| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"glbrad01" |
| Date: |
09 Feb 2005 06:18:30 AM |
| Object: |
Gravity and Inflation |
I've theorized about gravity facing, opposing, itself in the Universe, the
infinitesimal of it facing and opposing the infinite of it as local hubs
face and oppose remote rims (hub facing and opposing rim). We know the
attraction of the local hub well but we only see the attraction of remote
rim as accelerating expansion of the universe out from each and every center
of the universe.
Of course I've been laughed at and cursed, called every name in the book,
for having this view because it is a view of infinite Universe and points
directly to that view. But, as with a photo negative, if you do away with
the picture of opposing local and remote facing and opposing attraction, if
you do away with a force facing and opposing itself; if you see the picture
inside-out rather than outside-in, as 'push' against the local hub and
'push' against a remote rim, push from inside out, instead of 'pull' to each
outside-in end opposed to the other, you then change the picture radically
to one of a force of negative gravity and a resulting observation being
inflation (accelerated inflation).
The biggest difference in observation is that in the first you are already
dealing in a fulfilled potential of infinite Universe (U), while in the
second observation you are dealing with forever unfulfilled potential. You
are dealing in the appearance of finite universe (u) forever trying for
infinite status (potential forever in suspended animation going for it, but
never to make the grade to a fulfillment already fulfilled).
Brad
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Gravity and Inflation |
09 Feb 2005 11:55:35 AM |
|
|
glbrad01 wrote:
I've theorized about gravity facing, opposing, itself in the Universe, the
infinitesimal of it facing and opposing the infinite of it as local hubs
face and oppose remote rims (hub facing and opposing rim).
[snip further gibberish]
Idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Gravity and Inflation |
09 Feb 2005 09:08:21 AM |
|
|
glbrad01 wrote:
I've theorized about gravity facing, opposing, itself in the Universe...
What equations are you using?
.
|
|
|
| User: "glbrad01" |
|
| Title: Re: Gravity and Inflation |
09 Feb 2005 01:44:35 PM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:FHpOd.58537$EG1.22394@attbi_s53...
glbrad01 wrote:
I've theorized about gravity facing, opposing, itself in the Universe...
What equations are you using?
Acceleration to the remote in the most remote picture, and acceleration to
the local in the most local picture.
Brad
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Gravity and Inflation |
09 Feb 2005 02:42:37 PM |
|
|
glbrad01 wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:FHpOd.58537$EG1.22394@attbi_s53...
glbrad01 wrote:
I've theorized about gravity facing, opposing, itself in the Universe...
What equations are you using?
Acceleration to the remote in the most remote picture, and acceleration to
the local in the most local picture.
Gibbering idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "glbrad01" |
|
| Title: Re: Gravity and Inflation |
10 Feb 2005 03:44:56 AM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" wrote
glbrad01 wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:FHpOd.58537$EG1.22394@attbi_s53...
glbrad01 wrote:
I've theorized about gravity facing, opposing, itself in the
Universe...
What equations are you using?
Acceleration to the remote in the most remote picture, and acceleration
to
the local in the most local picture.
Gibbering idiot.
--
Uncle Al
(Grin)
Brad
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
