Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all



 Science > Physics > Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Sam Wormley"
Date: 21 Mar 2006 12:19:32 PM
Object: Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all
Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/10/3/15/1
21 March 2006
One of the most fascinating natural phenomena on Earth is the flipping
of its magnetic field, which has occurred hundreds of times in the last
160 million years. When the magnetic field flips, the North Pole
becomes the South Pole and vice versa. The last time this happened was
some 780,000 years ago, so we could be heading for another reversal
soon. Now, physicists in Italy have found that the frequency of these
polarity reversals is not random as previously thought but occurs in
clusters, revealing some kind of "memory" of previous events
(physics/0603086).
Although a full geomagnetic polarity reversal can take thousands of
years to complete, the implications could be enormous. As well as
affecting the migration trajectories of birds and other animals, the
disruption to the Earth's magnetic field could expose the Earth to
hazardous cosmic rays -- a scenario that some researchers have linked
to mass extinction events like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs
around 65 million years ago. Geoscientists believe that our planet's
internal magnetic dynamo is responsible for pole reversals, but the
actual mechanism is not well understood.
Previous analyses assumed that the number of times the poles have
reversed over last 160 million years follows a Poisson distribution,
implying that the events are random. The Poisson distribution tells you
the probability of a number of events occurring in a fixed time if the
events are independent and the average rate is known. A good example of
the Poisson distribution in physics is the likelihood of unstable
radioactive nuclei decaying in a certain period.
Now, a team of physicists led by Vincenzo Carbone of the University of
Calabria have discovered that the sequence of polarity reversals can be
well described by a Lévy distribution instead. In contrast to Poisson
statistics, the Lévy distribution describes stochastic processes that
are characterised by the presence of "memory" effects -- or long-range
correlations between the events in time. Lévy distributions are widely
used to study many critical phenomena, such as earthquakes, and also
when analysing financial data. The researchers obtained their results
by careful statistical analysis of different sets of paleomagnetic data
containing estimates of when the Earth's poles reversed.
"The result means that polarity reversals are not random events that
are independent of each other," explains team member Fabio Lepreti.
"Instead, there is some degree of memory in the magnetic dynamo
processes giving rise to the reversals," he says. "We hope that our
work will serve as a useful reference point for models that aim to
describe the phenomenon of pole reversal." The Italy team now plans to
build new dynamic models to describe the field reversal sequences in a
simple way, so that the physical mechanisms that trigger pole reversals
can be more easily explained.
.

User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all 21 Mar 2006 12:26:30 PM
Sam Wormley wrote:

Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/10/3/15/1

21 March 2006

One of the most fascinating natural phenomena on Earth is the flipping
of its magnetic field, which has occurred hundreds of times in the last
160 million years. When the magnetic field flips, the North Pole
becomes the South Pole and vice versa. The last time this happened was
some 780,000 years ago, so we could be heading for another reversal
soon. Now, physicists in Italy have found that the frequency of these
polarity reversals is not random as previously thought but occurs in
clusters, revealing some kind of "memory" of previous events
(physics/0603086).

Although a full geomagnetic polarity reversal can take thousands of
years to complete, the implications could be enormous. As well as
affecting the migration trajectories of birds and other animals, the
disruption to the Earth's magnetic field could expose the Earth to
hazardous cosmic rays -- a scenario that some researchers have linked
to mass extinction events like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs
around 65 million years ago. Geoscientists believe that our planet's
internal magnetic dynamo is responsible for pole reversals, but the
actual mechanism is not well understood.

Previous analyses assumed that the number of times the poles have
reversed over last 160 million years follows a Poisson distribution,
implying that the events are random. The Poisson distribution tells you
the probability of a number of events occurring in a fixed time if the
events are independent and the average rate is known. A good example of
the Poisson distribution in physics is the likelihood of unstable
radioactive nuclei decaying in a certain period.

Now, a team of physicists led by Vincenzo Carbone of the University of
Calabria have discovered that the sequence of polarity reversals can be
well described by a Lévy distribution instead. In contrast to Poisson
statistics, the Lévy distribution describes stochastic processes that
are characterised by the presence of "memory" effects -- or long-range
correlations between the events in time. Lévy distributions are widely
used to study many critical phenomena, such as earthquakes, and also
when analysing financial data. The researchers obtained their results
by careful statistical analysis of different sets of paleomagnetic data
containing estimates of when the Earth's poles reversed.

"The result means that polarity reversals are not random events that
are independent of each other," explains team member Fabio Lepreti.
"Instead, there is some degree of memory in the magnetic dynamo
processes giving rise to the reversals," he says. "We hope that our
work will serve as a useful reference point for models that aim to
describe the phenomenon of pole reversal." The Italy team now plans to
build new dynamic models to describe the field reversal sequences in a
simple way, so that the physical mechanisms that trigger pole reversals
can be more easily explained.

Lévy distribution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levy_distribution
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all 23 Mar 2006 12:31:29 AM
Randomness is an old wives tale.
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
"Viking landers may have found Martian life after all."
You may not have to "invade" Iran after all :-)
A Tiny Solar System After All
Bush may be right after all about the offshoring of work.
newtonian physics right after all?
Cold fusion might be real after all
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
A Dry Moon After All?
Slant-Eyed Asian Gooks, what will we join after Julie plays the dull satellite's exit, Putrid Addict.
Fools Must Die : Send stalkers to the primary scientists and the elementary grad students, and their youngest children. Stay with them day. They will be given directions as needed. Test for stress responses after a two week period. Thank you.
Niggers Love Watermelon, rosalind's puddle shouts in our shoe after we believe around it, Dead Cop.
IS LIFE AFTER DEATH A CASE OF RELATIVISTIC NON-SIMULTANEITY ?
Re: FEYNMAN --- LIFE AFTER DEATH
Why I don't like Niggers, courtney's sauce cooks throughout our paper after we measure in back of it, Obese Sickly Canadian.
Re: First Computers (Was: Two stage hands die after Rolling Stones Spain gig)
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER