| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jevan" |
| Date: |
10 Jan 2005 09:37:46 AM |
| Object: |
ideas |
Well I put some of my ideas on my webpage http://www.jevan1.com/ click on
"ideas".
For example, how would we have antigravity anyway? I haven't got the
solution though. One idea was whether we could be able to focus magnetism,
if we could then that could do it. There is always a north and a south pole.
But, since it is possible for magnetism waves to cancel out, (if you hold
two magnets near each other both northpoles, in the middle there should be
no net force a metal object located there? not quite, actually probably it
would hold it in place?). But anyway the thing is for magnetic (and
electric) fields is that apparently superposition holds (IE you can add the
individual sources that generate the field, to get the net total effect).
So, it should be possible to have regions of zero field. Surely then, you
could come up with a mathematical design which can have zero field
everywhere except at a single point in 3d-space? (Alike to the challenge of
coming up with a square wave from a sum of sine waves... how would you do it
if you don't know the answer). Unless someone prove it mathematically not
possible?
JP
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: ideas |
10 Jan 2005 11:04:43 AM |
|
|
Jevan wrote:
Well I put some of my ideas on my webpage http://www.jevan1.com/ click on
"ideas".
Braggart. It wasn't a brainstorm. It wasn't even a cloudy day.
Hell, the sun wasn't up.
For example, how would we have antigravity anyway? I haven't got the
solution though. One idea was whether we could be able to focus magnetism,
[snp crap]
Idiot. What is the magnetic field of a magnestar? 10^15 gauss vs
10^12 gauss for your everyday pulsar. Are those focused enough,
idiot? Hey stooopid, how many refirgerator magnets would have to
shove up your ***** to
sum to 10^15 gauss?
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: ideas |
10 Jan 2005 09:48:19 AM |
|
|
Jevan wrote:
Well I put some of my ideas on my webpage http://www.jevan1.com/ click on
"ideas".
*plonk*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "mospam" |
|
| Title: Re: ideas |
10 Jan 2005 10:06:07 AM |
|
|
This has already been done;
http://zapatopi.net/afdb.html
Just put on a AFDB, and be "clear" again.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jevan" |
|
| Title: Re: ideas |
10 Jan 2005 09:48:01 AM |
|
|
http://www.americanantigravity.com/
Like, is it bogus or is any of this actually possible?
------------------------------------------------
What are the major categories for Antigravity Devices?
Machs Principle: Offcenter-rotators, inertial-thrusters, or piezo-devices.
These devices attempt to pull themselves up by the bootstraps to overcome
gravity mechanically.
ELF-Grav Shielding: Low-Frequency EM-waves block gravitons from interacting
with mass, creating a shield from gravity and inertia.
Mass-Fluctuation: Utilizing EM-waves to create mass fluctations simulates
negative mass which has been proposed to generate an Antigravity Effect.
Biefield-Brown: High-voltages are used to create an
asymmetrical-capacitance, which Puthoff & Sakarov have proposed creates
forward directional thrust by interacting with quantum-foam.
Superconductive Grav-Shield: A rotating superconductor or gas-plasma creates
a shield around the test device that blocks inertia and mass, similar to the
ELF shield above.
Superconductive HFGW: The Gertsenshtein Effect allows a high-frequency
interaction between Electromagnetism and Gravitation that creates powerful
Gravitational-Waves, capable of exerting tons of force.
Bismuth/ Element 115: A poorly understood mechanism claimed to be the result
of reverse-engineering UFOs that somehow translates high-voltage electricity
into a propulsive gravity-wave.
Gyroscopic-Precession: A variation on Machs Principle in which a force
applied horizontally creates an upward thrust in a rotating gyroscope.
Includes NMR Antigravity, a nanoscale-variation of Gyroscopic precession in
which EM-radiation is used to generate Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and create
a precessional force against gravity for the entire test-object.
Lenz-Law: A series of variations on the common electromagnetic
inductive-force in which an Antigravity craft is repelled from the Earths
surface using a macro-scale variant of Lenzs Law.
GeoMagnetic Levitation: A high-energy, low-efficiency device that generates
upward and directional thrust by applying a very high-strength magnetic
field to repel against the Earths natural magnetic field.
Rotating Magnetic Field Device: A broad category of Antigravity device in
which a series of high-speed rotating electromagnetic fields are used to
warp-space and generate a pure, high-efficiency, and sometimes overunity
Antigravity Effect. May be related to Magnus-Effect propulsion or Rotating
Superconductive Antigravity.
Hutchison-Effect: A poorly understood high-voltage/high-frequency
Antigravity mechanism capable of lifting hundreds of pounds of weight, but
lacking the repeatability for close scientific scrutiny and easy
replication. This is an aspect of scalar-technology, and may be also called
scalar-antigravity or Bearden Antigravity.
Poynting Vector Propulsion: A real, workable reactionless-drive based on
classical electrodynamics principles, tested to generate pounds of thrust.
Scalability for this system is unknown early prototypes are unstable.
"Jevan" <jp@jevan1.com> wrote in message
news:llxEd.4241$i6.37970@nasal.pacific.net.au...
Well I put some of my ideas on my webpage http://www.jevan1.com/ click on
"ideas".
For example, how would we have antigravity anyway? I haven't got the
solution though. One idea was whether we could be able to focus magnetism,
if we could then that could do it. There is always a north and a south
pole.
But, since it is possible for magnetism waves to cancel out, (if you hold
two magnets near each other both northpoles, in the middle there should be
no net force a metal object located there? not quite, actually probably it
would hold it in place?). But anyway the thing is for magnetic (and
electric) fields is that apparently superposition holds (IE you can add
the
individual sources that generate the field, to get the net total effect).
So, it should be possible to have regions of zero field. Surely then, you
could come up with a mathematical design which can have zero field
everywhere except at a single point in 3d-space? (Alike to the challenge
of
coming up with a square wave from a sum of sine waves... how would you do
it
if you don't know the answer). Unless someone prove it mathematically not
possible?
JP
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
