| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
14 Apr 2007 03:29:05 PM |
| Object: |
Hey, Did Yu know, re: Probe B |
As a matter of fact. According to NIST the mass of the probe should
be varying if the polhode like motion was observed!
So all that was required was a mass measure while orbiting. A laser
range level could have done the job maybe.
A new age of failed experimental interpretations maybe or the theory
was verified.
Some people would like to see the hourly data set to look for orbital
coincident precession.
Mr. Cahill predicted 0.02 arcsec over the orbit period.
It is not necessary to go to the space situation room. Just build an
earth gravity gyrospace observatory.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Did Yu know, re: Probe B |
14 Apr 2007 05:45:51 PM |
|
|
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
As a matter of fact. According to NIST the mass of the probe should
be varying if the polhode like motion was observed!
[snip crap]
Gee, Eagleturd, why isn't your posting SOp muffled as though it were
issuing through your rectum? You still don't know ***** about common
arithmetic or anything associated with it.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Did Yu know, re: Probe B |
15 Apr 2007 01:17:36 AM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message =
news:4621599F.6FDBD05F@hate.spam.net...
[snip river of *****]
Gee, Uncle Stooopidtord, GPS works. How, git? You've no
fucking idea.
.
|
|
|
| User: "cnctut" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Did Yu know, re: Probe B |
15 Apr 2007 11:22:51 AM |
|
|
(snip crap)
Androclown--(Loa Loa)
I sure get tired of your GPS crap--what is your problem? Are you
looking for someone to carry your math books again.
Good news! You get my first posting for April--fool!
Tut
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Did Yu know, re: Probe B |
14 Apr 2007 08:14:16 PM |
|
|
On Apr 14, 12:29 pm, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
As a matter of fact. According to NIST the mass of the probe should
be varying if the polhode like motion was observed!
So all that was required was a mass measure while orbiting. A laser
range level could have done the job maybe.
A new age of failed experimental interpretations maybe or the theory
was verified.
Some people would like to see the hourly data set to look for orbital
coincident precession.
Mr. Cahill predicted 0.02 arcsec over the orbit period.
Who cares about Cahill other than Cahill?
It is not necessary to go to the space situation room. Just build an
earth gravity gyrospace observatory.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Did Yu know, re: Probe B |
15 Apr 2007 10:15:11 AM |
|
|
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1176599656.858755.286100@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 14, 12:29 pm, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
As a matter of fact. According to NIST the mass of the probe should
be varying if the polhode like motion was observed!
So all that was required was a mass measure while orbiting. A laser
range level could have done the job maybe.
A new age of failed experimental interpretations maybe or the theory
was verified.
Some people would like to see the hourly data set to look for orbital
coincident precession.
Mr. Cahill predicted 0.02 arcsec over the orbit period.
Who cares about Cahill other than Cahill?
Peter Brown aka Mountainman :-)
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
