey, please don't insult engineers- we have no more use for kooks
than you
have (and we too believe in conservation of energy) :)
I'm a renegade engineer. I know how primitive the condensed matter
physics is which is taught to engineers.
Franz
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kelly" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
01 Feb 2005 10:36:03 PM |
|
|
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctoksb$5uh$4@titan.btinternet.com...
"Don Kelly" <dhky@peeshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:a2ELd.240436$8l.195802@pd7tw1no...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:4RrLd.2310$Sx6.203320@read2.cgocable.net...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:NEiLd.1888$m22.357@read1.cgocable.net...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in
message
---------Snip------------
Your undersdtanding of the physics of condensed matter is
seriously
flawed. I take it that you are an engineer.
-----------
Hey, please don't insult engineers- we have no more use for kooks
than you
have (and we too believe in conservation of energy) :)
I'm a renegade engineer. I know how primitive the condensed matter
physics is which is taught to engineers.
Point well made-
however, conservation of energy is pretty fundamental to engineering
(including my old area- electromechanical energy conversion). Most engineers
(at least those who deserve to be so called) know the limitations of their
expertise and don't get into what they don't know.
I won't get into condensed matter physics - because I have no expertise in
that area and know it.
However, if I follow the rule that is presented by some (not you) confidence
in an concept is inversely proportional to the understanding of the concept.
As the Irish say "no use being ignorant unless you can show it"
--
Don Kelly
dhky@peeshaw.ca
remove the urine to answer
.
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
02 Feb 2005 06:00:35 AM |
|
|
"Don Kelly" <dhky@peeshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:TMYLd.250158$6l.123440@pd7tw2no...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctoksb$5uh$4@titan.btinternet.com...
"Don Kelly" <dhky@peeshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:a2ELd.240436$8l.195802@pd7tw1no...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in
message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:4RrLd.2310$Sx6.203320@read2.cgocable.net...
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:NEiLd.1888$m22.357@read1.cgocable.net...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote
in
message
---------Snip------------
Your undersdtanding of the physics of condensed matter is
seriously
flawed. I take it that you are an engineer.
-----------
Hey, please don't insult engineers- we have no more use for
kooks
than you
have (and we too believe in conservation of energy) :)
I'm a renegade engineer. I know how primitive the condensed
matter
physics is which is taught to engineers.
Point well made-
however, conservation of energy is pretty fundamental to
engineering
(including my old area- electromechanical energy conversion). Most
engineers
(at least those who deserve to be so called) know the limitations of
their
expertise and don't get into what they don't know.
I won't get into condensed matter physics - because I have no
expertise in
that area and know it.
However, if I follow the rule that is presented by some (not you)
confidence
in an concept is inversely proportional to the understanding of the
concept.
As the Irish say "no use being ignorant unless you can show it"
In spite of my lousy knees, I just had to go upstairs to share that
one with my wife.
{:-))
Franz
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vendicar Decarian" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
01 Feb 2005 04:10:51 PM |
|
|
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
The law of conservation of energy has never, never been violated.
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:4RrLd.2310$Sx6.203320@read2.cgocable.net...
It's violated all the time Fraz.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
No. That is an impossibility.
Oh is it now. Tell us Franz. Where does the energy come from to drive
electron tunneling in semiconductors? Where does the energy come from to
produce Hawking radiation (presuming it exists)?
And Franz, where did the energy come from that deflected the scale balance
that was used to measure the Casimer force?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
Familiarise yourself with Noether's
theorem, which i this isnstance sats that if energy conservation
fails, then the laws of physics would not be the same tomorrow as they
are today.
First, in the long run, it's not at all clear that they are static over
time. They appear to be currently, but that is just a low energy
assumption.
Second, since the removal of energy from the vacuum has already been
accomplished through the measurement of the Casimer force, your assumption
that energy can not come from nothing is simply an acceptance of the
existance of free vacuum energy that you initially referred to as crank
science.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
Your undersdtanding of the physics of condensed matter is seriously
flawed.
Doubtful as I have not exposed any flawed and inconsistant thinking as you
have now done several times.
As the universe expands that gravitational poteltial energy is
increasing now isn't it Franz?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
No.
So in your view then, two objects can separate from each other without any
increase in gravitational potential energy? And here we thoughy you were
saying that gravitational potential and kenetic energy sum to a constant.
Snicker....
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
Your knowledge of GR is also sadly cracked.
Make up your mind Franz. Does gravitational potential energy and kenetic
energy sum to a constant or not? Is the universe's expansion accerating or
not?
Tell us Franz. Has vacuum energy been tapped to perform work or not?
Still laughing at Franz.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology |
02 Feb 2005 06:00:37 AM |
|
|
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:t%SLd.2115$m22.529@read1.cgocable.net...
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in
message
news:ctl6q0$7hp$6@titan.btinternet.com...
The law of conservation of energy has never, never been
violated.
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:4RrLd.2310$Sx6.203320@read2.cgocable.net...
It's violated all the time Fraz.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
No. That is an impossibility.
Oh is it now. Tell us Franz. Where does the energy come from to
drive
electron tunneling in semiconductors?
The energy before and the energy after are equal. No problem
Where does the energy come from to
produce Hawking radiation (presuming it exists)?
Hawking radiation has to exist, unless there is something seriously
amiss with QED, which is in fact the best verified theory man has ever
produced.
The positive energy of the real partner which escapes from the
vicinity of the event horizon is equal and opposite to the negative
gravitational energy of the other partner.
And Franz, where did the energy come from that deflected the scale
balance
that was used to measure the Casimer force?
Permanent magnets also exert forces on one another. They, too, obey
the rules of energy conservation, like the Casimir force does.
Perhaps you ought to sit back for a while and ask yourself what the
difference might be between the Casimir force and the integrated van
de Waals' forces when the two surfaces are brought into mutual
proximity.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
Familiarise yourself with Noether's
theorem, which i this isnstance sats that if energy conservation
fails, then the laws of physics would not be the same tomorrow as
they
are today.
First, in the long run, it's not at all clear that they are static
over
time. They appear to be currently, but that is just a low energy
assumption.
From the same stable comes the statement that if the three spatial
components of four-momentum are not conserved, the laws of physics
will depend on whether you are in London or in New York.
And that if angular momentum was not conserved, the laws of physics
would depend on whether toy enunciate them standing up or lying down.
Second, since the removal of energy from the vacuum has already
been
accomplished through the measurement of the Casimer force,
Balls.
The measurement of the existence of a force is not synonymous with the
existence of an energy.
If you bring two solid surfaces together, work is done *by the Casimir
force*, resulting in a negative potential energy, analogous to a
binding energy.. When you replace them, an exactly equal amount of
work will have to be done *by you*.
your assumption
that energy can not come from nothing is simply an acceptance of the
existance of free vacuum energy that you initially referred to as
crank
science.
I only referred to it as crank science because that is precisely what
it is.
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
Your undersdtanding of the physics of condensed matter is
seriously
flawed.
Doubtful as I have not exposed any flawed and inconsistant
thinking as you
have now done several times.
Point to one solitary instance, and do it clearly and unambiguously
enogh for me to be able to refute you.
As the universe expands that gravitational poteltial energy is
increasing now isn't it Franz?
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctllv3$3an$1@titan.btinternet.com...
No.
So in your view then, two objects can separate from each other
without any
increase in gravitational potential energy? And here we thoughy you
were
saying that gravitational potential and kenetic energy sum to a
constant.
Snicker....
Well, you may, since you seem to be unable to understand the
difference between space itself expanding and objects moving apart in
space.
By r=the way, if I were you, I would lay off talking about energy in
th | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
