Mark Oliver wrote:
At present, there is no supportable rationalization regarding the
fundamentals of time or gravity. Mankind clearly observes that both
do
exist; yet we do not understand how or why. Newton's Law of gravity
is still
utilized in modern time, despite it being over 300 years old.
Although
millions of dollars have been spent worldwide building high-speed
particle
accelerators (atom smashers), the force carrier for gravity still
eludes
modern science to present day. This website has been created to put
forward
new perspectives to the science community, without contradiction of
known
facts, based upon reliable observations of behaviours on Earth.
General relativity replaced Newton's model about 100 years ago. Newton
is a pretty good approximation, though, and is used in certain
circumstances.
FACT - gravity is the only known force that we cannot shield, whereas
an
"anti-gravity" effect could be created by "blocking gravitational
interactions" between objects. Therefore, it is appropriate to state
that
gravity travels through all physical objects, as opposed to being
exchanged
between objects. Ironically, although time is not recognized as a
force in
science, it too affects all matter in a similar manner, and cannot be
shielded either. To date, no force carrier for gravity has been
found,
supporting that it is not exchanged between objects.
FACT - since gravity travels through physical objects, this must have
a
"cumulative net effect" upon matter, which can be quantified and
measured in
some form. A good example of this quantification is placing a
wrinkled leaf
inside the pages of a book. The more "time" the leaf is inside the
book; the
more "pressed" it becomes. Yet the force of gravity acting upon the
leaf
inside the book never changes, it's only the "cumulative net effect"
of
gravity, which pressed the leaf flat. This verifies that gravity
indeed has
a "cumulative net effect" while passing through objects.
This has more to do with the structure of the leaf than that of
gravity. If you replace the leaf with a rock, the effect will not be
the same.
FACT - gravity defies the conservation of energy, as it indefinitely
converts potential energy to kinetic energy to maintain constant
force
between physical objects, perpetually. Other than the obvious fact
that mass
is energy, however, the energy is not exchanged while gravity
maintains a
constant force between objects.
This is completely, mind-bogglingly false. Converting potential energy
to kinetic does not in any way violate conservation of energy.
FACT - we assume that a black hole is an enormous gravitational
field,
caused by a collapsed star, compacting matter so densely, it is
singularity.
However, gravity is based upon mass, not density of mass. Thus when
a star
collapses, its mass doesn't change, thus its gravitational force
doesn't
change, but then what changes? This observation supports conclusions
contained herein
Well, for one, quantum effects on the black hole become non-negligible.
FACT - in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) gravity is virtually ignored, as
its
interaction is nominal. Also, time behaves in a state of "controlled
chaos",
cycling back and forth in a random manner. Yet as physical mass
accumulates, both time and gravity become very stable, grow in
influence,
and the force of gravity becomes the most powerful force in the
Universe,
relative to physical mass. This suggests there could be a
relationship
between gravity and time, as both grow in influence and stabilize as
energy
accumulates.
Time does not "grow in influence" once quantum effects are negligible.
FACT - the speed of light ("C"), slows approximately 27% in velocity
when
passed through water, yet returns to "C" when it exits the water.
This
defies physics, as there is no energy source to "re-accelerate" light
back
to value of "C". This observation supports conclusions contained
herein.
This interpretation is not exactly correct.
FACT - Newton's Law states; Force = Mass x Acceleration (f=ma).
However,
this law does not explain why an object dropped from any height will
be
deformed (by force) when impacting the Earth. At the moment of
impact, the
acceleration of an object is immediately reduced to ZERO, thus at
that
precise moment, force = zero. However, an egg dropped from a height
of 5
feet will break when it impacts the floor, eventhough there is no
force at
the moment of impact. Therefore, there must be another element (a
force),
which causes the egg to break.
It's called impulse. This is a pretty elementary concept.
[snip rest]
A.
.
