Believe it or not, inverted realtion appears an exact relation it
self. So the Gedanken may be inverted to transform the argument in
example.
The skill to inverted is a basic symmtric argument applied. An
examination of Gedanken, well defined in the previous post, allows all
cause to experimental necessity to be solution to a class of problem.
This problem in fact!
All expermental need was to allow relation's truth to be validated, by
an exact sets existence. All measure as experimental result therefor
allowed the set. And so the symbol to define the solution to
inference was a certain word. I do not know the proper word so one is
selected, call this particular set a valdidity set. A set to cause
truth, called a validity set, for in set theory all set is held true
and relation between appears the question.
To prove a set true is to prove that force exists for example. A
scale tips or not.
So the set validity proves the relation, not the effect of all, i.e. a
sets existence.
Here as the solution I propose without proper inference th einverted
Gedanken, ny time is short right now. Please consider its relation to
the set of solutions it is to be related to.
"A set as the dog in the park was a cause to park's existence."
Inverted Gedanken defined in existential of Greek inference.
I will clarify latter in abstracted second predicate.
.
|
