| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Agent Smith" |
| Date: |
31 Jan 2008 04:42:47 PM |
| Object: |
Huckabee is running out of money |
NPR just reported that useful detail.
.
|
|
| User: "Ghamph" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 06:30:34 PM |
|
|
"Agent Smith" <agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A36B433F5550agentsmithtwoblockso@207.115.17.102...
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Huckabee motto: "A squirrel in every popcorn popper."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 09:09:03 AM |
|
|
"Ghamph" <ghamph@localnet.com> wrote in news:13q4pt7omlesc66
@corp.supernews.com:
"Agent Smith" <agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A36B433F5550agentsmithtwoblockso@207.115.17.102...
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Huckabee motto: "A squirrel in every popcorn popper."
Huckabee motto: "Let's kill all the scientists."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 08:39:45 PM |
|
|
Agent Smith wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
He should pray. Maybe his whole family will be killed in an
automobile accident and life insurance will pay off double. Test of
faith!
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 11:47:02 AM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 11:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
He'z got a doll that looks like Shuk Nurres.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjYv2YW6azE
Isn't it amazing what they can do with plastic?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 05:44:42 PM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 5:42=A0pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
In next November, I believe that John McCain (unless sandbagged) will
be elected our next president. I won't yet even begin to speculate on
who the VP candidate would be, but I would not rule out Joe Lieberman
(shock!).
McCaine is a bit liberal for me, but compared against every other of
the contenders, there is no question in my mind that he would place
our nation above himself and to a great job as president. McMaine,
unlike any other canditate has already demonstrated that he has the
"right stuff".
Need I point out that Ms. Clinton fell on her face on Health Care
during the Clinton administration. Obama, exactly who is he? (Nuff
said there.) And my views about Mitt Romney are pretty negative, since
I remember him as our Massachusetts Governor (if you want me to
explain why, just ask).
Also, I have to ask: Why should anyone in sci.physics care who is
dropping out of the race on a daily basis? Lets just wait and see who
the real presidential candidates eventually are.
Harry C.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 09:08:16 AM |
|
|
"hhc314@yahoo.com" <hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in news:0020d769-abcb-422d-
934b-4ce1aae15278@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November.
(Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
That's the amazing thing that we're learning by watching this race
develop. That the Republicans can screw up as badly as Bush just did,
and the Dems still manage to throw away their chance at a win. I also
think that McCain will defeat Hillary.
The dumb dems haven't had a new idea since 1964, and it's become obvious
to everybody alive, except the network news that the Dems are a bigger
bunch of bigots than the people they accuse of bigotry. They're just
feminist and black Archie Bunkers.
In next November, I believe that John McCain (unless sandbagged) will
be elected our next president. I won't yet even begin to speculate on
who the VP candidate would be, but I would not rule out Joe Lieberman
(shock!).
It'll either be Romney or a conservative. Perish forbid that it might
be Huckabee, which is a terrifying thought. McCain's an old man, and
the veep is always the party nominee after an eight year presidency.
McCaine is a bit liberal for me,
Sure, but the alternative is a neo-con, none of whom are running, a
police state nutjob like Guiliani or a nutjob from the Christian right,
like Huckabee. The Republican party is filled by fascists of all
different stripe. Since Reagan opened the Pandora's Box of deficit
spending, you'll never again see a fiscal conservative emerge, in the
history of America.
Deficit spending it's the only way to win in the middle east, but in the
end, it will destroy America. Considering the debt we're all carrying,
that end may not be too far off. Look at the shenanigans the government
is pulling now, bailing out dishonest home lenders and dishonest home
buyers. Who will pick up the burden? You guessed, the ordinary
citizens, who did nothing dishonest.
But they won't pick it up in their taxes, but in the value of the
dollar. Lowering interest rates is equivalent to printing money, and
the more we print (and borrow) the farther the dollar falls.
but compared against every other of
the contenders, there is no question in my mind that he would place
our nation above himself and to a great job as president. McMaine,
unlike any other candidate has already demonstrated that he has the
"right stuff".
Well, as a soldier, he's the only one who might handle the mess in the
middle east.
Need I point out that Ms. Clinton fell on her face on Health Care
during the Clinton administration.
I've been saying this for years, but worse, she's not well bred. You'd
think that being from Wellesley, she would be, but she's not. She
hasn't got a clue about the routine businessman's task of balancing
books, and thinks that the lives of people can be improved if you hand
them free money.
That bottomless pit is just as big a black hole as the bottomless pit of
military spending and tax cuts for the rich. At least the nation gets
something in return for its military spending, and now is then we need
it. Because of her liberal principles, she thinks that killing is bad,
even to the point of being afraid to blow up Moslem training schools.
She's spineless, and she's not a leader, but just another wild spender
on social programs. We've already seen that idea is a failure.
Obama, exactly who is he?
He's black, and all his cronies are black, so what more do you need to
know? When he's elected, the blacks will descend onto Washington with
their hands out, asking for financial help getting over the tragedy of
slavery. I ask you, why is that any different from reparations? As far
as I'm concerned, we've *had* reparations, since Johnson's Great Society
started.
(Nuff
said there.) And my views about Mitt Romney are pretty negative, since
I remember him as our Massachusetts Governor (if you want me to
explain why, just ask).
I figure that Romney might not be so bad, because he's rich, and used to
handling big budgets. After all, if liberal Massachusetts can get a
Republican governor, he must have done something right.
Also, I have to ask: Why should anyone in sci.physics care who is
dropping out of the race on a daily basis?
Because Huckabee is an anti-science Christian nutjob. They figure that,
since science is too complicated for them to understand, nobody should
be allowed to understand it, and it should be taken out of the schools
and replaced with religion. Even with their bizarre golden tablets, the
Mormons still gave BYU to the world, proving that they at least respect
education.
Lets just wait and see who the real presidential candidates eventually
are.
I prefer to get involved, especially where the very existence of science
education itself is under attack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris H. Fleming" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 05:48:15 PM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 10:08 am, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
"hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:0020d769-abcb-422d-
934b-4ce1aae15...@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November.
(Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
That's the amazing thing that we're learning by watching this race
develop. That the Republicans can screw up as badly as Bush just did,
and the Dems still manage to throw away their chance at a win. I also
think that McCain will defeat Hillary.
The dumb dems haven't had a new idea since 1964, and it's become obvious
to everybody alive, except the network news that the Dems are a bigger
bunch of bigots than the people they accuse of bigotry. They're just
feminist and black Archie Bunkers.
In next November, I believe that John McCain (unless sandbagged) will
be elected our next president. I won't yet even begin to speculate on
who the VP candidate would be, but I would not rule out Joe Lieberman
(shock!).
It'll either be Romney or a conservative. Perish forbid that it might
be Huckabee, which is a terrifying thought. McCain's an old man, and
the veep is always the party nominee after an eight year presidency.
McCaine is a bit liberal for me,
Sure, but the alternative is a neo-con, none of whom are running, a
police state nutjob like Guiliani or a nutjob from the Christian right,
like Huckabee. The Republican party is filled by fascists of all
different stripe. Since Reagan opened the Pandora's Box of deficit
spending, you'll never again see a fiscal conservative emerge, in the
history of America.
Deficit spending it's the only way to win in the middle east, but in the
end, it will destroy America. Considering the debt we're all carrying,
that end may not be too far off. Look at the shenanigans the government
is pulling now, bailing out dishonest home lenders and dishonest home
buyers. Who will pick up the burden? You guessed, the ordinary
citizens, who did nothing dishonest.
But they won't pick it up in their taxes, but in the value of the
dollar. Lowering interest rates is equivalent to printing money, and
the more we print (and borrow) the farther the dollar falls.
but compared against every other of
the contenders, there is no question in my mind that he would place
our nation above himself and to a great job as president. McMaine,
unlike any other candidate has already demonstrated that he has the
"right stuff".
Well, as a soldier, he's the only one who might handle the mess in the
middle east.
Need I point out that Ms. Clinton fell on her face on Health Care
during the Clinton administration.
I've been saying this for years, but worse, she's not well bred. You'd
think that being from Wellesley, she would be, but she's not. She
hasn't got a clue about the routine businessman's task of balancing
books, and thinks that the lives of people can be improved if you hand
them free money.
That bottomless pit is just as big a black hole as the bottomless pit of
military spending and tax cuts for the rich. At least the nation gets
something in return for its military spending, and now is then we need
it. Because of her liberal principles, she thinks that killing is bad,
even to the point of being afraid to blow up Moslem training schools.
She's spineless, and she's not a leader, but just another wild spender
on social programs. We've already seen that idea is a failure.
Obama, exactly who is he?
He's black, and all his cronies are black, so what more do you need to
know? When he's elected, the blacks will descend onto Washington with
their hands out, asking for financial help getting over the tragedy of
slavery. I ask you, why is that any different from reparations? As far
as I'm concerned, we've *had* reparations, since Johnson's Great Society
started.
I would look more closely. The black establishment has been supporting
Clinton as she will pander to them and Obama has so far refused to.
The black population, on the other hand, doesn't seem to care so much
what whom their aging establishment endorses. Obama skipped the entire
black hierarchy in SC and still took the black vote.
(Nuff
said there.) And my views about Mitt Romney are pretty negative, since
I remember him as our Massachusetts Governor (if you want me to
explain why, just ask).
I figure that Romney might not be so bad, because he's rich, and used to
handling big budgets. After all, if liberal Massachusetts can get a
Republican governor, he must have done something right.
Also, I have to ask: Why should anyone in sci.physics care who is
dropping out of the race on a daily basis?
Because Huckabee is an anti-science Christian nutjob. They figure that,
since science is too complicated for them to understand, nobody should
be allowed to understand it, and it should be taken out of the schools
and replaced with religion. Even with their bizarre golden tablets, the
Mormons still gave BYU to the world, proving that they at least respect
education.
Lets just wait and see who the real presidential candidates eventually
are.
I prefer to get involved, especially where the very existence of science
education itself is under attack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 06:29:43 PM |
|
|
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:9147438b-6205-4b7e-a0c2-dd22d275478f@q21g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 1, 10:08 am, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
"hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:0020d769-abcb-422d-
934b-4ce1aae15...@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November.
(Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
That's the amazing thing that we're learning by watching this race
develop. That the Republicans can screw up as badly as Bush just
did, and the Dems still manage to throw away their chance at a win.
I also think that McCain will defeat Hillary.
The dumb dems haven't had a new idea since 1964, and it's become
obvious to everybody alive, except the network news that the Dems are
a bigger bunch of bigots than the people they accuse of bigotry.
They're just feminist and black Archie Bunkers.
In next November, I believe that John McCain (unless sandbagged)
will be elected our next president. I won't yet even begin to
speculate on who the VP candidate would be, but I would not rule
out Joe Lieberman (shock!).
It'll either be Romney or a conservative. Perish forbid that it
might be Huckabee, which is a terrifying thought. McCain's an old
man, and the veep is always the party nominee after an eight year
presidency.
McCaine is a bit liberal for me,
Sure, but the alternative is a neo-con, none of whom are running, a
police state nutjob like Guiliani or a nutjob from the Christian
right, like Huckabee. The Republican party is filled by fascists of
all different stripe. Since Reagan opened the Pandora's Box of
deficit spending, you'll never again see a fiscal conservative
emerge, in the history of America.
Deficit spending it's the only way to win in the middle east, but in
the end, it will destroy America. Considering the debt we're all
carrying, that end may not be too far off. Look at the shenanigans
the government is pulling now, bailing out dishonest home lenders and
dishonest home buyers. Who will pick up the burden? You guessed,
the ordinary citizens, who did nothing dishonest.
But they won't pick it up in their taxes, but in the value of the
dollar. Lowering interest rates is equivalent to printing money, and
the more we print (and borrow) the farther the dollar falls.
but compared against every other of
the contenders, there is no question in my mind that he would place
our nation above himself and to a great job as president. McMaine,
unlike any other candidate has already demonstrated that he has the
"right stuff".
Well, as a soldier, he's the only one who might handle the mess in
the middle east.
Need I point out that Ms. Clinton fell on her face on Health Care
during the Clinton administration.
I've been saying this for years, but worse, she's not well bred.
You'd think that being from Wellesley, she would be, but she's not.
She hasn't got a clue about the routine businessman's task of
balancing books, and thinks that the lives of people can be improved
if you hand them free money.
That bottomless pit is just as big a black hole as the bottomless pit
of military spending and tax cuts for the rich. At least the nation
gets something in return for its military spending, and now is then
we need it. Because of her liberal principles, she thinks that
killing is bad, even to the point of being afraid to blow up Moslem
training schools.
She's spineless, and she's not a leader, but just another wild
spender on social programs. We've already seen that idea is a
failure.
Obama, exactly who is he?
He's black, and all his cronies are black, so what more do you need
to know? When he's elected, the blacks will descend onto Washington
with their hands out, asking for financial help getting over the
tragedy of slavery. I ask you, why is that any different from
reparations? As far as I'm concerned, we've *had* reparations, since
Johnson's Great Society started.
I would look more closely. The black establishment has been supporting
Clinton as she will pander to them and Obama has so far refused to.
The black population, on the other hand, doesn't seem to care so much
what whom their aging establishment endorses. Obama skipped the entire
black hierarchy in SC and still took the black vote.
As I understand it, the black vote is split between the two, and that
even though the "establishment" may support Clinton, the voters
themselves swing the other way. Remember what happened last week, when
the entire black community rose up en masse and apparently spoke with
one voice, when they thought that Hillary was putting down Barack, by
saying that white people had more civil rights cred than black people.
To me, that doesn't sound very much like support for Hillary, at all.
It seems fairly obvious to me that blacks will vote for one of their
own, rather than for a white person who says she's on their side.
Blacks have certainly been stabbed in the back enough times by white
people who claimed to want to help them.
One of the most interesting scientific results to emerge in the past few
years, well before the ethnic and gender issues of this campaign
emerged, is that tribalism pretty much rules **all** human behavior.
Lord knows, I'm as tribal as the next ethnic group, and there are
virtually no circumstances under which I will ever vote for anybody but
a moderate, white, educated, non-Christian man.
I know I'll get lambasted for mentioning the word "tribe" in the same
sentence as "black," but the fact of the matter is that people vote for
their own kind. Pretty much the only saving grace that white men have
right now is that all the other groups are so extremely fragmented that
they can't stop fighting among themselves long enough to unite against
their common enemy.
That probably won't change any time soon.
(Nuff
said there.) And my views about Mitt Romney are pretty negative,
since I remember him as our Massachusetts Governor (if you want me
to explain why, just ask).
I figure that Romney might not be so bad, because he's rich, and used
to handling big budgets. After all, if liberal Massachusetts can get
a Republican governor, he must have done something right.
Also, I have to ask: Why should anyone in sci.physics care who is
dropping out of the race on a daily basis?
Because Huckabee is an anti-science Christian nutjob. They figure
that, since science is too complicated for them to understand, nobody
should be allowed to understand it, and it should be taken out of the
schools and replaced with religion. Even with their bizarre golden
tablets, the Mormons still gave BYU to the world, proving that they
at least respect education.
Lets just wait and see who the real presidential candidates
eventually are.
I prefer to get involved, especially where the very existence of
science education itself is under attack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 05:38:23 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
Pffft...the Republicans don't stand a chance. once the Dems have their love
fest in August.
In next November, I believe that John McCain (unless sandbagged) will
be elected our next president. I won't yet even begin to speculate on
who the VP candidate would be, but I would not rule out Joe Lieberman
(shock!).
McCain will *never* get elected. He's too strong on Iraq. America wants
withdrawal.
McCaine is a bit liberal for me
There's a surprise. It explains how you are hopelessly deluded about
Republican chances.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 11:00:15 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:drmdnU4Z0IQvmT7anZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews.com:
hhc314@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
Pffft...the Republicans don't stand a chance. once the Dems have their
love fest in August.
Don't bet on it. The swing voters know that if we precipitously pull
out of Iraq, we will leave a genocidal bloodbath in our wake, of Shiite
killing Sunnis, and al Quaeda may take command of whatever failed state
appears afterward. What purpose is there in toppling Afghanistan
because they gave sanctuary to al Qaeda, and then giving a replacement
country to the jihadists?
The problem with you liberals is that you're spineless. Repugnicants
may be assholes, but occasionlly an ***** is useful, when there's a
dirty job that needs to be done, like murdering homicidal jihadist
madmen in large numbers.
In next November, I believe that John McCain (unless sandbagged) will
be elected our next president. I won't yet even begin to speculate on
who the VP candidate would be, but I would not rule out Joe Lieberman
(shock!).
McCain will *never* get elected. He's too strong on Iraq. America
wants withdrawal.
Not any more. Petraeus has everybody thinking that the Surge worked.
The problem with you liberals is that you live in the past. You make
the same mistake every time, which is that you don't change your
attitude as circumstances change. The last liberal to adapt to the
present was Bill Clinton, and his rush to the right bought him the White
House.
If you bigots want the White House, you'd be advised to learn from a
master.
McCaine is a bit liberal for me
There's a surprise. It explains how you are hopelessly deluded about
Republican chances.
We'll see who's hopelessly deluded when the Dems field a ticket with a
Wellesely ***** and a black throwback to the days of the spoils system
of politics. Then just watch all the white men, independants and
moderates rush into the Republican camp. I've already got my money down
on it, in Vegas.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
02 Feb 2008 08:00:17 AM |
|
|
Agent Smith wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:drmdnU4Z0IQvmT7anZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews.com:
hhc314@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just
my opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
Pffft...the Republicans don't stand a chance. once the Dems have
their love fest in August.
Don't bet on it. The swing voters know that if we precipitously pull
out of Iraq,
Who's proposing that? The US will *never* leave Iraq completely. Iraq is now
our forward base since we are out of Saudi Arabia.
we will leave a genocidal bloodbath in our wake, of
Shiite killing Sunnis, and al Quaeda may take command of whatever
failed state appears afterward. What purpose is there in toppling
Afghanistan because they gave sanctuary to al Qaeda, and then giving
a replacement country to the jihadists?
Exactly our question to Bush.
The problem with you liberals is that you're spineless. Repugnicants
may be assholes, but occasionlly an ***** is useful, when there's a
dirty job that needs to be done, like murdering homicidal jihadist
madmen in large numbers.
There's three kinds of people: dicks, pussies, and assholes. Pussies think
everyone can get along, and dicks just want to ***** all the time without
thinking it through. But then you got your assholes, Chuck. And all the
assholes want is to ***** all over everything! So, pussies may get mad at
dicks once in a while, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also
***** assholes, Chuck. And if they didn't ***** the assholes, you know what
you'd get? You'd get your ***** and your ***** all covered in *****!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
02 Feb 2008 03:56:14 PM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:PtGdnfVYusPs6jnanZ2dnUVZ_vyinZ2d@giganews.com:
Agent Smith wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:drmdnU4Z0IQvmT7anZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews.com:
hhc314@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just
my opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get
their stuff together.
Pffft...the Republicans don't stand a chance. once the Dems have
their love fest in August.
Don't bet on it. The swing voters know that if we precipitously pull
out of Iraq,
Who's proposing that? The US will *never* leave Iraq completely. Iraq
is now our forward base since we are out of Saudi Arabia.
Hillary is proposing it. She's said several times that she'll pull us
out imediately. ;(
we will leave a genocidal bloodbath in our wake, of
Shiite killing Sunnis, and al Quaeda may take command of whatever
failed state appears afterward. What purpose is there in toppling
Afghanistan because they gave sanctuary to al Qaeda, and then giving
a replacement country to the jihadists?
Exactly our question to Bush.
Everybody knows that, but we can't turn back the clock, and fix it so we
never went into Iraq, like liberals seem to think. We're in it, and now
we must do the best we can, within the limits of not getting overrun and
butchered in great numbers, not letting the Shiites genocide the Sunnis,
and not letting al Qaeda get the country when we leave. The Democratic
plans will reduce the chances of success on all three of those goals.
;(
The problem with you liberals is that you're spineless. Repugnicants
may be assholes, but occasionlly an ***** is useful, when there's a
dirty job that needs to be done, like murdering homicidal jihadist
madmen in large numbers.
There's three kinds of people: dicks, pussies, and assholes. Pussies
think everyone can get along, and dicks just want to ***** all the time
without thinking it through. But then you got your assholes, Chuck.
And all the assholes want is to ***** all over everything! So, pussies
may get mad at dicks once in a while, because pussies get fucked by
dicks. But dicks also ***** assholes, Chuck. And if they didn't *****
the assholes, you know what you'd get? You'd get your ***** and your
***** all covered in *****!
That's a rather unpleasant way to say that you agree. :(
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 07:35:12 AM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 6:44=A0pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:42=A0pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. =A0This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. =A0(Just my
opinion.) =A0Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
Its a sad fact after the meltdown of public support for the idiot now
occupying the whitehouse a freind said, "wow the only way the
Democrats could lose this one is to run a woman or a black guy"
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 10:42:39 AM |
|
|
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in news:0cb6cb3a-12db-418f-a7ee-
5a2e6164f3ca@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 31, 6:44 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
Its a sad fact after the meltdown of public support for the idiot now
occupying the whitehouse a freind said, "wow the only way the
Democrats could lose this one is to run a woman or a black guy"
Well, I was never that specific, but I certainly saw that they would do
their best to screw up such an easy victory, by choosing a flaming
liberal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 11:10:32 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:42:39 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in news:0cb6cb3a-12db-418f-a7ee-
5a2e6164f3ca@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 31, 6:44 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.
Its a sad fact after the meltdown of public support for the idiot now
occupying the whitehouse a freind said, "wow the only way the
Democrats could lose this one is to run a woman or a black guy"
Well, I was never that specific, but I certainly saw that they would do
their best to screw up such an easy victory, by choosing a flaming
liberal.
Only in the US could someone call either Clinton or Obama a "flaming
liberal" with a straight face. In the rest of the Western World they'd
be considered part of the moderate right.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 03:58:15 PM |
|
|
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
news:mgk6q31kuj1924tf7vrovd54r43measr61@4ax.com:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:42:39 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in news:0cb6cb3a-12db-418f-a7ee-
5a2e6164f3ca@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 31, 6:44 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just
my opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get
their stuff together.
Its a sad fact after the meltdown of public support for the idiot
now occupying the whitehouse a freind said, "wow the only way the
Democrats could lose this one is to run a woman or a black guy"
Well, I was never that specific, but I certainly saw that they would
do their best to screw up such an easy victory, by choosing a flaming
liberal.
Only in the US could someone call either Clinton or Obama a "flaming
liberal" with a straight face. In the rest of the Western World they'd
be considered part of the moderate right.
Running from a fight that isn't lost is what flaming liberals do.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 05:24:54 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already toast.
The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and McCain-Romney.
(Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality check).
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 05:50:05 PM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 6:24=A0pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrap=
ers..."
WTC Towers 1 and 2 spring to mind. :-)
Harry C.
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 06:00:15 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:50:05 -0800 (PST), "hhc314@yahoo.com"
<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:24 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
WTC Towers 1 and 2 spring to mind. :-)
Harry C.
Yes, that's the point.
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 05:28:04 PM |
|
|
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
news:92m4q3t71them1d1a79jm5frsku0rfjvia@4ax.com:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already toast.
The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and McCain-Romney.
(Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality check).
It'll be interesting to see if he takes any Bible Belt states on Super
Tuesday.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gernic" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 05:43:19 PM |
|
|
"Agent Smith" <agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A36BBE16DA27agentsmithtwoblockso@207.115.17.102...
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
news:92m4q3t71them1d1a79jm5frsku0rfjvia@4ax.com:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already toast.
The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and McCain-Romney.
(Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality check).
It'll be interesting to see if he takes any Bible Belt states on Super
Tuesday.
the primary division is between dense city people (democrat) and
suburban/rural people (republican)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
31 Jan 2008 05:45:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:28:04 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
news:92m4q3t71them1d1a79jm5frsku0rfjvia@4ax.com:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already toast.
The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and McCain-Romney.
(Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality check).
It'll be interesting to see if he takes any Bible Belt states on Super
Tuesday.
Huckabee or Paul?
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 06:08:06 PM |
|
|
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
news:9cn4q39tolkdrrhd7k3tp27h2unrpgj5ga@4ax.com:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:28:04 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
news:92m4q3t71them1d1a79jm5frsku0rfjvia@4ax.com:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already
toast. The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and
McCain-Romney. (Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality
check).
It'll be interesting to see if he takes any Bible Belt states on Super
Tuesday.
Huckabee or Paul?
Huckabee aka. Suckabee. Let's just hope that McCain doesn't choose him
as a running mate, to get the Christian whacko vote.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 05:34:43 AM |
|
|
raven1 wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already toast.
The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and McCain-Romney.
(Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality check).
As is Ron Paul.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 09:11:35 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:SaadnUvRGpNLnj7anZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@giganews.com:
raven1 wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already toast.
The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and McCain-Romney.
(Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality check).
As is Ron Paul.
Ron Paul is not planning to give up any time soon, and the longer he
hangs on, the better he'll look in 2012. Look how long McCain had to
stay the course, just to get an honest shot at the High Castle. Same
for Ronnie Raygun, and you can bet we haven't seen the last of Kucinich,
either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
02 Feb 2008 07:54:28 AM |
|
|
Agent Smith wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:SaadnUvRGpNLnj7anZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@giganews.com:
raven1 wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already
toast. The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and
McCain-Romney. (Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality
check).
As is Ron Paul.
Ron Paul is not planning to give up any time soon, and the longer he
hangs on, the better he'll look in 2012.
That wasn't my point. The point is that Ron Paul is a moron. As are anyone
that thinks he's a viable candidate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
02 Feb 2008 08:27:11 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, Geoff
<gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote
on Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:54:28 -0500
<3eOdnXizJPuF6znanZ2dnUVZ_qOknZ2d@giganews.com>:
Agent Smith wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:SaadnUvRGpNLnj7anZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@giganews.com:
raven1 wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
NPR just reported that useful detail.
Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already
toast. The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and
McCain-Romney. (Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality
check).
As is Ron Paul.
Ron Paul is not planning to give up any time soon, and the longer he
hangs on, the better he'll look in 2012.
That wasn't my point. The point is that Ron Paul is a moron. As are anyone
that thinks he's a viable candidate.
I'm not sure who's the bigger moron, Ron Paul or Mike
Huckabee. Considering Ron Paul is for free trade, but
not for NAFTA or CAFTA, one has to ask what "free trade"
means in this context, for example. He also supports what
was Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative (expensive!),
and elimination of welfare and SS benefits for illegal
immigrants.
(One suspects he's not sufficiently researched the problem.
He's not alone in that, though.)
--
#191,
Linux. Because vaporware only goes so far.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 01:49:00 PM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 9:11=A0am, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
Ron Paul is not planning to give up any time soon, and the longer he
hangs on, the better he'll look in 2012. =A0Look how long McCain had to
stay the course,
McCain has only stayed the course because there is no one else. He
is winning simply by default. He is so moderate that he could just as
easily be a Democrat as a Republican. And in light of the last couple
of
decades, for a Republican, he is as far left as you can get. It's not
about
"cross-aisle" politics, its about left wing liberal policy
agreement.
As a conservative Christian, I am really hard pressed as to who I will
vote for come November. Unfortunately, Huckabee will be but a memory
though frankly, he too raises several questions for me.
Honestly, if it wasn't for Ron Paul's unrealistic foreign policy, what
he
has said during the debates makes a good deal of sense. But he is
an isolationist which is like putting a fully loaded gun to your head
and
pulling the trigger in a global economy. A century ago a nature could
"endure" an isolationist position, but today, it is simply out of the
question.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 03:53:21 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:600f38be-c528-4044-bc68-
e999a533d9fa@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 1, 9:11 am, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
Ron Paul is not planning to give up any time soon, and the longer he
hangs on, the better he'll look in 2012. Look how long McCain had to
stay the course,
McCain has only stayed the course because there is no one else. He
is winning simply by default.
That's right. The Neo-cons screwed everything up so badly that, until
the middle east is calmed down, the Democrats will forever be able to
lambaste the right wing of your party by association with the Iraqi
catastrophe. You can expect to hear about the Iraq catastrophe for
about the next three election cycles, and I'm not talking about the
Congressional cycles. Every sentence that the Dems say from now until
then end of this historical cycle will consist of four words -
"subject," "verb" and "Iraqi catastrophe."
If the Shiites genocide the Sunnis, because of a decision Hillary makes
in the White House, the Dems will still be able to blame the Republican
rightists. You guys have put your right hand into a meat grinder, and
you won't get it out for a long, long time. And the joke's on you,
Sheila, because both liberals and the independents are enjoying watching
you suffer. We've known that you losers were trouble since Nixon was
president.
He is so moderate that he could just as
easily be a Democrat as a Republican. And in light of the last couple
of
decades, for a Republican, he is as far left as you can get. It's not
about "cross-aisle" politics, its about left wing liberal policy
agreement.
Maybe so, but as long as Americans are dying in a foreign country,
runaway social spending is the least of our worries. There is only one
issue in the election, and it's the middle east. Until that mess is
cleaned up, you don't have a leg to stand on, and it's your boy, George
Bush, the Christian nutjob who brought the wrath of God down onto
innocent Americans. Maybe you ought to try reading some other books
than the Bible, for a change, because with every public statement you
people make, you damage America, by aggressively spreading ignorance.
You're not Christians, you're Satanists. Remember, the Bible says that
Satan will come to you in a form that is pleasing. Well, what form is
more pleasing that Jesus Christ. You can't tell good from evil, because
you're still living in the twelfth century.
As a conservative Christian,
What are you doing in sci.astro, trying to convince people of the six
thousand year creation, when you know perfectly well that you're
surrounded by people who understand that galaxies twelve million light
years away was emitted their light twelve million years ago?
I am really hard pressed as to who I will
vote for come November.
Haven't you heard the news? You guys are officially liberals now,
because now Hillary and Barack are going to churches and quoting Jesus,
about how we're supposed to care for the poor.
Unfortunately, Huckabee will be but a memory
though frankly, he too raises several questions for me.
Honestly, if it wasn't for Ron Paul's unrealistic foreign policy, what
he has said during the debates makes a good deal of sense.
You apparently haven't looked closely at the part where he wants to
replace the IRS with a national sales tax that will be applied to all
sorts of unexpected things, like rents and mortgages, for instance.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee is running out of money |
01 Feb 2008 03:04:51 PM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 2:49=A0pm, wrote:
=A0A century ago a nature could
"endure" an isolationist position, but today, it is simply out of the
question.
Why do you think that?
Harry C.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
