Science > Physics > If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"S. Enterprize Company" |
| Date: |
26 Jan 2004 09:59:41 AM |
| Object: |
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'sMessage forum |
26 Jan 2004 11:06:10 AM |
|
|
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s |
26 Jan 2004 02:21:29 PM |
|
|
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg
As you can see again, there isn't one bad post on _S. Enterprize Co.'s
Message Forum_ ( The Alternative Science Physics Forum). But I can't say the
same for this forum. S. Enterprize Message Forum is found below on the SIG. We
try to keep things clean and scientific there.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
UGH!
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 03:00:57 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, Uncle Al
<UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
wrote
on Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:06:10 -0800
<40154902.588B649@hate.spam.net>:
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
"Ahh, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package.
How efficient of you."
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
"You are an idiot. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ..."
(I need to deconstruct this one at some point. Ming is
not all that good at putting sound in SWF files yet.)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
Alleged picture of individual in shower with head up *****.
http://www.you-moron.com/
"You moron, what did you expect to see here? Retard Imbecile Idiot
Simpleton ..."
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
Intel Inside, Idiot Outside
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
Crackpot.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
Moron walking fishlike implement.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
Idiot Zone (with donkey)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
"Stupid idiot" scribbled on light grey brick wall.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg
The Complete Idiot's Guide to Being a LOUD Usenet Moron.
("Idiot-proof steps, expert advice, and practical tips."
I'm not sure what the picture is; could be a snowblower
or some sort of monster truck...)
* * *
Nice editorial comments :-) , but I'll admit I wonder
where one can get a rather detailed refutation of The
Smart Model -- of course, I also wonder where I can get a
rather detailed *exposition* of The Smart Model which is
(a) coherent, and (b) at least has the potential of being
testable. I suspect the one will have to await the other,
which could take a very very long time. (Googling
on "refutation of the Smart Model" didn't produce much
of interest.)
At least with the Standard Model one can pick up a book
and read it; I have one -- somewhere -- which is a textbook
I've used in my youth. It goes into some detail on how
to use the Hamiltonian, for example, and develops enough
theory to work out the eigenstates of a hydrogen atom.
(No, it doesn't look like a doughnut.)
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 06:07:24 AM |
|
|
<SNIP> above filth and trash
At least with the Standard Model one can pick up a book
and read it; I have one -- somewhere -- which is a textbook
I've used in my youth. It goes into some detail on how
to use the Hamiltonian, for example, and develops enough
theory to work out the eigenstates of a hydrogen atom.
Hamiltonians are of no use for an incorrect model. Eigenstates for and
electron orbital is ridiculous.
(No, it doesn't look like a doughnut.)
Neither does the Smart Model.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 11:00:08 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 27 Jan 2004 12:07:24 GMT
<20040127070724.21903.00000479@mb-m25.aol.com>:
<SNIP> above filth and trash
At least with the Standard Model one can pick up a book
and read it; I have one -- somewhere -- which is a textbook
I've used in my youth. It goes into some detail on how
to use the Hamiltonian, for example, and develops enough
theory to work out the eigenstates of a hydrogen atom.
Hamiltonians are of no use for an incorrect model.
Eigenstates for and electron orbital is ridiculous.
Explain the electron single and double slit experiments
using your Smart Model, then.
(No, it doesn't look like a doughnut.)
Neither does the Smart Model.
Figured out what methane looks like yet?
[.sigsnip]
--
#191, -- insert random calthrop here
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 06:17:13 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 27 Jan 2004 12:07:24 GMT
<20040127070724.21903.00000479@mb-m25.aol.com>:
<SNIP> above filth and trash
At least with the Standard Model one can pick up a book
and read it; I have one -- somewhere -- which is a textbook
I've used in my youth. It goes into some detail on how
to use the Hamiltonian, for example, and develops enough
theory to work out the eigenstates of a hydrogen atom.
Hamiltonians are of no use for an incorrect model.
Eigenstates for and electron orbital is ridiculous.
Explain the electron single and double slit experiments
using your Smart Model, then.
As photons are generated and emitted, it causes waves in the Aether Fluid.
Analogy: Drop a pebble ( or pebbles) in some water, and watch the waves
produced in the water. Now make a slit in the water, it makes the same wave
patterns as in slit experiments with photons.
(No, it doesn't look like a doughnut.)
Neither does the Smart Model.
Figured out what methane looks like yet?
http://members.aol.com/human14737/bgif16.gif
It's just one atom of Carbon using the Smart Model with 4 attached
hydrogens using the Smart Model.
[.sigsnip]
--
#191, -- insert random calthrop here
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
28 Jan 2004 12:31:09 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 28 Jan 2004 00:17:13 GMT
<20040127191713.17130.00000966@mb-m03.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 27 Jan 2004 12:07:24 GMT
<20040127070724.21903.00000479@mb-m25.aol.com>:
<SNIP> above filth and trash
At least with the Standard Model one can pick up a book
and read it; I have one -- somewhere -- which is a textbook
I've used in my youth. It goes into some detail on how
to use the Hamiltonian, for example, and develops enough
theory to work out the eigenstates of a hydrogen atom.
Hamiltonians are of no use for an incorrect model.
Eigenstates for and electron orbital is ridiculous.
Explain the electron single and double slit experiments
using your Smart Model, then.
As photons are generated and emitted, it causes waves
in the Aether Fluid. Analogy: Drop a pebble ( or pebbles)
in some water, and watch the waves produced in the water.
Now make a slit in the water, it makes the same wave
patterns as in slit experiments with photons.
I didn't say *photons* in the above.
I said *electrons*.
(Turns out it doesn't make that much difference, though.
One still gets an interference pattern.)
(No, it doesn't look like a doughnut.)
Neither does the Smart Model.
Figured out what methane looks like yet?
http://members.aol.com/human14737/bgif16.gif
It's just one atom of Carbon using the Smart Model with 4 attached
hydrogens using the Smart Model.
Well, it's an improvement over your batik square. I'm
still not sure it's quite right though; a saturated aliphatic
hydrocarbon should be a zigzag.
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
28 Jan 2004 02:51:13 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 28 Jan 2004 00:17:13 GMT
<20040127191713.17130.00000966@mb-m03.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 27 Jan 2004 12:07:24 GMT
<20040127070724.21903.00000479@mb-m25.aol.com>:
<SNIP> above filth and trash
At least with the Standard Model one can pick up a book
and read it; I have one -- somewhere -- which is a textbook
I've used in my youth. It goes into some detail on how
to use the Hamiltonian, for example, and develops enough
theory to work out the eigenstates of a hydrogen atom.
Hamiltonians are of no use for an incorrect model.
Eigenstates for and electron orbital is ridiculous.
Explain the electron single and double slit experiments
using your Smart Model, then.
As photons are generated and emitted, it causes waves
in the Aether Fluid. Analogy: Drop a pebble ( or pebbles)
in some water, and watch the waves produced in the water.
Now make a slit in the water, it makes the same wave
patterns as in slit experiments with photons.
I didn't say *photons* in the above.
I said *electrons*.
Ok replace the word photon with electrons in the analogy.
(Turns out it doesn't make that much difference, though.
One still gets an interference pattern.)
(No, it doesn't look like a doughnut.)
Neither does the Smart Model.
Figured out what methane looks like yet?
http://members.aol.com/human14737/bgif16.gif
It's just one atom of Carbon using the Smart Model with 4 attached
hydrogens using the Smart Model.
Well, it's an improvement over your batik square. I'm
That was just a rough sketch.
still not sure it's quite right though; a saturated aliphatic
hydrocarbon should be a zigzag.
One carbon with 4 hydrogen atoms ( CH4) isn't zig-zag. A long chain
Carbohydrogen can be slightly zig-zag but it is still a line chain of
interacting fields.
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
28 Jan 2004 02:54:38 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 28 Jan 2004 00:17:13 GMT
<20040127191713.17130.00000966@mb-m03.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 27 Jan 2004 12:07:24 GMT
<20040127070724.21903.00000479@mb-m25.aol.com>:
<SNIP> above filth and trash
At least with the Standard Model one can pick up a book
and read it; I have one -- somewhere -- which is a textbook
I've used in my youth. It goes into some detail on how
to use the Hamiltonian, for example, and develops enough
theory to work out the eigenstates of a hydrogen atom.
Hamiltonians are of no use for an incorrect model.
Eigenstates for and electron orbital is ridiculous.
Explain the electron single and double slit experiments
using your Smart Model, then.
As photons are generated and emitted, it causes waves
in the Aether Fluid. Analogy: Drop a pebble ( or pebbles)
in some water, and watch the waves produced in the water.
Now make a slit in the water, it makes the same wave
patterns as in slit experiments with photons.
I didn't say *photons* in the above.
I said *electrons*.
Ok replace the word photon with electrons in the analogy.
(Turns out it doesn't make that much difference, though.
One still gets an interference pattern.)
(No, it doesn't look like a doughnut.)
Neither does the Smart Model.
Figured out what methane looks like yet?
http://members.aol.com/human14737/bgif16.gif
It's just one atom of Carbon using the Smart Model with 4 attached
hydrogens using the Smart Model.
Well, it's an improvement over your batik square. I'm
That was just a rough sketch.
still not sure it's quite right though; a saturated aliphatic
hydrocarbon should be a zigzag.
One carbon with 4 hydrogen atoms ( CH4) isn't zig-zag. A long chain
Carbohydrogen can be slightly zig-zag
Or Hydro-Carbons....
but it is still a line chain of
interacting fields.
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
28 Jan 2004 11:00:07 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 28 Jan 2004 08:51:13 GMT
<20040128035113.22644.00000887@mb-m18.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 28 Jan 2004 00:17:13 GMT
<20040127191713.17130.00000966@mb-m03.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 27 Jan 2004 12:07:24 GMT
<20040127070724.21903.00000479@mb-m25.aol.com>:
<SNIP> above filth and trash
At least with the Standard Model one can pick up a book
and read it; I have one -- somewhere -- which is a textbook
I've used in my youth. It goes into some detail on how
to use the Hamiltonian, for example, and develops enough
theory to work out the eigenstates of a hydrogen atom.
Hamiltonians are of no use for an incorrect model.
Eigenstates for and electron orbital is ridiculous.
Explain the electron single and double slit experiments
using your Smart Model, then.
As photons are generated and emitted, it causes waves
in the Aether Fluid. Analogy: Drop a pebble ( or pebbles)
in some water, and watch the waves produced in the water.
Now make a slit in the water, it makes the same wave
patterns as in slit experiments with photons.
I didn't say *photons* in the above.
I said *electrons*.
Ok replace the word photon with electrons in the analogy.
So the creation of electrons causes Aether Fluid waves?
(Turns out it doesn't make that much difference, though.
One still gets an interference pattern.)
(No, it doesn't look like a doughnut.)
Neither does the Smart Model.
Figured out what methane looks like yet?
http://members.aol.com/human14737/bgif16.gif
It's just one atom of Carbon using the Smart Model with 4 attached
hydrogens using the Smart Model.
Well, it's an improvement over your batik square. I'm
That was just a rough sketch.
still not sure it's quite right though; a saturated aliphatic
hydrocarbon should be a zigzag.
One carbon with 4 hydrogen atoms ( CH4) isn't zig-zag.
Correct. I was referring to the longer ones. CH4 looks like
a fat, fuzzy calthrop. (Fuzzy because of the electron probability
clouds. Fat because the atom radius is half the bond length,
generally speaking.)
A long chain Carbohydrogen can be slightly zig-zag but it is
still a line chain of interacting fields.
Graphite looks a bit like a beehive, with a layered hexagonal lattice.
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/C/xtal.html
This is not consistent with, say, the more traditional 2-D
representation
|
- C -
|
which suggests a square lattice. Then again, this is only a schematic
representation.
Diamond has an interesting structure ('A4', apparently,
has meaning among crystallographers) that is
described/diagrammed in a number of places, among them
http://cst-www.nrl.navy.mil/lattice/struk/a4.html
or one can fire up JMol, and rotate the crystal structure every whichway:
http://cst-www.nrl.navy.mil/lattice/struk.jmol/a4.html
(As usual, the electron fuzziness is more or less ignored, and the
bond lengths are exaggerated relative to the atoms. However,
drawn to scale it would just look like a blob of atoms.)
Another schematic diagram is available at
http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/tk/tks/diamond-structure.html
which might better show the lattice if only because there are
more atoms, but again the bond lengths are exaggerated.
Obviously at least one of the lattices requires bond bending, relative
to the other.
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Moroney" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
26 Jan 2004 03:19:54 PM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) writes:
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
So in other words, not only do you censor it, you brag about it as well?
Or maybe I'm giving you too much credit, and nobody even finds you worth
the effort.
--
-Mike
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
26 Jan 2004 04:16:55 PM |
|
|
smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) writes:
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
So in other words, not only do you censor it, you brag about it as well?
Or maybe I'm giving you too much credit, and nobody even finds you worth
the effort.
--
-Mike
I moderate only the filth and scum you people put there. Everything else
that is scientific, even if it disagrees logically with the Smart Model ( very
little chance ), is allowed.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
26 Jan 2004 04:23:03 PM |
|
|
smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) writes:
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
So in other words, not only do you censor it, you brag about it as well?
Or maybe I'm giving you too much credit, and nobody even finds you worth
the effort.
--
-Mike
I moderate only the filth and scum you people put there. Everything else
that is scientific, even if it disagrees logically with the Smart Model (
very
little chance ), is allowed.
Something else I don't allow at my Website, and that is insurrection against
the United States. Like toxic things against, kids and US policy.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 12:38:54 AM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20040126105941.28443.00000735@mb-m01.aol.com>...
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
I guess that's fair. After all, there aren't any posts on this
forum that show just the opposite. (Excuse me now while I pinch out a
fart.)
-Mark Martin
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 06:10:32 AM |
|
|
smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20040126105941.28443.00000735@mb-m01.aol.com>...
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
I guess that's fair. After all, there aren't any posts on this
forum that show just the opposite. (Excuse me now while I pinch out a
fart.)
-Mark Martin
I guess you can see why people with good credentials and world class leaders
of physics don't participate here on this news group. There's too much filth,
trash, pervertion and crap here.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Helland" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
26 Jan 2004 02:04:36 PM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20040126105941.28443.00000735@mb-m01.aol.com>...
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
Please explain in less than 300 words what problem it is that the
Smart Model solves.
Based on what I've read of your work the model "seems to make more
logical sense."
I must say that using these words you aren't making a very strong case
for the problems that you're solving, and you're not making a very
strong case for your solution beingn better.
If something that "seems to make more logical sense" was automatically
a better scientific theory than Newton's work makes alot more sense
than Einstein's.
Again, point out the specific problems you are solving, make the
strongest case possible for the problem, and make the strongest case
possible for your solution, and please do this very precisely and
briefly.
Without a satisfactory response to this request, it seems quite
understandable why noone has shown why your model is incorrect:
because it doesn't solve an interesting problem in an intersting way.
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
26 Jan 2004 02:15:13 PM |
|
|
smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20040126105941.28443.00000735@mb-m01.aol.com>...
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
Please explain in less than 300 words what problem it is that the
Smart Model solves.
What problem does it not solve?
Based on what I've read of your work the model "seems to make more
logical sense."
I must say that using these words you aren't making a very strong case
for the problems that you're solving, and you're not making a very
strong case for your solution beingn better.
If something that "seems to make more logical sense" was automatically
a better scientific theory than Newton's work makes alot more sense
than Einstein's.
Again, point out the specific problems you are solving, make the
strongest case possible for the problem, and make the strongest case
possible for your solution, and please do this very precisely and
briefly.
Without a satisfactory response to this request, it seems quite
understandable why noone has shown why your model is incorrect:
because it doesn't solve an interesting problem in an intersting way.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Helland" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
26 Jan 2004 11:34:56 PM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20040126151513.12710.00000964@mb-m29.aol.com>...
Please explain in less than 300 words what problem it is that the
Smart Model solves.
What problem does it not solve?
That is the least informing answer that I could have possibly received.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Titan Point" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 07:54:38 AM |
|
|
(Mike Helland) wrote in message news:<ad157aec.0401262134.3ccbaffe@posting.google.com>...
smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20040126151513.12710.00000964@mb-m29.aol.com>...
Please explain in less than 300 words what problem it is that the
Smart Model solves.
What problem does it not solve?
That is the least informing answer that I could have possibly received.
It was, however, the funniest possible answer. I laughed out loud.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 12:57:59 AM |
|
|
(Mike Helland) wrote:
smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20040126151513.12710.00000964@mb-m29.aol.com>...
Please explain in less than 300 words what problem it is that the
Smart Model solves.
What problem does it not solve?
That is the least informing answer that I could have possibly received.
But it does tell you something about smart1234.
Apparently, he's not so smart.
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 02:36:57 AM |
|
|
mhelland@techmocracy.net (Mike Helland) wrote:
smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20040126151513.12710.00000964@mb-m29.aol.com>...
Please explain in less than 300 words what problem it is that the
Smart Model solves.
What problem does it not solve?
That is the least informing answer that I could have possibly received.
But it does tell you something about smart1234.
Apparently, he's not so smart.
Jim
Have you ever wondered why God let's people die on earth? Because He is
smart.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 08:18:17 PM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote:
mhelland@techmocracy.net (Mike Helland) wrote:
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20040126151513.12710.00000964@mb-m29.aol.com>...
Please explain in less than 300 words what problem it is that the
Smart Model solves.
What problem does it not solve?
That is the least informing answer that I could have possibly received.
But it does tell you something about smart1234.
Apparently, he's not so smart.
Jim
Have you ever wondered why God let's people die on earth? Because He is
smart.
You don't have to be very smart to understand death.
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 12:55:52 AM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote:
If you notice there isn't one <snip> post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
26 Jan 2004 10:02:16 AM |
|
|
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
From Moderator - Smart1234
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
27 Jan 2004 12:59:57 AM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote:
If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum
showing The Smart Model is incorrect.
From Moderator - Smart1234
I've an idea! Why, don't you reply to yourself some more.
Yeah, that's the ticket!
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Scot Gillman" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
31 Jan 2004 02:42:45 AM |
|
|
GREAT WORK Smart Al.
Theism, polytheirsm, science, the arts...
I have bookemarked your page with its
Science News... I always liked Science News.
Your meteorological "Weather Channel" was
for me, thankfully, not the televisioin
Weather Channel.
It is fascinating that you solicit folks from
a bachelor of science degree to PhD.
A fascinating book you might enjoy is
a U. of Chicago Press paperback entitled
"Philosophers Speak of God". I used it
in Sunday school, actually a Reform Jewish
synagogue that had sunday school on the
Christian sabbath.
My mother doesn't like anti-Semites, and I know
she would approve of your site.
I am particularly less fear ridden that your
weather site not was not the television
cable tv... but rather something else, and
I enjoy and will suffer the pop up smileys
to have internet access to Science News
magazine.
Thank you for contributing to sci.physics.
Doug Gillman
Cincinnati, OH 45216-0237
513-242-2393
iMac X & HP Vectra Series 4, 5/133 on
242-3689
email:
Dream on nacelles' wind, Caught in tepid Tome, an urge,
Gin in from the cold.
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: If you notice there isn't one bad post on S. Enterprize Co.'s Message forum |
31 Jan 2004 10:53:17 AM |
|
|
GREAT WORK Smart Al.
Theism, polytheirsm, science, the arts...
I have bookemarked your page with its
Science News... I always liked Science News.
Your meteorological "Weather Channel" was
for me, thankfully, not the televisioin
Weather Channel.
It is fascinating that you solicit folks from
a bachelor of science degree to PhD.
A fascinating book you might enjoy is
a U. of Chicago Press paperback entitled
"Philosophers Speak of God". I used it
in Sunday school, actually a Reform Jewish
synagogue that had sunday school on the
Christian sabbath.
My mother doesn't like anti-Semites, and I know
she would approve of your site.
I am particularly less fear ridden that your
weather site not was not the television
cable tv... but rather something else, and
I enjoy and will suffer the pop up smileys
to have internet access to Science News
magazine.
Thank you for contributing to sci.physics.
Doug Gillman
Cincinnati, OH 45216-0237
513-242-2393
iMac X & HP Vectra Series 4, 5/133 on
242-3689
email:
Dream on nacelles' wind, Caught in tepid Tome, an urge,
Gin in from the cold.
Thank you for the compliments.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
