Gravity



 Science > Physics > Gravity

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "i_cu_l8tr"
Date: 22 Jan 2006 11:34:10 AM
Object: Gravity
As an engineering student in college, I became fascinated by all that I
was absorbing. Somewhere in all the calculus, chemistry, astronomy,
physics and engineering my mind began to wonder and tried to envision
it all. One day I became very interested in the striking similarities
between Columb's Law and Newton's Universal Law of Gravity. It just
seemed to stick in my mind. It was also somewhere around this time I
was blown away by using dimensional analysis on Einstein's E=mc
squared equation. During astronomy I could see the static gravitational
sphere of influence of a theoretical massive object alone in space and
the asymptotic nature of the slope of g prime. It slowly approaches
zero with infinity but never makes it. It's influence is everywhere.
It dawned on me that space (or dimensional length) is directly
proportional to time as one second equaled meters and mass was
proportional energy in joules. Then the massive objects began to appear
as two bodies attracted by their difference in net energy potentials or
electro-static. I began to bridge columbic and gravitational forces
using the mass to energy equation with dimensional analysis. I called
them finger puzzles. I did this off and on for years. It was very
interesting to me. I was trying to match the slope of g prime for any
mass regardless of size.
.

User: "Hexenmeister"

Title: Re: Gravity 22 Jan 2006 03:57:08 PM
"i_cu_l8tr" <i_cu_l8tr@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137951250.408075.30000@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

As an engineering student in college, I became fascinated by all that I
was absorbing. Somewhere in all the calculus, chemistry, astronomy,
physics and engineering my mind began to wonder and tried to envision
it all. One day I became very interested in the striking similarities
between Columb's Law and Newton's Universal Law of Gravity. It just
seemed to stick in my mind. It was also somewhere around this time I
was blown away by using dimensional analysis on Einstein's E=mc
squared equation. During astronomy I could see the static gravitational
sphere of influence of a theoretical massive object alone in space and
the asymptotic nature of the slope of g prime. It slowly approaches
zero with infinity but never makes it. It's influence is everywhere.
It dawned on me that space (or dimensional length) is directly
proportional to time as one second equaled meters and mass was
proportional energy in joules. Then the massive objects began to appear
as two bodies attracted by their difference in net energy potentials or
electro-static. I began to bridge columbic and gravitational forces
using the mass to energy equation with dimensional analysis. I called
them finger puzzles. I did this off and on for years. It was very
interesting to me. I was trying to match the slope of g prime for any
mass regardless of size.

Did you have a question?
Hexenmeister.
.

User: "Michael Varney"

Title: Re: Gravity 22 Jan 2006 01:56:34 PM
i_cu_l8tr wrote:

As an engineering student in college,

uh oh... let me guess... you have come up with some sort of earth
shattering theory based on simple levers or some such thing? Whenever a
person starts a post with: "As an" anything... it is bad news.
I became fascinated by all that I

was absorbing. Somewhere in all the calculus, chemistry, astronomy,
physics and engineering my mind began to wonder and tried to envision
it all. One day I became very interested in the striking similarities
between Columb's Law and Newton's Universal Law of Gravity. It just
seemed to stick in my mind. It was also somewhere around this time I
was blown away by using dimensional analysis on Einstein's E=mc
squared equation. During astronomy I could see the static gravitational
sphere of influence of a theoretical massive object alone in space and
the asymptotic nature of the slope of g prime. It slowly approaches
zero with infinity but never makes it. It's influence is everywhere.
It dawned on me that space (or dimensional length) is directly
proportional to time as one second equaled meters and mass was
proportional energy in joules. Then the massive objects began to appear
as two bodies attracted by their difference in net energy potentials or
electro-static. I began to bridge columbic and gravitational forces
using the mass to energy equation with dimensional analysis. I called
them finger puzzles. I did this off and on for years. It was very
interesting to me. I was trying to match the slope of g prime for any
mass regardless of size.

Right.
Crank alert.
.

User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Gravity 22 Jan 2006 12:52:01 PM
i_cu_l8tr wrote:

As an engineering student in college, I became fascinated by all that I
was absorbing. Somewhere in all the calculus, chemistry, astronomy,
physics and engineering my mind began to wonder and tried to envision
it all. One day I became very interested in the striking similarities
between Columb's Law and Newton's Universal Law of Gravity. It just
seemed to stick in my mind. It was also somewhere around this time I
was blown away by using dimensional analysis on Einstein's E=mc
squared equation. During astronomy I could see the static gravitational
sphere of influence of a theoretical massive object alone in space and
the asymptotic nature of the slope of g prime. It slowly approaches
zero with infinity but never makes it. It's influence is everywhere.
It dawned on me that space (or dimensional length) is directly
proportional to time as one second equaled meters and mass was
proportional energy in joules. Then the massive objects began to appear
as two bodies attracted by their difference in net energy potentials or
electro-static. I began to bridge columbic and gravitational forces
using the mass to energy equation with dimensional analysis. I called
them finger puzzles. I did this off and on for years. It was very
interesting to me. I was trying to match the slope of g prime for any
mass regardless of size.

Are There Any Good Books on Relativity Theory?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/rel_booklist.html
.
User: "i_cu_l8tr"

Title: Re: Gravity 22 Jan 2006 07:58:28 PM
Sam Wormley wrote:

i_cu_l8tr wrote:

As an engineering student in college, I became fascinated by all that I
was absorbing. Somewhere in all the calculus, chemistry, astronomy,
physics and engineering my mind began to wonder and tried to envision
it all. One day I became very interested in the striking similarities
between Columb's Law and Newton's Universal Law of Gravity. It just
seemed to stick in my mind. It was also somewhere around this time I
was blown away by using dimensional analysis on Einstein's E=mc
squared equation. During astronomy I could see the static gravitational
sphere of influence of a theoretical massive object alone in space and
the asymptotic nature of the slope of g prime. It slowly approaches
zero with infinity but never makes it. It's influence is everywhere.
It dawned on me that space (or dimensional length) is directly
proportional to time as one second equaled meters and mass was
proportional energy in joules. Then the massive objects began to appear
as two bodies attracted by their difference in net energy potentials or
electro-static. I began to bridge columbic and gravitational forces
using the mass to energy equation with dimensional analysis. I called
them finger puzzles. I did this off and on for years. It was very
interesting to me. I was trying to match the slope of g prime for any
mass regardless of size.



Are There Any Good Books on Relativity Theory?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/rel_booklist.html

That's quite an extensive list you have there. I have read some of them
over the years. They are quite interesting. I liked the ones about the
dying supermassive stars into black holes. Try discussing radius of
convergence with the guys down at the bar. Right.
.


User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Gravity 22 Jan 2006 09:32:30 PM
i_cu_l8tr wrote:

As an engineering student in college, I became fascinated by all that I
was absorbing. Somewhere in all the calculus, chemistry, astronomy,
physics and engineering my mind began to wonder and tried to envision
it all. One day I became very interested in the striking similarities
between Columb's Law and Newton's Universal Law of Gravity. It just
seemed to stick in my mind. It was also somewhere around this time I
was blown away by using dimensional analysis on Einstein's E=mc
squared equation. During astronomy I could see the static gravitational
sphere of influence of a theoretical massive object alone in space and
the asymptotic nature of the slope of g prime. It slowly approaches
zero with infinity but never makes it. It's influence is everywhere.
It dawned on me that space (or dimensional length) is directly
proportional to time as one second equaled meters and mass was
proportional energy in joules. Then the massive objects began to appear
as two bodies attracted by their difference in net energy potentials or
electro-static. I began to bridge columbic and gravitational forces
using the mass to energy equation with dimensional analysis. I called
them finger puzzles. I did this off and on for years. It was very
interesting to me. I was trying to match the slope of g prime for any
mass regardless of size.

Are There Any Good Books on Relativity Theory?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/rel_booklist.html
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Chiral gravity of the Solar system
black holes and gravity
Gravity not a Force?
Aether medium gravity
Quantum Gravity Seminar - Fall 2004, Week 7
Neutron Stars Without Gravity
Tetrad Formalism for Emergent Einstein Gravity
"Gravity"
Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 4: Newtonian and SR "Causation"
Quantum Gravity 26.1: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 18.0: Time Generates Space and Expansion/Contraction via Riccati Paraboloid
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 20.0: Determinant-Matrix-Tensor Relationships of Riccati
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 29.0: Passing Thru Phase Transitions "Too Fast"
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER