| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
18 Mar 2007 10:22:48 AM |
| Object: |
Gedenken Defined |
I was trying to identify a theorectical theory. A form of all theory.
And the statement may sound funny, but theoretical theory appears the
exact correct word usage for certain applied relation.
For example, just in case you think it an invalid topic. A short, as
the relation of a degree of length related to the size. A size
appears always less than, without the exact limit identified. "A
Short" So a relation as theory was to necessarily be modifed because
of this class of example of relation. I specified a type.
A type as relation of all.
Exact form allows a class to be a class, while type appeared a class.
Implying type as a relation.
A cause to the relation, as with, "the short" appears the kind of type
of all types.
Abstract relation was the relation referenced in the last sentence.
And so all relation as theory appeared type. A dilemma was stated
becuase type as theory would never allow a kind of effect. Only the
relation such as, "the short" would be stated without consequence.
SO theorectical theory was stated.
In case it is considered a semantic arguement without implication, a
theory was devised where example defined a consequence itself in the
abstract. Thereby causing all type of consequence in theory. Allowing
a class as principle in physicial theory!
Principle is normally a simple relation applied to cuase effect. Now
it is allowed a place as theory of all theory. So an effect in
relation to all others is allowed to be discussed with perfect
theorectical form.
So pick and effect in physics.
I selected the air pressure. An effect of air placed next to vacuum
was the force. And to cause the level without having the situation
stated was an example of theorectical air.
How is this transform of example to proceed?
So apply the transform . Here is the outcome. Air self forces. Air
itself is self causing the next level. An imbalance of force then
becomes the result rather than the air itself imbalanced!
So there it is theorectical air. An to state its existence is to
imply the effect of force. All forces are then defineable in all air
theory. So the implication in Bernoulli's air theory will be allowed
in example.
"A venturi caused air." In venturi theory the velocity caused the
force, but under this transform the venturi caused force to exceed the
level of the air present, imlying either air created, of force itself
to imbalance within the air. The self force altering or air
increasing in presence.
And so to prove the validity of theorectical theory usefullness a
packet appears the defined air. A correpsondence in theory of the
abstract volume without stated size is the packet implied ot exist.
So I am well grounded.
A packet either alters size or self force alters in Bernoulli's Theory
of Venturi.
Which occurs?
A test or experiment is allowed and a Gedanken type appears
theoretically allowed. If the form of abstains Gedenkan allowance
then the experiemnt was required, if the form allows Gedaken then the
theorectical test appears! Gedanken is an exact theorectical solution
to all theory therefor.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Gedenken Defined |
18 Mar 2007 01:29:38 PM |
|
|
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
I was trying to identify a theorectical theory.
[snip rest of crap]
Popeye as physics git.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "H. W. .... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -" |
|
| Title: Re: Gedenken Defined |
18 Mar 2007 10:35:01 AM |
|
|
On 18 Mar 2007 08:22:48 -0700, "Douglas Eagleson"
<eaglesondouglas@yahoo.com> wrote:
I was trying to identify a theorectical theory.
..........
snip crap
Gedenken
(+ Gen.) think of; remember; recollect; bear in mind;
mention; commemorate
w.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Eagleson" |
|
| Title: Re: Gedenken Defined |
18 Mar 2007 10:50:19 AM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 11:35 am, H. W. <.... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .-
--- -. DOT .- -> wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 08:22:48 -0700, "Douglas Eagleson"
<eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I was trying to identify a theorectical theory.
..........
snip crap
Gedenken
(+ Gen.) think of; remember; recollect; bear in mind;
mention; commemorate
w.
I was referring to the Gedaken experiment. It is believe it or not a
specific relation of theory that allows it to exist.
When the science is examined as a form and the equivalence principle
is placed in relation to theory, that was a designed fom of the
science.
People do keep exact track of all relations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "H. W. .... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -" |
|
| Title: Re: Gedenken Defined |
18 Mar 2007 12:10:15 PM |
|
|
On 18 Mar 2007 08:50:19 -0700, "Douglas Eagleson"
<eaglesondouglas@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 11:35 am, H. W. <.... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .-
--- -. DOT .- -> wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 08:22:48 -0700, "Douglas Eagleson"
<eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I was trying to identify a theorectical theory.
..........
snip crap
Gedenken
(+ Gen.) think of; remember; recollect; bear in mind;
mention; commemorate
w.
I was referring to the Gedaken experiment. It is believe it or not a
specific relation of theory that allows it to exist.
When the science is examined as a form and the equivalence principle
is placed in relation to theory, that was a designed fom of the
science.
People do keep exact track of all relations.
aahhrgg....now it's Gedaken!
Kanaken Kakerlaken kacken Gedaken
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
