| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"MobyDikc" |
| Date: |
25 Feb 2006 02:56:46 PM |
| Object: |
Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists |
I would like to here interesting comments and criticisms of the
following paper:
http://www.cosmik-debris.net/science/time.htm
"This paper suggests that a quantum universe can be modeled as a
discrete system of interacting particles by an algorithm. The only two
postulates of the conjecture, mind and measurement, lead to a new
method of predicting measurements from the model. The predictions are
conjectured to be incomplete and varying with motion despite the
algorithm computing precise values. The conjecture is explained in two
parts, Newton's physics and modern physics."
Make sure the date ontop is Feb. 25th.
.
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists |
25 Feb 2006 03:22:24 PM |
|
|
"MobyDikc" <mobydikc@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1140901005.971906.228620@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I would like to here interesting comments and criticisms of the
following paper:
http://www.cosmik-debris.net/science/time.htm
"This paper suggests that a quantum universe can be modeled as a
discrete system of interacting particles by an algorithm. The only two
postulates of the conjecture, mind and measurement, lead to a new
method of predicting measurements from the model. The predictions are
conjectured to be incomplete and varying with motion despite the
algorithm computing precise values. The conjecture is explained in two
parts, Newton's physics and modern physics."
Make sure the date ontop is Feb. 25th.
Who cares about the date tagged on top a pile of
armchair puke? Peter Lynds?
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "MobyDikc" |
|
| Title: Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists |
25 Feb 2006 03:36:39 PM |
|
|
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"MobyDikc" <mobydikc@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1140901005.971906.228620@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I would like to here interesting comments and criticisms of the
following paper:
http://www.cosmik-debris.net/science/time.htm
"This paper suggests that a quantum universe can be modeled as a
discrete system of interacting particles by an algorithm. The only two
postulates of the conjecture, mind and measurement, lead to a new
method of predicting measurements from the model. The predictions are
conjectured to be incomplete and varying with motion despite the
algorithm computing precise values. The conjecture is explained in two
parts, Newton's physics and modern physics."
Make sure the date ontop is Feb. 25th.
Who cares about the date tagged on top a pile of
armchair puke?
Anyone interested in radical alternatives to string theory and the
traditional methodology of model physical phenomena.
I'm guessing that's not you. Your opinion is noted.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists |
25 Feb 2006 03:45:01 PM |
|
|
"MobyDikc" <mobydikc@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1140903399.703789.319320@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"MobyDikc" <mobydikc@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1140901005.971906.228620@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I would like to here interesting comments and criticisms of the
following paper:
http://www.cosmik-debris.net/science/time.htm
"This paper suggests that a quantum universe can be modeled as a
discrete system of interacting particles by an algorithm. The only two
postulates of the conjecture, mind and measurement, lead to a new
method of predicting measurements from the model. The predictions are
conjectured to be incomplete and varying with motion despite the
algorithm computing precise values. The conjecture is explained in two
parts, Newton's physics and modern physics."
Make sure the date ontop is Feb. 25th.
Who cares about the date tagged on top a pile of
armchair puke?
I wrote:
| Who cares about the date tagged on top a pile of
| armchair puke? Peter Lynds?
Any particular reason why you sneakily removed your hero's
name from my quote?
Dirk Vdm
Anyone interested in radical alternatives to string theory and the
traditional methodology of model physical phenomena.
I'm guessing that's not you. Your opinion is noted.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MobyDikc" |
|
| Title: Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists |
25 Feb 2006 03:53:02 PM |
|
|
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"MobyDikc" <mobydikc@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1140903399.703789.319320@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"MobyDikc" <mobydikc@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1140901005.971906.228620@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I would like to here interesting comments and criticisms of the
following paper:
http://www.cosmik-debris.net/science/time.htm
"This paper suggests that a quantum universe can be modeled as a
discrete system of interacting particles by an algorithm. The only two
postulates of the conjecture, mind and measurement, lead to a new
method of predicting measurements from the model. The predictions are
conjectured to be incomplete and varying with motion despite the
algorithm computing precise values. The conjecture is explained in two
parts, Newton's physics and modern physics."
Make sure the date ontop is Feb. 25th.
Who cares about the date tagged on top a pile of
armchair puke?
I wrote:
| Who cares about the date tagged on top a pile of
| armchair puke? Peter Lynds?
Any particular reason why you sneakily removed your hero's
name from my quote?
Any particular reason you think he's my hero?
Or more to the point, do you think bringing up his name everytime is
somehow an interesting comment or criticism of my paper?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
