Science > Physics > Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
12 Feb 2006 09:42:54 AM |
| Object: |
Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
http://physicsmathforums.com/
Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved
In 1949 Godel published a paper showing that within the theory of
relativity, time as we understand it, does not exist. Einstein
recognized Godel's paper as "an important contribution to the general
theory of relativity," and since then physicists have not been able to
find any logical shortcomings in Godel's work, and nobody has been able
to account for the existence of time. But the Theory of Moving
Dimensions accounts for time as we know it by showing that it is an
emergent property of the underlying dimension's intrinsic relative
movement.
Godel wrote, "By making a round trip on a rocket ship in a sufficiently
wide course, it is possible in these worlds to travel into any region
of the past, present, and future, and back again, exactly as it is
possible in other worlds to travel to distant parts of space. This
state of affairs seems to imply an absurdity. For it enables one to
travel into the near past of those places where he himself lived. There
he would find a person who would be himself at some earlier period of
life. Now he could do something to this person, which, by his memory,
he knows has not happened to him."
Kaku writes, "Kurt Godel's essay constitutes, in my opinion, an
important contribution to the general theory of relativity, especially
to the analysis of the concept of time. The problem here involved
disturbed me already at the time of the building up of the general
theory of relativity, without my having succeeded in clarifying it...
The distinction "earlier-later" is abandoned for world-points which lie
far apart in a cosmological sense, and those paradoxes, regarding the
direction of the causal connection, arise, of which Mr. Godel has
spoken. . . It will be interesting to weigh whether these are not to be
excluded on physical grounds." -Michio Kaku
The mistake Einstein made in his formulation was confusing time itself
with the fourth dimension. Time is an emergent property that we witness
because of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions, and because it thus inherits properties of a dimension, it
is all too tempting for physicists to refer to time as a dimension.
Time travel is impossible both in reality and Moving Dimensions theory,
though I encourage prominent physicists to keep on writing books about
time machines and bookstores to stock them in the science-fiction
sections.
Time arises from the interaction of the expanding fourth dimension with
the three spatial dimensions, but many physicists mistakenly labeled
the fourth dimension as the time dimension.
A lot of confusion has arisen by from this mislabeling coupled with the
physicists' tendency to over-extend metaphors. As soon as physicists
mistakenly labeled the fourth dimension the time dimension, they were
eager to see it as an entity analogous to the three spatial dimensions,
where one can get from any point to any other point.
But time is an emergent property deriving from the expansion of a
single spatial dimension relative to the three other stationary spatial
dimensions. The fourth dimension expands in units of the Planck length
at the rate of c, so in a sense the fourth dimension is only ever
Planck's length deep to all macroscopic objects. Only a photon can
exist in this dimension, orthogonal to the three dimensions, and at
that point a photon is matter surfing the expanding dimension. Huygen's
principle demonstrates that every point along a spherically symmetric
wavefront is the source of a spherically symmetric wave, and so it is
with a photon. This is because every point in space-time is the source
of a spherically symmetric expansion of the fourth dimension relative
to the three stationary dimensions.
Time travel to any significant degree is impossible because the time
dimension never reaches deeper than Planck's length. You could only go
back in time by Planck's time, which wouldn't be very useful!
Physicists enjoy viewing the time dimension on equal footing with the
spatial dimensions. After all, they say it is just another a
"dimension" that just happens to have a minus sign infront of it in the
space-time metric. But they never seek to explain the minus sign.
Instead they rush straight ahead into all their ridiculous notions of
time travel, stating that just as we can get from any point A to any
point B in space, we can get from any point A to any point B in time.
But time travel has never been accomplished, nor will it ever be.
Physicists were right in recognizing that time is a dimension, but they
fell short in recognizing that it was different from the three spatial
dimensions in that it is expanding at the rate of c relative to the
three spatial dimensions.
The notion of past, present, and future is more related to the change
of energy than it is to the actual existence of a physical past, a
physical present, and a physical future. Only the present ever exists,
and the past is what is recorded in our minds-it exists nowhere else.
But because time is a dimension, physicists were seduced into believing
one could travel anywhere within it. But in reality we never get any
further than Planck's length deep in time, and it is at that depth
that photons surf through the universe, while electrons oscillate, and
out bodies maintain their average position firmly in the three spatial
dimensions as the time dimension expands relentlessly about us in units
of Planck's length.
"For Godel, if there is time travel, there isn't time. The goal of the
great logician was not to make room in physics for one's favorite
episode of Star Trek, but rather to demonstrate that if one follows the
logic of relativity further even than its father was willing to
venture, the results will not just illuminate but eliminate the reality
of time." -A World Without Time, Palle Yourgrau
Unification of QM and Relativity
Relativity becomes increasingly exact at long-length scales but fails
at short ones because space-time itself is quantized, as the time
dimension is expanding in units of the Planck length. The concept of
general relativity's smooth geometry, at large scales, disappears on
short-distance scales-this has been a problem to string theorists, but
only because they were never bold enough to recognize that's the way it
is because that's the way it is-GR does not break down at distances
smaller than the Planck length because such distances do not exist with
any degree of certainty. The fourth dimension is expanding relative to
the three spatial dimensions in units of the Planck length, and thus
distances smaller than the Planck length cannot be measured nor
defined.
In An Elegant Universe, Brian Greene writes, "Recall that the problem
in merging general relativity and quantum mechanics turns up when the
central tenet of the former-that space and time constitute a smoothly
curving geometrical structure-confronts the essential feature of the
latter-that everything in the universe, including the fabric of space
and time, undergoes quantum fluctuations that become increasingly
turbulent when probed on smaller and smaller distance scales. On
sub-Planck-scale distances, the quantum undulations are so violent that
they destroy the notion of a smoothly curving geometrical space; this
means that general relativity breaks down."
But general relativity does not break down. It works perfectly well,
holding the planets in their orbits, curving space and time about
massive objects, bending light just so, in accordance with Einstein's
equations.
General relativity does not break down at sub-Planck-scale distances
because such distances do not exist. The fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions in units of the Planck length,
and thus all physical measurements and physical definitions are larger
than the Planck length. General relativity need have no fear of ever
breaking down at distances smaller than the Planck length, because such
distances do not exist in the physical world!!
http://physicsmathforums.com/
.
|
|
| User: "G. Hobba" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
12 Feb 2006 04:42:11 PM |
|
|
<jollyrogership@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1139758974.102517.278620@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://physicsmathforums.com/
Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved
In 1949 Godel published a paper showing that within the theory of
relativity, time as we understand it, does not exist.
That is not what he did.
Rest of usual junk and other misconceptions mercifully snipped.
Bill
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
12 Feb 2006 01:10:54 PM |
|
|
On 12 Feb 2006 07:42:54 -0800, wrote:
http://physicsmathforums.com/
Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved
In 1949 Godel published a paper showing that within the theory of
relativity, time as we understand it, does not exist. Einstein
recognized Godel's paper as "an important contribution to the general
theory of relativity," and since then physicists have not been able to
find any logical shortcomings in Godel's work, and nobody has been able
to account for the existence of time. But the Theory of Moving
Dimensions accounts for time as we know it by showing that it is an
emergent property of the underlying dimension's intrinsic relative
movement.
Godel wrote, "By making a round trip on a rocket ship in a sufficiently
wide course, it is possible in these worlds to travel into any region
of the past, present, and future, and back again, exactly as it is
possible in other worlds to travel to distant parts of space. This
state of affairs seems to imply an absurdity. For it enables one to
travel into the near past of those places where he himself lived. There
he would find a person who would be himself at some earlier period of
life. Now he could do something to this person, which, by his memory,
he knows has not happened to him."
What Godel and Einstein failed to realize is that, if you could go
back in time, then time does not pass. If time does not pass, then a
time dimension makes motion impossible and talking about traveling in
time to the past (or the future) is pure crackpottery. Conclusion:
there is no time dimension. As simple as that.
Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/notorious.htm
Having said that, your moving dimension theory is just as much
crackpottery as Godel's time travel crap. A dimension is a degree of
freedom. It's an abstract concept. It cannot move and it certainly
cannot be compacted into a little fucking ball, a la string theory.
There is indeed a fourth spatial dimension in which the visible
universe is moving at c but it is certainly not a temporal dimension.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Immortalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
12 Feb 2006 02:03:35 PM |
|
|
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:pk1vu1d7snmu8m2jp0ds3v3637nbope6h7@4ax.com...
On 12 Feb 2006 07:42:54 -0800, wrote:
http://physicsmathforums.com/
Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved
In 1949 Godel published a paper showing that within the theory of
relativity, time as we understand it, does not exist. Einstein
recognized Godel's paper as "an important contribution to the general
theory of relativity," and since then physicists have not been able to
find any logical shortcomings in Godel's work, and nobody has been able
to account for the existence of time. But the Theory of Moving
Dimensions accounts for time as we know it by showing that it is an
emergent property of the underlying dimension's intrinsic relative
movement.
Godel wrote, "By making a round trip on a rocket ship in a sufficiently
wide course, it is possible in these worlds to travel into any region
of the past, present, and future, and back again, exactly as it is
possible in other worlds to travel to distant parts of space. This
state of affairs seems to imply an absurdity. For it enables one to
travel into the near past of those places where he himself lived. There
he would find a person who would be himself at some earlier period of
life. Now he could do something to this person, which, by his memory,
he knows has not happened to him."
What Godel and Einstein failed to realize is that, if you could go
back in time, then time does not pass. If time does not pass, then a
time dimension makes motion impossible and talking about traveling in
time to the past (or the future) is pure crackpottery. Conclusion:
there is no time dimension. As simple as that.
Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/notorious.htm
Having said that, your moving dimension theory is just as much
crackpottery as Godel's time travel crap. A dimension is a degree of
freedom. It's an abstract concept. It cannot move and it certainly
cannot be compacted into a little fucking ball, a la string theory.
There is indeed a fourth spatial dimension in which the visible
universe is moving at c but it is certainly not a temporal dimension.
Then your saying that it is a dimension that necessarily takes time to
happen?
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
13 Feb 2006 02:13:14 PM |
|
|
Louis Savain "Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:pk1vu1d7snmu8m2jp0ds3v3637nbope6h7@4ax.com...
[Dr. Elliot McGucken] aka
jollyrogership@yahoo.com w/i http://physicsmathforums.com/
Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved
In 1949 Godel published a paper showing that within the theory
of relativity, time as we understand it, does not exist. Einstein
recognized Godel's paper as "an important contribution to the
general theory of relativity," and since then physicists have not
been able to find any logical shortcomings in Godel's work, and
nobody has been able to account for the existence of time.
But the Theory of Moving Dimensions accounts for time as we
know it by showing that it is an emergent property of the underlying
dimension's intrinsic relative movement.
Godel wrote, "By making a round trip on a rocket ship in a sufficiently
wide course, it is possible in these worlds to travel into any region
of the past, present, and future, and back again, exactly as it is
possible in other worlds to travel to distant parts of space. This
state of affairs seems to imply an absurdity. For it enables one to
travel into the near past of those places where he himself lived. There
he would find a person who would be himself at some earlier period of
life. Now he could do something to this person, which, by his memory,
he knows has not happened to him."
[Louis]
What Godel and Einstein failed to realize is that, if you could go
back in time, then time does not pass. If time does not pass, then a
time dimension makes motion impossible and talking about traveling in
time to the past (or the future) is pure crackpottery. Conclusion:
there is no time dimension. As simple as that. [See here in:]
Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/notorious.htm
Having said that, your moving dimension theory is just as much
crackpottery as Godel's time travel crap. A dimension is a degree of
freedom. It's an abstract concept. It cannot move and it certainly
cannot be compacted into a little fucking ball, a la string theory.
There is indeed a fourth spatial dimension in which the visible
universe is moving at c but it is certainly not a temporal dimension.
Louis Savain
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHAA.... ho-di-door here for minute , guys:
"A dimension can't move and it certainly cannot be compacted
into a little fucking ball, a la string theory"... I would agree with that,
but I think that the stringers do see these disappearing or curling
or compacted dimensions (or McGucken's equivalent of moving
them) in a different way. They view these aspects or convolutions
as [A] somehow akin to describing a 10 mile long, ten foot dia
sewer pipe, a perfectly real 3D object, to look like a 2D pathway
on the landscape when seen from 5 miles up in a 747..
or [B] like a gigantic, 1 million mile across star that looks like a
dot/point without extent which cannot been seen as a disk no
matter how powerful the telescope is...
or [C] like in the calculus neglect principle of
dx^2 from a slight change dx in x. [(x+ dx)^2 = x^2 + 2 xdx + dx^2]
where a whole dimension is discarded: d(x^2) ---> 2 (x)
The real dims of [A] or [B] or dx^2 tail will always be there but
for convenience sake it is neglected, curled up, compacted or let
disappear since these appendages, A or B or C, do become too
small to influence their theories,... until these neglects do come
back to bite author and student in the *****... and this pain is then
(re)-explained as paradoxes... with their "emergent" dilatations,
contractions, time travel and wormholes... with much buzz
wording, the panacea for fixing physics theories... including the use
of 3 lbs of octonions and 25 colored tetrads and a nonexistent
instanton giving the theory a new hardon for the old hadrons...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/a0d89711d4d76110
ahahahaha.....
The real problem in all this is human vanity when they are *selling*
their story, the show, the theory. They never humbly advertise the
limitations of their stories, empathizing and loudly stipulating right
at the outset that they dropped those very (inconvenient) details
in their story. Over and over we see their belief that in their geriatric
eyes nature has to fit into their fucking equations which is why
relativists are so much laughed at these days, especially now,
50 years after Einstein himself said to Besso:
= "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based
= on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that
= case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
= theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." -- A.E.
or when Albert exclaimed that
= "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
= certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality"
These days, barring the geriatric mental masterbators of relativity,
theatrics of therotical physics does move away from eqautions and
more and more toward concepts that use computing power to fit
observations into models, like in Steven Wolfram's stuff, or the
older self-similarity hierarchy etc... all of which indicate more novel
thinking than the pedestrian appendages of SR/GR ... ahahahaha...
.... but in Savain's model no such embarrassment arises because
as he said himself: "Nothing escapes the lattice!".... ahahahahaha...
ahahaha... ahahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
13 Feb 2006 08:04:58 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:13:14 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
Louis Savain "Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:pk1vu1d7snmu8m2jp0ds3v3637nbope6h7@4ax.com...
[Dr. Elliot McGucken] aka
jollyrogership@yahoo.com w/i http://physicsmathforums.com/
Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved
In 1949 Godel published a paper showing that within the theory
of relativity, time as we understand it, does not exist. Einstein
recognized Godel's paper as "an important contribution to the
general theory of relativity," and since then physicists have not
been able to find any logical shortcomings in Godel's work, and
nobody has been able to account for the existence of time.
But the Theory of Moving Dimensions accounts for time as we
know it by showing that it is an emergent property of the underlying
dimension's intrinsic relative movement.
Godel wrote, "By making a round trip on a rocket ship in a sufficiently
wide course, it is possible in these worlds to travel into any region
of the past, present, and future, and back again, exactly as it is
possible in other worlds to travel to distant parts of space. This
state of affairs seems to imply an absurdity. For it enables one to
travel into the near past of those places where he himself lived. There
he would find a person who would be himself at some earlier period of
life. Now he could do something to this person, which, by his memory,
he knows has not happened to him."
[Louis]
What Godel and Einstein failed to realize is that, if you could go
back in time, then time does not pass. If time does not pass, then a
time dimension makes motion impossible and talking about traveling in
time to the past (or the future) is pure crackpottery. Conclusion:
there is no time dimension. As simple as that. [See here in:]
Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/notorious.htm
Having said that, your moving dimension theory is just as much
crackpottery as Godel's time travel crap. A dimension is a degree of
freedom. It's an abstract concept. It cannot move and it certainly
cannot be compacted into a little fucking ball, a la string theory.
There is indeed a fourth spatial dimension in which the visible
universe is moving at c but it is certainly not a temporal dimension.
Louis Savain
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHAA.... ho-di-door here for minute , guys:
"A dimension can't move and it certainly cannot be compacted
into a little fucking ball, a la string theory"... I would agree with that,
but I think that the stringers do see these disappearing or curling
or compacted dimensions (or McGucken's equivalent of moving
them) in a different way. They view these aspects or convolutions
as [A] somehow akin to describing a 10 mile long, ten foot dia
sewer pipe, a perfectly real 3D object, to look like a 2D pathway
on the landscape when seen from 5 miles up in a 747..
or [B] like a gigantic, 1 million mile across star that looks like a
dot/point without extent which cannot been seen as a disk no
matter how powerful the telescope is...
or [C] like in the calculus neglect principle of
dx^2 from a slight change dx in x. [(x+ dx)^2 = x^2 + 2 xdx + dx^2]
where a whole dimension is discarded: d(x^2) ---> 2 (x)
The real dims of [A] or [B] or dx^2 tail will always be there but
for convenience sake it is neglected, curled up, compacted or let
disappear since these appendages, A or B or C, do become too
small to influence their theories,... until these neglects do come
back to bite author and student in the *****... and this pain is then
(re)-explained as paradoxes... with their "emergent" dilatations,
contractions, time travel and wormholes... with much buzz
wording, the panacea for fixing physics theories... including the use
of 3 lbs of octonions and 25 colored tetrads and a nonexistent
instanton giving the theory a new hardon for the old hadrons...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/a0d89711d4d76110
ahahahaha.....
ahahaha... LOL. This is a beaut for my collection, Hanson. I've
noticed something about the crackpots of the physics community. They
always seem to have an answer when they get caught with their dirty
hands in the cookie jar. One of their favorites replies is, "you just
don't understand what we mean by this".
The real problem in all this is human vanity when they are *selling*
their story, the show, the theory. They never humbly advertise the
limitations of their stories, empathizing and loudly stipulating right
at the outset that they dropped those very (inconvenient) details
in their story. Over and over we see their belief that in their geriatric
eyes nature has to fit into their fucking equations which is why
relativists are so much laughed at these days, especially now,
50 years after Einstein himself said to Besso:
= "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based
= on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that
= case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
= theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." -- A.E.
or when Albert exclaimed that
= "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
= certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality"
These days, barring the geriatric mental masterbators of relativity,
theatrics of therotical physics does move away from eqautions and
more and more toward concepts that use computing power to fit
observations into models, like in Steven Wolfram's stuff, or the
older self-similarity hierarchy etc... all of which indicate more novel
thinking than the pedestrian appendages of SR/GR ... ahahahaha...
Geriatric physics is on the way out. The old dipshits can leave a fart
trail from here to Alpha Centauri, it makes no difference in the end.
They croak sooner or later or they become obsolete.
... but in Savain's model no such embarrassment arises because
as he said himself: "Nothing escapes the lattice!".... ahahahahaha...
ahahaha... ahahahanson
Indeed, this is the way of the lattice, from the very beginning. We
might as well resign ourselves to our fate. Nothing, absolutely
nothing escapes the lattice! ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spaceman" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
13 Feb 2006 08:09:25 PM |
|
|
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:t392v1l8ap059q1dbloveisgg9kircr3n9@4ax.com...
| ahahaha... LOL. This is a beaut for my collection, Hanson. I've
| noticed something about the crackpots of the physics community. They
| always seem to have an answer when they get caught with their dirty
| hands in the cookie jar. One of their favorites replies is, "you just
| don't understand what we mean by this".
Sort of like where they are telling me
that a "distance per a time" is not a speed.
:)
| Geriatric physics is on the way out. The old dipshits can leave a fart
| trail from here to Alpha Centauri, it makes no difference in the end.
| They croak sooner or later or they become obsolete.
I actually hope for the obselete since they could get
a job in the physics museum and we could press a button
and listen to them for a good laugh once in a while.
(when we press the button an old post from here will pop
up and they will parrot off the answers that are truly funny.)
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr.
"Physicistologist"
:)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
12 Feb 2006 03:44:28 PM |
|
|
MDT also differentiates between time and dimensions.
Time is an emergent property of a fourth dimension that is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions.
In GR, which has been experimentally verified, dimensions can warp and
bend, expand and contract.
Many trained physicists have a knee-jerk reaction that the fourth
dimension cannot be moving because "dimensions cannot move." First
off, since the universe is expanding, space-time is also expanding,
demonstrating that dimensions are moving and expanding. Secondly,
general relativity demonstrates that massive objects warp space-time,
meaning that as a massive object moves though space-time, it stretches
space-time, showing again that space-time in one area can move, or
deform, relative to space-time in another area. GR is a sound theory,
backed up with multiple high-profile experiments, including the
demonstration that starlight is bent by the sun and the verification
that orbiting stars radiate energy in the form of gravity waves. Thus
there exist neither philosophical nor physical barriers to the concept
of moving dimensions, but for artificial ones within lazy minds.
A curious sign of the times is that physicists will accept on blind
faith the existence of ten, twenty, or thirty dimensions, dimensions
that are curled up, or too small to measure, and yet they will reel in
shock and horror at a perfectly obvious postulate-the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.
http://physicsmathforums.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
12 Feb 2006 04:12:47 PM |
|
|
Two popes walk into a bar........
.
|
|
|
| User: "Immortalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity |
12 Feb 2006 07:50:10 PM |
|
|
<donstockbauer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139782367.638012.180620@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Two popes walk into a bar........
A guy enters bar carrying an alligator. Says to the patrons, "Here's a deal.
I'll open this alligator's mouth and place my genitals inside. The gator
will close his mouth for one minute, then open it, and I'll remove my unit
unscathed. If it works, everyone buys me drinks." The crowd agrees. The guy
drops his pants and puts his privates in the gator's mouth. Gator closes
mouth. After a minute, the guy grabs a beer bottle and bangs the gator on
the top of its head. The gator opens wide, and he removes his genitals
unscathed. Everyone buys him drinks. Then he says: "I'll pay anyone $100
who's willing to give it a try." After a while, a hand goes up in the back
of the bar. It's a woman. "I'll give it a try," she says, "but you have to
promise not to hit me on the head with the beer bottle."
Time is an emergent property of a fourth
dimension that is expanding relative to the
three spatial dimensions.
If time emerges as the dimension expands does time emerge just enough for
there to be enough time to pass for more time to emerge or does more than
enough time emerge per increment of dimensional expansion (extension) so
there is surplus time for evolution to use in human thinking?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
