Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 2



 Science > Physics > Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 2

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 30 Aug 2005 12:28:36 AM
Object: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 2

From Osher Doctorow


Take a look at part 1 of this thread - it's very interesting for one
thing in relation to Sir Roger Penrose's twistors but also in relation
to my very recent "Continuous verbal knowledge and continuous universe"
thread.
Quantum Logic and Quantum Gravity (the latter represented by
Superstring/Brane/M Theories and by Loop Quantum Gravity or LQG) were
supposed to respectively find the logical basis of quantum theory and
"unify" quantum theory and general relativity (GR). Forget for a
moment that the Quantum Logic of the early 1970s collapsed in an
attempt to show via Werner Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle that
there isn't any real logic to quantum theory! (It's been revived and
modified since the 1990s, but without quite shaking off Heisenberg's
ideas.) Quantum Gravity has turned into two fads:
A. The "Discrete Universe" fad.
B. The Algebraic Topology fad (sometimes Algebraic Geometry which it
partly replaced)
Think I'm kidding? Ask a member of the Quantum Gravity schools what
Quantum Theory and General Relativity (GR) have in common, and you'll
either get a "nothing" or an "almost nothing" reply, the latter couched
in "limit under certain conditions" language.
The Quantum Gravity schools, to make a long story short, have given up
on intersections if they ever knew about them. You've heard of
"Anybody for tennis"? Tennis is supposed to be continuous game. How
about "Anybody for discrete tennis?" You won't get any takers. But
you get "suckers" for discrete universe fads every time. The topper to
this story is that Quanum Logic and Quantum Gravity are going down the
same path that 1970s Quantum Logic collapsed into, since the latter
collapsed into discrete islands of unrelated propositions that not only
were unrelated to each other but to continuing experimental research.
Intersection Theory asks what Quantum Theory and General Relativity,
and for that matter any two or more theories, have in common. And Part
1 gives some interesting ideas in that direction.
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3
Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics
#1 new book; preface Re: ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANG THEORY IN PHYSICS
*11* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"; ATOMIC THEORY as primal axiom of all science
*6* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; Missing Mass conundrum & Cosmic distribution of chemical elements
All Tied Up & Strung Along: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! Great Summer Work For Physicists!! No Knowledge of Physics Needed!!
Moving Dimensions Theory & On The Advancement Of Physics: MDT & higher dimensions /Kaluza Klein Theory
On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory
is string theory widely accepted in the world of physics
*10* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"; (pi) and (e) explained
Moving Dimensions Theory & On The Advancement Of Physics : MDT Underlies String Theory
Parallel (entire) Universes, Multiverse, Sliders - accepted Physics theory
a Physics theory that add an observer can change the result
Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance
PHYSICS OF GENESIS SPECIAL THEORY MODELING
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER