| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Mitchell" |
| Date: |
22 Oct 2004 08:46:41 PM |
| Object: |
God |
Now you see it, now you don't.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: God |
23 Oct 2004 09:23:44 AM |
|
|
Mitchell wrote:
Now you see it, now you don't.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
You are looking in the wrong place.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: God |
24 Oct 2004 06:02:30 PM |
|
|
Mitchell I can see God fitting in only in the Quantum realm of the
universe. That is a very weird place. Einstien rules our macro
realm,and actions are slow,and stuff can be measured,and math equations
don't end up in infinity. Reality is the big cosmolagy of the universe
is in slow motion giving us lots of time to figure things out. No need
of a God to find answers. Man has found better ways. Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: God |
24 Oct 2004 08:12:20 PM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Mitchell I can see God fitting in only in the Quantum realm of the
universe. That is a very weird place. Einstien rules our macro
realm,and actions are slow,and stuff can be measured,and math equations
don't end up in infinity. Reality is the big cosmolagy of the universe
is in slow motion giving us lots of time to figure things out. No need
of a God to find answers. Man has found better ways. Bert
Herb--Religion and Physics are orthogonal.
http://www.csicop.org/si/9907/
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: God |
25 Oct 2004 08:22:12 AM |
|
|
Hi Sam I don't know how you are using that word orthogonal? That word
means "determined by right angles"(perpendicular) please make yourself
more realistically clearer. Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: God |
25 Oct 2004 08:36:07 AM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Hi Sam I don't know how you are using that word orthogonal? That word
means "determined by right angles"(perpendicular) please make yourself
more realistically clearer. Bert
Also used loosely to mean "irrelevant to", e.g. "This may be
orthogonal to the discussion, but ...", similar to "going off
at a tangent".
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell" |
|
| Title: Re: God |
25 Oct 2004 01:16:30 AM |
|
|
Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<UpYed.300888$MQ5.69304@attbi_s52>...
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Mitchell I can see God fitting in only in the Quantum realm of the
universe. That is a very weird place. Einstien rules our macro
realm,and actions are slow,and stuff can be measured,and math equations
don't end up in infinity. Reality is the big cosmolagy of the universe
is in slow motion giving us lots of time to figure things out. No need
of a God to find answers. Man has found better ways. Bert
Herb--Religion and Physics are orthogonal.
http://www.csicop.org/si/9907/
ORTHOGONAL; such a fancy word Worm. You must have got that
from Uncle Al.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: God |
25 Oct 2004 08:08:33 AM |
|
|
orthogonal
<geometry> At 90 degrees (right angles).
N mutually orthogonal vectors span an N-dimensional
vector space, meaning that, any vector in the space can be
expressed as a linear combination of the vectors. This is
true of any set of N linearly independent vectors.
The term is used loosely to mean mutually independent or well
separated. It is used to describe sets of primitives or
capabilities that, like linearly independent vectors in
geometry, span the entire "capability space" and are in some
sense non-overlapping or mutually independent. For example,
in logic, the set of operators "not" and "or" is described as
orthogonal, but the set "nand", "or", and "not" is not
(because any one of these can be expressed in terms of the
others).
Also used loosely to mean "irrelevant to", e.g. "This may be
orthogonal to the discussion, but ...", similar to "going off
at a tangent".
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
