How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant?



 Science > Physics > How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Grey Knight"
Date: 05 Oct 2004 08:21:03 AM
Object: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant?
Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^
I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?
NB: references to "making the star think that X" are figurative ;)
(A) "Siphoning off" hydrogen via a wormhole, making the star think it
is in the helium-burning stage
(B) Applying some kind of gravitational effect to make the star think
it has a different mass (masses submerged in this universe's
"slipspace" near the star could conceivably have such an effect?)
(C) None of the above (specify a new idea)
.

User: "Dr Matrix-Element"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 10:40:48 AM
"Grey Knight" <greyknight3@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:73250d5a.0410050521.757696b1@posting.google.com...

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?
NB: references to "making the star think that X" are figurative ;)

(A) "Siphoning off" hydrogen via a wormhole, making the star think it
is in the helium-burning stage
(B) Applying some kind of gravitational effect to make the star think
it has a different mass (masses submerged in this universe's
"slipspace" near the star could conceivably have such an effect?)
(C) None of the above (specify a new idea)

Neither of the above.
What you want to to increase temperature at the core by shrinking the star,
right? To do this you need to artificially lower the temperature of the core
so that the star collapses and consequently the core heats up. I suggest
directing a neutron star directly into your G5 star's center. The star
first collapses, then the core heats up, and it turns prematurily into a red
gant.
.

User: "Tom Clarke"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 02:56:37 PM
(Grey Knight) wrote in message

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^


I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?
NB: references to "making the star think that X" are figurative ;)


(A) "Siphoning off" hydrogen via a wormhole, making the star think it
is in the helium-burning stage
(B) Applying some kind of gravitational effect to make the star think
it has a different mass (masses submerged in this universe's
"slipspace" near the star could conceivably have such an effect?)
(C) None of the above (specify a new idea)

C. {I tend to agree with it can't be done, but since it is SF}
Inject a catalyst into the star. Carbon catalyzes hydrogen fusion,
so perhaps a planet of carbon would heat up the fusion process and
blow the atomsphere up into a red-giant-like phase.
Considering that you are asking on s.p.f, home of cold fusion discussion,
maybe an asteroid of palladium which is what is supposed to catalyze
cold fusion?
Tom Clarke
.

User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 10:50:29 AM
Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant).

Sorry, but AFAIK, an M3 star is *not* a red giant. It is a red star
- but it is on the main sequence, like our sun, and even smaller than it!
So, please specify what you want - a M3 star, or a red giant? Apparently
the second...

In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?
NB: references to "making the star think that X" are figurative ;)

(A) "Siphoning off" hydrogen via a wormhole, making the star think it
is in the helium-burning stage

Well, you had to "siphon off" the hydrogen from its center (since there
both the hydrogen and helium "burning" takes place, so "siphoning off"
hydrogen from the outer layers won't help).
Unfortunately, that would also reduce the total mass of the star, and
IIRC, there is a lower limit on the mass, under which a star won't
become a red giant. So you have to pay attention that you don't "siphon
off" to much hydrogen... ;-)
So I would recommend that additional to the "siphoning off" of hydrogen,
you also add helium through the same wormhole!

(B) Applying some kind of gravitational effect to make the star think
it has a different mass

Probably won't work. I think the result would be a collapse of the star
and explosive helium burning, leading to a disruption of the star.
Perhaps if one were able to apply gravitational fields in a very
controlled, very specific manner, it *could* work - but sounds quite
complicated to me.

(masses submerged in this universe's
"slipspace" near the star could conceivably have such an effect?)

What's a "slipspace"???

(C) None of the above (specify a new idea)

Since a star becomes a red giant when a certain amount of the hydrogen
in its core has turned to helium, approach (A) above should work -
provided that not only hydrogen is taken out, but helium is added instead.
Bye,
Bjoern
.
User: "Dr Matrix-Element"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 11:28:18 AM
"Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
news:cjufs5$p0e$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...

Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant).


Sorry, but AFAIK, an M3 star is *not* a red giant. It is a red star
- but it is on the main sequence, like our sun, and even smaller than it!

So, please specify what you want - a M3 star, or a red giant? Apparently
the second...


In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?
NB: references to "making the star think that X" are figurative ;)

(A) "Siphoning off" hydrogen via a wormhole, making the star think it
is in the helium-burning stage


Well, you had to "siphon off" the hydrogen from its center (since there
both the hydrogen and helium "burning" takes place, so "siphoning off"
hydrogen from the outer layers won't help).

Unfortunately, that would also reduce the total mass of the star, and
IIRC, there is a lower limit on the mass, under which a star won't become
a red giant. So you have to pay attention that you don't "siphon off" to
much hydrogen... ;-)

So I would recommend that additional to the "siphoning off" of hydrogen,
you also add helium through the same wormhole!


(B) Applying some kind of gravitational effect to make the star think
it has a different mass


Probably won't work. I think the result would be a collapse of the star
and explosive helium burning, leading to a disruption of the star.

Perhaps if one were able to apply gravitational fields in a very
controlled, very specific manner, it *could* work - but sounds quite
complicated to me.


(masses submerged in this universe's
"slipspace" near the star could conceivably have such an effect?)


What's a "slipspace"???


(C) None of the above (specify a new idea)


Since a star becomes a red giant when a certain amount of the hydrogen in
its core has turned to helium, approach (A) above should work - provided
that not only hydrogen is taken out, but helium is added instead.

And how exactly will you remove the hydrogen directly from the core? Inject
a miniature black hole right in its center and then remove the blackhole
right after the hydrogen is sucked in? And how will you prevent the helium
from being sucked in?
.
User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 11:47:31 AM
Dr Matrix-Element wrote:

"Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
news:cjufs5$p0e$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...

Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant).


Sorry, but AFAIK, an M3 star is *not* a red giant. It is a red star
- but it is on the main sequence, like our sun, and even smaller than it!

So, please specify what you want - a M3 star, or a red giant? Apparently
the second...



In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?
NB: references to "making the star think that X" are figurative ;)

(A) "Siphoning off" hydrogen via a wormhole, making the star think it
is in the helium-burning stage


Well, you had to "siphon off" the hydrogen from its center (since there
both the hydrogen and helium "burning" takes place, so "siphoning off"
hydrogen from the outer layers won't help).

Unfortunately, that would also reduce the total mass of the star, and
IIRC, there is a lower limit on the mass, under which a star won't become
a red giant. So you have to pay attention that you don't "siphon off" to
much hydrogen... ;-)

So I would recommend that additional to the "siphoning off" of hydrogen,
you also add helium through the same wormhole!



(B) Applying some kind of gravitational effect to make the star think
it has a different mass


Probably won't work. I think the result would be a collapse of the star
and explosive helium burning, leading to a disruption of the star.

Perhaps if one were able to apply gravitational fields in a very
controlled, very specific manner, it *could* work - but sounds quite
complicated to me.



(masses submerged in this universe's
"slipspace" near the star could conceivably have such an effect?)


What's a "slipspace"???



(C) None of the above (specify a new idea)


Since a star becomes a red giant when a certain amount of the hydrogen in
its core has turned to helium, approach (A) above should work - provided
that not only hydrogen is taken out, but helium is added instead.



And how exactly will you remove the hydrogen directly from the core? Inject
a miniature black hole right in its center and then remove the blackhole
right after the hydrogen is sucked in? And how will you prevent the helium
from being sucked in?

Good questions. It *is* science fiction, not science, after all. ;-)
Bye,
Bjoern
.
User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 01:32:59 PM
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:


Dr Matrix-Element wrote:

"Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
news:cjufs5$p0e$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...

Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant).


Sorry, but AFAIK, an M3 star is *not* a red giant. It is a red star
- but it is on the main sequence, like our sun, and even smaller than it!

So, please specify what you want - a M3 star, or a red giant? Apparently
the second...



In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?
NB: references to "making the star think that X" are figurative ;)

(A) "Siphoning off" hydrogen via a wormhole, making the star think it
is in the helium-burning stage


Well, you had to "siphon off" the hydrogen from its center (since there
both the hydrogen and helium "burning" takes place, so "siphoning off"
hydrogen from the outer layers won't help).

Unfortunately, that would also reduce the total mass of the star, and
IIRC, there is a lower limit on the mass, under which a star won't become
a red giant. So you have to pay attention that you don't "siphon off" to
much hydrogen... ;-)

So I would recommend that additional to the "siphoning off" of hydrogen,
you also add helium through the same wormhole!



(B) Applying some kind of gravitational effect to make the star think
it has a different mass


Probably won't work. I think the result would be a collapse of the star
and explosive helium burning, leading to a disruption of the star.

Perhaps if one were able to apply gravitational fields in a very
controlled, very specific manner, it *could* work - but sounds quite
complicated to me.



(masses submerged in this universe's
"slipspace" near the star could conceivably have such an effect?)


What's a "slipspace"???



(C) None of the above (specify a new idea)


Since a star becomes a red giant when a certain amount of the hydrogen in
its core has turned to helium, approach (A) above should work - provided
that not only hydrogen is taken out, but helium is added instead.



And how exactly will you remove the hydrogen directly from the core? Inject
a miniature black hole right in its center and then remove the blackhole
right after the hydrogen is sucked in? And how will you prevent the helium
from being sucked in?


Good questions. It *is* science fiction, not science, after all. ;-)

Conservation of angular momentum then viscosity. To swell the star
you need a vastly higher core temp. Inject a neutron star or
especially a black hole. Stuff has to *swirl* in. In the first case
you get enormous viscous losses plus pulsed nuclear fusion when
incoming tamps down onto the neutron star's surface. In the second
case you get viscous losses amounting to about 40-60% net conversion
of infall mass into energy, compared to fusion's 0.1%.
The neutron star will accrete into a black hole's threshhold for
collapse - and that will be a dose of fun in itself.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.


User: "Morituri-Max"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 12:24:02 PM
Dr Matrix-Element wrote:

And how exactly will you remove the hydrogen directly from the core? Inject
a miniature black hole right in its center and then remove the blackhole
right after the hydrogen is sucked in? And how will you prevent the helium
from being sucked in?

It's supposed to be sci fi.. think of some ways with carte blanche in the tech
dept.. suspension of disbelief is in effect.. heh
.
User: "Ian Stirling"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 05:44:04 PM
In sci.physics Morituri-Max <newage@sendarico.net> wrote:

Dr Matrix-Element wrote:

And how exactly will you remove the hydrogen directly from the core? Inject
a miniature black hole right in its center and then remove the blackhole
right after the hydrogen is sucked in? And how will you prevent the helium
from being sucked in?


It's supposed to be sci fi.. think of some ways with carte blanche in the tech
dept.. suspension of disbelief is in effect.. heh

What about fusion poisons?
What if we take all the rocky bodies within the nearest few light years,
and swap them for a bit of stellar core?
(apart from some really surprised aliens).
Can you kill the fusion in a reasonable volume of the star?
.



User: "Michael Moroney"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 06 Oct 2004 02:57:46 PM
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> writes:

Grey Knight wrote:

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant).

Sorry, but AFAIK, an M3 star is *not* a red giant. It is a red star
- but it is on the main sequence, like our sun, and even smaller than it!
So, please specify what you want - a M3 star, or a red giant? Apparently
the second...

I suspect the original poster meant a M III star and a G V star, where the
first letter is the general spectral class and the second Roman numeral is
the star's type (V="dwarf" like the Sun, III=giant) rather than M3 and G5
(where the number is a subdivision of the spectral classes "M" and "G",
numbered 0-9). From memory the Sun is a G6 V star.
--
-Mike
.


User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 08:37:09 AM
Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant).

A G5 Star like our Sun turns into a red giant all by itself and will
enentually shink to a white dwarf.
See: http://www.astronomynotes.com/evolutn/s1.htm
http://www.edu-observatory.org/eo/black_holes.html
.

User: "Morituri-Max"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 12:22:33 PM
Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?
NB: references to "making the star think that X" are figurative ;)

time.. lots and lots of time... if you don't have so much time.. try syphoning
off most of its hydrogen..
.

User: "ru"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 11:15:36 AM
In article <73250d5a.0410050521.757696b1@posting.google.com>, Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?

what happens (briefly) is that the core stop burning, and the radiative
pressure on the atmosphere stops balancing its weight. the atmosphere
starts to collapse onto the core, until a shell around the core gets hot
enough to start burning (i can't actually remember if this is helium or
hydrogen burning; there may well be hydrogen left over in the atmosphere
of the star after the core has used up all of its hydrogen; my old
lecture notes are at home ;-) ). this inflates the atmosphere, and the
star bloats up into a red giant.
one way to do what you want would be to remove the central radiative
pressure that the burning core exerts on the atmosphere, while keeping
its mass there to cause the atmosphere to collapse. this means either:
a) stopping the core burning, b) preventing the energy caused by fusion
getting out or c) channeling it off somewhere else.
alternatively, you could find some way of collapsing the atmosphere by
massively increasing the gravitational attraction on the atmosphere so
it collapses in spite of the radiative pressure of the core. you
probably wouldn't get a pure red giant in this case, as you'd still have
the core shining through.
either way, you're talking about technology levels where the aliens can
do essentially whatever they want :)
--
ru
.
User: "Dr Matrix-Element"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 11:31:13 AM
"ru" <ru@no.spam.please.net> wrote in message
news:slrncm5i58.1ti5.ru@newred.gradwell.net...

In article <73250d5a.0410050521.757696b1@posting.google.com>, Grey Knight
wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?


what happens (briefly) is that the core stop burning, and the radiative
pressure on the atmosphere stops balancing its weight. the atmosphere
starts to collapse onto the core, until a shell around the core gets hot
enough to start burning (i can't actually remember if this is helium or
hydrogen burning; there may well be hydrogen left over in the atmosphere
of the star after the core has used up all of its hydrogen; my old
lecture notes are at home ;-) ). this inflates the atmosphere, and the
star bloats up into a red giant.

one way to do what you want would be to remove the central radiative
pressure that the burning core exerts on the atmosphere, while keeping
its mass there to cause the atmosphere to collapse. this means either:
a) stopping the core burning, b) preventing the energy caused by fusion
getting out or c) channeling it off somewhere else.

This is exactly what I have already proposed. You cool the core by firing
something cold into it. A neutron star will do.

alternatively, you could find some way of collapsing the atmosphere by
massively increasing the gravitational attraction on the atmosphere so
it collapses in spite of the radiative pressure of the core. you
probably wouldn't get a pure red giant in this case, as you'd still have
the core shining through.

There is no way you can do this.
.
User: "ru"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 05 Oct 2004 11:53:57 AM
In article <4162cc52$7@clarion.carno.net.au>, Dr Matrix-Element wrote:

one way to do what you want would be to remove the central radiative
pressure that the burning core exerts on the atmosphere, while keeping
its mass there to cause the atmosphere to collapse. this means either:
a) stopping the core burning, b) preventing the energy caused by fusion
getting out or c) channeling it off somewhere else.


This is exactly what I have already proposed. You cool the core by firing
something cold into it. A neutron star will do.

because neutron stars are noted for their coldness, clearly.
besides, stick a neutron star in another star and you get... a bigger neutron
star! (assuming you don't tip it over the edge to a black hole.) not exactly
what the OP was looking for.

There is no way you can do this.

ahem: "science *fiction*"
--
ru
.
User: "Dr Matrix-Element"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 06 Oct 2004 12:49:19 PM
"ru" <ru@no.spam.please.net> wrote in message
news:slrncm5kd5.o76.ru@newred.gradwell.net...

In article <4162cc52$7@clarion.carno.net.au>, Dr Matrix-Element wrote:

one way to do what you want would be to remove the central radiative
pressure that the burning core exerts on the atmosphere, while keeping
its mass there to cause the atmosphere to collapse. this means either:
a) stopping the core burning, b) preventing the energy caused by fusion
getting out or c) channeling it off somewhere else.


This is exactly what I have already proposed. You cool the core by firing
something cold into it. A neutron star will do.


because neutron stars are noted for their coldness, clearly.

besides, stick a neutron star in another star and you get... a bigger
neutron
star! (assuming you don't tip it over the edge to a black hole.) not
exactly
what the OP was looking for.

A neutron star will start sucking in the core, releasing electrons and
energy. This will instantly expand the star into a red giant.
Some time later, when much of core is sucked in, star will collapse again,
creating orbiting dense cloud around the neutron star, thus expanding into
red giant again.
The third time the star collapses, it forms a sepernova as no more fuel can
be used for keeping it from total collapse.
.



User: "Grey Knight"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 06 Oct 2004 08:40:02 AM
ru <ru@no.spam.please.net> wrote in message news:<slrncm5i58.1ti5.ru@newred.gradwell.net>...

In article <73250d5a.0410050521.757696b1@posting.google.com>, Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?

I see the confusion; the website I went to to look up spectral types
must have replaced roman numerals with arabic; hence GV -> G5 and MIII
-> M3. Tsk tsk. Yellow Dwarf to Red Giant is indeed what I intended.
The "slipspace" I referred to earlier, but didn't define, is the
common-or-garden subspace/hyperspace/whateverspace employed by scifi
writers since the dawn of time; this current incarnation is a
six-dimensional space (four spacelike, two timelike) which is probably
going to end up (in the final draft) being orthogonal to Minkowski
space rather than "underpinning" it as is more common. YGTI.

what happens (briefly) is that the core stop burning, and the radiative
pressure on the atmosphere stops balancing its weight. the atmosphere
starts to collapse onto the core, until a shell around the core gets hot
enough to start burning (i can't actually remember if this is helium or
hydrogen burning; there may well be hydrogen left over in the atmosphere
of the star after the core has used up all of its hydrogen; my old
lecture notes are at home ;-) ). this inflates the atmosphere, and the
star bloats up into a red giant.

one way to do what you want would be to remove the central radiative
pressure that the burning core exerts on the atmosphere, while keeping
its mass there to cause the atmosphere to collapse. this means either:
a) stopping the core burning, b) preventing the energy caused by fusion
getting out or c) channeling it off somewhere else.

I'm interested in this idea of simply removing the radiation pressure;
perhaps the aliens are siphoning off some of the *radiation* from the
core, tapping the star as an energy source? The outer layers of the
core would probably still remain hot enough to trigger helium burning,
since they manage it in a regular red giant.
This approach has the added advantage of giving a plausible *reason*
for the aliens' actions; I was worried about that for a while ^_^ I
only really came up with it because I liked the idea of some little
green Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen going "Oh, that star isn't really very
nice looking; let's tinker with it a bit."
I remember from my stellar physics classes that, what with all the
collisions, photons generated in the core take some incredible number
of years to escape (compared to eight minutes from the Sun to Earth!);
given that, how long could we expect the aliens to be siphoning off
photons before the star begins to swell noticeably, and how long would
the expansion take once it starts? (assuming reasonable figures for
star's mass, percentage of photons siphoned, etc) If the aliens were
to change their minds, could they reverse the process by cutting the
wormhole? If not, how else could they reverse it? How long would that
take?
How long is a piece of string? Who will live? Who will die? Will I
ever play the harmonium again? Tune in next week for the thrilling
conclusion!

either way, you're talking about technology levels where the aliens can
do essentially whatever they want :)

In the current draft, most of their technology isn't *terribly*
advanced, but they have an excellent grasp of general relativity and
can generate wormholes with a bit of effort. That might change if the
outcome of these discussions necessitates higher technologies.
.
User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 06 Oct 2004 09:01:13 AM
Grey Knight wrote:

ru <ru@no.spam.please.net> wrote in message news:<slrncm5i58.1ti5.ru@newred.gradwell.net>...

In article <73250d5a.0410050521.757696b1@posting.google.com>, Grey Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?



I see the confusion; the website I went to to look up spectral types
must have replaced roman numerals with arabic; hence GV -> G5 and MIII
-> M3. Tsk tsk. Yellow Dwarf to Red Giant is indeed what I intended.

Oh, I see.

The "slipspace" I referred to earlier, but didn't define, is the
common-or-garden subspace/hyperspace/whateverspace employed by scifi
writers since the dawn of time; this current incarnation is a
six-dimensional space (four spacelike, two timelike) which is probably
going to end up (in the final draft) being orthogonal to Minkowski
space rather than "underpinning" it as is more common. YGTI.

How can a sixdimensional space be orthogonal to the usual Minkowski
space? That would only work if both were part of a larger vector
space (at least tendimensional).

what happens (briefly) is that the core stop burning, and the radiative
pressure on the atmosphere stops balancing its weight. the atmosphere
starts to collapse onto the core, until a shell around the core gets hot
enough to start burning (i can't actually remember if this is helium or
hydrogen burning; there may well be hydrogen left over in the atmosphere
of the star after the core has used up all of its hydrogen; my old
lecture notes are at home ;-) ). this inflates the atmosphere, and the
star bloats up into a red giant.

one way to do what you want would be to remove the central radiative
pressure that the burning core exerts on the atmosphere, while keeping
its mass there to cause the atmosphere to collapse. this means either:
a) stopping the core burning, b) preventing the energy caused by fusion
getting out or c) channeling it off somewhere else.



I'm interested in this idea of simply removing the radiation pressure;
perhaps the aliens are siphoning off some of the *radiation* from the
core, tapping the star as an energy source? The outer layers of the
core would probably still remain hot enough to trigger helium burning,
since they manage it in a regular red giant.

Err, they manage that only in a regular red giant because they are
heated by the core!

This approach has the added advantage of giving a plausible *reason*
for the aliens' actions; I was worried about that for a while ^_^ I
only really came up with it because I liked the idea of some little
green Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen going "Oh, that star isn't really very
nice looking; let's tinker with it a bit."

I remember from my stellar physics classes that, what with all the
collisions, photons generated in the core take some incredible number
of years to escape (compared to eight minutes from the Sun to Earth!);

Several million years, IIRC.

given that, how long could we expect the aliens to be siphoning off
photons before the star begins to swell noticeably, and how long would
the expansion take once it starts? (assuming reasonable figures for
star's mass, percentage of photons siphoned, etc)

Well, if they somehow managed to siphon off *all* photons below a
certain depth, they would have to do that only for a rather short time
(I think a good estimate would be the free-fall time for the core of the
star). But after the core has collapsed enough, they have to stop the
siphoning off again, so that the radiation coming from the core then
can exert the pressure needed to push the outer layers outwards and
cause the swelling!

If the aliens were
to change their minds, could they reverse the process by cutting the
wormhole?

No. As said above: cutting the wormhole (after the core has collapsed
sufficiently!) is in contrast *necessary* for *making* the red giant in
the first place!

If not, how else could they reverse it? How long would that
take?

They would have to somehow expand the core again, so that the pressure
and temperature in it is less, helium is no longer "burned" to hydrogen,
the radiation pressure coming from the core is less, and therefore the
outer layers are no longer pushed outwards and heated so much. Then the
outer layers have to contract again, but not so violently that this
collapse will heat up and compress the core again.
Sounds quite difficult, and lengthy...
[snip]
Bye,
Bjoern
.
User: "Grey Knight"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 07 Oct 2004 05:34:25 AM
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<ck0tr9$b90$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...

Grey Knight wrote:

ru <ru@no.spam.please.net> wrote in message news:<slrncm5i58.1ti5.ru@newred.gradwell.net>...

In article <73250d5a.0410050521.757696b1@posting.google.com>, Grey Knight wrote:

8< 8< snip snip 8< 8<

The "slipspace" I referred to earlier, but didn't define, is the
common-or-garden subspace/hyperspace/whateverspace employed by scifi
writers since the dawn of time; this current incarnation is a
six-dimensional space (four spacelike, two timelike) which is probably
going to end up (in the final draft) being orthogonal to Minkowski
space rather than "underpinning" it as is more common. YGTI.


How can a sixdimensional space be orthogonal to the usual Minkowski
space? That would only work if both were part of a larger vector
space (at least tendimensional).

They are ^_^
Hey, if string theorists can do it, so can I!
8< 8< snip snip 8< 8<

I'm interested in this idea of simply removing the radiation pressure;
perhaps the aliens are siphoning off some of the *radiation* from the
core, tapping the star as an energy source? The outer layers of the
core would probably still remain hot enough to trigger helium burning,
since they manage it in a regular red giant.


Err, they manage that only in a regular red giant because they are
heated by the core!

Ah, but we aren't necessarily taking *all* the radiation. If a
suitable amount is removed so as to mimic the drop in reaction rate in
a normal red giant, surely we'd get the same effect? Or have I
overlooked something?

This approach has the added advantage of giving a plausible *reason*
for the aliens' actions; I was worried about that for a while ^_^ I
only really came up with it because I liked the idea of some little
green Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen going "Oh, that star isn't really very
nice looking; let's tinker with it a bit."

I remember from my stellar physics classes that, what with all the
collisions, photons generated in the core take some incredible number
of years to escape (compared to eight minutes from the Sun to Earth!);


Several million years, IIRC.

Poor things. A few million years being used as a quantum pinball, a
few hours leaving the solar system (maybe hitting a planet if they're
really lucky) and then off on a trip through near-total vacuum. Maybe
hitting something in another star system after a few centuries if
they're REALLY lucky, but otherwise it's the intergalactic void. Who'd
be a photon, eh?

given that, how long could we expect the aliens to be siphoning off
photons before the star begins to swell noticeably, and how long would
the expansion take once it starts? (assuming reasonable figures for
star's mass, percentage of photons siphoned, etc)


Well, if they somehow managed to siphon off *all* photons below a
certain depth, they would have to do that only for a rather short time
(I think a good estimate would be the free-fall time for the core of the
star). But after the core has collapsed enough, they have to stop the
siphoning off again, so that the radiation coming from the core then
can exert the pressure needed to push the outer layers outwards and
cause the swelling!

Unless they only extract a portion of the photons? By how much does
the hydrogen-burning rate slow down in a normal red giant compared to
a yellow dwarf?

If the aliens were
to change their minds, could they reverse the process by cutting the
wormhole?


No. As said above: cutting the wormhole (after the core has collapsed
sufficiently!) is in contrast *necessary* for *making* the red giant in
the first place!

If not, how else could they reverse it? How long would that
take?


They would have to somehow expand the core again, so that the pressure
and temperature in it is less,
helium is no longer "burned" to hydrogen,

Um, doesn't helium burn to carbon?

the radiation pressure coming from the core is less, and therefore the
outer layers are no longer pushed outwards and heated so much. Then the
outer layers have to contract again, but not so violently that this
collapse will heat up and compress the core again.

Sounds quite difficult, and lengthy...

Hmm, you're right about that. <ponders>
.
User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 07 Oct 2004 07:59:16 AM
Grey Knight wrote:

Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<ck0tr9$b90$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...

Grey Knight wrote:

[snip]

I'm interested in this idea of simply removing the radiation pressure;
perhaps the aliens are siphoning off some of the *radiation* from the
core, tapping the star as an energy source? The outer layers of the
core would probably still remain hot enough to trigger helium burning,
since they manage it in a regular red giant.


Err, they manage that only in a regular red giant because they are
heated by the core!



Ah, but we aren't necessarily taking *all* the radiation. If a
suitable amount is removed so as to mimic the drop in reaction rate in
a normal red giant, surely we'd get the same effect? Or have I
overlooked something?

I think what you keep overlooking is that you *first* need a collapse of
the *core* (and that could be achieved by taking the radiation pressure
away from its interior!), but after the collapse, after the He burning
has begun in the then denser and hotter core, you need the radiation
pressure *from* that core in order to expand the outer layers and heat
them up.
[snip]

given that, how long could we expect the aliens to be siphoning off
photons before the star begins to swell noticeably, and how long would
the expansion take once it starts? (assuming reasonable figures for
star's mass, percentage of photons siphoned, etc)


Well, if they somehow managed to siphon off *all* photons below a
certain depth, they would have to do that only for a rather short time
(I think a good estimate would be the free-fall time for the core of the
star). But after the core has collapsed enough, they have to stop the
siphoning off again, so that the radiation coming from the core then
can exert the pressure needed to push the outer layers outwards and
cause the swelling!



Unless they only extract a portion of the photons? By how much does
the hydrogen-burning rate slow down in a normal red giant compared to
a yellow dwarf?

I don't know. I would expect still some amount of hydrogen burning
in the new hotter, denser core, although mainly helium is burnt there.
But in the outer layers, a fair amount of hydrogen burning should take
place also.

They would have to somehow expand the core again, so that the pressure
and temperature in it is less, helium is no longer "burned" to hydrogen,



Um, doesn't helium burn to carbon?

Ooops. Typo.
[snip]
Bye,
Bjoern
.
User: "Steve Willner"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 07 Oct 2004 03:27:43 PM
In article <ck3ej4$pnf$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>,
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> writes:

I think what you keep overlooking is that you *first* need a collapse of
the *core*

You need a contraction; I don't see why you would need a collapse.
The "natural" way to have a core contraction is that the mean
molecular weight in the core goes up as hydrogen is converted to
helium. Sucking the hydrogen out -- if one could do that! -- ought
to amount to much the same thing.

(and that could be achieved by taking the radiation pressure
away from its interior!),

I don't think radiation pressure is important in the Sun. Isn't it
just good old nkT (gas kinetic pressure). Radiation pressure is
important in very massive stars, of course.

but after the collapse, after the He burning
has begun in the then denser and hotter core, you need the radiation
pressure *from* that core in order to expand the outer layers and heat
them up.

Again, I don't think radiation pressure is important.

Unless they only extract a portion of the photons? By how much does
the hydrogen-burning rate slow down in a normal red giant compared to
a yellow dwarf?

Doesn't it go up? Giants are much more luminous than dwarfs. In low
mass stars such as the Sun, most of the luminosity comes from shell
hydrogen burning -- or at least that's my memory from quite some time
ago. But my memory on this point is not to be trusted.
--
Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123

Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
(Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a
valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial
email may be sent to your ISP.)
.
User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 08 Oct 2004 04:04:31 AM
Steve Willner wrote:

In article <ck3ej4$pnf$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>,
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> writes:

I think what you keep overlooking is that you *first* need a collapse of
the *core*



You need a contraction; I don't see why you would need a collapse.

Hey, grant me a bit of exaggeration! ;-)
[snip]

(and that could be achieved by taking the radiation pressure
away from its interior!),



I don't think radiation pressure is important in the Sun. Isn't it
just good old nkT (gas kinetic pressure). Radiation pressure is
important in very massive stars, of course.

Well, I am not very well versed in solar physics, but I always thought
that radiation pressure plays a rather big part, at least in the core...
[snip]
Bye,
Bjoern
.
User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 08 Oct 2004 03:47:53 PM
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<ck5l6v$iks$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...

Steve Willner wrote:

In article <ck3ej4$pnf$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>,
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> writes:

I think what you keep overlooking is that you *first* need a collapse of
the *core*



You need a contraction; I don't see why you would need a collapse.


Hey, grant me a bit of exaggeration! ;-)


[snip]


(and that could be achieved by taking the radiation pressure
away from its interior!),



I don't think radiation pressure is important in the Sun. Isn't it
just good old nkT (gas kinetic pressure). Radiation pressure is
important in very massive stars, of course.


Well, I am not very well versed in solar physics, but I always thought
that radiation pressure plays a rather big part, at least in the core...

Wolf-Rayet stars. Pop III stars I believe. As in, you won't find any
within a distance that is measured in less than a billion light years.
I speak not for stars in general, but radiation pressure can do some
interesting things when scaled up enough.



[snip]


Bye,
Bjoern

.
User: "Steve Willner"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 15 Oct 2004 02:52:05 PM
In article <fd0fc2fa.0410081247.4bc61e0a@posting.google.com>,
(Eric Gisse) writes:

Wolf-Rayet stars. Pop III stars I believe. As in, you won't find any
within a distance that is measured in less than a billion light years.

Plenty of Wolf-Rayet stars nearby, both in the Milky Way and nearby
galaxies. They are massive, hot stars beginning to leave the main
sequence and are part of Pop. I.
Pop III stars are the putative first stage of star formation, formed
with no elements heavier than helium. Probably not any nearer than
12 billion light years (proper distance).
--
Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123

Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
(Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a
valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial
email may be sent to your ISP.)
.
User: "Alfred A. Aburto Jr."

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 16 Oct 2004 09:59:11 PM

Steve Willner wrote:
In article <fd0fc2fa.0410081247.4bc61e0a@posting.google.com>,
fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse) writes:

Wolf-Rayet stars. Pop III stars I believe. As in, you won't find any
within a distance that is measured in less than a billion light years.



Plenty of Wolf-Rayet stars nearby, both in the Milky Way and nearby
galaxies. They are massive, hot stars beginning to leave the main
sequence and are part of Pop. I.

Pop III stars are the putative first stage of star formation, formed
with no elements heavier than helium. Probably not any nearer than
12 billion light years (proper distance).

But Population III stars might still form (locally) in rare instances right?
.
User: "Joseph Lazio"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 17 Oct 2004 09:55:34 AM

"AAA" == Alfred A Aburto <aburto@sbcglobal.net> writes:

Pop III stars are the putative first stage of star formation,
formed with no elements heavier than helium. Probably not any
nearer than 12 billion light years (proper distance).

AAA> But Population III stars might still form (locally) in rare
AAA> instances right?
Effectively, no. As Steve wrote, Population III stars contain only
hydrogen and helium. Certainly all of the star formation regions in
the Milky Way contain "metals." The most likely candidate for local
formation of recent Pop. III stars would be a local dwarf galaxy. I'm
not an expert on nearby galaxies, but my interpretation of the
abstract of this paper is that no dwarf galaxies are known with a
primordial gas composition, <URL:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2000A%26ARv..10....1K

.

--
Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail:

No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/
sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html
.
User: "Alfred A. Aburto Jr."

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 17 Oct 2004 08:20:25 PM
Joseph Lazio wrote:

"AAA" == Alfred A Aburto <aburto@sbcglobal.net> writes:



Pop III stars are the putative first stage of star formation,
formed with no elements heavier than helium. Probably not any
nearer than 12 billion light years (proper distance).



AAA> But Population III stars might still form (locally) in rare
AAA> instances right?

Effectively, no. As Steve wrote, Population III stars contain only
hydrogen and helium. Certainly all of the star formation regions in
the Milky Way contain "metals." The most likely candidate for local
formation of recent Pop. III stars would be a local dwarf galaxy. I'm
not an expert on nearby galaxies, but my interpretation of the
abstract of this paper is that no dwarf galaxies are known with a
primordial gas composition, <URL:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2000A%26ARv..10....1K

Apreciate the replies Joseph & Steve. I just thought that somewhere,
perhaps between galaxies or between clusters of galaxies there was some
pure hydrogen & helium gas clouds and maybe these contain Pop. III
stars. Just a thought ...
I know too that there are scientists searching for the the most metal
poor stars. There must be some dwarf (low mass, long lived) Pop III
stars out there somewhere ...
.
User: "Steve Willner"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 18 Oct 2004 02:56:37 PM
In article <41731A77.1020703@sbcglobal.net>,
"Alfred A. Aburto Jr." <aburto@sbcglobal.net> writes:

I know too that there are scientists searching for the the most metal
poor stars.

Yep. I don't know what the record is these days, but I think I
remember reading less than 1% of solar metallicity.

There must be some dwarf (low mass, long lived) Pop III
stars out there somewhere ...

Good guess, but in fact there aren't, or at least not any known!
This is called the "G subdwarf problem." If the Pop III stars formed
with anything like the initial mass function we see nowadays, there
ought to be lots of stars of a couple of tenths of a solar mass and
zero metallicity. No such stars are known. The reason seems to be
that zero-metallicity gas forms _only_ stars above some minimum mass,
and all such stars have long since disappeared either in explosions
or by cooling below the threshold of visibility.
The details are still very murky, though, unless there is recent work
I am not aware of. (Quite possible.)
--
Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123

Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
(Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a
valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial
email may be sent to your ISP.)
.






User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 08 Oct 2004 04:06:40 AM
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
[snip]

I don't think radiation pressure is important in the Sun. Isn't it
just good old nkT (gas kinetic pressure). Radiation pressure is
important in very massive stars, of course.



Well, I am not very well versed in solar physics, but I always thought
that radiation pressure plays a rather big part, at least in the core...

O.k., you are right, I was wrong. Again, learned something new. :-)
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure>
(second-to-last paragraph)
Bye,
Bjoern
.






User: "Kathy Rages"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 07 Oct 2004 02:42:58 PM
In article <73250d5a.0410060540.21065e8c@posting.google.com>,
Grey Knight <greyknight3@yahoo.com> wrote:

ru <ru@no.spam.please.net> wrote in message
news:<slrncm5i58.1ti5.ru@newred.gradwell.net>...

In article <73250d5a.0410050521.757696b1@posting.google.com>, Grey

Knight wrote:

Thought that subject line would get your attention ^_^

I'm writing a sci-fi book in which one of the plot elements is a bunch
of aliens "modifying" a star to turn it from a G5 (yellow main seq)
into an M3 (red giant). In your humble opinions, what would be a
plausible (Well; don't worry too much, it IS fiction) method for this
to happen?

what happens (briefly) is that the core stop burning, and the radiative
pressure on the atmosphere stops balancing its weight. the atmosphere
starts to collapse onto the core, until a shell around the core gets hot
enough to start burning (i can't actually remember if this is helium or
hydrogen burning; there may well be hydrogen left over in the atmosphere
of the star after the core has used up all of its hydrogen; my old
lecture notes are at home ;-) ). this inflates the atmosphere, and the
star bloats up into a red giant.

one way to do what you want would be to remove the central radiative
pressure that the burning core exerts on the atmosphere, while keeping
its mass there to cause the atmosphere to collapse. this means either:
a) stopping the core burning, b) preventing the energy caused by fusion
getting out or c) channeling it off somewhere else.


I'm interested in this idea of simply removing the radiation pressure;
perhaps the aliens are siphoning off some of the *radiation* from the
core, tapping the star as an energy source? The outer layers of the
core would probably still remain hot enough to trigger helium burning,
since they manage it in a regular red giant.

Actually, this is going at it backwards. If you want to turn the sun into a
red giant you have to deposit (a LOT of) additional energy in the central
regions. That's right, a red giant is MORE luminous than the main-sequence
star it evolved from. That's why the earth is going to get roasted, rather
than frozen, in 5 billion years. A red giant is red because its surface
area has increased so much that it can radiate away the energy it's
producing at a lower surface temperature, not because it's radiating away
less energy.
So your aliens are going to need steller-class amounts of energy to
manipulate in order to pull this off. Maybe if they dropped (or generated)
a medium-size black hole inside the sun . . .
--
Kathy Rages
.
User: "Greg Neill"

Title: Re: How to turn a yellow dwarf into a red giant? 09 Oct 2004 01:06:50 PM
"Kathy Rages" <rages@darkstar.arc.nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:ck4682$1ue@library2.airnews.net...


Actually, this is going at it backwards. If you want to turn the sun into a
red giant you have to deposit (a LOT of) additional energy in the central
regions. That's right, a red giant is MORE luminous than the main-sequence
star it evolved from. That's why the earth is going to get roasted, rather
than frozen, in 5 billion years. A red giant is red because its surface
area has increased so much that it can radiate away the energy it's
producing at a lower surface temperature, not because it's radiating away
less energy.

So your aliens are going to need steller-class amounts of energy to
manipulate in order to pull this off. Maybe if they dropped (or generated)
a medium-size black hole inside the sun . . .

Since it's sci-fi, why not posit that the aliens can adjust
the fabric of space in small regions, like the center of a
sun? A modest tuning of the speed of light should be able
to affect the fusion rate to the desired degree...
.





  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER