| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
07 Mar 2006 03:29:11 PM |
| Object: |
How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
No I'm not having a bad day, what makes you say that?
Frickin MSoft, is driving me to distraction.
You know I have 1 gig, of ram. One thousand megabytes of ram, and it
will only allow me
to allocate something like 40% of that, for the computer program I am
creating.
As an instance, it will not permit me to load an image that is 4000 by
4000, it says I am out of resources, but will pop it into a browser
window faster than you can say jack the bear and do 27 copies of it, in
tandem if you want.
And it has been like that for years. No matter how much memory you
have, unless you
are somehow part of their world domination scheme, if you try to make a
robust program,
they will get you.
And they get you, by running your program, out of memory.
And they don't just say 'You are out of resources' and terminate the
program, that is what they should do, but no, they put error messages
on a timer, and give you cacading dialog boxes, with orchestral banging
on every beat, filling your screen with error messages, and leavng you
the programmer, looking like a complete moron, and they 'Win' again.
And leaving the user, scrambling for 'ctrl-alt-delete'
The program is 6 meg in size.
1 have 1000 meg of ram.
It says I am out of resources.
Look in ctrl-alt-delete- it is in total, using 16 meg of ram in full
operation.
It says I am out of resources.
Nice people. But then what should we expect from an evil empire.
At any rate, regarding the atom...to answer a question which was posed
to me...
A microwave bombards molecules in the food and causes them to vibrate,
and that creates heat.
The bowl will get hot, by the em waves from the food molecules, hitting
the molecules in the glass because the food or water is touching the
glass..
You will notice, that a cup of coffee, with water heated in the
microwave, will cool faster, than heated in the kettle.
The microwave is tuned, to interact with molecules, not tuned, to
interact or agitate, the nucleus, of the atom, be that hydrogen, or
oxygen, etc.
So it is working with em waves, interacting with electrons, and
although the microwaves may hit the nucleus of the atom, it is
relatively unaffected, because of the much stronger force, the nuclear
force, which causes the nulceus to vibrate on it's own normal
frequency.
A red hot heating element, sets up a little more of a sustained,
vibration in the molecules, as opposed to microwaves. For some strange
reason.
Can you turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon?
I'll bet Steven Seagal could if he had to. You know like if these guys
were attacking a ship and he was the cook, like in Under Siege. All you
need is a little know how.
And whole bunch of plutonium.
.
|
|
| User: "G.L. Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
07 Mar 2006 10:46:04 PM |
|
|
<rick_sobie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1141766951.608236.260750@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
No I'm not having a bad day, what makes you say that?
Frickin MSoft, is driving me to distraction.
You know I have 1 gig, of ram. One thousand megabytes of ram, and it
will only allow me
to allocate something like 40% of that, for the computer program I am
creating.
As an instance, it will not permit me to load an image that is 4000 by
4000, it says I am out of resources, but will pop it into a browser
window faster than you can say jack the bear and do 27 copies of it, in
tandem if you want.
And it has been like that for years. No matter how much memory you
have, unless you
are somehow part of their world domination scheme, if you try to make a
robust program,
they will get you.
And they get you, by running your program, out of memory.
And they don't just say 'You are out of resources' and terminate the
program, that is what they should do, but no, they put error messages
on a timer, and give you cacading dialog boxes, with orchestral banging
on every beat, filling your screen with error messages, and leavng you
the programmer, looking like a complete moron, and they 'Win' again.
And leaving the user, scrambling for 'ctrl-alt-delete'
The program is 6 meg in size.
1 have 1000 meg of ram.
It says I am out of resources.
Look in ctrl-alt-delete- it is in total, using 16 meg of ram in full
operation.
It says I am out of resources.
Nice people. But then what should we expect from an evil empire.
I have run into this problem many times. So what did I do about it? I wrote
my own
memory manager that has several features unavailable (and some "undoable")
with the
allocator provided by microsoft. You can use it as a replacement for
"malloc" but in your
case, you could get around your problem by allocating a shared memory
segment that is
at least 25% bigger than the total amount of memory you expect your program
to have
"in use" at any time. Hence you have allotted a single resource from the
system that you
will not "free" until your program exits. Then my algorithm manages its own
heap within
that single memory segment effectively taking control of memory resource
allocation
away from the Microsoft kernel. In some cases, it can be up to 60 (yes,
sixty) times
faster than using the standard "malloc."
If you are interested, I can try to round up that source code for you but it
has been some
time since I've done any real programming. I would have to search my old
archives for
that code. It is written in "C" and some Intel assembler because the
algorithm uses
dynamic stack allocation for its own internal memory resources.
This brings back old memories...
Post a reply if you want me to look for that source code.
Cheers,
- Gordon
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
08 Mar 2006 03:33:45 PM |
|
|
Well thanks very much for the offer Gordon. I am using a memory
resident memory manager now, and essentially it just runs in the
program on a seprate thread, so the program is multithreaded, and it
seems to work really well, until I need a vast amount of resources all
at once.
Now I think that the problem is that I have no way of actually knowing
how much memory the user will require, and I will tell you why.
This program, it is basically a graphics program, and people use large
images. Celebrity photos from photo houses, and I don't know if they
are wall papering their rooms with these photos or what, but you can
actually see the bacteria, on their skin, these images are so huge.
So what I have done. is to simply restrict the size to 4000 by 4000,
which is 4 times the size of the screen basically and then I ask them,
'Do you really need to paste an image, of this magnitude?, and if so
they can paste it in sections.
That was my solution and I think also that it is just the tip of the
iceberg though, regarding the hurtles, one must overcome, to get a
product to market.
I don't like to get into the negativity you know, but I do recll
finding some code once that stated' if this browser is not IE4, then
this program has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down'
That bit of code, that was in a script, on a MSoft website, went forth
and formed the basis of many class action suits which eventually
included numerous governments and culminated in them being charged with
breaches of monopoly laws etc, and only recently,
after some 10 years did they settle with Europe and various countries,
but nothing really came of it. They had teams and teams of lawyers and
it was tied up in the courts, I was not involved at all, it was only a
small part of the problem, but as I say, when it came down to the
government taking action, they failed to do so, and decided rather to
turn a blind eye. The issue had been so obscured by then, it was
useless to try and prosecute them. They are just too intelligent, and
just too well funded.
But, they did shoot themselves in the foot, because by stifling the
industry as they have done, with their monopolies, and by taking other
people's ideas, I am sure you herd many instances of that, where they
entered into agreements with Cisco, or IBM and said things like, "Well
you made a mistake, you trusted us" and etc.
My point is simply this, if they hadn't tken the stance they did, in
the hopes of controlling the net, by controlling the bottleneck, the
browser, then they never would have killed the golden goose, which was
feeding the industry.
And now Firefox is a better browser anyways, and Word sucks out loud. I
mean you can't even get the cursor to stay put, you can't get an image
with text the way you want it, hyperlinks don't work and etc.
They did finally put out a more stable os with XP, and so maybe there
is hope on the horizon.Together we almost made them release the source
code, but there was so much incriminating evidence within that code.
Within Windows 95 and 98 they could never release it to the public.
But they should create an operating system, specially designed with the
programmer in mind.
Make it a seperate product, but make it simple, make it bulletproof,
and let the real talent out there, do their thing. It would revitalize
the industry.
What I have done, and the timing is perfect, because the Candian gov't
just got hacked, I have created 100% secure incryption, and it will be
included in the next release of my product.
It is unbreakable, 200 million bit encryption, and it is fast and easy
to use. That is my contribution, to freedom of speech and privacy, for
gov't and business on the net.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
08 Mar 2006 06:56:37 PM |
|
|
What I have done, and the timing is perfect, because the Candian gov't
just got hacked, I have created 100% secure incryption, and it will be
included in the next release of my product.
It is unbreakable, 200 million bit encryption, and it is fast and easy
to use. That is my contribution, to freedom of speech and privacy, for
gov't and business on the net.
If anyone wants to have a look at what I am doing, I have uploaded a
Beta Test copy of the program to my website. It is about 12 meg. It is
a paint and animation program that makes animated gifs for the web or
you could have your own TV show etc.
It has been around for quite a while. This is version XV for XP only.
You need a fairly modern, fast machine for graphics and paint programs
such as this.
It is geared for serious professionals or hobbyists alike.
http://www.members.shaw.ca/ricksobie/PersonalTV-Studio.zip
Take a look at it if you would like. It includes the unbreakable
encryption, so if you believe in freedom of speech, on the net, and
privacy, then you might spread it far spread it fast, and spread it
wide.
.
|
|
|
| User: "avery" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
08 Mar 2006 07:03:36 PM |
|
|
I'm not sure what the original post was about, but I can tell you with
absolute certainty that you could very easily (with a modicum of scientific
know-how) create a weapon that uses simple microwave technology to
obliterate and melt the brains of the gentrifying assholes who now populate
the restaurant across the street from you, in the locale formerly known as a
bodega.
WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 12:01:28 AM |
|
|
You know I was listening to an old Art Bell show today, and this is no
word of a lie, it was the John Huchison episode. You know the guy who
recreated the Philadelphia experiment using Tesla Technology, and the
inventor of the much publicized Huchison (sp) Effect
anyways, in that episode, they actually speak, about a physicist who
used a microwave oven, for a levitation experiment, I kid you not.
So you see, not only can you make great weaponry from your household
appliances, you can also, do magic tricks, with a little know how.
Anyways if anyone who likes math, wants to take a look at what this
scramjet encryption looks like, well, you can't. We agreed there would
be no math.
But you can look at what a workgroup page using it, might look like.
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rsobie/WorkgroupExample.html
I challenge anyone to crack this encryption. Basically it can't be
done.
And so once again, we have reached that mountain pass,
and beyond, is a new country, but one not of weapons and mass
destruction,
one where you can send an e-mail to a coworker, about your boss,
and they can't intercept it.
One where you can arrange for that political payola, on election day,
and no one is the wiser, where you can create a thing, and take
pictures of it,
and store them on your disk, and even if they hack your computer,
they cannot de-crypt your images. Ever.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 12:13:48 AM |
|
|
You see you could hypothetically, reverse engineer this program, get
the highly complex algorythms, and then you would say "A ha! I have you
now!" except that you would never know, where on the internet, where on
a person's disk, or on a floppy, or on a cd, is their key image, when
the world, the net, your harrdrive, and everywhere is filled, with jpeg
images.
And it is it easier to remember an image, than a password? Oh yes.
Is it easier to store? The net has gazillions of images, and if you
select a celebrity image as your key, you just know, that until the end
of time, that image will be on the net somewhere if if you lose your
copy.
Sure, they could muscle it outta ya. You would say, you won't crack,
but they always do. And everyone has their price! lol So I suppose it
is only as secure as the people who use it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
14 Mar 2006 12:08:03 AM |
|
|
Amazing...
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
14 Mar 2006 12:11:00 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Amazing...
Thanks mon,
I have been burning the midnight oil, but I managed to get the standard
edition
out on a secure server for download, and the Deluxe packaged and up
there as well.
For business, gov't and education, I still want to give them a stand
alone
Scramject Encryptor, that they could send along as an attachment
in an e-mail.
Maybe even an option to run through a directory, and scramble the
images,
naming them with a date and maybe the prefix SCB or some such.
Until then I guess they could go for the deluxe and find some excuse to
play with it on company time. You know for scientific purposes.
Maybe even go to Vegas as a group and do their own workshop. lol
On the companies dime.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Some screen shots etc.
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rsobie/PTVStudio.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
14 Mar 2006 06:37:07 PM |
|
|
http://img107.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc150&image=78660_Spyware.jpg
I wanted to show you this.
This is from the front page of one the leading software distributors.
Notice that three of the four products on their fron t page, are to
protect you from spyware.
It is a battle that seems to have been raging on and on and I don't see
that getting any better. There just seems to be holes and more holes
and hacking is some kind of a sport and it doesn't seem to be
stoppable. It has turned inmto a huge industry trying to prevent it
with these type of safety net programs but look at the terminology. I
find that fascinating.
The one on the right protects you from phishing, pharming, and spam.
I mean seriously, they are setting up pharms, in our computers.
Homesteaders of a sort. That will be next no doubt. Protects you from
gypsies, homesteaders, squatters,
and claim jumpers.
Good lord what will they think of next.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "G.L. Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 07:55:11 AM |
|
|
Hey!
Using a picture as an encryption key!!! THAT IS A REALLY COOL IDEA!
But unless your algorithm works in a way similar to Public Key Cryptography,
anyone you wish to communicate with using it would have to be given a copy
of your key image so they can read your communication. So I am supposing
that since you claim it is "unbreakable" then you've found some way to use
two
different images as keys that work in tandem like "public key" algorithms.
Otherwise, all they need to do is find out what is in common with everyone
you have been communicating with to increase the chances, due to
carelessness on the part of those entrusted with the key image, of finding
out
which one it is. You would have to use a separate image for each person you
communicated with to reduce the odds; but "the human factor" would still be
there...
Just thinking out loud,
- Gordon
<rick_sobie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1141884828.471825.135350@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
You see you could hypothetically, reverse engineer this program, get
the highly complex algorythms, and then you would say "A ha! I have you
now!" except that you would never know, where on the internet, where on
a person's disk, or on a floppy, or on a cd, is their key image, when
the world, the net, your harrdrive, and everywhere is filled, with jpeg
images.
And it is it easier to remember an image, than a password? Oh yes.
Is it easier to store? The net has gazillions of images, and if you
select a celebrity image as your key, you just know, that until the end
of time, that image will be on the net somewhere if if you lose your
copy.
Sure, they could muscle it outta ya. You would say, you won't crack,
but they always do. And everyone has their price! lol So I suppose it
is only as secure as the people who use it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 12:56:54 PM |
|
|
G.L. Cross wrote:
Hey!
Using a picture as an encryption key!!! THAT IS A REALLY COOL IDEA!
But unless your algorithm works in a way similar to Public Key Cryptography,
anyone you wish to communicate with using it would have to be given a copy
of your key image so they can read your communication. So I am supposing
that since you claim it is "unbreakable" then you've found some way to use
two
different images as keys that work in tandem like "public key" algorithms.
Otherwise, all they need to do is find out what is in common with everyone
you have been communicating with to increase the chances, due to
carelessness on the part of those entrusted with the key image, of finding
out
which one it is. You would have to use a separate image for each person you
communicated with to reduce the odds; but "the human factor" would still be
there...
Just thinking out loud,
- Gordon
Yes the human factor is there all right. But then I didn't want to do
what PGP did,
because basically people don't use it. The whole vouching for the other
guy thing,
well what if you have no friends? I mean it is just too complicated for
the average
person, and it is not secure. It was cracked within a week with a
supercomputer.
So your e-mail is not really secure. Yes it is secure from the average
Joe hacker,
but then people don't use PGP.
So basically what I did, was make it easy to just click and copy the
scrambled
image, and the key, fetched from somewhere, yes a group key if you are
in a
group and you paste it amd it decrypts the scrambled image.
So the only way to obtain your image key, unless someone tells you the
link,
is to use espionage.
And you could hypothetically place a hidden mem res program which
monitors the
clipboard and captures the data and whatever, do it from satelite, read
the monitor
from space, get the person drunk, send in Lola he'll talk that sort of
thing.
But it is safer for several reasons. One, it uses an image for e-mail,
so text reading
e-mail snoopers can't read it even if the user doesn't encrypt it, it
is still more private.
Second it is scrambled and only those in your loop can un-scramble it.
It is geared more for say a doctior's office and that. I was a
consultant you know for a number of years and I will tell you, that
people's data is not secure.
The average business, has no clue, and takes no precautions,
whatsoever.
They might have a firewall, but that is not secure. Most people don't
go to the trouble
of configuring their firewall. They buy a router, and it stays on
default settings.
Anything that is too complicated or time consuming they just say forget
it.
A top Canadian official, lost his laptop last year I think it was, and
everyone went
into panic mode. You know the budget, it always gets out somehow.
There are so many holes in the OS, just a couple days ago, the
Provincial
government here got hacked.
People live in fear of this sort of thing.
And it is easy to avoid. If your private corespondance, is on a image
and it
is scrambled, you are safe from hackers.
If your work, your intellectual property is scrambled on disk, only you
know the key
only you could decrypt it. Not even with a thousand supercomputers,
could they
decrypt your work. And it is right there, file save, file save
scrambled.
File open, file open scrambled. So it is the convenience which I think
will
make it more attractive to people to use.
I worked in a lot of workgroups as well, you know as a programmer, and
really they
do not protect their work any more than anyone else. They have
passwords
for workgroup access, but that is not secure. I saw a slick hacker tool
once,
called a magic wand. You pass it obver the password box, it pops in the
password.
How it works, I have no idea, but it is like a key to the public
washroom.
And MSoft and almost everyone else these days it seems, can access your
machine through some hole or port or data miner.
I envision a workgroup of people, sending corespondance regarding their
project, to each other, in scrambled form. Managers should insist on
it.
If it is a club, say an Internet club or something, then you are just a
private club.
And yes a sys op of that club, could have a set of individual keys for
every person,
and it could be set up, that you didn't use a group key at all, but you
pulled
images from the database on demand, and encrypted them according to IP.
So this is just a new thing, and Bill, if you are thinking of stealing
my idea,
to replace your password keys in your os registrations for Windows,
forget it.
No ticky no laundry baby. Instead of stealing it, like you did my
ghosting
algorythms, and all the rest, how about lets make a deal.
I think it would be cool, to replace passwords, with image stamps.
Everyone knows this is my idea Bill if you are out there. So if you or
one of your cronies steal it, well, I don't know what I will do, I
suppose
I can't do much can I. But everyone will know.
.
|
|
|
| User: "G.L. Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
11 Mar 2006 10:30:23 PM |
|
|
<rick_sobie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1141930614.376070.29020@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
G.L. Cross wrote:
Hey!
Using a picture as an encryption key!!! THAT IS A REALLY COOL IDEA!
But unless your algorithm works in a way similar to Public Key
Cryptography,
anyone you wish to communicate with using it would have to be given a
copy
of your key image so they can read your communication. So I am supposing
that since you claim it is "unbreakable" then you've found some way to
use
two
different images as keys that work in tandem like "public key"
algorithms.
Otherwise, all they need to do is find out what is in common with
everyone
you have been communicating with to increase the chances, due to
carelessness on the part of those entrusted with the key image, of
finding
out
which one it is. You would have to use a separate image for each person
you
communicated with to reduce the odds; but "the human factor" would still
be
there...
Just thinking out loud,
- Gordon
Yes the human factor is there all right. But then I didn't want to do
what PGP did,
because basically people don't use it. The whole vouching for the other
guy thing,
well what if you have no friends? I mean it is just too complicated for
the average
person, and it is not secure. It was cracked within a week with a
supercomputer.
There are other "public key" algorithms besides PGP (in fact "PGP" is an
acronym
for "Pretty Good Privacy"; it was not meant to be unbreakable). I do not
know what
the algorithm is called or exactly how it works but the one I am thinking of
is derived
from two VERY LARGE prime numbers. Then some very clever mathematics is used
to
generate a "public" key and a "private" key from the product of those two
prime
numbers. The mathematics is clever in that you decrypt messages sent to you
by
*encrypting* what you got with your "private" key and Walla!... out pops the
message in
the clear. To send a message to someone, you encrypt it with that person's
published
"public" key - ONLY the matching "private" key (known only to your intended
recipient)
can be used to decrypt the message. If I recall, breaking the code without
the matching
"private" key boils down to first figuring out what the number is that was
used to derive
the public key (which everyone has). I understand this part is "doable." but
once you have
this magic number, deriving the "private" key from it amounts to being able
to factor this
number which is product of two VERY LARGE prime numbers neither of which
you know. Factoring a million-digit number which happens to be the product
of two
thousand-digit primes is the part that becomes "unsolvable"...
Do you happen to know what this method is called? I just can't remember (it
is *not* PGP).
- Gordon
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "realityprofessor" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 01:33:56 PM |
|
|
wrote:
G.L. Cross wrote:
Hey!
Using a picture as an encryption key!!! THAT IS A REALLY COOL IDEA!
But unless your algorithm works in a way similar to Public Key Cryptography,
anyone you wish to communicate with using it would have to be given a copy
of your key image so they can read your communication. So I am supposing
that since you claim it is "unbreakable" then you've found some way to use
two
different images as keys that work in tandem like "public key" algorithms.
Otherwise, all they need to do is find out what is in common with everyone
you have been communicating with to increase the chances, due to
carelessness on the part of those entrusted with the key image, of finding
out
which one it is. You would have to use a separate image for each person you
communicated with to reduce the odds; but "the human factor" would still be
there...
Just thinking out loud,
- Gordon
Yes the human factor is there all right. But then I didn't want to do
what PGP did,
because basically people don't use it. The whole vouching for the other
guy thing,
well what if you have no friends? I mean it is just too complicated for
the average
person, and it is not secure. It was cracked within a week with a
supercomputer.
So your e-mail is not really secure. Yes it is secure from the average
Joe hacker,
but then people don't use PGP.
So basically what I did, was make it easy to just click and copy the
scrambled
image, and the key, fetched from somewhere, yes a group key if you are
in a
group and you paste it amd it decrypts the scrambled image.
So the only way to obtain your image key, unless someone tells you the
link,
is to use espionage.
And you could hypothetically place a hidden mem res program which
monitors the
clipboard and captures the data and whatever, do it from satelite, read
the monitor
from space, get the person drunk, send in Lola he'll talk that sort of
thing.
But it is safer for several reasons. One, it uses an image for e-mail,
so text reading
e-mail snoopers can't read it even if the user doesn't encrypt it, it
is still more private.
Second it is scrambled and only those in your loop can un-scramble it.
It is geared more for say a doctior's office and that. I was a
consultant you know for a number of years and I will tell you, that
people's data is not secure.
The average business, has no clue, and takes no precautions,
whatsoever.
They might have a firewall, but that is not secure. Most people don't
go to the trouble
of configuring their firewall. They buy a router, and it stays on
default settings.
Anything that is too complicated or time consuming they just say forget
it.
A top Canadian official, lost his laptop last year I think it was, and
everyone went
into panic mode. You know the budget, it always gets out somehow.
There are so many holes in the OS, just a couple days ago, the
Provincial
government here got hacked.
People live in fear of this sort of thing.
And it is easy to avoid. If your private corespondance, is on a image
and it
is scrambled, you are safe from hackers.
If your work, your intellectual property is scrambled on disk, only you
know the key
only you could decrypt it. Not even with a thousand supercomputers,
could they
decrypt your work. And it is right there, file save, file save
scrambled.
File open, file open scrambled. So it is the convenience which I think
will
make it more attractive to people to use.
I worked in a lot of workgroups as well, you know as a programmer, and
really they
do not protect their work any more than anyone else. They have
passwords
for workgroup access, but that is not secure. I saw a slick hacker tool
once,
called a magic wand. You pass it obver the password box, it pops in the
password.
How it works, I have no idea, but it is like a key to the public
washroom.
And MSoft and almost everyone else these days it seems, can access your
machine through some hole or port or data miner.
I envision a workgroup of people, sending corespondance regarding their
project, to each other, in scrambled form. Managers should insist on
it.
If it is a club, say an Internet club or something, then you are just a
private club.
And yes a sys op of that club, could have a set of individual keys for
every person,
and it could be set up, that you didn't use a group key at all, but you
pulled
images from the database on demand, and encrypted them according to IP.
So this is just a new thing, and Bill, if you are thinking of stealing
my idea,
to replace your password keys in your os registrations for Windows,
forget it.
No ticky no laundry baby. Instead of stealing it, like you did my
ghosting
algorythms, and all the rest, how about lets make a deal.
I think it would be cool, to replace passwords, with image stamps.
Everyone knows this is my idea Bill if you are out there. So if you or
one of your cronies steal it, well, I don't know what I will do, I
suppose
I can't do much can I. But everyone will know.
Guys, I've read your posts, but I'm also an idiot, in that I don't know
the first thing about encryption except that I live next door to some
company known as RSA. Anyway, I now have to provide/verify both text
and image, in order to sign-in to my Bank of America online account.
Is that what you are talking about or is that different?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 01:58:47 PM |
|
|
Verify the image, that is probably like an image of some text, that is
to prevent automatic repat entering of text until it cracks the
password.
Lots of sites use this now. The idea there is that a hacker can set up
his machine to repeatedly enter a series of passwords hoping to get a
hit. Which causes an excess in net traffic to the site, and sometimes
is successful, if they don't have monitoring for repeat IP access, you
know you have tried to access your account 15 times in the last 10
minutes well what if you need to? So to solve all that, it takes a
human, to read that image of some text or numbers and enter it. OCR
(character recognition) can't read it, it is obscured text, not a usual
font.
But no that is not the same thing.
What this is, is that instead of a password, you have an image.
Now people, are predictable, and they create passwords often that a
good hacker can surmise.
So if he or she surmises 5% they are capable of accessing your sstem 5%
of the time.
But they could never surmise the complexity of a single image stamp.
And that is the same for a supercomputer.
An image has maybe a million bits of information on it, a password, has
maybe what 8 characters?
The chances of a supercomputer reproducing a daylight photographic
scenery,
merely from nosie, by chance, lets say. Is off the scale. It isn't
going to happen,
and even if in its gazillions of iterations it did, one time, type
Shakespeare,
who would know it was Shakespeare, that appeared on the screen, unless
an
operator, was sitting there watching a gazillion images of random
noise,
until that one image of a sunny day in a park, happened on the screen,
merely by chance.
So it is secure, and yes banks should use it as well.
If you wanted to be ultrasecure, you would have a device that plugs
into your
USB port, that reads a holographic stamp. That is your one key image.
No one on earth could compromise that, unless they stole your stamp.
So is it more secure then, to have a stamp image in your memory. You
alone
know the location, and there is nothing to steal? Probably.
Either way, the idea of an image password, is light years ahead
of a simple 8 or 10 characters of text.
And if you could model my the algorythms I used, and watch it on the
screen,
like atoms in a dance, it would be a 3D mixing of little balls, going
this way and
that, and without any regular or predictable behaviour, simply because
a scene, like when you look out the window, is not in any way
predictable,
it is truly too complex as to be considered predictable in any way.
The colors, there are millions of them. The flowers, the birds,
everything in a
scene, in one instant, one click of a camera, frozen in time, unique.
.
|
|
|
| User: "realityprofessor" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 02:31:57 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Verify the image, that is probably like an image of some text, that is
to prevent automatic repat entering of text until it cracks the
password.
Lots of sites use this now. The idea there is that a hacker can set up
his machine to repeatedly enter a series of passwords hoping to get a
hit. Which causes an excess in net traffic to the site, and sometimes
is successful, if they don't have monitoring for repeat IP access, you
know you have tried to access your account 15 times in the last 10
minutes well what if you need to? So to solve all that, it takes a
human, to read that image of some text or numbers and enter it. OCR
(character recognition) can't read it, it is obscured text, not a usual
font.
But no that is not the same thing.
What this is, is that instead of a password, you have an image.
Now people, are predictable, and they create passwords often that a
good hacker can surmise.
So if he or she surmises 5% they are capable of accessing your sstem 5%
of the time.
But they could never surmise the complexity of a single image stamp.
And that is the same for a supercomputer.
An image has maybe a million bits of information on it, a password, has
maybe what 8 characters?
The chances of a supercomputer reproducing a daylight photographic
scenery,
merely from nosie, by chance, lets say. Is off the scale. It isn't
going to happen,
and even if in its gazillions of iterations it did, one time, type
Shakespeare,
who would know it was Shakespeare, that appeared on the screen, unless
an
operator, was sitting there watching a gazillion images of random
noise,
until that one image of a sunny day in a park, happened on the screen,
merely by chance.
So it is secure, and yes banks should use it as well.
If you wanted to be ultrasecure, you would have a device that plugs
into your
USB port, that reads a holographic stamp. That is your one key image.
No one on earth could compromise that, unless they stole your stamp.
So is it more secure then, to have a stamp image in your memory. You
alone
know the location, and there is nothing to steal? Probably.
Either way, the idea of an image password, is light years ahead
of a simple 8 or 10 characters of text.
And if you could model my the algorythms I used, and watch it on the
screen,
like atoms in a dance, it would be a 3D mixing of little balls, going
this way and
that, and without any regular or predictable behaviour, simply because
a scene, like when you look out the window, is not in any way
predictable,
it is truly too complex as to be considered predictable in any way.
The colors, there are millions of them. The flowers, the birds,
everything in a
scene, in one instant, one click of a camera, frozen in time, unique.
Well, what B of A provides, in signing up for an Online Account, is
both text and Image, the image being selectable scenes of mountains,
rock concert 'jams', famous celebrities in concert, seaside vistas,
etc., etc. The applicant must choose, from many possible selections,
both a textual (short message) as well as a picture, from one of the
many provided. That text/picture selection becomes the 'key' for the
person's account, which then, if both can be verified by the person
signing-in, finally allows the person to enter their existing,
long-time-held, password. All of this comes after one's UserName has
been entered!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 02:27:30 PM |
|
|
Lets put it this way, if you used statistical analysis, suppose you had
a busy site, lets use Hotmail.com, and you used statistical analysis,
on one million passwords, you would find the most common passwords
people use and with little effort, could create a wonder tool to crack
passwords in no time.
I don't know what the rate would be, of public affective password
cracking but lets face it, it is common knowledge that it is done every
day. How else could anyone hack into the Pentagon? The Pentagon for
crying out loud was hacked a couple years ago.
Banks get robbed, routinely of millions through cyber crime, but it is
not publicized because it would make the public feel it is insecure to
do business that way.
It is covered by insurance and passed on to you.
There is also a certain undercurrent, that likes this setup. A company
as large as MSoft or any huge giant corporation stands to profit
greatly from easy access to people's intellectual property etc.
Industrial espionage is big business. And sure they would pay to know a
competitors secrets, and to know about an upstart company that might
threaten their market share. So to close the doors, is not in their
best interest. That is why they won't close those doors.
You need to do that yourself, and this is one easy way you can do that.
But you know for government, it is more important. The little old
ladies, who are great secretaries, don't know much about PGP and all
that and they like to gossip in e-mails and all that as well, and you
know, just because it doesn't hit the press, doesn't mean there hasn't
been a leak.
So I think for simple peace of mind, this system could be easily made
part of normal security procedures. And I suppose with my product
offereing which is in Beta Testing I am encouraging that and offfering
a solution to the problem which is rampant at this time.
And take a look at it now, while it is there if you want. I have it
available on-line
for Beta Testing. You can see how the Scramjet encryption works, and
you can see
an example of what a page using it might even look like.
Here is the link to the program
http://www.members.shaw.ca/ricksobie/PersonalTV-Studio.zip
and here is what the scrambled image might look like in public.
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rsobie/ScramjetExample.html
to unscramble it, download the program, and then in the Workgroup
tab there, access that page and follow the instructions.
You know about those honeymoon photographs, if you were Paris Hilton,
maybe it is OK if someone hacks your blackberry. Everyone knows she
lost her blackberry when she was 16.
But Catherine Zeta Jones and Micheal Douglas, they sued a tabloid for
millions over
their wedding photos.
I think it would be safe to say that there are a few politicians who
probably have
even been blackmailed, over some careless security on their own
computers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 02:42:37 PM |
|
|
And if you are a company like Blackberry, it makes more sense to make a
licensing deal with me, than to pay a fortune to do your own Scramjet
look alike. And then perhaps suffer from legal battles and all that
other problem with betamax vrs VHS etc.
Personal TV Studio is a very popular program, in use throughout the
world, and I expect that this technology will be everywhere in a week.
So to say to your consumers, it uses Scramjet technology, assures them
because they will know what that is.
They will know, because chances are, they are already using it, and
know, that it is unbreakable encryption, and 100% secure.
So yes this is my bid for my yacht, and the girls are getting
impatient, so lets get cracking people.
Send two copies to your friends, don't make them download it from my
website, I will be out of bandwidth.
This weekend it will probably hit the normal chanels which I have and
basically hit a million servers by next week.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 03:58:01 PM |
|
|
You will notice if you download the program, I have a password box, to
enter the program. That is just for show basically. To tell the user it
is a Beta Test copy licensed to me. It is my password and etc. After
Beta Testing that will be different.
But you know as a developer, I have the same problems as anyone else
with hackers. This program is available through warez, and is probably
on Kazaa and that whole network regged as itwere. Registered copy
available for those who know how to find such things and are willing to
take the risks of virii etc with these sorts of things.
And it only takes 5 minutes for them to hack my program.
They buy one licensed copy, and then just give everyone the number.
I could be a *****, and make everyone go to the net for verification,
and make them install stamps and make them do things, to each other,
even, if they wanted it bad enough they might, but you know, this
industry is still a bit of an old western town, and you still need
exposure, and it is a long road to victory.
So a little bit of leakage into the world is expected.
Abd what makes my program different from any other product available
through warez?
They could just as easily, make people go to the web, and do things
with IP addresses and make everyone jump through hoops, companies like
CorelDraw, or MSoft, but they don't. Consumer backlash or something I
guess.
nd really the net is also about sharing. So the day that stops, is the
day the net will have become the playground for the rich, and no more
than an on-line shopping channel.
So we implement some security measures in our programs, make it
difficult to hack, and then just accept some losses. We count on
volume, and look to pleasing the people, rather than being some sort of
miserly Scrooge who freaks out over the things kids do, because they
don't have any money.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 04:18:11 PM |
|
|
But you know, that is what is going to happen. You will need to go the
web, and pick a stamp, and then in order for your program to run, each
time it will need to verify a stamp. I don't know how long it will be,
or who will be the ***** as it were to implement it first.
Autcad, used to require an actual physical button, be installed on your
serial port, that came with the package, and the box set was something
like 10 thousand dollars to buy.
Great if you are an industry leader who owns the market.
A friend of mine, a consultant, has sold menu items that install in
Oracle, in the menu, for 10 thousand dollars. The menu item does some
small task, but just that tiny bit of code, is important to some group
and they will pay 10,000 because to have a team do it themselves, would
cost twice that.
He makes everyone go to him and get a number personally, on-line but he
does each individual customer, with their own algorythm and it reports
back and bla bla bla so there are ways, to do it. But only really if
you hold all the cards, and that is where MSoft, kills the
compoetition. They give things away for free, removing the commercial
viability of the enterprise. They maintain their monopoly.
I think each sector of the economy and politics and even science medice
etc have their own security issues. But each of us really don't want to
live in a world that is totalitarian. We don't want a world where
everything is barcoded. What price freedom as they say.
And so for this here, the Scramjet technology for scrambling images, it
is a two sided sword of course. But you know it does one thing for
everyone. It gives them freedom of speech if they want to use it. And
that more than anything else, will go forth and forever provide at
least one way, that hypothetically a totalitarian regime could always
be prevented. The underground could always get there messages to each
other, and the allied resistance, would survive.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 01:15:13 PM |
|
|
I envision a workgroup of people, sending corespondance regarding their
project, to each other, in scrambled form. Managers should insist on
it.
If it is a club, say an Internet club or something, then you are just a
private club.
And yes a sys op of that club, could have a set of individual keys for
every person,
and it could be set up, that you didn't use a group key at all, but you
pulled
images from the database on demand, and encrypted them according to IP.
But I should mention alos, that what I did for the really paranoid, you
know who might be worried that their key image, could be accessed by
the next user, just getting it from the clipboard, is to put an uption,
in the main menu under 'Window' to free the clipboard.
Lets put it this way, if a spy agency, wanted to monitor your activity,
they could sit in the street in a van and unless your office was
shielded, they could read your monitor or something from the em waves
it gives off.
I have seen guys, sitting in cars, on TLC you know the telly did a
program about this, and people have wireless networks, and the guy is
in a car, outside their building accessing their network like it was a
public washroom.
For us, OK, we use the force, we don't need telephones, we don't need
e-mail, so for us it is sort of redundant, we access the S4 or S5
level, we have no secrets from each other in that way. But this is
really not for us, in our little network. It is for Joe Average,
and their business, to protect their industrial secrets, it is to
protect politicians from
embarassment, to protect medical records, to protect their ideas,
their secrets,
their honeymoon pIcTur-eS, and all that sort of thing.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
09 Mar 2006 03:32:13 AM |
|
|
Since I crossposted, I want to make this on topic there as well...
If you downloaded the program, it allows you to do a lot of
entertainment industry type things. It is not just for paranoid
physicists, who want to keep their formulas safe.
Formulas, formulii whatever.
Anyways, in there is an example of a movie script - a snippet of one,
which I originally wrote for Brad and Jen. Sounds weird saying that
together now doesn't it?
Anyways, I am sure people would like to see Brangelina do another flick
and who wouldn't they are a great duo.
And this script, Midnight in the Hall of Records, would suit them well
I think.
So I am going to spoil it for ya right now, because basically, I can't
be bothered to market the thing or do the pitch thing or any of that. I
am just too busy.
But there is a part in that script, that is a real tear jerker. I mean
they would be crying in the aisles, I kid you not.
What I did, was to make a light hearted, comedy, and then wham, hit
them with the agony and the ecstacy.
You know in the style of the old tragedies.
There are two masks in theater. One happy, one sad. That is the agony,
and the ecstasy. Although it has become something else over the years.
It is now drama and comedy or something watered down, tame, diluted.
So what I did, was create a light hearted comedy, and then at the pitch
of the action, a great tender moment of self sacrifice on the part of
our hero. In this case Bradley.
And so the scene is Pompeii, and they have been wandering around
Pompeii, Brad is searching for Angelina, they went back in time, when
they were investigating a ruin they discovered, and they ended up in
Pompeii. Brad has to find Angelina he finds her as Pompeii is erupting,
they are fleeing for their lives, and they run down the pier,
the last boat is leaving, the lava is raining, they are running they
have to leap for the boat.
They will never make it.
At the last second. At the very end of the pier, Brad pivots, grabs
Angelina, and hurls her to the boat. Where the passengers catch her.
He stands tall like a statue, bronzed brawny, covered with sweat, and
dirty from the
falling soot, a god.
And Angelina screaming in the boat as it departs. No, you can't do this
to me.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
07 Mar 2006 03:43:51 PM |
|
|
wrote:
No I'm not having a bad day, what makes you say that?
Frickin MSoft, is driving me to distraction.
You know I have 1 gig, of ram. One thousand megabytes of ram, and it
will only allow me
to allocate something like 40% of that, for the computer program I am
creating.
As an instance, it will not permit me to load an image that is 4000 by
4000, it says I am out of resources, but will pop it into a browser
window faster than you can say jack the bear and do 27 copies of it, in
tandem if you want.
And it has been like that for years. No matter how much memory you
have, unless you
are somehow part of their world domination scheme, if you try to make a
robust program,
they will get you.
And they get you, by running your program, out of memory.
And they don't just say 'You are out of resources' and terminate the
program, that is what they should do, but no, they put error messages
on a timer, and give you cacading dialog boxes, with orchestral banging
on every beat, filling your screen with error messages, and leavng you
the programmer, looking like a complete moron, and they 'Win' again.
And leaving the user, scrambling for 'ctrl-alt-delete'
The program is 6 meg in size.
1 have 1000 meg of ram.
It says I am out of resources.
Look in ctrl-alt-delete- it is in total, using 16 meg of ram in full
operation.
It says I am out of resources.
Nice people. But then what should we expect from an evil empire.
Let me tell you what I think is happenning here. And it is totally
ilegal, totally criminal.
When you write a program, you allocate a block of memory for your
programs operation, and then you use that memory. It is like a hotel.
Your memory is say, on the 9th floor.
What MSoft has been doing for years, is they will recognize, your
program, and they will move your pointers.
That is to say, that you will allocate memory from your floor, and
then you will free that memory, and reallocate and so on.
But when you go to free it, its not there. Your pointers have moved.
So you can't free it, they call that a heap leak. It uses up memory.
So, people wrote a program, a memory resident program, to track this.
It has to run along side your program.
It is, on every clock tick, watching Windows, and when Windows, moves
your pointers, it tells your program, and you adjust your pointers.
BUT!
They win in the end, because they are moving you up, every time, floor
after floor, until you reach the top floor, and viola, you are out of
resources.
Below you it is empty floors, but they have succeeded in what they had
hoped, that is to make your program look like it makes the system
unstable, and that is contrary to legal business practice.
But they get away with it today, as they have since the beginning.
All their earnings, should have been siezed by the state long ago as
proceeds of crime.
But white collar crime, appears to be no crime at all.
It was they, who brough the computer boom to a grinding halt, because
programmers, could not continue to create programs, with them, using
tactics such as these, to destroy their work.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Puppet_Sock" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
13 Mar 2006 03:00:23 PM |
|
|
wrote:
[wah repeated endlesslessly for many many lines snipped]
So, your code does something that you don't understand, didn't
expect, and can't fix. Why it absolutely *MUST* be Microsoft's
fault, and they must have done it on purpose.
Baby. Learn to code. Then learn to debug.
Also, learn to find an on-topic news group to whine in.
Socks
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
07 Mar 2006 03:57:40 PM |
|
|
Can you turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon?
I'll bet Steven Seagal could if he had to. You know like if these guys
were attacking a ship and he was the cook, like in Under Siege. All you
need is a little know how.
What you didn't see in Under Seige was Seagal pop a smoke detector in
the microwave.
You don't want to do that.
Kabooooom!
lol
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
07 Mar 2006 04:07:53 PM |
|
|
Yes I am thinking of giving up programming because of MSoft and writing
a series of books and then going on the Art Bell show to promote them.
How to use the fiber optic back bone of the Internet as your own giant
supercollider.
How to make a nuclear weapon out of a microwave oven.
Time travel with fridge magnets? Can it be done?
and so on...
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
07 Mar 2006 05:20:24 PM |
|
|
Herein lies the problem.
So you recognize, for instance that MSoft, is engaged in what should be
considered illegal activity. And many states tried to prosecute but
they were unsuccessful.
Simply because it always end up in over complication.
Another problem is that certain characters are not allowed, in
filenames, but they are permitted to be used, in filenames.
MSoft just uses some exception rules to compensate for that. So rather
than just not permit, the use of illehgal characters, they permit their
use, and when you programatically deal with files, if you come up
against these characters, well crashola. But they never should have
been allowed in filenames, since they are not permitted, in filenames.
So this is how they get your head spinning, and the courts head
spinning and do you really, want to hear any more about this problem?
No you do not.
You just want it to go away.
You end up saying, well computers have problems, software has issues,
and lets not go into it.
What fertile ground for criminal activity.
And so that is why, in this lawless society, it is alright to be
frustrated.
What you need to do, is to strap on your fridge magnet invisiobility
belt, the ones that Al bielek spoke about, yes that laughed at Galileo
and they laughed at Al, but here is how you do it.
You take two smoke detectors, and two fridge magnets, and you crazy
glue the fridge magnets to the smoke detectors, making sure they are
dead center.
Then you attach these to your belt, and you turn on the microwave, then
quickly get into the fridge .Wait five minutes and voila, invisibility.
Feel free to run amok.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon |
13 Mar 2006 03:35:22 PM |
|
|
First you need to learn how to turn your cerebrum into a functioning
organ.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
