Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~



 Science > Physics > Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Anonymous"
Date: 11 Sep 2005 10:50:42 PM
Object: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value, I'll direct this
message to others more mature, polite, and conservative.
Everybody knows that mortal humans must each die someday.
Even Jesus Christ died (most horribly, being crucified),
and Jesus' soul spent fully three days and three nights
in Hades before being resurrected into his immortal body.
That must've seemed like a thousand years to Jesus' soul!
So make no mistake regardless of your religious beliefs
or lack thereof; someday *you* too will die, whereupon
your immortal soul will be dispatched into the hereafter.
Christian, Muslim, Jew, Atheist, it makes no difference.
Death is the great equalizer. Make NO mistake about it.
Upon ones bodily death, his/her immortal soul which had
inhabited that now-deceased person is instantaneously
discarnated into the spirit realm. In this discarnate
state, the soul then begins to Judge that now-dead self.

Judgment is meted out in accordance with by what measure
that old self had adjudged others during its incarnated
lifetime. If you'd judged others righteously, accurately,
honestly, etc, then your soul's Judgment of your self-in-
life will be likewise righteous, accurate, and honest.

But if you'd routinely misjudged others during your last
lifetime in the body, that is unrighteously, inaccurately,
dishonestly, etc, then that's precisely the SAME measure
by which your discarnated soul will Judge your last self.
If you were generous in life, your soul will be entreated
generously. But if you were stingy and self-serving, then
that's how your soul will be mistreated... just desserts.

This describes a fundamental difference between friendly
verses unfriendly ghosts. People who'd lived virtuously,
helpfully, graciously, gratefully, joyfully, etc, during
their lives-incarnate find themselves similarly virtuous
and optimistic about their prospects in the spirit realm,
as they await their next incarnation into a new body, in
a new time and place, usually on Earth, but sometimes on
other inhabited planets in solar systems lightyears away.

By stark contrast, those lamentable souls who'd behaved
dishonestly, disrespectfully, the sacrilegious, impious,
irreverent, during their miserable lifetime in the body,
liars, cheaters, adulterers, the disloyal and unfaithful,
worst of all were violent criminals, rapists, murderers
(and cowards who stood by and did nothing to stop them),
then the afterlife (or 'Life Between Lives' as a famous
author has called our discarnate souljourns in a book so
titled) isn't nearly as brightly illuminated, rather is
dark and foreboding, made so by that soul's own shadows,
each soul by the measure of their ill-will against God
and against their brethren during their physical lives.

You can see this contrast in the souls encountered by
the great spirit medium Derek Acorah on 'Most Haunted':
http://www.derekacorah.org/

When Mr. Acorah encounters souls of predominantly good-
will, friendly ghosts, he says so immediately. Likewise,
when he encounters a malefic ill-willed soul who'd been
an inhumane lowlife during their last incarnation, then
Derek immediately says so, e.g. "that's a bad one; evil,
wretched soul, that one is", etc.
And it isn't just what Derek Acorah says, but is as much
his demeanor with which he says it. When he encounters the
good souls, his face lights up with joy and optimism. But
when he is confronted by bad souls, his countenance shows
it. His face grimaces--repulsed by that evil soul's anger
and hatred, that ugly soul's violent and sadistic pattern.

And because good-willed, God-loving souls are insulated
by a great chasm from the God-hating ill-willed souls in
the spirit realm (as between the pure astral plane verses
the low astral plane for example), the good souls tend to
congregate in the brighter light, whereas bad souls band
together in the darker, courser, lower-vibratory levels
for more remedial training, as they await incarnations
into decidedly more difficult and painful circumstances
on account of their *indebtedness* to the Great Spirit.

This is especially true of the troubled ghosts who haunt
physical places. Some don't even know they are dead yet.
Others, particularly the egregiously sinful ones in life,
they're fearful of leaving their known haunting spot for
the inevitable Judgment which awaits their participation.
They can't evade this forever. And the longer they wait,
the harsher the spectre of their future Judgment becomes.

Even the living haunt physical locations while they sleep,
while they are dreaming. I know I do this frequently, and
many other incarnated souls do it whether they realize it
or not. I think most are just too afraid to remember it,
that our souls are still haunting some places we used to
haunt before we were born into the bodies we now inhabit.
Not so much specific places as by *patterns* of haunting.

This is akin to souls-incarnate today who fear the future,
who fear the unknown, who fear death and dying, who fear
ghosts for that matter. What they're *really* fearing is
their own shadow-self, the Devil and Satan in all of us.

It's their own innate vulnerability which makes them so
afraid, so vulnerable, so uncertain, so devoid of faith,
hope and charity. They didn't practice and nurture these
spirit awarenesses (neither the other seven) during their
earthly incarnation, and that's why they don't practice
them in the very same spirit realm whilst discarnate from
the body. Same spirit. One has a physical body, the other
does not. Otherwise, we're talking about the SAME spirit
realm, each very veiled, hidden, insulated from the other
only by the perspective of incarnated verses discarnated.
Jesus advised us to store up our treasures in heaven, in
the spirit realm, while we are living in the body. That's
good advise, since that's where our discarnate soul will
reap the benefits after we die, and we'll bring these
heavenly treasures with us into our next incarnation,
to continue practicing and nurturing them ad infinitum.

In closing, soon enough *you* too will find your soul is
without a living body to continue inhabiting--for awhile.
It is best to practice and nurture things of the spirit,
heavenly things, while you're still living in your body.
Because once your body dies, it's your spiritual habits
which will help to illuminate your discarnate souljourn,
and will help to keep your soul separated from malicious
souls which heavily populate the lower reaches of Hades.

Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.web-space.tv/danieljosephmin/

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQySn0pljD7YrHM/nEQKE/gCeONdSU0iVvLM/kFWRWzRAT9nvuOIAn1Y2
XrtC9H8UNrTIgP/9Rr6j/j6D
=gc58
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.

User: "tim gueguen"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 04:52:32 PM
"Anonymous" <nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid> wrote in message
news:U5PKDB2138606.951875@anonymous.poster...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value, I'll direct this
message to others more mature, polite, and conservative.

Hey, Min-eeme! That brain tumour still hasn't killed you I see.
tim gueguen 101867
.
User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 11:10:42 PM
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:52:32 GMT, "tim gueguen" <tgueguen@shaw.ca>
wrote:


"Anonymous" <nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid> wrote in message
news:U5PKDB2138606.951875@anonymous.poster...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value, I'll direct this
message to others more mature, polite, and conservative.

Hey, Min-eeme! That brain tumour still hasn't killed you I see.

He's been dead from the neck up for years.


tim gueguen 101867

.


User: "Skraedder"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 08:44:29 AM
"Anonymous" wrote...


REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value, I'll direct this
message to others more mature, polite, and conservative.

Everybody knows that mortal humans must each die someday.

So far so good.


Upon ones bodily death, his/her immortal soul which had
inhabited that now-deceased person is instantaneously
discarnated into the spirit realm.

And the evidence for this is...?
Skraedder
.
User: "Jor-El"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 13 Sep 2005 06:16:02 PM
"Skraedder" <Skraedder@skraedder.com> wrote in news:dg40ns$t8n$1
@rdel.co.uk:

Upon ones bodily death, his/her immortal soul which had
inhabited that now-deceased person is instantaneously
discarnated into the spirit realm.


And the evidence for this is...?

I'm sure you've dealt with these cranks before, and you should know the
answer to this question. The evidence is that God told him once in a
fantasy, er, ah, I mean prayer that he had.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 08:46:37 AM
In article <dg40ns$t8n$1@rdel.co.uk>,
"Skraedder" <Skraedder@skraedder.com> wrote:

"Anonymous" wrote...


REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value, I'll direct this
message to others more mature, polite, and conservative.

Everybody knows that mortal humans must each die someday.


So far so good.


Upon ones bodily death, his/her immortal soul which had
inhabited that now-deceased person is instantaneously
discarnated into the spirit realm.


And the evidence for this is...?

It's a Discovery Channel show on TV.
/BAH
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 10:38:01 AM

REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value

And, apparently, neither are you!
.

User: "JohnN"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 22 Sep 2005 01:54:32 PM
Anonymous wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value, I'll direct this
message to others more mature, polite, and conservative.

Everybody knows that mortal humans must each die someday.
Even Jesus Christ died (most horribly, being crucified),
and Jesus' soul spent fully three days and three nights
in Hades

Was Jesus Greek? How could his soul get into Hades?
JohnN
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 11 Sep 2005 11:46:13 PM
Isn't Post #1 just ever so slightly off-topic???????
.
User: "Cousin Ricky"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 08:19:19 PM
wrote:

Isn't Post #1 just ever so slightly off-topic???????

Dang, i fell for it!
Don't know which of the crossposted newsgroups you posted from, but we
in sci.astro.amateur do deal with "ghosts" (i.e., spurious images), so
the subject line is quite plausible. But i was expecting to be
enlightened about optical effects, not speculative theology. Oh well,
Min will always find a way...
Come to think of it, photographic artifacts that i've seen passed off
as "evidence" for ghosts--namely, lens flares--could themselves be
considered "ghosting" of the light source. So i guess they really
*are* photos of ghosts. ;-)
Clear skies!
--
------------------- Richard Callwood III --------------------
~ U.S. Virgin Islands ~ USDA zone 11 ~ 18.3N, 64.9W ~
~ eastern Massachusetts ~ USDA zone 6 (1992-95) ~
--------------- http://cac.uvi.edu/staff/rc3/ ---------------
.
User: "Philip Deitiker"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 08:39:17 PM
"Cousin Ricky" <rickyusvi@yahoo.com> says in
news:1126574359.326302.13490@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

donstockbauer@hotmail.com wrote:

Isn't Post #1 just ever so slightly off-topic???????


Dang, i fell for it!

Don't know which of the crossposted newsgroups you posted from,
but we in sci.astro.amateur do deal with "ghosts" (i.e.,
spurious images), so the subject line is quite plausible.

I didn't know that spurious images could be friendly or unfreindly.
Maybe you are spending to much time on those high altitude
observatories. Try taking an oxygen tank with you next time.
.


User: "richard schumacher"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 07:54:18 PM
In article <1126500373.843504.227130@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:

Isn't Post #1 just ever so slightly off-topic???????

Off the mark; that's typical for a tropical astrologer.
.


User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 02:57:13 AM
On 12 Sep 2005 03:50:42 -0000, nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid
(Anonymous) wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value, I'll direct this
message to others more mature, polite, and conservative.

Everybody knows that mortal humans must each die someday.

So far, so good...

Even Jesus Christ died (most horribly, being crucified),
and Jesus' soul spent fully three days and three nights
in Hades before being resurrected into his immortal body.

Oh dear, didn't take long to reveal that you are a nut-job yourself.

That must've seemed like a thousand years to Jesus' soul!

So make no mistake regardless of your religious beliefs
or lack thereof; someday *you* too will die, whereupon
your immortal soul will be dispatched into the hereafter.
Christian, Muslim, Jew, Atheist, it makes no difference.
Death is the great equalizer. Make NO mistake about it.

Upon ones bodily death, his/her immortal soul which had
inhabited that now-deceased person is instantaneously
discarnated into the spirit realm. In this discarnate
state, the soul then begins to Judge that now-dead self.

Take your meds, and stuff spewing this infantile crap in sci.skeptic,
OK?
:
<schizoid ravings snipped for sanity>
.
User: "Eric Stevens"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 04:19:08 AM
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:27:13 +0930, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:

On 12 Sep 2005 03:50:42 -0000, nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid
(Anonymous) wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

REALIZING THAT the left-wing nutjobs in this group aren't
amenable to learning anything of value, I'll direct this
message to others more mature, polite, and conservative.

Everybody knows that mortal humans must each die someday.


So far, so good...

Even Jesus Christ died (most horribly, being crucified),
and Jesus' soul spent fully three days and three nights
in Hades before being resurrected into his immortal body.


Oh dear, didn't take long to reveal that you are a nut-job yourself.

The PGP signature is enough to establish that the author almost
certainly is Min.


That must've seemed like a thousand years to Jesus' soul!

So make no mistake regardless of your religious beliefs
or lack thereof; someday *you* too will die, whereupon
your immortal soul will be dispatched into the hereafter.
Christian, Muslim, Jew, Atheist, it makes no difference.
Death is the great equalizer. Make NO mistake about it.

Upon ones bodily death, his/her immortal soul which had
inhabited that now-deceased person is instantaneously
discarnated into the spirit realm. In this discarnate
state, the soul then begins to Judge that now-dead self.


Take your meds, and stuff spewing this infantile crap in sci.skeptic,
OK?

:

<schizoid ravings snipped for sanity>

Eric Stevens
.
User: "MA"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 08:21:26 AM
There are no ghosts. I have lived in this world for 545 years and I've
never seen one.
.
User: "Philip Deitiker"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 11:10:07 AM
In sci.archaeology, MA created a message ID
news:1126531286.563630.34030@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

There are no ghosts. I have lived in this world for 545 years

and I've

never seen one.

I saw a ghost, there was a picture of one hanging from the wall
of the catholic school not far from my house when I was a kid.
His name was Holy. Also don't forget casper. Certainly ghosts
must exists because fools have painted them and they make
cartoons about them on T.V. [Did I say fools?]

.

User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 13 Sep 2005 12:00:08 AM
In sci.physics, MA
<magnus.alkarp@arkeologi.uu.se>
wrote
on 12 Sep 2005 06:21:26 -0700
<1126531286.563630.34030@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

There are no ghosts. I have lived in this world for 545 years and I've
never seen one.

Boo!
Oh....wait, you mean the aetherial kind. I'm an SRian so can't
be that kind of ghost...
;-) :-)
--
#191,

It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 13 Sep 2005 05:20:27 PM
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in
message news:pfshv2-6gc.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
| In sci.physics, MA
| <magnus.alkarp@arkeologi.uu.se>
| wrote
| on 12 Sep 2005 06:21:26 -0700
| <1126531286.563630.34030@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
| > There are no ghosts. I have lived in this world for 545 years and
I've
| > never seen one.
| >
|
| Boo!
|
| Oh....wait, you mean the aetherial kind. I'm an SRian so can't
| be that kind of ghost...
|
| ;-) :-)
Ah, but are you a catholic SRian or a protestant SRian?
Androcles
.
User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 13 Sep 2005 11:00:07 PM
In sci.physics, Androcles
<Androcles@MyPlace.org>
wrote
on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:20:27 GMT
<LgIVe.64539$2n6.53366@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>:


"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in
message news:pfshv2-6gc.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
| In sci.physics, MA
| <magnus.alkarp@arkeologi.uu.se>
| wrote
| on 12 Sep 2005 06:21:26 -0700
| <1126531286.563630.34030@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
| > There are no ghosts. I have lived in this world for 545 years and
I've
| > never seen one.
| >
|
| Boo!
|
| Oh....wait, you mean the aetherial kind. I'm an SRian so can't
| be that kind of ghost...
|
| ;-) :-)

Ah, but are you a catholic SRian or a protestant SRian?
Androcles

Neither; I'm an atheist SRian. :-P
Not that it matters; you'll just claim SR is a religion, anyway. :-P
--
#191,

It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 16 Sep 2005 10:11:13 AM
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in
message news:ejikv2-scv.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
| In sci.physics, Androcles
| <Androcles@MyPlace.org>
| wrote
| on Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:20:27 GMT
| <LgIVe.64539$2n6.53366@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>:
| >
| > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in
| > message news:pfshv2-6gc.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
| > | In sci.physics, MA
| > | <magnus.alkarp@arkeologi.uu.se>
| > | wrote
| > | on 12 Sep 2005 06:21:26 -0700
| > | <1126531286.563630.34030@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
| > | > There are no ghosts. I have lived in this world for 545 years
and
| > I've
| > | > never seen one.
| > | >
| > |
| > | Boo!
| > |
| > | Oh....wait, you mean the aetherial kind. I'm an SRian so can't
| > | be that kind of ghost...
| > |
| > | ;-) :-)
| >
| > Ah, but are you a catholic SRian or a protestant SRian?
| > Androcles
|
| Neither; I'm an atheist SRian. :-P
|
| Not that it matters; you'll just claim SR is a religion, anyway. :-P
You believe without proof. That's religion, isn't it?
Androcles
.
User: "richard schumacher"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 17 Sep 2005 03:50:44 PM

You believe without proof. That's religion, isn't it?

No, belief without proof is faith. Religion is a mix of folklore, folk
cosmology, makeshift and/or incomplete ethics, and superstition. Faith
is a necessary but insufficient condition to adhere to a religion.
.
User: "Philip Deitiker"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 17 Sep 2005 08:40:02 PM
richard schumacher <no-spam@invalid.net> says in
news:no-spam-1A1EC7.15504417092005@news.isp.giganews.com:


You believe without proof. That's religion, isn't it?


No, belief without proof is faith. Religion is a mix of
folklore, folk cosmology, makeshift and/or incomplete ethics,
and superstition. Faith is a necessary but insufficient
condition to adhere to a religion.

Religion is a set of beliefs in a higher being including the customs
and traditions associated with those beliefs.

.









User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 12 Sep 2005 11:08:24 PM
On 12 Sep 2005 03:50:42 -0000, nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid
(Anonymous) wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

<sigh> More idiotic drivel from Min the Mindless, Emperor of Moronica
and Drooler of the Universe.
.

User: "Nick"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 26 Sep 2005 12:23:08 AM
The ghosts are in hell. They're no longer around anymore.
.
User: "Autymn D. C."

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 26 Sep 2005 12:31:52 AM
Nick wrote:

The ghosts are in hell. They're no longer around anymore.

Wrong, retard, corpses are in hell. Ghosts go wherever they want.
-Aut
.
User: "Nick"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 26 Sep 2005 01:07:21 AM
Ghosts are in hell and they cant go anywhere else.
There is hell for the body but its when it is alive.
.
User: "Autymn D. C."

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 26 Sep 2005 10:56:31 AM
Nick wrote:

Ghosts are in hell and they cant go anywhere else.
There is hell for the body but its when it is alive.

Ghosts can go through earth, fool. Why would they stay with their dead
bodies? They are anywhere and everywhere. You're a deluded liar, who
doesn't know how to write a contraction right.
http://dictionary.com/search?q=cant
http://dictionary.com/search?q=its
Michael Gray wrote:

You believe in hell and ghosts, and you have the temerity to call
someone else a "retard"?!

Yes, the former is a stead and the latter is a siht. Read this to get
up to speed for the former:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/browse_frm/thread/0c215b6aad53a068/84ac0152967c302e#84ac0152967c302e.
As for ghosts, do some research [over millennia] before complaining.
They beat God any day.
-Aut
.


User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 26 Sep 2005 06:00:07 AM
In sci.physics, Autymn D. C.
<lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
wrote
on 25 Sep 2005 22:31:52 -0700
<1127712712.873353.43670@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

Nick wrote:

The ghosts are in hell. They're no longer around anymore.


Wrong, retard, corpses are in hell. Ghosts go wherever they want.

Were that the case I'd probably be somewhere else. :-) Say,
a spacecraft somewhere in the Betelgeuse system...
And corpses aren't in Hell anyway; they're buried in the ground
or split up into airborne CO2 and H2O, and whatever's left over
when one is handed the urn (or, in my grandmother's case, a
copper box).


-Aut

--
#191,

It's still legal to go .sigless.
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 26 Sep 2005 01:04:55 AM
On 25 Sep 2005 22:31:52 -0700, "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

Nick wrote:

The ghosts are in hell. They're no longer around anymore.


Wrong, retard, corpses are in hell. Ghosts go wherever they want.

-Aut

You believe in hell and ghosts, and you have the temerity to call
someone else a "retard"?!
.



User: "Jor-El"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 13 Sep 2005 06:13:20 PM
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid (Anonymous) wrote in
news:U5PKDB2138606.951875@anonymous.poster:

Upon ones bodily death, his/her immortal soul which had
inhabited that now-deceased person is instantaneously
discarnated into the spirit realm.

Participants in this group are scientists, and as such studied the Second
Law of Thermodynamics in college. The Second Law contradicts the belief in
an eternal soul, and because of this, you won't find many Believers in this
group.
.
User: "Anonymous"

Title: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~ 14 Sep 2005 04:49:21 AM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
It's like the great builder Ed Leedskalnin said:
"I found out that the researchers were misled by
wrong instruction books..."
--'MAGNETIC CURRENT', Edward Leedskalnin, 1945

"...the one who is educated from the wrong books
is not educated, he is misled....

"An educated person is one whose senses are
refined. We are born as brutes, we remain and
die as the same if we do not become polished.
Some are too coarse to take it....

"Now, if you lack willingness to learn, you will
remain as a brute and if you do things that are
not good and right, you will be a low person"
--'BOOK IN EVERY HOME', Edward Leedskalnin, 1936
*************************************************
*Ed Leedskalnin's 'BOOK IN EVERY HOME':
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4GJHYS2W37281.7235763889@anonymous.poster
*Ed Leedskalnin's 'MAGNETIC CURRENT':
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=88OON8VQ37281.7281597222@anonymous.poster
*************************************************
"M...@...t" wrote:

Participants in this group are...
<snipped for clarity>

"Where ignorance is bliss 'tis folly to be wise."
--Thomas Gray (1716-1771)
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQyd/55ljD7YrHM/nEQIAAACg0XNAO1yU6VOgEAtqMXTXFzaqJn4An29i
FJ71wpHK8FikLbmEC9p5K9vF
=ATKO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.



  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER