| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"uri" |
| Date: |
14 Jan 2008 08:51:55 AM |
| Object: |
Got banned forever |
I got banned from physics forums. They wrote to me:
You have been banned for the following reason:
Banned means BANNED...permanently, forever, until eternity. Stop
trying to come back with new nicknames.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
.
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
14 Jan 2008 08:57:18 AM |
|
|
On Jan 14, 9:51 am, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
I got banned from physics forums. They wrote to me:
You have been banned for the following reason:
Banned means BANNED...permanently, forever, until eternity. Stop
trying to come back with new nicknames.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
.
|
|
|
| User: "uri" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
14 Jan 2008 09:03:41 AM |
|
|
On Jan 14, 4:57 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
No i meant physics forums at http://www.physicsforums.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
15 Jan 2008 07:30:22 AM |
|
|
On 14 jan, 10:03, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:57 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
No i meant physics forums athttp://www.physicsforums.com/
That's no physics forum, despite the name. Just a private club,
like monitored newsgroups.
They thrive on mutual comfort in their restricted beliefs and are
unwilling and unable to tangle with physical reality.
You won't find anything there that's not fully explained in
the literature.
You lost nothing.
Andr=E9 Michaud
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
15 Jan 2008 10:06:00 AM |
|
|
On Jan 15, 4:30 am, wrote:
On 14 jan, 10:03, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:57 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
No i meant physics forums athttp://www.physicsforums.com/
That's no physics forum, despite the name. Just a private club,
like monitored newsgroups.
They thrive on mutual comfort in their restricted beliefs and are
unwilling and unable to tangle with physical reality.
You won't find anything there that's not fully explained in
the literature.
They wouldn't put up with your *****, huh?
You lost nothing.
Andr=E9 Michaud
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
15 Jan 2008 09:47:54 AM |
|
|
On Jan 15, 8:30 am, wrote:
On 14 jan, 10:03, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:57 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
No i meant physics forums athttp://www.physicsforums.com/
That's no physics forum, despite the name. Just a private club,
like monitored newsgroups.
They thrive on mutual comfort in their restricted beliefs and are
unwilling and unable to tangle with physical reality.
You won't find anything there that's not fully explained in
the literature.
You lost nothing.
I take it you got banned too?
- Randy
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
15 Jan 2008 10:32:13 AM |
|
|
On 15 jan, 10:47, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:30 am, wrote:
On 14 jan, 10:03, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:57 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
No i meant physics forums athttp://www.physicsforums.com/
That's no physics forum, despite the name. Just a private club,
like monitored newsgroups.
They thrive on mutual comfort in their restricted beliefs and are
unwilling and unable to tangle with physical reality.
You won't find anything there that's not fully explained in
the literature.
You lost nothing.
I take it you got banned too?
- Randy
No I was not.
I prefer freedom.
No one can prevent any of my posts from appearing
on unmonitored ngs.
In other words, I recognize to no one the right to
censor me.
Besides, original ideas are never discussed by
orthodoxes.
Only umphteenth time rehashed stuff by orthodoxes
and would be orthodoxes is to be found on monitored
ngs and private groups.
Fully covered by available literature.
Uninteresting, useless and meaningless.
Andr=E9 Michaud
.
|
|
|
| User: "uri" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
04 Feb 2008 05:15:28 AM |
|
|
On Jan 15, 6:32 pm, wrote:
No I was not.
I prefer freedom.
No one can prevent any of my posts from appearing
on unmonitored ngs.
In other words, I recognize to no one the right to
censor me.
Besides, original ideas are never discussed by
orthodoxes.
Only umphteenth time rehashed stuff by orthodoxes
and would be orthodoxes is to be found on monitored
ngs and private groups.
Fully covered by available literature.
Uninteresting, useless and meaningless.
Andr=E9 Michaud
I prefer freedom too. I rather go to unmoderated forums or to forums
where the moderators are much nicer like sciforums. In moderated
forums there is no democracy. The moderators just set themselves above
the people and there is nothing you can do about it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "uri" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
04 Feb 2008 05:20:34 AM |
|
|
On Jan 15, 6:32 pm, wrote:
No I was not.
I prefer freedom.
No one can prevent any of my posts from appearing
on unmonitored ngs.
In other words, I recognize to no one the right to
censor me.
Besides, original ideas are never discussed by
orthodoxes.
Only umphteenth time rehashed stuff by orthodoxes
and would be orthodoxes is to be found on monitored
ngs and private groups.
Fully covered by available literature.
Uninteresting, useless and meaningless.
Andr=E9 Michaud
I prefer freedom too. I rather go to unmoderated forums or to forums
where the moderators are much nicer like sciforums. In moderated
forums there is no democracy. The moderators just set themselves above
the people and they often abuse their powers by deleting or locking
posts and by banning users they don't like and there is nothing you
can do about it. Unmoderated forums where there is freedom are much
better.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
15 Jan 2008 01:42:00 PM |
|
|
On Jan 15, 7:32 am, wrote:
On 15 jan, 10:47, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:30 am, wrote:
On 14 jan, 10:03, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:57 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
No i meant physics forums athttp://www.physicsforums.com/
That's no physics forum, despite the name. Just a private club,
like monitored newsgroups.
They thrive on mutual comfort in their restricted beliefs and are
unwilling and unable to tangle with physical reality.
You won't find anything there that's not fully explained in
the literature.
You lost nothing.
I take it you got banned too?
- Randy
No I was not.
I prefer freedom.
No one can prevent any of my posts from appearing
on unmonitored ngs.
In other words, I recognize to no one the right to
censor me.
Besides, original ideas are never discussed by
orthodoxes.
Only umphteenth time rehashed stuff by orthodoxes
and would be orthodoxes is to be found on monitored
ngs and private groups.
Fully covered by available literature.
Uninteresting, useless and meaningless.
You say that as if you have actually studied the subjects you deem
uninteresting, useless, and meaningless.
Andr=E9 Michaud
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
15 Jan 2008 01:59:23 PM |
|
|
On 15 jan, 14:42, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 15, 7:32 am, wrote:
On 15 jan, 10:47, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:30 am, wrote:
On 14 jan, 10:03, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:57 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
No i meant physics forums athttp://www.physicsforums.com/
That's no physics forum, despite the name. Just a private club,
like monitored newsgroups.
They thrive on mutual comfort in their restricted beliefs and are
unwilling and unable to tangle with physical reality.
You won't find anything there that's not fully explained in
the literature.
You lost nothing.
I take it you got banned too?
- Randy
No I was not.
I prefer freedom.
No one can prevent any of my posts from appearing
on unmonitored ngs.
In other words, I recognize to no one the right to
censor me.
Besides, original ideas are never discussed by
orthodoxes.
Only umphteenth time rehashed stuff by orthodoxes
and would be orthodoxes is to be found on monitored
ngs and private groups.
Fully covered by available literature.
Uninteresting, useless and meaningless.
You say that as if you have actually studied the subjects you deem
uninteresting, useless, and meaningless.
Once covered, repetition is uninteresting. I seldom rediscus even
my own ideas.
Only new angles or data are of interest to me.
Andr=E9 Michaud
.
|
|
|
| User: "uri" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
01 Feb 2008 05:33:23 AM |
|
|
But why do they ban people forever? They don't give people a second
chance, they just ban them for a lifetime an for eternity.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Neill" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
01 Feb 2008 08:08:06 AM |
|
|
"uri" <danny99@bezeqint.net> wrote in message
news:23b0a343-8a61-47aa-b9a6-b662b31e85b2@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com=20
But why do they ban people forever? They don't give people a second
chance, they just ban them for a lifetime an for eternity.
Why do you believe people who act like idiots=20
should be given a second chance? If you invite
someone to dinner and he shits on your parlor=20
rug, do you still serve him dessert?
I'll bet the people who use the message board=20
properly are completely unperturbed by this
policy, and probably appreciate the way it=20
weeds out pests and maintains a low noise=20
level.
.
|
|
|
| User: "uri" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
03 Feb 2008 07:44:44 AM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 4:08 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote:
Why do you believe people who act like idiots
should be given a second chance?
They are the idiots that they behave like this. People change. Just
because a person did once behave badly doesn't mean that he will not
change his behaviour. They are idiots because they don't give people a
second chance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Neill" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
03 Feb 2008 08:19:18 AM |
|
|
"uri" <danny99@bezeqint.net> wrote in message
news:daa03848-4306-47bf-90a4-292ccf2da6ae@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com=20
On Feb 1, 4:08 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote:
=20
Why do you believe people who act like idiots
should be given a second chance?
=20
They are the idiots that they behave like this. People change. Just
because a person did once behave badly doesn't mean that he will not
change his behaviour. They are idiots because they don't give people a
second chance.
It's *you* that wants a second chance. They are not
obliged to dole out second chances and suffer the
backsliders in their midst. I'm pretty sure that=20
none of thm loses any sleep over it.
If you're truly repentant, why don't you contact the
moderator(s) directly and make a deal? Offer a=20
security deposit for good behavior for six months :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rock Brentwood" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
03 Feb 2008 03:25:22 PM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 8:08=A0am, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote:
Why do you believe people who act like idiots
should be given a second chance?
Because everybody is born a language-impaired, thought-impaired,
babbling idiot. If you start banning people based on what they are or
were at one point in time, irrespective of what they will or might
become at a later time, then you might as well ban everybody from
everything, because ... everybody was -- at least at one point in
their life -- a language-impaired, thought-impaired, babbling idiot.
There's such a thing as a learning curve. And people evolve
cognitively over time. Moreover, the idiot-phase is a CRUCIAL element
in that evolution. That's why, among other things, adults have such a
difficult time learning a new language -- they're afraid of going
through the necessary process to break through the learning barrier
(i.e., doing the very same things babies and toddlers do to learn
their first language -- babble on like incessant thought-impaired
idiots).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Neill" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
03 Feb 2008 11:38:10 PM |
|
|
"Rock Brentwood" <markwh04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1710ebd4-0cbc-402d-8484-5547b5c4f77d@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com=20
On Feb 1, 8:08 am, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote:
Why do you believe people who act like idiots
should be given a second chance?
=20
Because everybody is born a language-impaired, thought-impaired,
babbling idiot. If you start banning people based on what they are or
were at one point in time, irrespective of what they will or might
become at a later time, then you might as well ban everybody from
everything, because ... everybody was -- at least at one point in
their life -- a language-impaired, thought-impaired, babbling idiot.
=20
There's such a thing as a learning curve. And people evolve
cognitively over time. Moreover, the idiot-phase is a CRUCIAL element
in that evolution. That's why, among other things, adults have such a
difficult time learning a new language -- they're afraid of going
through the necessary process to break through the learning barrier
(i.e., doing the very same things babies and toddlers do to learn
their first language -- babble on like incessant thought-impaired
idiots).
Very well. Perhaps you would then take him under your
wing and vouch for him in the forum from which he
was banned? You could speak to the moderators on
his behalf, reassuring them that he is a reformed
individual.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "uri" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
01 Feb 2008 05:31:57 AM |
|
|
But why do they ban people forever? They don't give people a second
chdance, they just ban them for a lifetime an for eternity.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: Got banned forever |
01 Feb 2008 08:21:58 AM |
|
|
On Jan 15, 2:59 pm, wrote:
On 15 jan, 14:42, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 15, 7:32 am, wrote:
On 15 jan, 10:47, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:30 am, wrote:
On 14 jan, 10:03, uri <dann...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:57 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then you must not be here, therefore I'm not reading your
posting, therefore there's no point in responding.
- Randy
No i meant physics forums athttp://www.physicsforums.com/
That's no physics forum, despite the name. Just a private club,
like monitored newsgroups.
They thrive on mutual comfort in their restricted beliefs and are
unwilling and unable to tangle with physical reality.
You won't find anything there that's not fully explained in
the literature.
You lost nothing.
I take it you got banned too?
- Randy
No I was not.
I prefer freedom.
No one can prevent any of my posts from appearing
on unmonitored ngs.
In other words, I recognize to no one the right to
censor me.
Besides, original ideas are never discussed by
orthodoxes.
Only umphteenth time rehashed stuff by orthodoxes
and would be orthodoxes is to be found on monitored
ngs and private groups.
Fully covered by available literature.
Uninteresting, useless and meaningless.
You say that as if you have actually studied the subjects you deem
uninteresting, useless, and meaningless.
Once covered, repetition is uninteresting. I seldom rediscus even
my own ideas.
Only new angles or data are of interest to me.
Like your idea (posted only in sci.math, I notice) that
because dimensional analysis shows that the velocity
of transverse waves on a string can be expressed in
units of c, it proves that all energy is propagated at
a speed c.
- Randy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
