| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Robert E. McElwaine" |
| Date: |
10 Feb 2004 03:48:31 PM |
| Object: |
FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
FREE-ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, Physicist
At the beginning of the twentieth century, everybody
"knew" that a heavier-than-air machine could not possibly
fly. It would violate the "laws" of physics. All of the
"experts" and "authorities" said so.
For example, Simon Newcomb declared in 1901: "The
demonstration that no possible combination of known
substances, known forms of machinery and known forms of
force, can be united in a practical machine by which man
shall fly long distances through the air, seems to the writer
as complete as it is possible for the demonstration of any
physical fact to be."
Fortunately, a few SMART people such as the Wright
Brothers did NOT accept such pronouncements as the final
word. Now we take airplanes for granted, (except when they
crash).
Today, orthodox physicists and other "scientists" are
saying similar things against several kinds of 'Free Energy'
Technologies, using negative terms such as "pseudo-science"
and "perpetual motion", and citing so-called "laws" which
assert that "energy cannot be created or destroyed" ("1st law
of thermodynamics") and "there is always a decrease in useful
energy" ("2nd law of thermodynamics"). The physicists do not
know how to do certain things, so they ARROGANTLY declare
that those things cannot be done. Such PRINCIPLES OF
IMPOTENCE are COMMON in orthodox modern physics and help to
cover up INCONSISTENCIES and CONTRADICTIONS in orthodox
modern theories.
The "laws" of "thermodynamics" and "conservation of
energy" ASSUME that the physical universe that we see around
us is a "CLOSED SYSTEM". It is NOT.
Free Energy Inventions are devices which can tap a
seemingly UNLIMITED supply of energy from the universe, or
from hyper-dimensional sources, with-OUT burning any kind of
fuel, making them the PERFECT SOLUTION to the world-wide
energy crisis and its associated pollution, degradation, and
depletion of the environment.
Most Free Energy Devices probably do not create energy,
but rather tap into EXISTING natural or hyper-dimensional
energy sources by various forms of induction. UNLIKE solar
or wind devices, they need little or no energy storage
capacity, because they can tap as much energy as needed WHEN
needed. Solar energy has the DIS-advantage that the sun is
often blocked by clouds, trees, buildings, or the earth
itself, or is reduced by haze or smog or by thick atmosphere
at low altitudes and high latitudes. Likewise, wind speed is
WIDELY VARIABLE and often non-existent. Neither solar nor
wind power are suitable to directly power cars and airplanes.
Properly designed Free Energy Devices do NOT have such
limitations.
For example, at least three U.S. patents (#3,811,058,
#3,879,622, and #4,151,431) have so far been awarded for
motors that run EXCLUSIVELY on permanent MAGNETS, seemingly
tapping into energy circulating through the earth's magnetic
field, or from some hyper-dimensional source. The first two
require a feedback network in order to be self-running. The
third one, as described in detail in "Science & Mechanics"
Magazine, Spring 1980, ("Amazing Magnet-Powered Motor", by
Jorma Hyypia, pages 45-48, 114-117, and front cover),
requires critical sizes, shapes, orientations, and spacings
of magnets, but NO feedback. Such a motor could drive an
electric generator or reversible heatpump in one's home, YEAR
ROUND, FOR FREE.
[Complete descriptive copies of U.S. patents are $3.00 each
from the U.S. Patent Office, 2021 Jefferson Davis Hwy.,
Arlington, VA 22202; correct 7-digit patent numbers
required. Or try getting copies of BOTH the article AND the
Patents via your local public or university library's inter-
library loan dept..]
See also http://www.hsv.com/writers/bearden/mageng .
A second type of free-energy device, such as the 'Gray
Motor' (U.S. Patent #3,890,548), the 'Tesla Coil', and the
motor of inventor Joseph Newman [see SCIENCE, 2-10-84, pages
571-2.], taps ELECTRO-MAGNETIC energy by INDUCTION from
'EARTH RESONANCE' (about 12 cycles per second and harmonics).
They typically have a 'SPARK GAP' in the circuit which serves
to SYNCHRONIZE the energy in the coils with the energy being
tapped. It is important that the total 'inductance' and
'capacitance' of the Device combine to 'RESONATE' at the same
frequency as 'EARTH RESONANCE' in order to maximize the power
output. This output can also be increased by centering the
SPARK GAP at the 'NEUTRAL CENTER' of a strong U-shaped
permanent magnet. In the case of a Tesla Coil, slipping a
'TOROID CHOKE COIL' around and about halfway down the
secondary coil will enhance output power. ["Earth Energy:
Fuelless Propulsion & Power Systems", by John Bigelow, 1976,
Health Research, P.O. Box 70, Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245.]
During the 1930's, an Austrian civil engineer named
Viktor Schauberger invented and partially developed an
'IMPLOSION TURBINE' (German name, 'ZOKWENDLE'), after
analyzing erosion, and lack of erosion, in differently shaped
waterways, and developing sophisticated mathematical
equations to explain it. As described in the book "A
Breakthrough to New Free-Energy Sources", by Dan A. Davidson,
1977, water is pumped by an IMPELLER pump through a
LOGARITHMIC-SPIRAL-shaped coil of tubing until it reaches a
CRITICAL VELOCITY. The water then IMPLODES, no longer
touching the inside walls of the tubing, and drives the pump,
which then converts the pump's motor into an ELECTRIC
GENERATOR. The device seems to be tapping energy from that
of the earth's rotation, via the 'Coriolis effect', LIKE A
TORNADO; or perhaps the energy source is again HYPER-
DIMENSIONAL. [ It can also NEUTRALIZE GRAVITY ! ]
A fourth type of Free Energy Device is the 'McClintock
Air Motor' (U.S. Patent #2,982,261), which is a cross between
a diesel engine (it has three cylinders with a compression
ratio of 27 to 1) and a rotary engine (with solar and
planetary gears). It burns NO FUEL, but becomes self-running
by driving its own air compressor. This engine also
generates a lot of heat, which could be used to heat
buildings; and its very HIGH TORQUE makes it ideal for large
trucks, preventing their slowing down when climbing hills.
Crystals may someday be used to supply energy, as shown
in the Star Trek shows, perhaps by inserting each one between
metal capacitor plates, bombarding it with a beam of
particles from a small radioactive source like that used in a
common household smoke detector, and repeatedly drawing off
the charge on the plates after very short time intervals;
and/or by surrounding the crystal with one or more coils of
wire of particular sacred-geometric shapes.
One other energy source should be mentioned here,
despite the fact that it does not fit the definition of Free
Energy. A Bulgarian-born American Physicist named Joseph
Maglich has invented and partially developed an atomic FUSION
reactor which he calls 'Migma', which uses NON-radioactive
deuterium as a fuel [available in nearly UN-LIMITED
quantities from sea water], does NOT produce radioactive
waste, can be converted DIRECTLY into electricity (with-OUT
energy-wasting steam turbines), and can be constructed small
enough to power a house or large enough to power a city. And
UNLIKE the "Tokamaks" and laser fusion MONSTROSITIES that we
read about, Migma WORKS, already producing at least three
watts of power for every watt put in. ["New Times" (U.S.
version), 6-26-78, pages 32-40.]
And then there are the 'cold fusion' experiments that
were in the news a few years ago, originally conducted by
University of Utah researchers B. Stanley Pons and Martin
Fleischmann. Some U.S. Navy researchers at the China Lake
Naval Weapons Center in California, under the direction of
chemist Melvin Miles, finally took the trouble to collect the
bubbles coming from such an apparatus, had them analyzed with
mass-spectrometry techniques, and found HELIUM 4, which
PROVES that atomic FUSION did indeed take place, and enough
of it to explain the excess heat generated.
There are GOOD INDICATIONS that the so-called "laws" of
thermodynamics are NOT so "absolute". For example, the late
Physicist Dewey B. Larson developed a comprehensive GENERAL
UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe, which he called the
'Reciprocal System', (which he describes in detail in several
books such as "Nothing But Motion" (1979) and "The Universe
of Motion" (1984)), in which the Physical Universe has TWO
DISTINCT HALVES, the material half and an anti-matter half,
with a CONTINUOUS CYCLE of matter and energy passing between
them, with-OUT the "heat death" predicted by thermodynamic
"laws". His Theory explains the Physical Universe MUCH
BETTER than modern orthodox theories, including phenomena
that orthodox physicists and astronomers are still scratching
their heads about, and is SELF-CONSISTENT in every way. Some
Free Energy Devices might be tapping into that energy flow,
seemingly converting "low-quality energy" into "high-quality
energy".
[ See the web site http://www.rsystem.org/isus/index.htm .]
Also, certain religious organizations such as 'Eckankar'
[1-800-568-3463, http://www.eckankar.org ] and 'Sant Mat'
teach their Initiates that the physical universe is only the
LOWEST of at least a DOZEN major levels of existence, like
parallel universes, or analogous to TV channels, as described
in books like "The Path of the Masters", by Dr. Julian
Johnson, 1939, and "Eckankar: The Key to Secret Worlds", by
Sri Paul Twitchell, 1969. For example, the next level up
from the physical universe is commonly called the 'Astral
Plane'. Also, each major level or 'plane', possibly even the
physical plane, is SUB-DIVIDED into NUMEROUS SUB-planes.
Long-time Initiates of these groups have learned to 'Soul
Travel' into these higher worlds and report on conditions
there. It seems plausible that energy could flow down from
these higher levels into our physical universe, or be created
at the boundary between them, given the right configurations
and motions of matter to channel it. This is supported by
many successful laboratory-controlled experiments in PSYCHO-
KINESIS throughout the world, such as those described in the
book "Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain".
In terms of economics, the market has FAILED. Inventors
do not have enough money and other resources to fully develop
and mass-produce Free Energy Equipment, and the conventional
energy producer$ have no desire to do so because of their
VE$TED INTERE$T$. The government is needed to intervene. If
the government does not intervene, then the total supply of
energy resources from the earth will continue to decline and
will soon run out, prices for energy will increase, and
pollution and its harmful effects (including the 'GREENHOUSE
EFFECT', acid rain, smog, radioactive contamination, oil
spills, rape of the land by strip mining, etc.) will continue
to increase.
The government should SUBSIDIZE research and development
of Free Energy by Inventors and universities, subsidize
private production (until the producers can make it on their
own), and subsidize consumption by low-income consumers of
Free Energy Hardware.
For more information, answers to your questions, etc.,
please consult my CITED SOURCES.
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
P.S.1:
FARADAY'S DISC and DePALMA'S N-MACHINE
"The 'N-machine.'
"This device is an offshoot of a 150-year-old mystery in
physics initially discovered by Michael Faraday in England in
1831, that has remained unexplained for well over a century
and a half. The mystery is this: that a ROTATING MAGNETIC
FIELD, relative to A CONDUCTOR ROTATING AT THE SAME SPEED
(which means the field is STATIONARY relative to the rotating
conducting elements), can ALSO create an electric current!
"About twenty years ago, another physicist, Dr. Bruce
DePalma, formerly of MIT, began a series of basic mechanical
experiments with 'rotating frames'--culminating in a device
he termed the 'N-Machine', which above a critical RPM
[27,000?] (revolutions per minute), APPEARS TO GENERATE MORE
ELECTRICAL CURRENT OUT OF A SPINNING 'FARADAY DISC' THAN THE
INPUT ENERGY REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ITS MECHANICAL ROTATION!
"It is our growing belief that Dr. DePalma's 'N-
machine'--if it IS successfully producing more energy than
required for its input--MUST be operating according to the
Cydonia 'hyperdimensional physics' we have been so graciously
'bequeathed'...by someone."
The paragraphs above are quoted from pages 371-2 of the
1992 Edition of "THE MONUMENTS OF MARS: A CITY ON THE EDGE OF
FOREVER", by Richard C. Hoagland.
Richard C. Hoagland's web site is
http://www.enterprisemission.com .
See also http://www.depalma.pair.com .
P.S.2: It has been rumored that the United States federal
government has ALREADY SECRETLY DEVELOPED Free-Energy
generators but has WITHHELD them from the public! This
includes FUELLESS electric generators the size of semi-truck
trailers that can EACH power a large city! This COVER-UP
should be INVESTIGATED ! FULL DISCLOSURE from the government
should be DEMANDED !
See the web pages at http://www.disclosureproject.org .
P.S.3: PASS IT ON !
"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS stranger than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
10 Feb 2004 04:38:51 PM |
|
|
"Robert E. McElwaine" wrote:
FREE-ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, Physicist
[snip]
Robert E. McElwaine,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
If translation in time is homogeneous, then Noether's theorem requires
conservation of energy. Pookie pookie, moron.
PRINCIPLES OF IMPOTENCE
EARTH RESONANCE
IMPLOSION TURBINE
NEUTRALIZE GRAVITY
Crystals may someday be used to supply energy, as shown in the Star Trek shows
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/crap.htm
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
(Do something naughty to physics)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. 4X" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
11 Feb 2004 03:58:40 PM |
|
|
(Robert E. McElwaine) wrote in message
news:172279b8.0402101348.a96328a@posting.google.com:
FREE-ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, PhysicistSLAP!
When will the Galactic Federation motherships land on Earth, *****? How
many times did you promise that?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
10 Feb 2004 05:35:05 PM |
|
|
On 10 Feb 2004 13:48:31 -0800, (Robert E.
McElwaine) wrote:
FREE-ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, Physicist
<utter ranting ***** snipped>
Robert is possibly the most famous kook and pest on the internet.
He even has his own newsgroup!
See
http://www.popmartian.com/mcelwaine/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisin" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
10 Feb 2004 06:47:40 PM |
|
|
But is he a real physicist, or a delusional physicist like Bob Lazar of Area
51 fame?
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:6hqi20dmnuidb1nurn383u20bqfinoa62b@4ax.com...
Robert is possibly the most famous kook and pest on the internet.
He even has his own newsgroup!
See
http://www.popmartian.com/mcelwaine/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
10 Feb 2004 11:15:41 PM |
|
|
Eric Gisin wrote:
But is he a real physicist...
So?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "EjP" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
11 Feb 2004 09:57:56 AM |
|
|
Eric Gisin wrote:
But is he a real physicist,
I've worked in physics for over 20 years, and I have
yet to meet a real physicist who puts "Physicist"
after their name in common usage. Normally,
if somebody does, it's a pretty good warning sign
that they're about to post a load of rambling
crap.
He apparently has a Bachelor's Degree in physics
from University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, but
has never done anything in his life remotely
resembling physics.
A quick search of Google shows him to be
a total whack job who speaks with great
authority on every topic under the sun.
To first order, his basic stand seems
to be that absolutely everything he's ever heard
is true.
-E
or a delusional physicist like Bob Lazar of Area
51 fame?
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:6hqi20dmnuidb1nurn383u20bqfinoa62b@4ax.com...
Robert is possibly the most famous kook and pest on the internet.
He even has his own newsgroup!
See
http://www.popmartian.com/mcelwaine/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
11 Feb 2004 07:44:04 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, Eric Gisin
<ericgisin@graffiti.net>
wrote
on Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:47:40 -0800
<c0bu431278h@enews2.newsguy.com>:
But is he a real physicist, or a delusional physicist like Bob Lazar of Area
51 fame?
Personally I think he's real delusional...
:-)
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:6hqi20dmnuidb1nurn383u20bqfinoa62b@4ax.com...
Robert is possibly the most famous kook and pest on the internet.
He even has his own newsgroup!
See
http://www.popmartian.com/mcelwaine/
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
11 Feb 2004 12:59:20 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:47:40 -0800, "Eric Gisin"
<ericgisin@graffiti.net> wrote:
But is he a real physicist, or a delusional physicist like Bob Lazar of Area
51 fame?
He has a real science degree, and was employed by a real University.
Whether that makes him a *real* physicist is a moot point.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
10 Feb 2004 04:13:23 PM |
|
|
Reality Check: Has the Second Law Been Falsified
http://www.csicop.org/sb/2002-09/reality-check.html
Pushing the Second Law to the Limit
http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2002/split/598-1.html
Critical Thinking
http://www.csicop.org/si/9012/critical-thinking.html
Tuning Up Your Crank Filters
http://spot.colorado.edu/~vstenger/Briefs/Cranks.html
Crank Information
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Robert+E.+McElwaine%22+site%3Awww.crank.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Fergerson" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
10 Feb 2004 11:27:42 PM |
|
|
Robert E. McElwaine wrote:
FREE-ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, Physicist
At the beginning of the twentieth century, everybody
"knew" that a heavier-than-air machine could not possibly
fly. It would violate the "laws" of physics. All of the
"experts" and "authorities" said so.
You can apparently type and cut-n-paste, but not read.
For example, Simon Newcomb declared in 1901: "The
demonstration that no possible combination of known
substances, known forms of machinery and known forms of
"Known". As in, at the time.
force, can be united in a practical machine by which man
shall fly long distances through the air, seems to the writer
as complete as it is possible for the demonstration of any
physical fact to be."
First off, your original claim is *****. Birds are
"biological machines", and can obviously fly in spite of
being heavier than air. People have known this for a very
long time.
Knowing that current technology is not up to certain
tasks is not the same as "could not possibly" be at some
later date.
Newcomb didn't say squat about violating any physical laws.
Today, orthodox physicists and other "scientists" are
saying similar things against several kinds of 'Free Energy'
Technologies, using negative terms such as "pseudo-science"
and "perpetual motion", and citing so-called "laws" which
assert that "energy cannot be created or destroyed" ("1st law
of thermodynamics") and "there is always a decrease in useful
energy" ("2nd law of thermodynamics"). The physicists do not
know how to do certain things, so they ARROGANTLY declare
that those things cannot be done. Such PRINCIPLES OF
IMPOTENCE are COMMON in orthodox modern physics and help to
cover up INCONSISTENCIES and CONTRADICTIONS in orthodox
modern theories.
This is not a technology problem, but a physics problem.
Apparently you don't know beans about either.
Perhaps if you had a life you wouldn't ***** your time
away making foolish posts.
The "laws" of "thermodynamics" and "conservation of
energy" ASSUME that the physical universe that we see around
us is a "CLOSED SYSTEM". It is NOT.
How nice. Problem is, in order to utilize the kind of
"free energy" you're talking about, we need to access a
sink. Trouble is, the entire _observable_ Universe is the
source.
<snip wishful thinking>
Look, I know you never read serious critiques of your
posts, but I'll put this here in the faint hope that someone
you'd otherwise gull into sending you money will see it.
Here's the fundamental difficulty with all your *****:
There's apparently truly ridiculous amounts of energy
contained in each and every cubic (insert favorite unit of
length) of vacuum, but there's simply nowhere with less
energy per volume we can reach to dissipate it to.
I too wish "free energy" to be doable, but wishes ain't
fishes.
Mark L. Fergerson
.
|
|
|
| User: "FEerguy9" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
12 Feb 2004 09:02:24 PM |
|
|
Robert E. McElwaine wrote:
FREE-ENERGY Technologies
by Robert E. McElwaine, Physicist
At the beginning of the twentieth century, everybody
"knew" that a heavier-than-air machine could not possibly
fly. It would violate the "laws" of physics. All of the
"experts" and "authorities" said so.
You can apparently type and cut-n-paste, but not read.
For example, Simon Newcomb declared in 1901: "The
demonstration that no possible combination of known
substances, known forms of machinery and known forms of
"Known". As in, at the time.
force, can be united in a practical machine by which man
shall fly long distances through the air, seems to the writer
as complete as it is possible for the demonstration of any
physical fact to be."
First off, your original claim is *****. Birds are
"biological machines", and can obviously fly in spite of
being heavier than air. People have known this for a very
long time.
Knowing that current technology is not up to certain
tasks is not the same as "could not possibly" be at some
later date.
Newcomb didn't say squat about violating any physical laws.
Today, orthodox physicists and other "scientists" are
saying similar things against several kinds of 'Free Energy'
Technologies, using negative terms such as "pseudo-science"
and "perpetual motion", and citing so-called "laws" which
assert that "energy cannot be created or destroyed" ("1st law
of thermodynamics") and "there is always a decrease in useful
energy" ("2nd law of thermodynamics"). The physicists do not
know how to do certain things, so they ARROGANTLY declare
that those things cannot be done. Such PRINCIPLES OF
IMPOTENCE are COMMON in orthodox modern physics and help to
cover up INCONSISTENCIES and CONTRADICTIONS in orthodox
modern theories.
This is not a technology problem, but a physics problem.
Apparently you don't know beans about either.
Perhaps if you had a life you wouldn't ***** your time
away making foolish posts.
The "laws" of "thermodynamics" and "conservation of
energy" ASSUME that the physical universe that we see around
us is a "CLOSED SYSTEM". It is NOT.
How nice. Problem is, in order to utilize the kind of
"free energy" you're talking about, we need to access a
sink. Trouble is, the entire _observable_ Universe is the
source.
<snip wishful thinking>
Look, I know you never read serious critiques of your
posts, but I'll put this here in the faint hope that someone
you'd otherwise gull into sending you money will see it.
Here's the fundamental difficulty with all your *****:
There's apparently truly ridiculous amounts of energy
contained in each and every cubic (insert favorite unit of
length) of vacuum, but there's simply nowhere with less
energy per volume we can reach to dissipate it to.
I too wish "free energy" to be doable, but wishes ain't
fishes.
But eer - someday - will be powerful DELICIOUS!!!
Frank
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ashley Clarke" |
|
| Title: Re: FREE ENERGY INVENTIONS |
11 Feb 2004 01:32:28 PM |
|
|
You make the same mistake as anyone else who tries to
explain Perpetual Motion, you copy excerpts.
My own workings are my own, they work and that`s all you
need to know for now!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Ashley Clarke
-------------------------------------------------------
Email:
-------------------------------------------------------
"Robert E. McElwaine" <rem356@dmailman.com> wrote in message
news:172279b8.0402101348.a96328a@posting.google.com...
<I snipped the whole shebang>
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
