| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Gaz" |
| Date: |
31 Mar 2005 01:39:20 PM |
| Object: |
How to study |
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
.
|
|
| User: "newedana" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 09:03:16 PM |
|
|
It is sad to see bad adivices for you in this website. I should like
to advise you to read the new textbook of natural science " Natrual
Science Founded on a New Atomic Model" written by Dr.Yoon
(www.yoonsatom.net)together with current texts. It is a sciense book
describing the natural phenomena with an entirely different principles.
I believe this textbook will become a standard worldwide science text
soon, replacing current textbooks saying falsehood. This textbook
published a half year ago privately. It can be seen only in the library
of University of Cicago, MIT, Stanford Akron and US congress in the
United States, and university library of Uppsala in Sweden, Oxford and
Cambridge in the UK, and is not available in city book stores. You can
judge by yourself which has better credibility in terms of describing
the nature, by comparing it with current science textbook in
subjectwise. For example, it explains very successfully the hydrogen
spectrum without quantizing radiation enery ( quantizing energy is
primitive, and is against the natural law), chemical periodicity of
elements. It explains the nuclear fission and fusion energy without
utilizing the stupid equation E=Mc square. It explains the liquid state
of material in molecular level, which was unable to explain with
current physics. Current scientific knowledge does not know what is the
denaturation of living tissue, but only foolish understanding, a three
dimensional molecular conformation of proteins. Our knowledge does not
know why water has the highest density at 4 degree C, a lesser density
than that of even boiling water, such a high boiling point 100 degree C
instead of having -79 degrees like hydrogen sulphide, according to
quantum mechanical calculation, and has the greatest heat capacity than
enything else? Nothing was elucidated yet for the physical character of
water, the most important material for human life. Dispite that
particle physicists today pretend to know everything in the universe.
You shoud never fall into a black hole of modern particle physics built
with entirely fraudulent knowledges. If you join to the group of doing
particle physics you will become another idiot or a parrot repeating to
say falsehood to the people for only the sake of your bread and milk. A
pity life!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 02:59:46 PM |
|
|
newedana wrote:
It is sad to see bad adivices for you in this website. I should like
to advise you to read the new textbook of natural science " Natrual
Science Founded on a New Atomic Model" written by Dr.Yoon
[snip crap]
For example, it explains very successfully the hydrogen
spectrum without quantizing radiation enery ( quantizing energy is
primitive, and is against the natural law), chemical periodicity of
elements. It explains the nuclear fission and fusion energy without
utilizing the stupid equation E=Mc square.
[snip rest of crap]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 04:34:15 PM |
|
|
Don't.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bz" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 02:30:56 PM |
|
|
Gaz <gr@iol.ie> wrote in news:FlY2e.50700$Z14.38802@news.indigo.ie:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
Do ALL your homework and ask the teacher for more.
Repeat the above until you have done all the problems in your books.
Get other text books from the library that cover the subjects of your courses
and do problems in THEM.
Come back in a couple of years and ask what to do next.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory L. Hansen" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 07:33:38 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns962A93A9F36BFWQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139>,
bz <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote:
Gaz <gr@iol.ie> wrote in news:FlY2e.50700$Z14.38802@news.indigo.ie:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
Do ALL your homework and ask the teacher for more.
Repeat the above until you have done all the problems in your books.
Get other text books from the library that cover the subjects of your courses
and do problems in THEM.
Come back in a couple of years and ask what to do next.
When I was taking classes I could never complete step one. There was
always more homework. If I finished the work for one class there was
always another.
--
"I fart for joy and I laugh more than if I had cast my old age, as a
serpent does its skin." -- Aristophanes, Peace, 421 BC
.
|
|
|
| User: "bz" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 07:56:25 PM |
|
|
(Gregory L. Hansen) wrote in
news:d2i8di$t2i$1@rainier.uits.indiana.edu:
In article <Xns962A93A9F36BFWQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139>,
bz <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote:
Gaz <gr@iol.ie> wrote in news:FlY2e.50700$Z14.38802@news.indigo.ie:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
Do ALL your homework and ask the teacher for more.
Repeat the above until you have done all the problems in your books.
Get other text books from the library that cover the subjects of your
courses and do problems in THEM.
Come back in a couple of years and ask what to do next.
When I was taking classes I could never complete step one. There was
always more homework. If I finished the work for one class there was
always another.
That may indicate that you were taking too many courses at the same time.
I used to sit in class and understand what the teacher was saying.
I didn't do my homework.
Test time came.
Guess what kind of grades I made on the tests.
Understanding how to work the problems doesn't help unless you have
practiced.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "GR_GR" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 09:17:36 PM |
|
|
bz wrote:
glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote in
news:d2i8di$t2i$1@rainier.uits.indiana.edu:
In article <Xns962A93A9F36BFWQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139>,
bz <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote:
Gaz <gr@iol.ie> wrote in news:FlY2e.50700$Z14.38802@news.indigo.ie:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
Do ALL your homework and ask the teacher for more.
Repeat the above until you have done all the problems in your books.
Get other text books from the library that cover the subjects of your
courses and do problems in THEM.
Come back in a couple of years and ask what to do next.
When I was taking classes I could never complete step one. There was
always more homework. If I finished the work for one class there was
always another.
That may indicate that you were taking too many courses at the same time.
I used to sit in class and understand what the teacher was saying.
I didn't do my homework.
Test time came.
Guess what kind of grades I made on the tests.
You failed.
Understanding how to work the problems doesn't help unless you have
practiced.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bz" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 05:53:35 AM |
|
|
GR_GR <nyb@colorado.edu> wrote in news:d2iegh$ai2$3@peabody.colorado.edu:
I used to sit in class and understand what the teacher was saying.
I didn't do my homework.
Test time came.
Guess what kind of grades I made on the tests.
You failed.
Good guess. Lets just say that there were several courses that I liked so
much I took them twice.
Did you know that an A and a D, only average to a C+?
Understanding how to work the problems doesn't help unless you have
practiced.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 06:41:40 AM |
|
|
In article <Xns962B3BF257EF2WQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139>,
bz <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote:
GR_GR <nyb@colorado.edu> wrote in news:d2iegh$ai2$3@peabody.colorado.edu:
I used to sit in class and understand what the teacher was saying.
I didn't do my homework.
Test time came.
Guess what kind of grades I made on the tests.
You failed.
Good guess. Lets just say that there were several courses that I liked so
much I took them twice.
Did you know that an A and a D, only average to a C+?
A huge part of learning how to study during college years is
to figure out your best self-training method so, when you
are paid to get something done, the learning piece of the
project takes less than a wall clock day.
Part of the OPs education is learning how to learn in the
most efficient manner. A key piece of this process is
learning what can be ignored or delayed until later; this
is not a trivial lesson. I never managed to learn this part.
/BAH
Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GR_GR" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 11:43:52 AM |
|
|
bz wrote:
GR_GR <nyb@colorado.edu> wrote in news:d2iegh$ai2$3@peabody.colorado.edu:
I used to sit in class and understand what the teacher was saying.
I didn't do my homework.
Test time came.
Guess what kind of grades I made on the tests.
You failed.
Good guess. Lets just say that there were several courses that I liked so
much I took them twice.
Did you know that an A and a D, only average to a C+?
:-)
Understanding how to work the problems doesn't help unless you have
practiced.
Anyone can understand the work as long as the teacher is the one doing it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 07:46:20 PM |
|
|
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
In article <Xns962A93A9F36BFWQAHBGMXSZHVspammote@130.39.198.139>,
bz <bz+sp@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote:
Gaz <gr@iol.ie> wrote in news:FlY2e.50700$Z14.38802@news.indigo.ie:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice
on
studying?
Do ALL your homework and ask the teacher for more.
Repeat the above until you have done all the problems in your books.
Get other text books from the library that cover the subjects of
your courses
and do problems in THEM.
Come back in a couple of years and ask what to do next.
When I was taking classes I could never complete step one. There was
always more homework. If I finished the work for one class there was
always another.
You think Einstein derived and understood GR the way they teach it? You
think Feynmann derived and understood QED the way they teach it?
--
"I fart for joy and I laugh more than if I had cast my old age, as a
serpent does its skin." -- Aristophanes, Peace, 421 BC
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 03:44:57 PM |
|
|
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission was SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education. The solution to
this "discrimination" was to corrupt the qualifying test and reduce
universities to expensive trash-talking high schools. If you cannot
meet New World Order standards you are truly loathsome. Consider a
Civil Service career.
Fall to the aptitudes and appetites of your betters. What idiot
Admissions Committee let you in?
1) A matriculant is there for blood. That is not you.
2) A matriculant is there for socializing. Get a journalism or
poli sci major, join a frat, graduate with your gentleman's C.
Studying is mostly irrelevant. Drink, *****, establish your life's
network, reduce your golf handicap.
3) A matriculant is a Diversity mercyhump. FOaD.
Guess what? The world wants to crush you ike an overripe grape, to
hang you from a gibbet for entertainment, to pick your bones clean, to
utterly destroy and discard you. Welcome to adulthood. For the good
of your species, fail.
One of the less able of Uncle Al's Severely Gifted public school chums
surfaced a couple of months back. He does international trade
taxation involving huge arbitrary sloshes of money. He expertly lies
for a living and doesn't get caught doing it. Even the worst of the
best is pretty damned good.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Philip Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 08:39:05 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:424C6F59.2B516C09@hate.spam.net...
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission was SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education.
110 IQ........make that 75%.
Phil H
.
|
|
|
| User: "GR_GR" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 09:20:00 PM |
|
|
Philip Holman wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:424C6F59.2B516C09@hate.spam.net...
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission was SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education.
110 IQ........make that 75%.
Phil H
110 IQ....... mate that 73%.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 02:58:40 PM |
|
|
GR_GR wrote:
Philip Holman wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:424C6F59.2B516C09@hate.spam.net...
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission was SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education.
110 IQ........make that 75%.
Phil H
110 IQ....... mate that 73%.
Fine. 3/4. "Everybody goes to college." There is an unresolved
congnitive dissonance even given statistical uncertainty in
intelligence testing.
Fat standardized test scores are no guarantee that the applicant will
do well. However, in any honest graduating class the vast majority of
the top 10% will have had fat scores. One mines ore to recover a
resource because the chance of finding the resource in non-ores is
essentially zero. You don't find many Italian dinners in a Vietnamese
restaurant.
How many 5'5" professional basketball players are there? How many
professional teams have a midget recruitment and tutorial program? If
it is ***** in sports it is ***** in academics.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 04:15:31 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
GR_GR wrote:
Philip Holman wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:424C6F59.2B516C09@hate.spam.net...
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some
advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission was
SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the
population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education.
110 IQ........make that 75%.
Phil H
110 IQ....... mate that 73%.
Fine. 3/4. "Everybody goes to college." There is an unresolved
congnitive dissonance even given statistical uncertainty in
intelligence testing.
Fat standardized test scores are no guarantee that the applicant will
do well. However, in any honest graduating class the vast majority
of
the top 10% will have had fat scores. One mines ore to recover a
resource because the chance of finding the resource in non-ores is
essentially zero. You don't find many Italian dinners in a
Vietnamese
restaurant.
How many 5'5" professional basketball players are there? How many
professional teams have a midget recruitment and tutorial program?
If
it is ***** in sports it is ***** in academics.
The relevant mass-energy disparity between a professional athelete and
an ordinary individual exceed the mass-energy disparity between a
prodigy and that ordinary individual. Thus in the latter case, said
disparity becomes relevant towards the limits of cognotive capability.
A limit way way beyond that of primitive GR or QFT. Likewise the
aristocratic Roman elites were soley capable of multiplying simple
numbers via lattice seaving as a product of prodigy or circumstance?
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 04:39:01 PM |
|
|
Schoenfeld wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
GR_GR wrote:
Philip Holman wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:424C6F59.2B516C09@hate.spam.net...
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some
advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission was
SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the
population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education.
110 IQ........make that 75%.
Phil H
110 IQ....... mate that 73%.
Fine. 3/4. "Everybody goes to college." There is an unresolved
congnitive dissonance even given statistical uncertainty in
intelligence testing.
Fat standardized test scores are no guarantee that the applicant will
do well. However, in any honest graduating class the vast majority
of
the top 10% will have had fat scores. One mines ore to recover a
resource because the chance of finding the resource in non-ores is
essentially zero. You don't find many Italian dinners in a
Vietnamese
restaurant.
How many 5'5" professional basketball players are there? How many
professional teams have a midget recruitment and tutorial program?
If
it is ***** in sports it is ***** in academics.
The relevant mass-energy disparity between a professional athelete and
an ordinary individual exceed the mass-energy disparity between a
prodigy and that ordinary individual.
[snip]
Hopeless idiot. Science is more than stringing together words. You
want a Liberal Arts or reilgious newsgroup, idiot Schoenfeld.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 06:24:15 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
Schoenfeld wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
GR_GR wrote:
Philip Holman wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:424C6F59.2B516C09@hate.spam.net...
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some
advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission
was
SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the
population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education.
110 IQ........make that 75%.
Phil H
110 IQ....... mate that 73%.
Fine. 3/4. "Everybody goes to college." There is an unresolved
congnitive dissonance even given statistical uncertainty in
intelligence testing.
Fat standardized test scores are no guarantee that the applicant
will
do well. However, in any honest graduating class the vast
majority
of
the top 10% will have had fat scores. One mines ore to recover a
resource because the chance of finding the resource in non-ores
is
essentially zero. You don't find many Italian dinners in a
Vietnamese
restaurant.
How many 5'5" professional basketball players are there? How
many
professional teams have a midget recruitment and tutorial
program?
If
it is ***** in sports it is ***** in academics.
The relevant mass-energy disparity between a professional athelete
and
an ordinary individual exceed the mass-energy disparity between a
prodigy and that ordinary individual.
[snip]
Hopeless idiot. Science is more than stringing together words. You
want a Liberal Arts or reilgious newsgroup, idiot Schoenfeld.
How about a physics newsgroup. And you can start by correcting your
futile attempt to "challenge General Relativity" (hint: parity is a
discrete symmetry), fucking idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 07:59:57 PM |
|
|
Schoenfeld wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
Schoenfeld wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
GR_GR wrote:
Philip Holman wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:424C6F59.2B516C09@hate.spam.net...
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some
advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission
was
SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the
population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education.
110 IQ........make that 75%.
Phil H
110 IQ....... mate that 73%.
Fine. 3/4. "Everybody goes to college." There is an unresolved
congnitive dissonance even given statistical uncertainty in
intelligence testing.
Fat standardized test scores are no guarantee that the applicant
will
do well. However, in any honest graduating class the vast
majority
of
the top 10% will have had fat scores. One mines ore to recover a
resource because the chance of finding the resource in non-ores
is
essentially zero. You don't find many Italian dinners in a
Vietnamese
restaurant.
How many 5'5" professional basketball players are there? How
many
professional teams have a midget recruitment and tutorial
program?
If
it is ***** in sports it is ***** in academics.
The relevant mass-energy disparity between a professional athelete
and
an ordinary individual exceed the mass-energy disparity between a
prodigy and that ordinary individual.
[snip]
Hopeless idiot. Science is more than stringing together words. You
want a Liberal Arts or reilgious newsgroup, idiot Schoenfeld.
How about a physics newsgroup. And you can start by correcting your
futile attempt to "challenge General Relativity" (hint: parity is a
discrete symmetry), fucking idiot.
Schoenfeld the critic troll brainfarts. No contribution, only
complaint. No references URL or literature, no mathematics, no input
to the discussion, no enlightenment, no hint of intelligence. Nothing
but anile kneejerk spasm befitting a particulary inferior undergrad
assignment in spew emulation. Having pissed upon a skyscraper wall,
the critic troll rears back and exhorts the crowd to admire both his
spoor and the manly implement that emplaced it.
Hey stooopid Schoenfeld, parity is the ONLY external, discrete,
non-Noetherian symmetry. That is the point stooopid Schoenfeld.
Nobody has ever looked, stooopid Schoenfeld. Weak fields typically
break parity symmetry - with only one unexamined case, namely
gravitation - stooopid Schoenfeld. BTW, stooopid Schoenfeld, there is
a new, sooner date for completion of the full parity Eotvos
experiment.
Hey stooopid Schoenfeld, I am the right hand of vengeance. I am the
boot that is going to kick your sorry ***** all the way back to Project
Head Start. I am the last living thing you are ever going to
remember. I am truth incarnate. GOD SENT ME.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GR_GR" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 07:10:24 PM |
|
|
Schoenfeld wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
Schoenfeld wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
GR_GR wrote:
Philip Holman wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:424C6F59.2B516C09@hate.spam.net...
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some
advice on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission
was
SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the
population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education.
110 IQ........make that 75%.
Phil H
110 IQ....... mate that 73%.
Fine. 3/4. "Everybody goes to college." There is an unresolved
congnitive dissonance even given statistical uncertainty in
intelligence testing.
Fat standardized test scores are no guarantee that the applicant
will
do well. However, in any honest graduating class the vast
majority
of
the top 10% will have had fat scores. One mines ore to recover a
resource because the chance of finding the resource in non-ores
is
essentially zero. You don't find many Italian dinners in a
Vietnamese
restaurant.
How many 5'5" professional basketball players are there? How
many
professional teams have a midget recruitment and tutorial
program?
If
it is ***** in sports it is ***** in academics.
The relevant mass-energy disparity between a professional athelete
and
an ordinary individual exceed the mass-energy disparity between a
prodigy and that ordinary individual.
[snip]
Hopeless idiot. Science is more than stringing together words. You
want a Liberal Arts or reilgious newsgroup, idiot Schoenfeld.
How about a physics newsgroup. And you can start by correcting your
futile attempt to "challenge General Relativity" (hint: parity is a
discrete symmetry), fucking idiot.
You were supposed to stop acting like a crack pot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 07:26:05 PM |
|
|
GR_GR wrote:
Hopeless idiot. Science is more than stringing together words.
You
want a Liberal Arts or reilgious newsgroup, idiot Schoenfeld.
How about a physics newsgroup. And you can start by correcting your
futile attempt to "challenge General Relativity" (hint: parity is a
discrete symmetry), fucking idiot.
You were supposed to stop acting like a crack pot.
Did you swallow, groupie?
.
|
|
|
| User: "GR_GR" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 07:40:45 PM |
|
|
Schoenfeld wrote:
GR_GR wrote:
Hopeless idiot. Science is more than stringing together words.
You
want a Liberal Arts or reilgious newsgroup, idiot Schoenfeld.
How about a physics newsgroup. And you can start by correcting your
futile attempt to "challenge General Relativity" (hint: parity is a
discrete symmetry), fucking idiot.
You were supposed to stop acting like a crack pot.
Did you swallow, groupie?
I guess there is no hope for the likes of you, crack pot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
04 Apr 2005 06:30:30 PM |
|
|
GR_GR wrote:
I guess there is no hope for the likes of you, crack pot.
A little ironic coming from you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GR_GR" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
04 Apr 2005 10:29:26 PM |
|
|
wrote:
GR_GR wrote:
I guess there is no hope for the likes of you, crack pot.
A little ironic coming from you.
So, I plonk a thread started by you and you decide to snipe from another.
Have at it, fudge packer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
04 Apr 2005 11:00:26 PM |
|
|
By staying the ***** out of ;;;;;;
da bar
here
jail
hell
*****
drugs
trouble
paying attension and doing the work is the best way to studdy
...reading the ***** they wrotee about it is NOT.
BTW you still here =A9=A1=F0 smack
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
31 Mar 2005 07:32:48 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
Gaz wrote:
I am in first year in Univeristy. Can someone give me some advice
on
studying?
Traditional minimum qualification for university admission was SAT
1100. That is a 110 IQ and excludes the bottom 90% of the population
that cannot imaginably benefit from higher education. The solution
to
this "discrimination" was to corrupt the qualifying test and reduce
universities to expensive trash-talking high schools. If you cannot
meet New World Order standards you are truly loathsome. Consider a
Civil Service career.
Fall to the aptitudes and appetites of your betters. What idiot
Admissions Committee let you in?
1) A matriculant is there for blood. That is not you.
2) A matriculant is there for socializing. Get a journalism or
poli sci major, join a frat, graduate with your gentleman's C.
Studying is mostly irrelevant. Drink, *****, establish your life's
network, reduce your golf handicap.
3) A matriculant is a Diversity mercyhump. FOaD.
Guess what? The world wants to crush you ike an overripe grape, to
hang you from a gibbet for entertainment, to pick your bones clean,
to
utterly destroy and discard you. Welcome to adulthood. For the good
of your species, fail.
4) Outsource your homework to the cheap and abundant online
third-world (the latest fad).
One of the less able of Uncle Al's Severely Gifted public school
chums
surfaced a couple of months back. He does international trade
taxation involving huge arbitrary sloshes of money. He expertly lies
for a living and doesn't get caught doing it. Even the worst of the
best is pretty damned good.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 12:18:06 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al, you're crustier than a four-day-old baguette.
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 03:05:19 PM |
|
|
PD wrote:
Uncle Al, you're crustier than a four-day-old baguette.
1200+ hopeful folk walked into first term majors organic lecture,
September 1969 at Michigan State. About 320 survived to second term
lecture and first term lab. Some 17 graduated BS/Chem. That is
precisely the way to identify winners. Those 17 were better in every
way than the ones who fell aside. The only way to accurately predict
the future is to create it yourself.
Losers can be picked up off any street by the truckload.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 03:14:09 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
PD wrote:
Uncle Al, you're crustier than a four-day-old baguette.
1200+ hopeful folk walked into first term majors organic lecture,
September 1969 at Michigan State. About 320 survived to second term
lecture and first term lab. Some 17 graduated BS/Chem. That is
precisely the way to identify winners. Those 17 were better in every
way than the ones who fell aside. The only way to accurately predict
the future is to create it yourself.
Losers can be picked up off any street by the truckload.
Oh, I'm not denying the truth of what you say.
(I note, however, that the 320 to 17 cut is illusory, because there
were probably only 19 out of those 320 that intended to be chemists
rather than doctors. A parallel statement can be made about the 700 in
the first term calculus-based physics class at Indiana University.)
I'm just chuckling at your gravely disposition about it. "Get away from
me, kid, ya bother me."
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: How to study |
01 Apr 2005 04:45:42 PM |
|
|
PD wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
PD wrote:
Uncle Al, you're crustier than a four-day-old baguette.
1200+ hopeful folk walked into first term majors organic lecture,
September 1969 at Michigan State. About 320 survived to second term
lecture and first term lab. Some 17 graduated BS/Chem. That is
precisely the way to identify winners. Those 17 were better in every
way than the ones who fell aside. The only way to accurately predict
the future is to create it yourself.
Losers can be picked up off any street by the truckload.
Oh, I'm not denying the truth of what you say.
(I note, however, that the 320 to 17 cut is illusory, because there
were probably only 19 out of those 320 that intended to be chemists
rather than doctors. A parallel statement can be made about the 700 in
the first term calculus-based physics class at Indiana University.)
I'm just chuckling at your gravely disposition about it. "Get away from
me, kid, ya bother me."
We've tried being girly nice since Johnson's "Great Society." It has
bankrupted the country and destroyed its social fabric. Education is
a hopeless money-gobbling morass. Take a plane, get strip-searched
without court-issued warrant. Income redistribution. Read the
Declaration of Independence for a list of contemporary grievances.
Losers deserve to lose, winners deserve to keep their rewards.
Anybody who is unwilling to run until they cough up blood earns no
pity from me.
You only truly own what you can hold in your arms at full run. Uncle
Al owns only half that - one hand will be firing an aimed gun.
"I'm a VICTIM!"
Die.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
