| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"mgh" |
| Date: |
06 Nov 2006 01:26:23 AM |
| Object: |
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
The following can be regarded as the most three significant equations
in physics.
E= mc2
F=ma
F =GmM/r2
All the significant and critical aspects of E= mc2
are explained in form of Frequently Asked Questions at
Link
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
These are of interest to a STUDENT and one who has ADVANCED knowledge
in science.
.
|
|
| User: "Bill Hobba" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 01:53:45 AM |
|
|
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162797983.443489.42830@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
The following can be regarded as the most three significant equations
in physics.
E= mc2
F=ma
F =GmM/r2
All the significant and critical aspects of E= mc2
are explained in form of Frequently Asked Questions at
Link
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
These are of interest to a STUDENT and one who has ADVANCED knowledge
in science.
Do you really think constantly spamming your delusional rot under different
names gives it any greater credibility?
Bill
.
|
|
|
| User: "mgh" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 05:40:10 AM |
|
|
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162797983.443489.42830@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
The following can be regarded as the most three significant equations
in physics.
E= mc2
F=ma
F =GmM/r2
All the significant and critical aspects of E= mc2
are explained in form of Frequently Asked Questions at
Link
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
These are of interest to a STUDENT and one who has ADVANCED knowledge
in science.
Do you really think constantly spamming your delusional rot under different
names gives it any greater credibility?
Bill
------------------------------
No I dont think,
the credibility comes from truth of ideas.
AJAY SHARMA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Hobba" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 06:05:34 AM |
|
|
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162813210.013775.87350@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162797983.443489.42830@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
The following can be regarded as the most three significant equations
in physics.
E= mc2
F=ma
F =GmM/r2
All the significant and critical aspects of E= mc2
are explained in form of Frequently Asked Questions at
Link
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
These are of interest to a STUDENT and one who has ADVANCED knowledge
in science.
Do you really think constantly spamming your delusional rot under
different
names gives it any greater credibility?
Bill
------------------------------
No I dont think,
the credibility comes from truth of ideas.
Then you only need to post it once and under the one name - preferably your
real one. The fact you don't is rather telling IMHO.
Bill
AJAY SHARMA
.
|
|
|
| User: "mgh" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 06:08:38 AM |
|
|
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162813210.013775.87350@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162797983.443489.42830@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
The following can be regarded as the most three significant equations
in physics.
E= mc2
F=ma
F =GmM/r2
All the significant and critical aspects of E= mc2
are explained in form of Frequently Asked Questions at
Link
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
These are of interest to a STUDENT and one who has ADVANCED knowledge
in science.
Do you really think constantly spamming your delusional rot under
different
names gives it any greater credibility?
Bill
------------------------------
No I dont think,
the credibility comes from truth of ideas.
Then you only need to post it once and under the one name - preferably your
real one. The fact you don't is rather telling IMHO.
Bill
AJAY SHARMA
==============================
The credibility comes from truth and merit od ideas.
I have no doubt about it.
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Hobba" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 06:51:00 PM |
|
|
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162814918.253361.74710@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162813210.013775.87350@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162797983.443489.42830@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
The following can be regarded as the most three significant
equations
in physics.
E= mc2
F=ma
F =GmM/r2
All the significant and critical aspects of E=
mc2
are explained in form of Frequently Asked Questions at
Link
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
These are of interest to a STUDENT and one who has ADVANCED
knowledge
in science.
Do you really think constantly spamming your delusional rot under
different
names gives it any greater credibility?
Bill
------------------------------
No I dont think,
the credibility comes from truth of ideas.
Then you only need to post it once and under the one name - preferably
your
real one. The fact you don't is rather telling IMHO.
Bill
AJAY SHARMA
==============================
The credibility comes from truth and merit od ideas.
Yes indeed. As another responder said:
'Mr. Ajay Sharma has produced a fraudulent paper in which he claims to have
"completed" Einstein's work. In reality, "100 years of E=mc2" is nothing but
a collection of errors. Mr. Ajay Sharma simply mistakes the trivial change
in a system's momentum for a n "increase in mass". Mr Ajay Sharma
perpetrates the same gross mistakes over 28 pages of torture replete with
misunderstandings, errors and slanders to Einstein's work. Mr.Sharma is
attempting to convince the reader that he has found errors in Einstein's
work (there aren't any) and that he is "completing" Einstein's "unfinished "
work. In reality, Einstein's work is correct and complete while Ajay
Sharma's is full with elementary errors. The tone of the paper is as
arrogant as it is ignorant, Ajay Sharma simply does not understand one of
the basic laws of physics: the law of conservation of momentum which is
conspicously absent from his so-called "discovery" '
The truth always outs - you are simply opening yourself up to further
ridicule. Rest assured people will keep pointing out how ignorant, arrogant
and delusional you so obviously are.
Bill
I have no doubt about it.
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "AJAY SHARMA" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 07:18:47 PM |
|
|
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162814918.253361.74710@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162813210.013775.87350@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bill Hobba wrote:
"mgh" <physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162797983.443489.42830@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=3Dmc2.
The following can be regarded as the most three significant
equations
in physics.
E=3D mc2
F=3Dma
F =3DGmM/r2
All the significant and critical aspects of E=
=3D
mc2
are explained in form of Frequently Asked Questions at
Link
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-eins=
tein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
These are of interest to a STUDENT and one who has ADVANCED
knowledge
in science.
Do you really think constantly spamming your delusional rot under
different
names gives it any greater credibility?
Bill
------------------------------
No I dont think,
the credibility comes from truth of ideas.
Then you only need to post it once and under the one name - preferably
your
real one. The fact you don't is rather telling IMHO.
Bill
AJAY SHARMA
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
The credibility comes from truth and merit od ideas.
Yes indeed. As another responder said:
'Mr. Ajay Sharma has produced a fraudulent paper in which he claims to ha=
ve
"completed" Einstein's work. In reality, "100 years of E=3Dmc2" is nothin=
g but
a collection of errors. Mr. Ajay Sharma simply mistakes the trivial change
in a system's momentum for a n "increase in mass". Mr Ajay Sharma
perpetrates the same gross mistakes over 28 pages of torture replete with
misunderstandings, errors and slanders to Einstein's work. Mr.Sharma is
attempting to convince the reader that he has found errors in Einstein's
work (there aren't any) and that he is "completing" Einstein's "unfinishe=
d "
work. In reality, Einstein's work is correct and complete while Ajay
Sharma's is full with elementary errors. The tone of the paper is as
arrogant as it is ignorant, Ajay Sharma simply does not understand one of
the basic laws of physics: the law of conservation of momentum which is
conspicously absent from his so-called "discovery" '
The truth always outs - you are simply opening yourself up to further
ridicule. Rest assured people will keep pointing out how ignorant, arrog=
ant
and delusional you so obviously are.
Bill
I have no doubt about it.
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-i=
s-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
I HAVE NUMBER OF TIME ADVISED THIS PLACLESS WRITER TO READ 11TH CLASS
PHYSICS.
My reply is below and journals.
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-in=
ventor-of-second-postulate.htm
See how Momentum is conserved in my paper. All references are given in
the end.
Part I
General meaning , explained in 11th class Physics.
The law of momentum conservation,
* In an isolated system, the momentum of system must be conserved.*
Mathematically implies that
Initial Momentum =3D Final Momentum
mu=3Dmv (1)
As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
So u=3Dv
which is Newton=E2=80=99s First law of motion.
Application of momentum conservation.
When body emits energy ( in this cases light energy)
then it recoils .Thus it is used to calculate the velocity of recoil.
It can be applied to following two cases.
------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
( body does not recoil with noticeable velocity, it tends to recoil)
The velocity cam be calculated but may be of the order of
1/100000000000000000000000000000000000 m/s or 10-^40m/s
This case resembles with Einstein=E2=80=99s two waves of equal energy emitt=
ed
in opposite directions.
-----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
the velocity can be calculated from conservation of momentum i.e.
initial momentum =3Dfinal momentum
Vrecoil =3D mv/M ~ 5m/s (say)
Thus after emission of energy BODY MAY REMAIN AT REST OR MOVE, the
Momentum is Conserved. It is basic physics of 11th standard.
If some one does not want to understand this then it his problem.
Einstein did all calculation under Classical conditions of velocity (v
<<c, her v is relative velocity between two systems i.e. system in
which body emits light and second system in which energy is measured.
Part II
The law of conservation of momentum is obeyed in my paper.
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
When two waves are emitted. The body recoils with velocity v , with
magnitude of the order of 10^-32 m/s i.e.
V (recoil)=3D1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
It can be easily calculated.
When two waves of different energies are emitted. If body emits two
light waves of slightly different energies i.e. 0.5001L and 0.4999L
(Einstein has used light waves of energy 0.5L and 0.5L) in opposite
directions. Now using the law of conservation of momentum, it can be
easily justified that in this case body remains at rest.
Let the body of mass 10kg emits light energy in two waves in visible
region equal to 7.9512=C3=9710^-19 J, this energy corresponds to TWO light
waves in visible region having wavelength 5000=C2=BAA or energy, 2hc/=CE=BB=
or
7=2E9512=C3=9710^-19 J.
Let towards the observer the body emits light energy 0.5001L i.e.
3=2E97639512=C3=9710^-19 J i.e. will have momentum ( p1 =3D E/c)
1=2E32546504=C3=9710^-27 m/s.
Secondly, the body emits light wave of energy 0.4999L i.e.
3=2E97480488=C3=9710^-19 J, away from the observer (=CF=86=3D 180=C2=BA) i.=
e=2E will have
momentum ( p2 =3D E/c) 1.32493496=C3=9710^-27 m/s. Let us assume that when
the body emits light waves of energy and moves (if it actually does)
with velocity Vb , then according to law of conservation of momentum we
get
0 =3D p1 +p2 +MbVb or Vb =3D -(p1 +p2) /Mb =3D =E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s=
(2)
0 =3D p1 +p2 +MbVb or Vb =3D -(p1 +p2) /Mb =3D =E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s=
(3)
Thus conservation of momentum requires that body should move with
velocity =E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s opposite to observer. Thus body will =
tend
to move with velocity 5.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s ( away from the observer) which
is immeasurably small by all means, hence the body remains at rest. Due
to this uniform relative velocity v of the system (=CE=BE, =CE=B7, =CE=B6 )=
will
not change, if body moves then v will vary accordingly.
References.
References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
..
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work
My work is available at
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
M; and=EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =EF=81=84=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-E=
nergy Equation
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
2=2E A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems (
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND
5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of M; and its applications in General=EF=81=84E =3D Ac2
=EF=81=84Generalized Mass-Energy Equation physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
Ajay Sharma Email
_________________
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dono" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 08:50:47 AM |
|
|
mgh wrote:
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
<idiocies snipped>
You got a good answer in the same forum:
http://macactupapi.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/07/100-years-of-e-mc2-a-hoax-by-ajay-sharma.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "AJAY SHARMA" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 09:48:56 AM |
|
|
Dono wrote:
mgh wrote:
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
<idiocies snipped>
You got a good answer in the same forum:
http://macactupapi.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/07/100-years-of-e-mc2-a-hoax-by-ajay-sharma.htm
============================
Well it is explained here,
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
AJAY SHARMA
.
|
|
|
| User: "AJAY SHARMA" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
06 Nov 2006 07:58:45 PM |
|
|
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
Dono wrote:
mgh wrote:
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
<idiocies snipped>
You got a good answer in the same forum:
http://macactupapi.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/07/100-years-of-e-mc2-a-hoax-by-ajay-sharma.htm
============================
Well it is explained here,
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
AJAY SHARMA
===========================Ajay Sharma reponds=================
Yes , the latest is
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dono" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
07 Nov 2006 09:26:19 AM |
|
|
mgh wrote:
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
Here is a much better site:
http://macactupapi.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/07/100-years-of-e-mc2-a-hoax-by-ajay-sharma.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "AJAY SHARMA" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
07 Nov 2006 10:20:26 AM |
|
|
Dono wrote:
mgh wrote:
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
Here is a much better site:
http://macactupapi.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/07/100-years-of-e-mc2-a-hoax-by-ajay-sharma.htm
========================
The best
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
07 Nov 2006 04:16:40 PM |
|
|
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
Dono wrote:
mgh wrote:
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2.
Here is a much better site:
http://macactupapi.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/07/100-years-of-e-mc2-a-hoax-by-ajay-sharma.htm
========================
The best
"100 Years of E=Mc2" a hoax by Ajay Sharma
Mr. Ajay Sharma has produced a fraudulent paper in which he claims to
have "completed" Einstein's work. In reality, "100 years of E=mc2" is
nothing but a collection of errors.
Mr. Ajay Sharma simply mistakes the trivial change in a system's
momentum for a n "increase in mass". Mr Ajay Sharma perpetrates the
same gross mistakes over 28 pages of torture replete with
misunderstandings, errors and slanders to Einstein's work.
Mr.Sharma is attempting to convince the reader that he has found errors
in Einstein's work (there aren't any) and that he is "completing"
Einstein's "unfinished " work. In reality, Einstein's work is correct
and complete while Ajay Sharma's is full with elementary errors.
The tone of the paper is as arrogant as it is ignorant, Ajay Sharma
simply does not understand one of the basic laws of physics: the law of
conservation of momentum which is conspicously absent from his
so-called "discovery"
Ajay Sharma paper "100 Years of E=Mc2" turns out to be a hoax.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AJAY SHARMA" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
07 Nov 2006 07:52:24 PM |
|
|
wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
Dono wrote:
mgh wrote:
History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=3Dmc2.
Here is a much better site:
http://macactupapi.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/07/100-years-of-e-mc2-a=
-hoax-by-ajay-sharma.htm
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
The best
"100 Years of E=3DMc2" a hoax by Ajay Sharma
Mr. Ajay Sharma has produced a fraudulent paper in which he claims to
have "completed" Einstein's work. In reality, "100 years of E=3Dmc2" is
nothing but a collection of errors.
Mr. Ajay Sharma simply mistakes the trivial change in a system's
momentum for a n "increase in mass". Mr Ajay Sharma perpetrates the
same gross mistakes over 28 pages of torture replete with
misunderstandings, errors and slanders to Einstein's work.
Mr.Sharma is attempting to convince the reader that he has found errors
in Einstein's work (there aren't any) and that he is "completing"
Einstein's "unfinished " work. In reality, Einstein's work is correct
and complete while Ajay Sharma's is full with elementary errors.
The tone of the paper is as arrogant as it is ignorant, Ajay Sharma
simply does not understand one of the basic laws of physics: the law of
conservation of momentum which is conspicously absent from his
so-called "discovery"
Ajay Sharma paper "100 Years of E=3DMc2" turns out to be a hoax.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
100 Years of E=3Dmc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-in=
ventor-of-second-postulate.htm
1=2E What is E=3Dmc2? What is its importance?
E=3Dmc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
2=2E This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?
The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L =3D mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=3Dmc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.
3=2E Is Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation of L =3Dmc2 correct?
The derivation of L=3Dmc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.
4=2E What are contradictory results?
Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein=E2=80=99s 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.
5=2E Was E=3Dmc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?
Yes, E=3Dmc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=3Dmc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.
6=2E Einstein speculated E=3Dmc2 from L=3Dmc2. What is the problem here?
Firstly derivation of L=3Dmc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=3Dmc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=3Dmc2 to get E=3Dmc2.
7=2E Then how did you derive new equation, dE =3DAc2dm (or DE =3D Ac2 DM =
)?
I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =3DAc2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.
Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
8=2E How do you compare these two equations?
Firstly dE =3DAc2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=3Dmc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =3DAc2dm is a general equation and E=3Dmc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=3Dmc2.
9=2E How did you justify your equation experimentally?
In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=3Dmc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.
10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?
Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.
11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?
The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.
What is Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s paper is different from Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1=
905
paper
How Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s
work is incorrectly published.
12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?
Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.
13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they don=E2=80=99t exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.
14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=3Dmc2?
This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newton=E2=80=99s Principia or Galileo=E2=
=80=99s
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email
References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
..
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work
My work is available at
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
100 Years of E=3Dmc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND
5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
Email
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
08 Nov 2006 12:38:13 PM |
|
|
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote:
The best
"100 Years of E=Mc2" a hoax by Ajay Sharma
Mr. Ajay Sharma has produced a fraudulent paper in which he claims to
have "completed" Einstein's work. In reality, "100 years of E=mc2" is
nothing but a collection of errors.
Mr. Ajay Sharma simply mistakes the trivial change in a system's
momentum for a n "increase in mass". Mr Ajay Sharma perpetrates the
same gross mistakes over 28 pages of torture replete with
misunderstandings, errors and slanders to Einstein's work.
Mr.Sharma is attempting to convince the reader that he has found errors
in Einstein's work (there aren't any) and that he is "completing"
Einstein's "unfinished " work. In reality, Einstein's work is correct
and complete while Ajay Sharma's is full with elementary errors.
The tone of the paper is as arrogant as it is ignorant, Ajay Sharma
simply does not understand one of the basic laws of physics: the law of
conservation of momentum which is conspicously absent from his
so-called "discovery"
Ajay Sharma paper "100 Years of E=Mc2" turns out to be a hoax.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AJAY SHARMA" |
|
| Title: Re: History, Mystery and Chemistry of E=mc2. |
08 Nov 2006 08:43:05 PM |
|
|
wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
wrote:
--------------Ajay Sharma responds -------------------------------
==============================
Nameless , Placeless , COWARD , I advise you read 11th physics and
Momemtum conservation then try to undersand the this post (extracted
from International jornals and conferences ) .
With other name you calimed in June 2006 , you will contradict my work
in journals , but it did not happen.
But you did now write real name now.
It is like accepting defeat.
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein...
1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?
The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.
3. Is Einstein's derivation of L =mc2 correct?
The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.
4. What are contradictory results?
Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein's 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.
5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?
Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.
6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?
Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einstein's derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.
7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?
I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.
Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
8. How do you compare these two equations?
Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=mc2.
9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?
In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.
10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?
Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.
11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?
The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.
What is Einstein's Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharma's Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharma's paper is different from Einstein's Sep 1905
paper
How Ajay Sharma's interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharma's
work is incorrectly published.
12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?
Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.
13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they don't exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.
14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?
This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newton's Principia or Galileo's
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_3...
Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email
References of Einstein's work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
PartII
References of Ajay Sharma's work
My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
"The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ?E = Ac2 ?M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology".
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_3...
International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND
5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
"The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ?E = Ac2 ?M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology".
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_3...
Email
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2
E=mc^2
E=MC2 100 yo today!
Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma
Einstein E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?
E=mc2
E=mc^2
102nd Birthday of E=mc2 ( 27 Sep 1905- 27 Sep.2007) Complete tribute in book Einstein's E=mc2 generalized , www.ajayonline.us
| Re: 102nd Birthday of E=mc2 ( 27 Sep 1905- 27 Sep.2007) Complete tribute in book Einstein's E=mc2 generalized , www.ajayonline.us
Proof for E=mc2
An alternate explanation of E=mc^2
Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
E=mc^2, Inertia, Pair Production, why?
102nd Birthday of E=mc2 ( 27 Sep 1905- 27 Sep.2007) Complete tribute in book Einstein's E=mc2 generalized , www.ajayonline.us
Question for physicists (E=mc^2)
|
|
|
