| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
14 Feb 2004 06:58:53 AM |
| Object: |
God is the Talk Show Host on Cosmic Radio |
In simple terms: Einstein's gravity is FM cosmic radio and dark
energy/matter is AM cosmic radio with God as the talk show host. :-)
That's my theory in a nutshell! :-)
On Feb 14, 2004, at 3:43 AM, Tony Smith wrote:
"Jack, you say,
about my WMAP ratio paper that was recently removed by arXiv and
which is on my web site at
http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/WMAPpaper.pdf
that
you "... cannot understand it ..." and you "... do not understand
the correspondence you make ...".
The correspondence is:
----------------------------------------------------------------
DE (dark energy, cosmological constant) - the 10 Rotations, Boosts,
and Special Conformal generators
DM (dark matter) - the 4 Translations
OM (ordinary matter) - the 1 Dilatation"
---------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I do not understand why you do that. It seems completely arbitrary
to me without compelling reason.
What you do here is not consistent with my theory, which is much simpler.
What I would have here is
Einstein gravity spin 1 tetrad field from locally gauging the 4
Translations.
Shipov torsion field, which is maybe spin 3/2 (supersymmetry), from
locally gauging the 6 Lorentz Rotations not done by Einstein in the
original 1915 geometrodynamics.
Spin 0 scalar gravity from locally gauging the 1 Dilatation.
A second spin 1 tetrad field from locally gauging the 4 special
conformal transformations to uniformly accelerated "hyperbolic motion"
of the "relativistic rocket" in special relativity.
I am not sure of any of the above as yet since I have not worked through
the algebra.
TS"The correspondence is clear to me in terms of Segal's intuitive
conformal model, and I have a link to my web site for more details
at the word "correspondence" in my WMAP ratio paper (on the line
immediately above the statement of the correspondence)."
It's not clear to me and it seems wrong in the light of what I have done.
Einstein's gravity (spin 2 metric field) emerges from the phase
modulation of the macro-quantum "superfluid" ODLRO vacuum coherence.
Both dark energy and dark matter are w = -1 residual micro-quantum zero
point energy "normal fluid" artifacts emergent from the amplitude
modulation of the same macro-quantum "superfluid" ODLRO vacuum
coherence. Dark energy anti-gravitates and dark matter gravitates from
battle-tested standard physics of the equivalence principle, covariance
of the local laws of physics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
They do so strongly at short range and are not limited by G(Newton) that
applies only in the long-range.
I do not understand Segal. I have not read him. His work may be
important but not for dark energy/matter in my opinion.
In simple terms: Einstein's gravity is FM cosmic radio and dark
energy/matter is AM cosmic radio with God as the talk show host. :-)
That's my theory in a nutshell! :-)
TA: "The link is to
http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/coscongraviton.html
However,
it is fair for you to ask me for an explanation of the correspondence
terms of your model, so here is my attempt at such an explanation:
--------------------------
Dark Energy DE:
DE is the NORMAL state of stuff in our universe (it is now,
according to WMAP, about 73% of it).
I do not understand you.
It looks more like deSitter spacetime than Minkowski spacetime."
I thought that would be anti-deSitter "hyperbolic" since the
anti-gravity makes the universe accelerate in its expansion not decelerate?
Also I do not think there is anything fundamental in the 73%. It is
probably contingent unless Simon Daniel can somehow get it from an
error-correcting code sphere packing in hyperspace information flow
model, but that model would have to be compelling in terms battle-tested
physics like general relativity and quantum theory.
TS:"In Segal's model and as Aldrovandi and Peireira show in some
mathematical detail in their paper at
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9809061
the DE spacetime structure comes from "... the group Q,
formed by a semi-direct product between Lorentz
and special conformal transformation groups ...".
Those are
the 10 Rotations, Boosts and Special Conformal generators
that
correspond to DE in my WMAP ratio paper."
You mean Poincare group not Lorentz group. In any case what you did here
is to replace one mystery by another mystery.
I do not understand your explanation. I have not read the papers you
cite. In any case I have a simple explanation of Einstein's gravity with
both dark energy and dark matter from the condensed matter physics point
of view of "More is different" so I do not need the stuff you mention
since it is excess theoretical baggage in my view. I do more with less
here I think. Of course, I may be completely wrong but I understand my
picture and I have no clue about the Segal stuff you cite until you can
explain it clearly and compellingly in your own words.
--------------------------
TS: "Dark Matter DM:
DM is a lesser part (it is now, according to WMAP, about 23% of it)
of our universe, and differs from the dominant DE by being
based on the 4 Translations."
Again I do not understand you.
TS: "In your terms,
"... Locally gauge the 4 parameter translation subgroup T4, to get a
local compensating field that is the spin 1 Einstein tetrad field ...".
Those
4 Translations
therefore
correspond to DM in my WMAP paper."
I do not understand what you wrote here. In my theory I have a simple
formula based on the two-fluid model well known in superfluid theory.
/\zpf = (Area Quantum)^-1[(Area Quantum)^3/2|Vacuum Coherence|^2 - 1]
DM is attractive /\zpf < 0
DE is repulsive /\zpf > 0
from Einstein's exotic vacuum equation
Guv + /\zpfguv = 0
End of story. Very simple. We don't need excess theoretical baggage from
Segal to, solve that simple observational problem in my opinion. I could
be wrong but I see no compelling reason to think I am at this moment.
--------------------------
TS: "Ordinary Matter OM:
OM (the stuff of which we and Earth are made) is sort of weird and
exceptional (it is now, according to WMAP, only about 4% of it).
For us to call it ordinary is quite provincial,
because it is only ordinary in the context of our physical bodies
and the planet on which we live.
What characterizes all OM is that its mass comes from the Higgs
mechanism.
You say "... Finally what about the dilaton? Who ordered that? :-)
I guess its compensating gauge field is spin 0 gravity? ...".
Your guess is close,
but the Dilatation actually gives the spin 0 Higgs field,"
Well that should give my
/\zpf = (Area Quantum)^-1[(Area Quantum)^3/2|Vacuum Coherence|^2 - 1]
Because the Higgs bosons come from linear noise in the |Vacuum
Coherence| background in terms of the renormalizable Mexican Hat
potential for the Vacuum Coherence (Inflation) local field. It's the
same as I did in my 1966 paper with Stoneham on the "Goldstone Theorem
and the Jahn-Teller Effect" in Proceedings of the Physical Society of
London. It's same simple game with some variations that all the Pundits
have been playing for a long time. I got it from Goldstone and Higgs and
mainly Kibble from going down to Imperial College from Harwell in the
summer of 1966.
TS: "and therefore all the mass of OM,
so
the 1 Dilatation
therefore
corresponds to OM in my WMAP paper."
Your associations here are too vague for my mind to grasp. The problem
seems different to me, but I could be wrong of course.
------------------------------
TS:"If you want to see our universe in your terms,
you might say that
DE and DM are "... TWO types ..." of spacetime
and
that
OM is something like a little frothy foam on/in the DE/DM system."
No, I do not say anything like that.
The DE and DM are simply the high and low superfluid density
non-equilibrium exotic phases of the physical vacuum relative to the
non-gravitating /\zpf = 0 equilibrium vacuum. DE is like a high density
peak and DM is like a low density peak in a longitudinal spin 0
"dilaton" standing "sound wave" in the "ether" (physical vacuum).
That's it. Very simple. It's AM near field cosmic radio, but off mass
shell so frequencies and wavelengths are not tied together as they are
in far field on mass shell propagation.
TS: "As my WMAP ratio paper says,
if you use the above correspondence you get a present-day ratio
DE : DM : OM = 75.3% : 20.2% : 4.5%
which is
close to the WMAP observation of 73% : 23% : 4%."
I do not understand how you compute those numbers. In any case, I think
those numbers are contingent in sense of WAP in Max Tegmark's infinity
of infinity of parallel universes. "My Father's House has many mansions."
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
