| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"S. Enterprize Company" |
| Date: |
11 Jul 2003 03:27:06 AM |
| Object: |
If The Smart Model is Correct... |
If The Smart Model is Correct...
Every book in science on the face of this earth must be re-written, and I
would like 10% of all profits made from sales, which should come up to be about
a few trillion dollars.
I'm not greedy. I would like a few extra dollars for a vacation from all my
hard work for that last 10 years.
S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
| User: "Frodo Morris" |
|
| Title: Re: If The Smart Model is Correct... |
11 Jul 2003 10:34:36 AM |
|
|
S. Enterprize Company wrote:
If The Smart Model is Correct...
Every book in science on the face of this earth must be re-written, and I
would like 10% of all profits made from sales, which should come up to be about
a few trillion dollars.
See, this is why the 'smart' 'model' isn't going so well; your
calculations are off by many orders of magnitude. Also, you fail to
understand intellectual property law. Inventions can be patented,
discoveries relating to natural processes cannot (although an artifact
incorporating this system may well be). So unless the 'smart' 'model'
is a fabrication (probable), it may not be patented. Albert Einstein
understood this perfectly well, which is why the theory of relativity
(which describes a naturally-occurring process) is not patented. After
all, if it could've been patented he would've; he did have the necessary
paperwork to hand.
I'm not greedy. I would like a few extra dollars for a vacation from all my
hard work for that last 10 years.
Then you should've organised your work such that something worthwhile
came out of it.
--
FM
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If The Smart Model is Correct... |
11 Jul 2003 12:05:15 PM |
|
|
S. Enterprize Company wrote:
If The Smart Model is Correct...
Every book in science on the face of this earth must be re-written, and I
would like 10% of all profits made from sales, which should come up to be
about
a few trillion dollars.
See, this is why the 'smart' 'model' isn't going so well; your
calculations are off by many orders of magnitude.
I did a few minute calculation of the energy levels in accelerators near the
speed of light for a proton and came up with about 10GeV, theirs was 6GeV.....
.. That's not too far off using only rough calculations.
(which describes a naturally-occurring process) is not patented. After
all, if it could've been patented he would've; he did have the necessary
paperwork to hand
He did apply for patent.
Then you should've organised your work such that something worthwhile
came out of it.
--
FM
I can still get 10% profit sharing.... .
S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Minor Crank" |
|
| Title: Re: If The Smart Model is Correct... |
12 Jul 2003 08:13:06 PM |
|
|
"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030711130515.22091.00000302@mb-m02.aol.com...
He did apply for patent.
Not for relativity. However, Einstein DID have a practical engineering side
to him, working to design a -safe- refrigerator with Leo Szilard. Their work
resulted in 45 patents.
http://gtalumni.org/StayInformed/magazine/sum98/einsrefr.html
Refrigerators were once dangerous appliances, from their use of ammonia as a
coolant. The story goes that Einstein was very moved when he read an account
of a family that died while they were sleeping when their refrigerator
suffered a leak, and that was his initial motivation for teaming up with
Szilard.
Minor Crank
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If The Smart Model is Correct... |
12 Jul 2003 10:53:09 PM |
|
|
"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030711130515.22091.00000302@mb-m02.aol.com...
He did apply for patent.
Not for relativity. However, Einstein DID have a practical engineering side
to him, working to design a -safe- refrigerator with Leo Szilard. Their work
resulted in 45 patents.
http://gtalumni.org/StayInformed/magazine/sum98/einsrefr.html
Refrigerators were once dangerous appliances, from their use of ammonia as a
coolant. The story goes that Einstein was very moved when he read an account
of a family that died while they were sleeping when their refrigerator
suffered a leak, and that was his initial motivation for teaming up with
Szilard.
Minor Crank
Oh.
S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: If The Smart Model is Correct... |
11 Jul 2003 05:22:18 PM |
|
|
On 11 Jul 2003 17:05:15 GMT, (S. Enterprize Company)
wrote:
S. Enterprize Company wrote:
If The Smart Model is Correct...
Every book in science on the face of this earth must be re-written, and I
would like 10% of all profits made from sales, which should come up to be
about
a few trillion dollars.
See, this is why the 'smart' 'model' isn't going so well; your
calculations are off by many orders of magnitude.
I did a few minute calculation of the energy levels in accelerators near the
speed of light for a proton and came up with about 10GeV, theirs was 6GeV.....
. That's not too far off using only rough calculations.
(which describes a naturally-occurring process) is not patented. After
all, if it could've been patented he would've; he did have the necessary
paperwork to hand
He did apply for patent.
Then you should've organised your work such that something worthwhile
came out of it.
--
FM
I can still get 10% profit sharing.... .
Only , and I quote:
"If The Smart Model is Correct..."
Sorry.
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
