Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real?



 Science > Physics > Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Bocks"
Date: 12 Jan 2005 11:21:11 PM
Object: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real?
Hi,
http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Thinktank/8863/HEffect1.html
What's your thought of the Hutchison Effect? If it is
crap, show why it is crap. If it is real, pls. explain
the mechanism. Know someone who has seen the effect
with his/her own eyes? Tnx - Bocks
.

User: "Dirk Van de moortel"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 01:06:11 PM
"Bocks" <milanorbocks@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1105593671.121458.36660@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Hi,

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Thinktank/8863/HEffect1.html


What's your thought of the Hutchison Effect? If it is
crap, show why it is crap. If it is real, pls. explain
the mechanism. Know someone who has seen the effect
with his/her own eyes? Tnx - Bocks

It's easy.
If some of the regular crackpots think it is real, then it is crap.
Otherwise the question is open :-)
Dirk Vdm
.

User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 12 Jan 2005 11:31:48 PM
Bocks wrote:

Hi,

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Thinktank/8863/HEffect1.html


What's your thought of the Hutchison Effect? If it is
crap, show why it is crap. If it is real, pls. explain
the mechanism. Know someone who has seen the effect
with his/her own eyes? Tnx - Bocks

Ref: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Gravity.html
Ref: Hartle, "Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity", Addison
Wesley (2003)
"A few properties of the gravitational interaction that help explain when
gravity is important can already be seen from the gravitational force law
F_grav = G m_1 m_2 / r_12^2
o Gravity is a universal interaction in Newtonian theory between all mass, and,
since E = mc^2, in relativistic gravity between all forms of energy.
o Gravity is unscreened. There are no negative gravitational charges to cancel
positive ones, and therefore it is not possible to shield (screen) the gravitational
interaction. Gravity is always attractive.
o Gravity is a long-range interaction. The Newtonian force law ia a 1/r^2
interaction. There is no length scale that sets a range for gravitational
interactions as there is for the strong and weak interactions.
o Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental interactions acting between
individual elementary particles at accessible energy scales. The ratio of
the gravitational attraction to the electromagnetic repulsion between two
protons separated by a distance r is
F_grav G m_p^2 / r^2 G m_p^2
-------- = -------------------- = ------------- ~ 10^-36
F_elec e^2 / (4 pi e_0 r^2) (e^2/4pi e_0)
where m_p is the mass of the proton and e is its charge.
These four facts explain a great deal about the role gravity plays in physical
phenomena. They explain, for example, why, although it is the weakest force,
gravity governs the organization of the universe on the largest distance
scales of astrophysics and cosmology. These distance scales are far beyond
the subatomic ranges of the strong and the weak interactions. Electromagnetic
interactions COULD be long range were there any large-scale objects with net
electric charge. But the universe is electrically neutral, and electromagnetic
forces are so much stronger than gravitational forces that any large-scale net
charge is quickly neutralized. Gravity is left to govern the structure of the
universe on the largest scales.
.
User: "Bocks"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 12:19:44 AM
Sam Wormley wrote:


These four facts explain a great deal about the role gravity plays in

physical

phenomena. They explain, for example, why, although it is the weakest

force,

gravity governs the organization of the universe on the largest

distance

scales of astrophysics and cosmology. These distance scales are far

beyond

the subatomic ranges of the strong and the weak interactions.

Electromagnetic

interactions COULD be long range were there any large-scale objects

with net

electric charge. But the universe is electrically neutral, and

electromagnetic

forces are so much stronger than gravitational forces that any

large-scale net

charge is quickly neutralized. Gravity is left to govern the

structure of the

universe on the largest scales.

We know a lot what gravity do but we don't know what is gravity, where
it
comes from. Could Hutchison somehow tap into the vacuum and able to
engineer space itself such that anomalous effect occurs? If you know
the
language of the space/time matrix (that exist higher order than our
space/time), then you can reprogram physical effects by directly
modifying
the matrix. Perhaps Hutchison accidentally got accessed to the language
where the matrix of space/time is written and can directly engineer
effects. Of course accidentally meant it is hard to replicate unless
one understands the mechanisms, etc. I'm looking for solid evidence
that
the Hutchison is just a pure hoax so I can forget about it and let it
not bother me in the future.
Bocks
.
User: "Jim Black"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 12:46:34 AM
Bocks wrote:

We know a lot what gravity do but we don't know what is gravity,
where it
comes from. Could Hutchison somehow tap into the vacuum and able to
engineer space itself such that anomalous effect occurs? If you know
the
language of the space/time matrix (that exist higher order than our
space/time), then you can reprogram physical effects by directly
modifying
the matrix. Perhaps Hutchison accidentally got accessed to the
language
where the matrix of space/time is written and can directly engineer
effects. Of course accidentally meant it is hard to replicate unless
one understands the mechanisms, etc. I'm looking for solid evidence
that
the Hutchison is just a pure hoax so I can forget about it and let it
not bother me in the future.

Bocks

It need not bother you. Agents will be coming for him shortly. Eat
your steak and be happy.
The alternate explanation is that he's using a string.
.

User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 12:31:41 AM
Bocks wrote:

We know a lot what gravity do but we don't know what is gravity, where
it comes from.

We know exactly what gravity is. Gravity is completely explained by General
Relativity--the curvature of spacetime.
Observational and Experimental Evidence Bearing on General Relativity
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html
General Relativity Tutorial
John Baez
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/gr.html
.
User: "Bocks"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 03:53:56 AM
Sam Wormley wrote:

Bocks wrote:

We know a lot what gravity do but we don't know what is gravity,

where

it comes from.


We know exactly what gravity is. Gravity is completely explained by

General

Relativity--the curvature of spacetime.

But is spacetime (as we know it) primary? or is there a more
primary substance before spacetime? In the Hutchison effect,
what if he indirectly programmed that primary substance hence
resulting in engineering reality itself?
You know exactly what gravity is? So what is the quantum mechanics
correlates of gravity?
Bocks
.
User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 08:40:53 AM
Bocks wrote:

Sam Wormley wrote:

Bocks wrote:


We know a lot what gravity do but we don't know what is gravity,


where

it comes from.


We know exactly what gravity is. Gravity is completely explained by


General

Relativity--the curvature of spacetime.



But is spacetime (as we know it) primary? or is there a more
primary substance before spacetime?

What might "more primary substance" mean?

In the Hutchison effect,
what if he indirectly programmed that primary substance hence
resulting in engineering reality itself?

What if the moon is made of green cheese?

You know exactly what gravity is? So what is the quantum mechanics
correlates of gravity?

What do you mean with "correlates" here?
Bye,
Bjoern
.

User: "John Sefton"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 07:38:07 AM
Bocks wrote:

Sam Wormley wrote:

Bocks wrote:


We know a lot what gravity do but we don't know what is gravity,


where

it comes from.


We know exactly what gravity is. Gravity is completely explained by


General

Relativity--the curvature of spacetime.



But is spacetime (as we know it) primary? or is there a more
primary substance before spacetime? In the Hutchison effect,
what if he indirectly programmed that primary substance hence
resulting in engineering reality itself?

You know exactly what gravity is? So what is the quantum mechanics
correlates of gravity?

Bocks

He's delusional.
Indoctrinated to the point of babble.
John
.



User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 03:23:54 AM
Bocks wrote:
[snip]

We know a lot what gravity do but we don't know what is gravity, where
it comes from.

Curvature of spacetime.

Could Hutchison somehow tap into the vacuum

What is that supposed to mean?

and able to
engineer space itself such that anomalous effect occurs?

I think you have read too much bad science fiction.

If you know the language of the space/time matrix

What's that?

(that exist higher order than our space/time),

What do you mean with "higher order"?
[snip more strange stuff]
Bye,
Bjoern
.
User: "John Sefton"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 11:18:51 AM
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:

Bocks wrote:

[snip]


We know a lot what gravity do but we don't know what is gravity, where
it comes from.



Curvature of spacetime.


Could Hutchison somehow tap into the vacuum



What is that supposed to mean?


and able to
engineer space itself such that anomalous effect occurs?



I think you have read too much bad science fiction.


If you know the language of the space/time matrix



What's that?


(that exist higher order than our space/time),



What do you mean with "higher order"?


Bjorn-yesterday doesn't question.
John
.




User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: Is the Hutchison Effect a hoax or real? 13 Jan 2005 09:25:13 AM
Bocks wrote:
[snip]
Complete utter ***** at face value.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: God Is Real Atheist Are Not
Real math issue, academics behaving badly
REAL Time-Travellers!!
Re: GET REAL EH!
Time travel is real - bid for your chance to try it
Time travel is real - bid for your chance to try it
Time travel is real - bid for your chance to try it
Time travel is real - bid for your chance to try it
Re: Pentagon 9/11 Fraud was Re: No Second Engine at the Pentagon was Re: The Ultimate Pentagon 9/11 Question Andy Carol couldn't answer. was Re: Flight 175 WAS a FUEL TANKER, for REAL. This is not a "theory".
Re: Pentagon 9/11 Fraud was Re: No Second Engine at the Pentagon was Re: The Ultimate Pentagon 9/11 Question Andy Carol couldn't answer. was Re: Flight 175 WAS a FUEL TANKER, for REAL. This is not a "theory".
Re: Al-Qaeda nukes real threat to USA...
Re: Al-Qaeda nukes real threat to USA
Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?
Is Lorentz contraction a real process ?
IS high energy physics real ?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER