| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
03 Oct 2006 05:39:36 AM |
| Object: |
GLOBAL WARMING |
A view from the True Geology
**********************************
Regarding a recent article in Courrier Mail on Equinox day
Here is copy of my comments sent to the Editor
AUSTRALIA FACING WORST FIRE SEASON',
Sirs,
One important aspect of the global warming is not considered and cannot
be considered in light of present fraudulent & misleading Geology
theories, implying indeed a stability of Earth upon present orbit
since alleged creation there. ( Incidentally there is a complete
consensus between Sectarians & Big Bang Creationists on that particular
point)
Well, it is not so and the direct consequences of the global warming
are an irreversible drift on the Ecliptic generating on the one hand an
increase in the De Coriolis forces with consequences of higher vortex
speed of tornadoes & cyclones ( to reach soon 400 km/h); and on the
other hand a irremediable loss of air in outer atmosphere, which loss
the alchemy of rocks into water is unable to compensate ... with then
the lower pressure of fresh water in aquifers, its depletion and the
invasion of seas under continents.
All such aspects of the whole Geology problem cannot be even considered
by present Universities brain-washed alleged scientists since implying
firstly an approach based on the UPL ( Universal Pressure Law) corner
stone indeed of the True Geology and secondly a synthesis approach
which is complete opposition to the ultra specialisation of
Universities, conducting indeed the mind formatted & programmed
alleged scientists to tunnel vision and painfully narrow mindedness.
As a final comment, it goes without saying that concerning both Mankind
& Earth past, that accepted theories in Geology are both painfully
infantile & misleading indeed. There was never indeed any Glaciations
nor Glacial Ages and the alleged proofs of it presented by blinded
fools are just the proofs of direct application of the laws of Physics
of fluid applied upon etero-sedimentations, Mountain building in a
matter of hours & coherent indeed with the UPL, a time column which
must be referenced to the different positions of Earth upon Ecliptic
since birth from Mother star & its consecutive drift etc Incidentally
the alleged evolution proposed by failed medical student Darwin is in
fact a permanent adaptation to reduced Cosmic pressure environnement...
In matter pertaining to real science, one should remember that
Simplicity is the key to Verity ...and in my view the drought &
bushfires are the cosnequences of ignorance & comptempt for Nature
laws. In this regard present fire season as I see it, could well
infringe into city and cut wide swathes of destruction into Perth,
Melbourne or Sydney.
Yours faithfully
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Mobile +33 650 171 464
Australia Mining Pioneer
Founder of the True Geology
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
15 Oct 2006 02:09:28 PM |
|
|
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:5tt2j2lbbg7uub5m92vranpe3jik92o2k7@4ax.com
Liar.
No lie, just researching from within the regular laws of physics and
from the best available facts as we have to work with.
If I was going to lie, I'd be telling you all about what a warm and
fuzzy nice sort of guy our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) is, and that
glogal warming has absoultely nothing whatsoever to do with humanity
running amuck.
<http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/1996-07/UoA-TRTM-050796.php>
Got that big old physically dark and nasty moon as of something prior to
the last ice age? (obviously not)
Liar.
No lie, just more of the same old available facts as best we have to
work with.
How much of the moon's 2e20 joules is getting converted into terrestrial
tidal driven heat?
Trick question, butthead, or are you off by more than 8 orders of
magnitude on the Moon's kinetic energy? Silly of me to even ask, come
to think of it; you're not bright enough for trick questions.
Where's the trick? So you're obviously not quite smart enough to
figgure it out, and otherwise you're not ever going to be nice enough as
to share?
I suspect it's no coincidence, either, that the number you've given is
correct for the _attractive force in newtons_. Do you in fact even
have a clue about the difference between force and energy?
Yes! why do you ask? or rather, so what's the difference?
You don't appear to have a clue that most of the actual energy gets sapped
from the Earth, not the Moon. And what's the point supposed to be, anyway
-- are you planning to change the number if you don't like it?
Unlike yourself, I'm not the least bit all-knowing and pagan born-again
chuck full of such warm and fuzzy bigotry. Please share whatever
all-knowing expertise you and your borg collective kind can muster, or
is that asking way too much?
How much energy is the moon's reflected and secondary emitted IR and FIR
worth these days?
Why, butthead? Planning to build a lunar-cell array to power your
house at night when solar-cells won't work? I have bad news . . .
Once again, you either don't know squat nor don't actually intend to
share and share alike. Or is it actually a little of both?
Isn't this fun. I keep asking silly questions that we should have all
of the replicated to death worth of hard-scientific answers to, yet you
folks simply can't answer with a straight butt crack. Why is that?
Because everybody knows you're a lying sack of *****, and your
questions are indeed silly ones. (Well, it probably helps that you're
also an insane crypto-Nazi who accuses everyone who argues with him of
being part of a Jewish conspiracy.)
My goodness, is this the reason why you're accomplishing such a terrific
rusemaster job at avoiding the root of this and every other related
topic?
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
15 Oct 2006 05:38:20 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:09:28 +0000 (UTC), "Brad Guth"
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:5tt2j2lbbg7uub5m92vranpe3jik92o2k7@4ax.com
You don't appear to have a clue that most of the actual energy gets sapped
from the Earth, not the Moon. And what's the point supposed to be, anyway
-- are you planning to change the number if you don't like it?
Unlike yourself, I'm not the least bit all-knowing and pagan born-again
chuck full of such warm and fuzzy bigotry. Please share whatever
all-knowing expertise you and your borg collective kind can muster, or
is that asking way too much?
No, indeed. Here are a few pointers: You're a fool. You're an
offensive fool. You're a bigoted, offensive fool. You're an
innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool. You're a scientifically
illiterate, innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool. You're a mentally
ill, scientifically illiterate, innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool;
and people are sick of listening to your demented, silly fantasies.
There are a few, like me, who get a certain sadistic satisfaction out
of mocking you, but most folks just wish you'd eat ***** and die.
If you'd like to hear more, just ask. Or you could go back to your
fantasies of running a concentration camp all day, and giving Hitler
blowjobs all night.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
23 Oct 2006 07:19:21 AM |
|
|
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:0jd5j211g6rla5veh094j8aq6no80un3pu@4ax.com
No, indeed. Here are a few pointers: You're a fool. You're an
offensive fool. You're a bigoted, offensive fool. You're an
innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool. You're a scientifically
illiterate, innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool. You're a mentally
ill, scientifically illiterate, innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool;
and people are sick of listening to your demented, silly fantasies.
There are a few, like me, who get a certain sadistic satisfaction out
of mocking you, but most folks just wish you'd eat ***** and die.
What's this, Bill Snyder going Usenet postal with a battery of lose
cannons?
All of the sudden true geology that's matter of fact, the regular laws
of physics, of replicated hard-science and obviously everything about
observationology (no matters how proof worthy the image) isn't quite
good enough. I'd suppose next you're going to have to trash the likes
of Einstein.
Only your hocus-pocus worth of your infomercial history, science and of
such skewed conditional laws of physics that supposedly had us walking
on that physically dark and terribly DNA lethal moon is all that
matters. And you actually think I'm a bigot? I'm impressed, as I'm
certain your boss, GW Bush or Hitler, would be impressed for different
reasons.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
23 Oct 2006 08:04:40 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:19:21 +0000 (UTC), "Brad Guth"
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:0jd5j211g6rla5veh094j8aq6no80un3pu@4ax.com
No, indeed. Here are a few pointers: You're a fool. You're an
offensive fool. You're a bigoted, offensive fool. You're an
innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool. You're a scientifically
illiterate, innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool. You're a mentally
ill, scientifically illiterate, innumerate, bigoted, offensive fool;
and people are sick of listening to your demented, silly fantasies.
There are a few, like me, who get a certain sadistic satisfaction out
of mocking you, but most folks just wish you'd eat ***** and die.
What's this, Bill Snyder going Usenet postal with a battery of lose
cannons?
All of the sudden true geology that's matter of fact, the regular laws
of physics, of replicated hard-science and obviously everything about
observationology (no matters how proof worthy the image) isn't quite
good enough. I'd suppose next you're going to have to trash the likes
of Einstein.
Only your hocus-pocus worth of your infomercial history, science and of
such skewed conditional laws of physics that supposedly had us walking
on that physically dark and terribly DNA lethal moon is all that
matters. And you actually think I'm a bigot? I'm impressed, as I'm
certain your boss, GW Bush or Hitler, would be impressed for different
reasons.
Of course you're a bigot as well as a fool and a loon. You accuse
everybody who disagrees with you with being part of a Jewish plot. If
you seriously imagine that calling them Nazis at the same time you're
doing that fools anybody, that delusion is just another reflection of
your basic stupidity and craziness.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
23 Oct 2006 09:08:25 AM |
|
|
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:1cfpj2dvg1gllcmgemuscn4dp69i3hdpa8@4ax.com
Of course you're a bigot as well as a fool and a loon. You accuse
everybody who disagrees with you with being part of a Jewish plot. If
you seriously imagine that calling them Nazis at the same time you're
doing that fools anybody, that delusion is just another reflection of
your basic stupidity and craziness.
Why can't Jews have plots? I thought most all religious cults had
plots. Is there any government on Earth without a plot? (I don't think
so)
But didn't we get ourselves into space specifically because of the
expertise of those smart Jewish collaborators to the Third Reich? And,
how about that nifty H-Bomb?
I always thought them German Jews were extremely smart rocket wizards,
at least a whole lot smarter than most of us at the time, and I'm not
sure they're not still ahead of most of us.
I have no problems with honest Jews that are smart at whatever they do.
After all, apparently their God was Jewish. Obviously you seem rather
miffed.
Are you saying there's no such thing as a bad Jew?
If you have hard-science or even a viable swag to offer that's different
than mine, as such I have no problems because you're going to back that
mindset up with something, arnt you?
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
14 Oct 2006 07:26:19 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:08:08 GMT, "Question Quigley"
<Quigley@limerick.ie> wrote:
I see you didn't take your meds today.
What are you taking, BTW? Lithium? Love those light elements.
Guth is so spaced, he's on DI-lithium. Now if only they'd beam him
up.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
11 Oct 2006 08:04:44 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:33:02 +0000 (UTC), "Brad Guth"
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:nrvii21huqipr32q40ahrkdufg0dsbkguk@4ax.com
Thanks for again demonstrating your inability to produce anything but
illiterate, delusional, and on the whole rather nasty, babble.
What!? You mean Bradley isn't a visionary?
Do hallucinations count as visions?
Do liars tell lies, and do they beget other liars?
Is being in denial of your denial yet another Jewish form of a lie?
Why are you folks so into avoiding the "GLOBAL WARNING" topic that's at
hand? or is that topic merely yet another lie?
Once again discrediting himself better than I could ever do.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
12 Oct 2006 11:05:59 AM |
|
|
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:ptqpi2lmnbq7ug60ppkh61amdp8n0n07qi@4ax.com
Why are you folks so into avoiding the "GLOBAL WARNING" topic that's at
hand? or is that topic merely yet another Jewish lie?
Once again discrediting himself better than I could ever do.
Discrediting the regular laws of physics and of the best available
science that's replicated: I think not!
Is it our nearby mascon of a moon, or is it simply the ongoing
arrogance, bigotry and greed of humanity itself that's toasting our
infomercial spewing butts of denial?
As I've said before; I'm to guess that the rest of us village idiots
really don't want to rock thy infomercial spewing fleet of boats of
wag-thy-dog damage control and continued denial, that is as long as it's
mostly nonjews are those getting summarily kicked in their teeth and
butt at the same time by mother nature.
"Exxon Stockholders Liable for Global Warming Damages"
<sun.myung.moon@thepopeshinesmyshoes.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9857EC2A58310H2PVNow@207.115.17.102
Giant CO2-H2O Natural Laser photographed from Space Satellites -- 2,763 megatons of TNT energy
equivilent each peak hour measured.
The secondary results of humans having boosted our global warming past
the point of no return is certinly becoming clear as this natural
"CO2-H2O LASER"
http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Bebinca/Bebinca_01.html
However, the only thing natural going on is the matter of fact that we
humans are the most likely natural cause of such a concentrated
formation of energy, though still a fraction of what our nearby mascon
of a moon is contributing on a global basis. Of course it has always
been the jobs of the Usenet rusemasters and naysayers to wag-thy-dogs to
death, and that's exactly what they've been doing all along. (must be a
predominately Jewish thing because, only the wealthy and most powerful
of this horrific environmental change are going to survive the long term
results, and at a good Exxon style profit to boot)
The "Bebinca Heat-Engine" that hosted a concentrated "300,000,000
megawatthours per hour at it's peak" is an impressive showing, as to
what's possible and no longer a what-if of our future. Add in a greater
concentration of CO2 and it should only get more interesting as these
heat-engine storms become more frequent, larger and having extended
lifespans. Amazing as to what lowering the albedo of mother Earth a
mere notch or two will actually do.
Thus far we can not tell with any certainty as to the difference between
a fossil imprint or mutation as having a solar and/or moon driven
indication, as to that which places our moon within the realm of having
been involved, at least as of much if anything prior to 10,000 BC seems
extremely iffy.
Much of Earth's supposed intelligent history doesn't even involve our
moon until nearly 2500 BC. I mean to ask, how absolutely dumb and
dumber were these early humans, as being the dominate species of
heathens just prior to 2500 BC?
This ziggurat was erected to the moon god Nanna.
It was built by Ur-Nammu at Ur around 2113-2096 B.C.
http://lib.haifa.ac.il/www/art/ur.html
It's as though all of the sudden, as of roughly 2500 BC, that nearby
moon of ours had become extremely worthy of being noticed.
So, I guess we honestly don't want to realize as to exactly when mother
Earth obtained her moon, or as to how much of our global warming trend
can be contributed by our moon, do we.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
12 Oct 2006 11:16:20 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:05:59 +0000 (UTC), "Brad Guth"
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:ptqpi2lmnbq7ug60ppkh61amdp8n0n07qi@4ax.com
Why are you folks so into avoiding the "GLOBAL WARNING" topic that's at
hand? or is that topic merely yet another Jewish lie?
Once again discrediting himself better than I could ever do.
Discrediting the regular laws of physics and of the best available
science that's replicated: I think not!
You mean like the data the VIRTIS probe is compiling on Venus even as
I type this? Not likely, you contemptibly dishonest fucktard.
Is it our nearby mascon of a moon, or is it simply the ongoing
arrogance, bigotry and greed of humanity itself that's toasting our
infomercial spewing butts of denial?
No, it's merely more of your feebleminded and illiterate *****.
As I've said before; I'm to guess that the rest of us village idiots
really don't want to rock thy infomercial spewing fleet of boats of
wag-thy-dog damage control and continued denial, that is as long as it's
mostly nonjews are those getting summarily kicked in their teeth and
butt at the same time by mother nature.
You need either fewer drugs or better ones.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
12 Oct 2006 11:42:11 AM |
|
|
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:ubqsi25ln90028ciqh8qn3upof1mhmnbe3@4ax.com
You mean like the data the VIRTIS probe is compiling on Venus even as
I type this? Not likely, you contemptibly dishonest fucktard.
Besides the matter of fact that your highly bigoted soul obviously can't
read, nor much less interpret a given image; What exactly is your
incest cloned Jewish infomercial spewing problem?
Is it our nearby mascon of a moon, or is it simply the ongoing
arrogance, bigotry and greed of humanity itself that's toasting our
infomercial spewing butts of denial?
No, it's merely more of your feebleminded and illiterate *****.
Again, might we bother as to asking, as to what sort of a insurmountable
Jewish problem do you folks have with Earth not having that absolutely
massive and nearby moon as of pre 10,000 BC?
Where's your physics and honestly replicated science that proves
otherwise?
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
12 Oct 2006 11:56:52 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:42:11 +0000 (UTC), "Brad Guth"
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:ubqsi25ln90028ciqh8qn3upof1mhmnbe3@4ax.com
You mean like the data the VIRTIS probe is compiling on Venus even as
I type this? Not likely, you contemptibly dishonest fucktard.
<Spacing restored>
Besides the matter of fact that your highly bigoted soul obviously can't
read, nor much less interpret a given image; What exactly is your
incest cloned Jewish infomercial spewing problem?
Look, kid, tell Mommy to go to the dictionary and look up "incest" for
you; and then have her look up "clone." Get her to explain to you in
words of one syllable why "incest cloned" makes even less sense than
the rest of your retarded babble. (Then we can have her try
explaining about the Moon, and the Apollo landings, and Venus.)
Is it our nearby mascon of a moon, or is it simply the ongoing
arrogance, bigotry and greed of humanity itself that's toasting our
infomercial spewing butts of denial?
No, I'm just impatient waiting for the pigs to fly, which will have to
happen before you become capable of speaking the truth.
No, it's merely more of your feebleminded and illiterate *****.
Again, might we bother as to asking, as to what sort of a insurmountable
Jewish problem do you folks have with Earth not having that absolutely
massive and nearby moon as of pre 10,000 BC?
Where's your physics and honestly replicated science that proves
otherwise?
You've only been pointed to a ton of it over the last few days, you
dishonest slime. Tidalites show very clearly that the moon's been
around for gigayears.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
12 Oct 2006 01:21:20 PM |
|
|
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:tgssi2tkcocs2ihah1676c7dgvur8ek6a0@4ax.com
You've only been pointed to a ton of it over the last few days, you
dishonest slime. Tidalites show very clearly that the moon's been
around for gigayears.
There's no such scientific proof, other than pertaining to a solar tide.
Hell's bells, our vast and unusually salty oceans and of many other
concentrated salt deposits simply haven't even been with us for all that
long.
We see that you and your kind still have nothing constructive to
contribute. Just more of the same old mainstream status quo. What a
surprise.
Why don't you bother as to interpret upon something/anything that could
possibly help us understand our failing environment, or otherwise
improve the quality of life for others (including those of us nonjews)?
Obviously that's simply asking too much of such a born-again pagan bigot
as yourself. Sorry I'd asked.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
12 Oct 2006 02:04:59 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:21:20 +0000 (UTC), "Brad Guth"
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:tgssi2tkcocs2ihah1676c7dgvur8ek6a0@4ax.com
You've only been pointed to a ton of it over the last few days, you
dishonest slime. Tidalites show very clearly that the moon's been
around for gigayears.
There's no such scientific proof, other than pertaining to a solar tide.
Hell's bells, our vast and unusually salty oceans and of many other
concentrated salt deposits simply haven't even been with us for all that
long.
Solar tide, my *****, you lying fucktard; there are tidalites whose
record corresponds to the *Moon's position in its orbit around the
Earth*.
[snip additional BS]
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
23 Oct 2006 07:03:43 AM |
|
|
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:p94ti2t6mk9tfnvupd2gfp59s351or3mqa@4ax.com
Solar tide, my *****, you lying fucktard; there are tidalites whose
record corresponds to the *Moon's position in its orbit around the
Earth*.
Too bad that it's of no scientific value, as to telling a pre 10,000 BC
solar tidalite from that of a lunar tidalite simply isn't possible.
Is there even any significant pre 10,000 BC seasons to work with?
When exactly (to the century) did Earth's tilt transpire?
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
23 Oct 2006 08:02:41 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:03:43 +0000 (UTC), "Brad Guth"
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill Snyder" <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:p94ti2t6mk9tfnvupd2gfp59s351or3mqa@4ax.com
Solar tide, my *****, you lying fucktard; there are tidalites whose
record corresponds to the *Moon's position in its orbit around the
Earth*.
Too bad that it's of no scientific value, as to telling a pre 10,000 BC
solar tidalite from that of a lunar tidalite simply isn't possible.
Liar. I said already posted a reference showing that some of them
depict >> the Moon's position relative to the Earth.
Is there even any significant pre 10,000 BC seasons to work with?
When exactly (to the century) did Earth's tilt transpire?
When the wackjobs all crowded over on one side.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: GLOBAL WARMING |
12 Oct 2006 01:27:36 PM |
|
|
True Geology
Of when and where did the bulk of our unusually salty oceans come from?
How much of it got contributed upon each near pass of the Sirius
star/solar system?
Where the heck did our once upon a time salty and extremely icy
proto-moon come from?
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
