Science > Physics > Integers form Riem Geometry and REals form Lobachevskian geometry
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Archimedes Plutonium" |
| Date: |
15 Feb 2005 12:11:22 PM |
| Object: |
Integers form Riem Geometry and REals form Lobachevskian geometry |
Subject:
FLT will prove integers are Riem geometry and RH to prove
Reals are Loba geometry
Date:
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:02:53 -0600
From:
Archimedes Plutonium <a_plutonium@iw.net>
Reply-To:
NOiwEMAIL
Organization:
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
Newsgroups:
sci.math, sci.logic, sci.physics
References:
1 , 2
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:54:35 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Back in the 1990s I wanted to know what the number set
intrinsic to Loba geometry was. I hypothesized that the REals
were the intrinsic set to Euclidean Geometry and that the Adics
were the intrinsic set to Riem. geometry. In geometry we have
three values of positive, zero and negative and thus we have
three geometries of Riem, Eucl, and Loba. But in physics we have
Duality not tri-ality. I was stuck and troubled with Doubly
Infinites. The Reals were rightward infinite strings and the Adics
were leftward infinite strings. So, according to Physics I should
stop with just the Reals and Adics because those two give Duality.
That Double Infinites are just nonsense. But what about the 3
geometries, and should Duality say that one of those geometries
is also nonsense?
When we look at the Adics they are disjoint infinite sets and they
are spherical in behaviour for they come back around. The Adics are
perfect description of Particles. When we look at the Reals they have
embedded within themselves the Wave nature of physics with its
periodic functions such as sin cosine tangent etc.
Perhaps the REals are really Loba geometry and not Euclidean but I
have not yet worked that out in my mind. And that would leave Euclidean
Geometry as a fictional geometry just as Newtonian Mechanics is a
fictional physics. Both the Adics and the REals have a zero point. And
so Euclidean GEometry is a geometry based on a single point of zero
and nothing more. Whereas Riem geometry are all the Adics and Loba
geometry is all the Reals
(if I work it out).
There are two major cracks in Reals that when fixed, I believe will
reveal the REals as Lobachevskian geometry, the intrinsic points
of Loba geometry. One of those cracks I mentioned in detail years
ago by talking about the plethora of definitions of the integral and
derivative. Math is riddled with scores and scores of different
definitions for integral and derivative of calculus. If the Reals were
Euclidean geometry then one definition
of integral and one definition of derivative should suffice for all
applications.
The other crack is the Riemann Hypothesis. If the Reals were Euclidean
geometry and if the Natural-Numbers all lined up in a straight line at
the 1/2 REal mark then RH would have been proven true by Mr. Riemann
himself.
But I suspect the reason RH is improvable by the old mathematics is
because the Reals do not form a Euclidean Geometry of points. I believe
the Reals form a Lobachevskian geometry and bend with a negative
curvature.
Because the REals bend with a negative curvature is the reason that
calculus needs a plethora of different definitions for the integral and
derivative to work as the REals bend.
We have a sense that the Adics bend positively as they stretch further
out for we know that .....9998 is -2 and we know that ....9999 is -1. So
the Adics bend like on the surface of a ball or sphere and as these
numbers get larger and larger they bend and come back around to their
starting point of 0 itself.
So the Adics as a set of numbers are the intrinsic points of
Riemannian Geometry.
Now as for the Reals, I am hypothesizing that they bend also but bend
negatively such as a saddle is negative curvature. So the reason for
these cracks of plethora of definitions for integral and derivative of
calculus and for the improvability of the Riemann Hypothesis is because
the Reals are not flat Euclidean geometry points but are the intrinsic
points of Lobachevskian Geometry.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
