hubble deep shot



 Science > Physics > hubble deep shot

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "John Sefton"
Date: 12 Aug 2005 03:33:41 PM
Object: hubble deep shot
http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg
All these spots of light are the same as atoms, except for
the quasars, which are emitted in pairs
at 9000 kps and are the same as photons.
This means that information travel at
the atomic level is 30 times faster than
information at our level.
Hmm. Maybe I *should* pay more attention to that
little voice.
John
Galaxy Model for the Atom
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: hubble deep shot 12 Aug 2005 03:31:11 PM
John Sefton wrote:


http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg

All these spots of light are the same as atoms, except for
the quasars, which are emitted in pairs
at 9000 kps and are the same as photons.

[snip crap]
Idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org"

Title: Re: hubble deep shot 12 Aug 2005 10:21:44 PM
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:42FD070F.5D518ECB@hate.spam.net...
| John Sefton wrote:
| >
| > http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg
| >
| > All these spots of light are the same as atoms, except for
| > the quasars, which are emitted in pairs
| > at 9000 kps and are the same as photons.
| [snip crap]
|
| Idiot.
[snip crap]
Idiot.
Androcles
.


User: "PD"

Title: Re: hubble deep shot 12 Aug 2005 03:53:25 PM
John Sefton wrote:

http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg

All these spots of light are the same as atoms, except for
the quasars, which are emitted in pairs
at 9000 kps and are the same as photons.

http://www.people.virginia.edu/~rjh9u/sneeze.html
All these spots of light are the same as galaxies, except for their
atoms, which are quasars flying at your face at 3000 kbytes/sec...
wait, I'm getting confused now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar
Quasars are not photons, John. Please take a Scientific American to the
bathroom and do not come out until you've read it.
PD


This means that information travel at
the atomic level is 30 times faster than
information at our level.

Hmm. Maybe I *should* pay more attention to that
little voice.

John
Galaxy Model for the Atom
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/

.
User: "John Sefton"

Title: Re: hubble deep shot 13 Aug 2005 09:18:00 AM
PD wrote:

John Sefton wrote:

http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg

All these spots of light are the same as atoms, except for
the quasars, which are emitted in pairs
at 9000 kps and are the same as photons.



http://www.people.virginia.edu/~rjh9u/sneeze.html
All these spots of light are the same as galaxies, except for their
atoms, which are quasars flying at your face at 3000 kbytes/sec...
wait, I'm getting confused now.

Doesn't really matter. Your Mom will help.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar
Quasars are not photons, John. Please take a Scientific American to the
bathroom and do not come out until you've read it.

PD

Oh, *all* quasars are *really* far away
(none are close)
and they *sometimes* are at galaxies' centres
(guys who actually use telescopes think
galaxies produce them)
and they are much, much more energetic than galaxies?
You believe that?
So what *are* they, then, PayDay?????



This means that information travel at
the atomic level is 30 times faster than
information at our level.

Hmm. Maybe I *should* pay more attention to that
little voice.

John
Galaxy Model for the Atom
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/



.
User: "PD"

Title: Re: hubble deep shot 15 Aug 2005 09:12:57 AM
John Sefton wrote:

PD wrote:

John Sefton wrote:

http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg

All these spots of light are the same as atoms, except for
the quasars, which are emitted in pairs
at 9000 kps and are the same as photons.



http://www.people.virginia.edu/~rjh9u/sneeze.html
All these spots of light are the same as galaxies, except for their
atoms, which are quasars flying at your face at 3000 kbytes/sec...
wait, I'm getting confused now.

Doesn't really matter. Your Mom will help.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar
Quasars are not photons, John. Please take a Scientific American to the
bathroom and do not come out until you've read it.

PD


Oh, *all* quasars are *really* far away
(none are close)
and they *sometimes* are at galaxies' centres
(guys who actually use telescopes think
galaxies produce them)
and they are much, much more energetic than galaxies?
You believe that?

So what *are* they, then, PayDay?????



They ain't photons, John. Photons are what arrive at our telescopes.
Quasars are objects that *shine* photons. Sort of like confusing a
train whistle and the train.
PD
.
User: "John Sefton"

Title: Re: hubble deep shot 19 Aug 2005 01:44:04 PM
PD wrote:

John Sefton wrote:

PD wrote:

John Sefton wrote:


http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg

All these spots of light are the same as atoms, except for
the quasars, which are emitted in pairs
at 9000 kps and are the same as photons.



http://www.people.virginia.edu/~rjh9u/sneeze.html
All these spots of light are the same as galaxies, except for their
atoms, which are quasars flying at your face at 3000 kbytes/sec...
wait, I'm getting confused now.


Doesn't really matter. Your Mom will help.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar
Quasars are not photons, John. Please take a Scientific American to the
bathroom and do not come out until you've read it.

PD


Oh, *all* quasars are *really* far away
(none are close)
and they *sometimes* are at galaxies' centres
(guys who actually use telescopes think
galaxies produce them)
and they are much, much more energetic than galaxies?
You believe that?

So what *are* they, then, PayDay?????



They ain't photons, John. Photons are what arrive at our telescopes.
Quasars are objects that *shine* photons. Sort of like confusing a
train whistle and the train.

PD

When a musical note is played, there
are also created in the surrounding
space many harmonics of this note.
These notes are not the same as the
original, but higher.
When the Galaxy Model says that galaxies
are atoms, it does not say that the galaxies are
very, very small. It says that they are the
same 'note' played at a much lower scale.
Are fractals the same as the original that
created them? Yes, just not the same size.
Photons are fractals of Quasars. Atoms are
fractals of Galaxies.
Looking for patterns is how we learn.
John
.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic background fractile 3D mesh of H filaments lit by hypernovae: Murray 2006.11.21
Article+Pictures: Galaxy HUDF-JD2 in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field
Re: Continental roots go deep, but not as deep as some people thought
Re: Minerals Are Key To Earthquakes Deep In The Earth
Gold and Dyson on "The Deep Hot Biosphere : The Myth of Fossil Fuels"
background filament networks (Murray mesh) in deep sky photos-- noise artifacts or early cosmic structure? Boehringer: Murray 2004.06.15 rmforall
Deep burn transmutation of nuclear waste
Shake Down: Deep tremors observed at San Andreas fault
RUSSIAN ASTROLOGER SUES NASA, TRIES TO STOP DEEP IMPACT MISSION
This is called "deep thought" :-)
My god, this one is "extreme deep thought" :-)
Deep Impact
BHARATIYA WHO GUIDED DEEP IMPACT TO ITS SUCCESS
DEEP IMPACT - FIRST IMPRESSIONS
NASA's Deep Impact Tells a Tale of the Comet
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER