Science > Physics > garvitation and structure of the universe as predicted by SFT
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"tony fleming" |
| Date: |
02 Sep 2005 04:52:02 AM |
| Object: |
garvitation and structure of the universe as predicted by SFT |
I thought that this work deserves it own thread, and might clutter up
the discussion happening on the universal expansion. so we'll shift any
discussion of gravity as seen by SFT to here. You will see that this
work is 'out there' and is probably unable to be appreciated by
many, but I do wish to open up discussion on it because it DOES fit in
with SFT which as I have been at pains to explain goes 'beyond
uncertainty' by the use of centre-of-motion E- and H-fields. This
work will in time be written up as a report but at this stage there is
much fleshing out to be done; so I do hope that the
'main-streamers' in our midst will be patient, and forbearing, and
fire your shots without too much hostility; I need your help to make
this a worthwhile report.
I have referred at times to the hydrogen paper found at the
www.unifiedphysics.com website that some of you have been visiting:
http://www.unifiedphysics.com/UP_EM_self_fields_all_in_one_revb_Nov_08_04.pdf
By way of introduction, we have been discussing the massive and the
massless photon. QFT with its HUP says of course that the photon is
massless (by definition even) otherwise we 'break gauge symmetry' thus
spoiling the mathematical basis (mmmm not a really good premise for an
assumption, but one which does at least QFT to barge right on through
the problematic issue where the photon is massive. On the otherhand
the mathematics within SFT balances both photons and electrons, and
photons and protons within the hydrogen atom, and as such reveals a
fracticality within the maths, that appears to be a reflection of the
actual physics (a wide and varied range of experimental evidence
supports the notions of photonic spectroscopy, or photonic chemistry).
There is plainly visible within the universe a layered structure of
matter that reflects a structure within the photon as indicated
theoretically by self-field theory (SFT). Four levels of gravitation
can be discerned; solar systems, galaxies, super clusters, and the
universe. Beyond that level there may be multiverses indicating
another 'cycle' of fields. The four levels of universal
gravitational strength are compliant with the four orthogonal
directions of rotation associated with maxwell-lorentz self-field
theory (see the orthogonality of the time derivatives of the E-field as
shown in Fig. 5 of) Each layer of gravitation suggests a different way
in which the Maxwell-lorentz self-field equations are being satisfied.
The observed cyclotron motion at each level follows the rotational axis
of the theory. Hence if we start with the atom, the plane of rotation
of this cyclotron motion is orthogonal to the orbital motion; at the
solar system this cyclotron effect is shifted by 90 degrees to the
atom, and the spin of the planets can be added to the orbital rotation
(e.g. relativistic effect due to the perihelion of mercury); this shift
continues as the series continues, so we find that the galactic
cyclotron effect is shifted 180 degrees from the atom, and 90 degrees
from the solar system. Now, no relativistic effect is seen.
Continuing, at the super-cluster level, we may again see a relativistic
effect but this time so as to detract from the orbital motion.
We also see a series of 'centres', like nuclei, larger collations
of matter that balance the smaller satellites within a system. These
are not the centres of motion of these systems. The series is
alternating with a 'black hole' inside the atom (negative total
energy), then a white hole (positive total energy) at the solar system
level, another black hole at the centre of each galaxy, and a white
hole at the centre of each super-cluster.
In the ordinary application of SFT, the problem is set up as an
eigenvalue problem to solve for the particle motions. As the quanta of
photon energies are changed, each motion changes to satisfy the new
particle-eigensolutions (as used in the hydrogen paper). Here, this
is another form of eigenvalue problem in which the fields play the
major role and the particles only a secondary role. Each field is
represented in SFT by spirals, and each layer of the
'field-eigensolution' has an integer spiral added to it; these
field-eigensolutions are accompanied by changes to the energy density
of the self-field equations and different fields (all versions of
Eq.1).
This theoretical and (partially) observed "differentiation" of the
photon, goes both ways; as we get bigger and bigger, we get derivative
functions of the fields; and as we go smaller and small we get
"integration" of the fields; structures, more tightly packed into
smaller and small regions where the energy densities get higher and
higher.
.
|
|
| User: "John Sefton" |
|
| Title: Re: garvitation and structure of the universe as predicted by SFT |
02 Sep 2005 10:23:44 PM |
|
|
tony fleming wrote:
I thought that this work deserves it own thread, and might clutter up
the discussion happening on the universal expansion. so we'll shift any
discussion of gravity as seen by SFT to here. You will see that this
work is 'out there' and is probably unable to be appreciated by
many, but I do wish to open up discussion on it because it DOES fit in
with SFT which as I have been at pains to explain goes 'beyond
uncertainty' by the use of centre-of-motion E- and H-fields. This
work will in time be written up as a report but at this stage there is
much fleshing out to be done; so I do hope that the
'main-streamers' in our midst will be patient, and forbearing, and
fire your shots without too much hostility; I need your help to make
this a worthwhile report.
I have referred at times to the hydrogen paper found at the
www.unifiedphysics.com website that some of you have been visiting:
http://www.unifiedphysics.com/UP_EM_self_fields_all_in_one_revb_Nov_08_04.pdf
By way of introduction, we have been discussing the massive and the
massless photon. QFT with its HUP says of course that the photon is
massless (by definition even) otherwise we 'break gauge symmetry' thus
spoiling the mathematical basis (mmmm not a really good premise for an
assumption, but one which does at least QFT to barge right on through
the problematic issue where the photon is massive. On the otherhand
the mathematics within SFT balances both photons and electrons, and
photons and protons within the hydrogen atom, and as such reveals a
fracticality within the maths, that appears to be a reflection of the
actual physics (a wide and varied range of experimental evidence
supports the notions of photonic spectroscopy, or photonic chemistry).
There is plainly visible within the universe a layered structure of
matter that reflects a structure within the photon as indicated
theoretically by self-field theory (SFT). Four levels of gravitation
can be discerned; solar systems, galaxies, super clusters, and the
universe. Beyond that level there may be multiverses indicating
another 'cycle' of fields. The four levels of universal
gravitational strength are compliant with the four orthogonal
directions of rotation associated with maxwell-lorentz self-field
theory (see the orthogonality of the time derivatives of the E-field as
shown in Fig. 5 of) Each layer of gravitation suggests a different way
in which the Maxwell-lorentz self-field equations are being satisfied.
The observed cyclotron motion at each level follows the rotational axis
of the theory. Hence if we start with the atom, the plane of rotation
of this cyclotron motion is orthogonal to the orbital motion; at the
solar system this cyclotron effect is shifted by 90 degrees to the
atom, and the spin of the planets can be added to the orbital rotation
(e.g. relativistic effect due to the perihelion of mercury); this shift
continues as the series continues, so we find that the galactic
cyclotron effect is shifted 180 degrees from the atom, and 90 degrees
from the solar system. Now, no relativistic effect is seen.
Continuing, at the super-cluster level, we may again see a relativistic
effect but this time so as to detract from the orbital motion.
We also see a series of 'centres', like nuclei, larger collations
of matter that balance the smaller satellites within a system. These
are not the centres of motion of these systems. The series is
alternating with a 'black hole' inside the atom (negative total
energy), then a white hole (positive total energy) at the solar system
level, another black hole at the centre of each galaxy, and a white
hole at the centre of each super-cluster.
In the ordinary application of SFT, the problem is set up as an
eigenvalue problem to solve for the particle motions. As the quanta of
photon energies are changed, each motion changes to satisfy the new
particle-eigensolutions (as used in the hydrogen paper). Here, this
is another form of eigenvalue problem in which the fields play the
major role and the particles only a secondary role. Each field is
represented in SFT by spirals, and each layer of the
'field-eigensolution' has an integer spiral added to it; these
field-eigensolutions are accompanied by changes to the energy density
of the self-field equations and different fields (all versions of
Eq.1).
This theoretical and (partially) observed "differentiation" of the
photon, goes both ways; as we get bigger and bigger, we get derivative
functions of the fields; and as we go smaller and small we get
"integration" of the fields; structures, more tightly packed into
smaller and small regions where the energy densities get higher and
higher.
No. See my thread: "Atoms are fractals..."
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|