"George Hammond" <nowhere1@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:wiZvf.6504$M%4.1800@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...

Hammond claims a child sees a "magnified" world compared
to an adult. Someone recently protested if a child and adult
point the same object their arms point to the same point in space
.... so how can the child be seeing a vastly larger object?

The answer to this is that the child's world is a "curved" version of
the adult's world.
It is here demonstrated that this curvature is caused by a
"Hubble Expansion" of the child's world relative to the adult's.

The conventional Hubble expansion is a well known solution to
Einstein's equation G_uv = rho (rho = mass density). The Hubble
expansion is derived by plugging in a metric of the type:

ds^2 = -dt^2 + a(t)^2 dR^2 (Friedman metric)

where a(t) is the radius of the universe. Putting this metric in

equation results in the well known Friedman equation which when
solved yields the radius of the universe, a(t), which shows that the
universe is expanding with time.

Now, Hammond has discovered that "subjective spacetime" is
ALSO curved, and the curvatrure is given by:

G_uv = - ln (brain growth)

this is the "subjective space" version of Einstein's equation. And
note that braingrowth now takes the place of mass density..

Now, I say, a similar solution for the "expansion of the subjective
universe" can be found by inserting the following metric:

ds^2 = a(t')^2 ( -dt^2 + dR^2) (Hammond metric)

Notice the slight difference between this metric and the Friedman metric.
In the Hammond metric the radius of the universe (the expansion factor
a(t') ) dilates the Time dimension as well as the Space dimension.
In fact the Hammond metric is already well known to relativity where
it is called the "conformal metric" and t' is called the "conformal time".
Of course in relativity, the transformation dt = a(t)dt' is only a
convenient "coordinate transformation" and t' is not the real physically
observable (clock) time. However, Hammond points out that in
subjective space it is known that growth (e.g. brain growth) not only
causes a spatial magnification, it also causes an increase in clock rate
(i.e. mental speed), so therefore conformal time ACTUALLY IS
"physical clock time" in subjective space.
At any rate, solving the Friedman equation in conformal time one
gets the well known result:

a(t') = const.[1 - cos(t')]

This is the famous curve first derived by Friedman in 1922 and shows
that a curved universe will expand to a maximum radius and then collapse
back to zero. The first half of this curve is known as the famous "Hubble
expansion" of the universe.
Now, I'm pointing out that this equation, when solved in "subjective
space" would have to describe the "human growth curve" of a human
being from birth to adulthood, and we see that the curve is of entirely
the correct shape... and that there are at least 4 adjustable parameters
in the solution which means it doubtlessly can made to conform
precisely to the human growth curve to within experimental accuracy.
This can hardly be a coincidence given the theoretical origin of the

At any rate.... we now see HOW it is that a child can see a highly
magnified world, compared to an adult... and yet be seen to be
pointing in the same direction as an adult. An "expansion of the
universe" is similar to being inside a large balloon while it is being
inflated. If say a horse is painted on the inside of the balloon, the
horse will get bigger and bigger, but farther and farther away.
This means that if the child points to the horses head, his arm will
remain in a fixed direction no matter how large the balloon gets.
And this is why a child is seen to be pointing in exactly the same
direction as an adult, even though the child may be seeing a
horse that is TWICE the size of the one the adult is seeing.
Hope this clarifies the situation... and I would point out that
the identification of the Hubble Curve as the Human Growth Curve
is just one more piece of evidence that human perception is
described by a relativistic Curvature, and that therefore,
God=G_uv.
--
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
========================================