GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL



 Science > Physics > GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "GRAVITYMECHANIC2"
Date: 16 Sep 2004 03:51:33 PM
Object: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL
MATTER AND ANTIMATTER
Copyright 1984 to 2003 Allen C. Goodrich
The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Astronomy (page 116) quotes
Stephen Hawking-
" Matter-antimatter pairs of particles are continually being produced
throughout space even in a perfect ' vacuum.'. This may be considered
a concequence of a variant of the Uncertainty Principle; large amounts
of energy are available for proportionally brief periods of time. This energy
may be sufficient to create an electron-positron pair,say, which then
annihilates almost immediately. The net effect is nothing produced from
nothing. In the extreme gravitational environment close to the
Schwarschild Radius of a black hole, one of the newly-created particles
may be dragged within the black hole. This time the net effect is a free
particle outside the hole. We cannot get something for nothing however,
and the black hole decreases in mass by an amount proportional to the
mass and energy of the free particle. In this way a black hole evaproates
away its rest mass energy.".
This theory requires that one of the particles , say the positron , is an
antimass which would subtract from the mass of the black hole and
result in an evaporation or decrease in the mass-energy of the black
hole. The first law of thermodynamics says that this is not possible.
In an expanding universe of constant total energy, as predicted by the
first law of thermodynamics, the expansion of the universe relative to
a mass, with the resulting decrease of potential energy, relative to that
mass, say, equal to the energy of a high energy gamma ray, could
result in the formation of an electron-positron pair of equal total
kinetic energy, if the mass provides the necessary environment.
This is necessary to conserve the total energy of the universe.
Although the positron is a positive charge and
the electron is a negative charge, their total energy is positive
and equal to the total energy of the high energy gamma ray that
they replaced. No reduction of the total energy of the black hole
could result from the acquisition of a positron.
( The first law of thermodyanmics so specifies.).
SEE
THE UNIVERSE- A GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF MASS ENERGY
SPACE TIME FRAME MECHANICS-APPEARING IN NEWSLETTER
"SPECTRUM" OF THE BUFFALO ASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION
INC. NOV.1996 TO FEB.1997
See http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/business.html
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/profile.html
TIDES AND GRAVITY MECHANICS
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/resume.html
.. .
"
.

User: "ZZBunker"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 17 Sep 2004 07:59:11 AM
(GRAVITYMECHANIC2) wrote in message news:<20040916165133.25357.00000361@mb-m22.news.cs.com>...

MATTER AND ANTIMATTER
Copyright 1984 to 2003 Allen C. Goodrich

Gravity is mother of all forces.
Since as Einstone told Physics Today 120 years ago
and counting now,
it's only syncopated European Chemists and
mathematicians with a spare E from their
spelling bee contests that actually believe in anything else.

The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Astronomy (page 116) quotes
Stephen Hawking-
" Matter-antimatter pairs of particles are continually being produced
throughout space even in a perfect ' vacuum.'. This may be considered
a concequence of a variant of the Uncertainty Principle; large amounts
of energy are available for proportionally brief periods of time. This energy
may be sufficient to create an electron-positron pair,say, which then
annihilates almost immediately. The net effect is nothing produced from
nothing. In the extreme gravitational environment close to the
Schwarschild Radius of a black hole, one of the newly-created particles
may be dragged within the black hole. This time the net effect is a free
particle outside the hole. We cannot get something for nothing however,
and the black hole decreases in mass by an amount proportional to the
mass and energy of the free particle. In this way a black hole evaproates
away its rest mass energy.".

This theory requires that one of the particles , say the positron , is an
antimass which would subtract from the mass of the black hole and
result in an evaporation or decrease in the mass-energy of the black
hole. The first law of thermodynamics says that this is not possible.

In an expanding universe of constant total energy, as predicted by the
first law of thermodynamics, the expansion of the universe relative to
a mass, with the resulting decrease of potential energy, relative to that
mass, say, equal to the energy of a high energy gamma ray, could
result in the formation of an electron-positron pair of equal total
kinetic energy, if the mass provides the necessary environment.
This is necessary to conserve the total energy of the universe.
Although the positron is a positive charge and
the electron is a negative charge, their total energy is positive
and equal to the total energy of the high energy gamma ray that
they replaced. No reduction of the total energy of the black hole
could result from the acquisition of a positron.
( The first law of thermodyanmics so specifies.).

SEE
THE UNIVERSE- A GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF MASS ENERGY
SPACE TIME FRAME MECHANICS-APPEARING IN NEWSLETTER
"SPECTRUM" OF THE BUFFALO ASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION
INC. NOV.1996 TO FEB.1997
See http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/business.html
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/profile.html
TIDES AND GRAVITY MECHANICS
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/resume.html
. .







"

.
User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 17 Sep 2004 08:18:15 AM
The other forces are just the many faces of gravity. Gravity took the
intrinsic energy of space,and created all that is at the spacetime we
refer to as the big bang. Since that point in spacetime right up to our
spacetime it evolved everything as we see it "now" It will evolve at a
continuos rate all there is for trillions of more years. Bert
.


User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 16 Sep 2004 07:01:44 PM
GRAVITYMECHANIC2 wrote:


MATTER AND ANTIMATTER
Copyright 1984 to 2003 Allen C. Goodrich

[snip]
Nobody's gonna steal it from you, idiot, except maybe to throw it
away.
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.

User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 16 Sep 2004 03:57:15 PM
GRAVITYMECHANIC2 wrote:

MATTER AND ANTIMATTER
Copyright 1984 to 2003 Allen C. Goodrich

Background;
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Gravity.html
The theory of general relativity describes the phenomenon of gravity very differently:
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/GeneralRelativity.html
Planetary Motion
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Kepler.html
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/LagrangesPlanetaryEquations.html
Background
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Gravity.html
The theory of general relativity describes the phenomenon of gravity very differently:
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/GeneralRelativity.html
Crank Information
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3AGRAVITYMECHANIC
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3AGRAVITYMECHANIC2
http://www.google.com/search?q=einstein+hoax+site%3Awww.crank.net
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Aretic
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Aretiche
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Areticher
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Areticher1
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Awittke
.
User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 16 Sep 2004 04:26:31 PM
Hi Sam it was Einstien that took the "force" away for gravity. Gravity
is a curvature of spacetime. Want a black hole,and it is space making a
complete circle. Want a singularity it is the fabric of space that is
ether torn or pinched. When you get to infinite density we have to
change our thinking from GR to QM,and a dash of string theory Bert
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 20 Sep 2004 08:15:50 PM
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:15471-414A0507-861@storefull-3174.bay.webtv.net...

Hi Sam it was Einstien that took the "force" away for gravity. Gravity
is a curvature of spacetime. Want a black hole,and it is space making a
complete circle. Want a singularity it is the fabric of space that is
ether torn or pinched. When you get to infinite density we have to
change our thinking from GR to QM,and a dash of string theory Bert

........hmmmm..."Want a black hole,and it is space making a complete
circle", you say?.........Well, Herbie, your sphincter is also making
a complete circle around your black hole when you take a *****.
Thereafter, be careful not tear the fabric or you'll pinch your hemmies.
Finally, make a dash for the string.....
ahahaha.....ahahahanson
.

User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 16 Sep 2004 09:48:24 PM
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in message news:<15471-414A0507-861@storefull-3174.bay.webtv.net>...

Hi Sam it was Einstien that took the "force" away for gravity. Gravity
is a curvature of spacetime. Want a black hole,and it is space making a
complete circle. Want a singularity it is the fabric of space that is
ether torn or pinched. When you get to infinite density we have to
change our thinking from GR to QM,and a dash of string theory Bert

------------------
Grvity is a force and what a force!!
it is just the fucken qm
that cannot handle with it
-------------
Y.Porat
----------------
.
User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 17 Sep 2004 02:12:54 AM
On 16 Sep 2004 19:48:24 -0700,
(Y.Porat) wrote:

herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in message news:<15471-414A0507-861@storefull-3174.bay.webtv.net>...

Hi Sam it was Einstien that took the "force" away for gravity. Gravity
is a curvature of spacetime. Want a black hole,and it is space making a
complete circle. Want a singularity it is the fabric of space that is
ether torn or pinched. When you get to infinite density we have to
change our thinking from GR to QM,and a dash of string theory Bert

------------------
Grvity is a force and what a force!!
it is just the fucken qm
that cannot handle with it
-------------
Y.Porat
----------------

No, stupid ignorant Y. Porat.
I see why Bjoern insisted on arguing with you - your ***** was confined
to one easily-ignorable thread.
.

User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 17 Sep 2004 09:07:48 AM
Y.Porat I"m shocked you using words like "fucking QM"Shame on you for
bad language and not liking man's greatest theory(never proven wrong)
Quantum gravity with its graviton is the way to go. Bert
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE AT ALL 17 Sep 2004 10:34:56 AM
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:6847-414AEFB4-23@storefull-3176.bay.webtv.net...

Y.Porat I"m shocked you using words like "fucking QM"
Shame on you for bad language and not liking man's
greatest theory(never proven wrong)
Quantum gravity with its graviton is the way to go. Bert

Herbie, leave Yehiel alone. He is fun. You are not.
Herbie, who gave you the assignment to play "Dear
Abbey" or "Emily Post", becoming Mrs. Director of
Contemporary Social Manners here?--- so, listen
Herbie, here is the first lesson for your renormalization:
***** QM --- ***** Relativity -- ***** Einstein -- ***** physics
--- ***** YOURSELF, because they are all just telling stories!
See, no shame!.........AHAHAHAHAHA........ahahahahaha...
ahahahaha........ahahahanson
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Quantum Gravity 145.6: All "Derivatives" Except Probable Influence/Causation Are "Entanglement/Miscodings"
Quantum Gravity 145.9: The Loudest Equations in the Universe, y = (+/-)k exp(t), y(t) = 0 all t,
Cause of Gravity
Stability Issues in LeSage Gravity #1
Are loop & string quantum gravity the ENRON & Martha Stewart of theoreticalphysics?
Gravity's Equivalence
GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83: Quantum Gravity First Riccati PI Equation
Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.0: Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 54.0: Big Bang Can't Be "Rounded Off"
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.1: U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.2: Continuation of U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10
Quantum Gravity 84.1 Mass in Vector Space vs Algebra
Quantum Gravity 98.3: The Noncommutative Time-Space "Disaster"
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER