| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Radium" |
| Date: |
23 Jul 2006 06:12:25 PM |
| Object: |
How about a single-electron laser? |
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
Thanks
Radium
.
|
|
| User: "Phat Bytestard" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
23 Jul 2006 07:20:36 PM |
|
|
On 23 Jul 2006 16:12:25 -0700, "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> Gave
us:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
Thanks
Radium
You should change your nym to: Stupidium
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
23 Jul 2006 10:22:47 PM |
|
|
Actually, Radium should change his nym to: Parrot, since he reapeats
things that he has heard or read, making no attempt to comprehend what
the phrases and expressions that he repeats actually mean.
I cut the guy quite a bit of slack during his first dozen posts or so,
but now that the pattern is starting to emerge, I have to admit that I
believe he is just one of the many net flakes posted here who has worn
out his welcome, so for him the solution is to simply post using a new
alias.
Note the lack of any response from "Radium" when I suggested two of the
better known texts in introductory physics that he could use
productively to obtain a basic understanding in physics.
Radium, were I to have a "kill file", you would by now be in it, but
alas, I don't. So I will, in the future,simply skip over your childish,
troll-like posts.
Harry C.
Phat Bytestard wrote:
On 23 Jul 2006 16:12:25 -0700, "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> Gave
us:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
Thanks
Radium
You should change your nym to: Stupidium
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark L. Fergerson" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
23 Jul 2006 10:45:14 PM |
|
|
Radium wrote:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
So fire electrons one-by-one through a FEL.
But what would be the point?
Mark L. Fergerson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Radium" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
23 Jul 2006 11:20:41 PM |
|
|
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
So fire electrons one-by-one through a FEL.
But what would be the point?
An FEL that is the size of a single atom laser or smaller.
Mark L. Fergerson
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimfoo" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
24 Jul 2006 12:28:16 AM |
|
|
How about a free positron laser the size of an anti-atom laser, and
then triangularly
polarize the light by passing it through a brewster triangle. then all
the anti-photons
would obliterate all the light in their path, making a black, devoid of
light beam, also
known as the shadow laser.
Radium wrote:
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
So fire electrons one-by-one through a FEL.
But what would be the point?
An FEL that is the size of a single atom laser or smaller.
Mark L. Fergerson
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
24 Jul 2006 08:07:35 PM |
|
|
That would work, but Radium would have to add a Framistating Discombobulator
which he could buy at
http://sendmeallyourmoneyandshutupyoufool.com
"jimfoo" <jim.hall@solihullsociety.org> wrote in message
news:1153718896.871816.130010@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
How about a free positron laser the size of an anti-atom laser, and
then triangularly
polarize the light by passing it through a brewster triangle. then all
the anti-photons
would obliterate all the light in their path, making a black, devoid of
light beam, also
known as the shadow laser.
Radium wrote:
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of
a
single-atom laser.
So fire electrons one-by-one through a FEL.
But what would be the point?
An FEL that is the size of a single atom laser or smaller.
Mark L. Fergerson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Karim Lenhard" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
24 Jul 2006 06:50:11 AM |
|
|
This would be legendary!
jimfoo wrote:
How about a free positron laser the size of an anti-atom laser, and
then triangularly
polarize the light by passing it through a brewster triangle. then all
the anti-photons
would obliterate all the light in their path, making a black, devoid of
light beam, also
known as the shadow laser.
Radium wrote:
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
So fire electrons one-by-one through a FEL.
But what would be the point?
An FEL that is the size of a single atom laser or smaller.
Mark L. Fergerson
.
|
|
|
| User: "GPG" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
24 Jul 2006 08:22:05 AM |
|
|
Karim Lenhard wrote:
This would be legendary!
jimfoo wrote:
How about a free positron laser the size of an anti-atom laser, and
then triangularly
polarize the light by passing it through a brewster triangle. then all
the anti-photons
would obliterate all the light in their path, making a black, devoid of
light beam, also
known as the shadow laser.
Radium wrote:
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:
Such a beam would travel at the speed of dark ,D, where D = Cv-1
.
|
|
|
| User: "GPG" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
24 Jul 2006 08:18:24 PM |
|
|
GPG wrote:
Karim Lenhard wrote:
This would be legendary!
jimfoo wrote:
How about a free positron laser the size of an anti-atom laser, and
then triangularly
polarize the light by passing it through a brewster triangle. then all
the anti-photons
would obliterate all the light in their path, making a black, devoid of
light beam, also
known as the shadow laser.
Radium wrote:
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:
Such a beam would travel at the speed of dark ,D, where D = Cx sqrt-1
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phat Bytestard" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
24 Jul 2006 08:15:42 PM |
|
|
On 24 Jul 2006 06:22:05 -0700, "GPG" <gpg212@yahoo.co.nz> Gave us:
Karim Lenhard wrote:
This would be legendary!
jimfoo wrote:
How about a free positron laser the size of an anti-atom laser, and
then triangularly
polarize the light by passing it through a brewster triangle. then all
the anti-photons
would obliterate all the light in their path, making a black, devoid of
light beam, also
known as the shadow laser.
Radium wrote:
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:
Such a beam would travel at the speed of dark ,D, where D = Cv-1
Perhaps what he really wants is the single photon laser. A quantum
flashbulb. Hard to tell what got/gets illuminated by it, or even
whether it did the job at all. A difficult task indeed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eeyore" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
23 Jul 2006 07:34:23 PM |
|
|
Radium wrote:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
Is that so it'll match your single braincell ?
Graham
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
24 Jul 2006 04:12:43 PM |
|
|
Radium wrote:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
Sort of like a fully-automatic muzzle loader?
Seems a bit oxymoronic to me - a continuous flux of particles being
sent out, one at a time...
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How about a single-electron laser? |
25 Jul 2006 04:05:55 AM |
|
|
In article <1153775563.063746.4520@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"tadchem" <tadchem@comcast.net> wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:
A single-atom laser has already been made. Is it possible to make a
one-electron laser? This would be the "free-electron" equivalent of a
single-atom laser.
Sort of like a fully-automatic muzzle loader?
In a fort battle, that was the women.
Seems a bit oxymoronic to me - a continuous flux of particles being
sent out, one at a time...
Would the thing go poof, poof?
/BAH
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
