| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Infinity TEXT & HTML" |
| Date: |
03 Nov 2006 11:36:10 AM |
| Object: |
Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090403080508000003010506
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
There must be, but it cannot be..???
The answer would be very helpful,...
Especially in the study of "Black Holes".
God's Creator!
(That was my only sin...) :-(
--------------090403080508000003010506
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body link="#0000ee" alink="#ee0000" bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"
vlink="#551a8b">
<div align="center"><font color="#009900"><big><big><b>Thus Spake: *G*
*O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*</b></big></big></font><br>
<br>
</div>
There must be, but it cannot be..???<br>
<br>
<big><b>The answer would be very helpful,...<br>
Especially in the study of "Black Holes".<br>
</b></big><br>
<br>
<div align="center"><font color="#009900"><big><big><b>God's Creator! </b></big></big></font><br>
(<font color="#ff0000"><i><big><b>That was my only sin...</b></big></i></font>)
<span class="moz-smiley-s2"><span> :-( </span></span><br>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------090403080508000003010506--
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
04 Nov 2006 07:49:29 AM |
|
|
Eschew equivocation.
The word 'nothing' can either refer to the (local) absence of anything
(a finite void) or to a (universal) absence of all things (an infinite
void).
The first is trivial. Any vacuum qualifies.
The second is impossible, as the simple existence of the name "nothing"
is sufficient to provide a counterexample that disproves the global
generalization.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "neo" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
04 Nov 2006 03:32:55 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Eschew equivocation.
The word 'nothing' can either refer to the (local) absence of anything
(a finite void) or to a (universal) absence of all things (an infinite
void).
The first is trivial. Any vacuum qualifies.
The second is impossible, as the simple existence of the name "nothing"
is sufficient to provide a counterexample that disproves the global
generalization.
Who created god? The question is logical.
Who created 'nothing'? This question is illogical. Which does not
exist, it can not have creator.
Suppose God = Nothing.
Then who created God(Nothing), this question becomes irrelevent.
But problem is that if nothing show some activity like creation of
universe, it is not nothing. It is something.
Like virus. When inactive it is just matter(nothing). But when active
it is life(something, God).
I don't know what I wrote. Late night posting.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Farts Loudly in the Library." |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? Yes, there is. |
04 Nov 2006 07:43:24 PM |
|
|
The definition of existence is vacuous unless you have nonexistence to
complement it.
Nonexistence is present both in physics, and math. Two examples will suffice
:
Math
There exists no such x s.t. x = x + 1. Such an x would be said to be
nonexistent.
Physics
There exists no such object as large as Jupiter which slammed into the
Earth yesterday. Such an object is said to be nonexistent.
So, yes. There is nonexistence. This can be thought of as nothing-space.
There is also a third type which is noteworthy. Triviality can be considered
as being distinct from both existence and nonexistence. This is because the
existence of a trivial is arbitrary, or indeterminate. To illustrate this,
two examples from math and phys
Math
The number 5 is unique. Suppose that there were 2 numeral 5's. It would
be impossibel to tell which one was existent, and which one was trivial. The
same thing carries over to all of geometry and everything else. The
existence of the trivial is indeterminate.
Physics
You cannot posibly determine if you are really yourself, or if you are
in fact an identical clone of yourself. You cannot determine whether there
is only one of you, or if there are multiple trivial copies of yourself
sitting there in front of your computer. The answer to the question is
unanswerable, indeterminate, arbitrary.
So, you have existence, nonexistence, and triviality. I would suggest
getting a copy of "Information and Randomness" by Christian Claude, ISBN
3-540-57456-5, and ISBN 0-387-57456-5. Claude does not discuss these issues,
but he does attempt to grapple with order and disorder, which is perhaps the
most important open issue to modern science in my opinion. Understanding
order and disorder will lead to many things including an understanding of
the continuity of spacetime. Existence and nonexistence can be used to make
statements regarding order and disorder which is rather more precise than
using the concept of randomness as a prepackaged standalone concept.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
05 Nov 2006 07:37:01 AM |
|
|
neo wrote:
Who created god? The question is logical.
The question presumes (1) that god exists, (2) that god was created,
and (3) that the creation of god was performed by some entity to which
the pronoun "who" may be applied.
None of these presumtions have been established as valid. Until such
time the question "Who created god?" is not logical.
Who created 'nothing'? This question is illogical. Which does not
exist, it can not have creator.
Suppose God = Nothing.
Then who created God(Nothing), this question becomes irrelevent.
But problem is that if nothing show some activity like creation of
universe, it is not nothing. It is something.
Like virus. When inactive it is just matter(nothing). But when active
it is life(something, God).
Poor analogy. Matter is something. Viruses simply blur the line
between living and non-living matter.
I don't know what I wrote. Late night posting.
Not bad, really.
"The gods created men to worship them; men created the gods so they
could blaspheme." - (source unknown)
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
05 Nov 2006 04:43:17 PM |
|
|
On 5 Nov 2006 05:37:01 -0800, "tadchem@comcast.net"
<tadchem@comcast.net> wrote:
- Refer: <1162733821.771379.161450@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
neo wrote:
Who created god? The question is logical.
The question presumes (1) that god exists, (2) that god was created,
and (3) that the creation of god was performed by some entity to which
the pronoun "who" may be applied.
:
It also makes the monstrously unwarranted assumption that the three
letter string: "god" has been defined in a meaningful way.
--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Infinity TEXT & HTML" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
05 Nov 2006 04:32:42 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050509040405050307010403
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
tadchem@comcast.net wrote:
neo wrote:
Who created god? The question is logical.
The question presumes (1) that god exists, (2) that god was created,
and (3) that the creation of god was performed by some entity to which
the pronoun "who" may be applied.
None of these presumtions have been established as valid. Until such
time the question "Who created god?" is not logical.
Who created 'nothing'? This question is illogical. Which does not
exist, it can not have creator.
Suppose God = Nothing.
Then who created God(Nothing), this question becomes irrelevent.
But problem is that if nothing show some activity like creation of
universe, it is not nothing. It is something.
Like virus. When inactive it is just matter(nothing). But when active
it is life(something, God).
Poor analogy. Matter is something. Viruses simply blur the line
between living and non-living matter.
I don't know what I wrote. Late night posting.
Not bad, really.
"The gods created men to worship them; men created the gods so they
could blaspheme." - (source unknown)
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
Thanks, everyone!
Why the obvious is so difficult to perceive, I do NOT know...
Einstein supposedly spent most of his years in LIFE seeking something
he believed would be so profound, and simple, that even a
child could understand it. (Not his E=MC^2) type revelation.)
However, most humans seem to believe;
"ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED OR DESTROYED"
If that is... Umm, TRUE, REAL, VALID, FACTUAL... .etc. :-\
Then "SOMETHING" & "NOTHING" & "EVERYTHING" are
simply;
"Manifestations Of ... (One-Unique-Indestructible-Thing)"..
Indeed, if this "Thing" has INFINITE-LIFE",
that can not be created or destroyed,
Then I'm a meat & water & Iron.... etc. Nut,
constantly trying to replicate myself as often as
possible. :-D
And I'm SURE! my little infinite
("Nutties"), will do the same. :-D
Infinity.
God's Creator!
(I don't forgive *****!)
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wise men study the unknown and mysterious things, to enhance their wisdom.
While frightened men shout, kneel down, close their eyes and mumble...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--------------050509040405050307010403
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body link="#0000ee" alink="#ee0000" bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"
vlink="#551a8b">
<font color="#3333ff"><big><big><b><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tadchem@comcast.net">tadchem@comcast.net</a> wrote:</b></big></big></font>
<blockquote
cite="mid1162733821.771379.161450@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><font color="#993399"><big><big><b>neo wrote:</b></big></big></font>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><big><b>Who created god? The question is logical.</b></big>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
The question presumes (1) that god exists, (2) that god was created,
and (3) that the creation of god was performed by some entity to which
the pronoun "who" may be applied.
None of these presumtions have been established as valid. Until such
time the question "Who created god?" is not logical.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Who created 'nothing'? This question is illogical. Which does not
exist, it can not have creator.
Suppose God = Nothing.
Then who created God(Nothing), this question becomes irrelevent.
But problem is that if nothing show some activity like creation of
universe, it is not nothing. It is something.
Like virus. When inactive it is just matter(nothing). But when active
it is life(something, God).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Poor analogy. Matter is something. Viruses simply blur the line
between living and non-living matter.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I don't know what I wrote. Late night posting.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Not bad, really.
"The gods created men to worship them; men created the gods so they
could blaspheme." - (source unknown)
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font color="#009900"><big><big><b>Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C*
*R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*<br>
<br>
</b></big></big></font><br>
<font color="#3333ff"><big><big><b>Thanks, everyone!</b></big></big></font><br>
<br>
<big><b>Why the obvious is so difficult to perceive, I do NOT know...</b></big><br>
<br>
Einstein supposedly spent most of his years in LIFE seeking something <br>
he believed would be so profound, and simple, that even a<br>
child could understand it. (<b>Not his <small><font color="#cc0000"><big><big>E=MC^2</big></big></font></small>)
type revelation.</b>)<br>
<br>
However, most humans seem to believe;<i><font color="#ff0000"><b><br>
"ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED OR DESTROYED"<br>
</b></font></i><br>
<b>If that is... Umm, TRUE, REAL, VALID, FACTUAL... .etc. <span
class="moz-smiley-s7"><span> :-\ </span></span><br>
Then "<font color="#000000"><big>SOMETHING" </big>
& "<big>NOTHING"</big> & "<big>EVERYTHING</big>" </font>
are simply;</b><br>
<b>"Manifestations Of ...
(One-Unique-Indestructible-Thing)"..<br>
</b><br>
<b> Indeed, if this <u>"Thing"</u> has INFINITE-LIFE",<br>
that can not be created or destroyed,<br>
Then I'm a meat & water & Iron.... etc.
Nut,<br>
constantly trying to replicate myself as often as
possible.</b> <span class="moz-smiley-s5"><span> :-D </span></span><br>
<br>
<b>And I'm SURE! my little infinite
("Nutties"), will do the same.</b> <span class="moz-smiley-s5"><span>
:-D </span></span><br>
<br>
<br>
<font color="#009900"><b> Infinity.</b></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<div align="center"><font color="#009900"><big><big><b>God's Creator! </b></big></big></font><br>
(<font color="#cc0000"><i><big><b>I don't forgive *****!</b></big></i></font>)<br>
</div>
<br>
-- <br>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>
<font color="#330033"><big><b>Wise men study the unknown and mysterious
things, to enhance their wisdom.<br>
While frightened men shout, kneel down, close their eyes and mumble...</b></big></font><br>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------050509040405050307010403--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
04 Nov 2006 07:19:23 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Eschew equivocation.
The word 'nothing' can either refer to the (local) absence of anything
(a finite void) or to a (universal) absence of all things (an infinite
void).
The first is trivial. Any vacuum qualifies.
QM disallows vacuums.
The second is impossible, as the simple existence of the name "nothing"
is sufficient to provide a counterexample that disproves the global
generalization.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "unsettled" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
04 Nov 2006 07:34:46 PM |
|
|
Lawson English wrote:
tadchem@comcast.net wrote:
Eschew equivocation.
The word 'nothing' can either refer to the (local) absence of anything
(a finite void) or to a (universal) absence of all things (an infinite
void).
The first is trivial. Any vacuum qualifies.
QM disallows vacuums.
The second is impossible, as the simple existence of the name "nothing"
is sufficient to provide a counterexample that disproves the global
generalization.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Was "nothing" pre-qualified as being inside the universe?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
04 Nov 2006 08:03:16 PM |
|
|
unsettled wrote:
Lawson English wrote:
tadchem@comcast.net wrote:
Eschew equivocation.
The word 'nothing' can either refer to the (local) absence of anything
(a finite void) or to a (universal) absence of all things (an infinite
void).
The first is trivial. Any vacuum qualifies.
QM disallows vacuums.
The second is impossible, as the simple existence of the name "nothing"
is sufficient to provide a counterexample that disproves the global
generalization.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Was "nothing" pre-qualified as being inside the universe?
Nothing is outside the universe....
;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "unsettled" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
04 Nov 2006 08:08:47 PM |
|
|
Lawson English wrote:
unsettled wrote:
Lawson English wrote:
tadchem@comcast.net wrote:
Eschew equivocation.
The word 'nothing' can either refer to the (local) absence of anything
(a finite void) or to a (universal) absence of all things (an infinite
void).
The first is trivial. Any vacuum qualifies.
QM disallows vacuums.
The second is impossible, as the simple existence of the name "nothing"
is sufficient to provide a counterexample that disproves the global
generalization.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Was "nothing" pre-qualified as being inside the universe?
Nothing is outside the universe....
;-)
Exactly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Farts Loudly in the Library." |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
04 Nov 2006 09:37:23 PM |
|
|
"unsettled" <unsettled@nonsense.com> wrote in message
news:a5b66$454d451f$4fe4d07$12999@DIALUPUSA.NET...
Lawson English wrote:
unsettled wrote:
Lawson English wrote:
tadchem@comcast.net wrote:
Eschew equivocation.
The word 'nothing' can either refer to the (local) absence of
anything
(a finite void) or to a (universal) absence of all things (an
infinite
void).
The first is trivial. Any vacuum qualifies.
QM disallows vacuums.
The second is impossible, as the simple existence of the name
"nothing"
is sufficient to provide a counterexample that disproves the global
generalization.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Was "nothing" pre-qualified as being inside the universe?
Nothing is outside the universe....
;-)
Exactly.
Universe is simultaneously open and closed. Existence is relative - due to
scale.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
04 Nov 2006 01:06:42 PM |
|
|
On 4 Nov 2006 05:49:29 -0800, "tadchem@comcast.net"
<tadchem@comcast.net> wrote:
Eschew equivocation.
The word 'nothing' can either refer to the (local) absence of anything
(a finite void) or to a (universal) absence of all things (an infinite
void).
The first is trivial. Any vacuum qualifies.
The second is impossible, as the simple existence of the name "nothing"
is sufficient to provide a counterexample that disproves the global
generalization.
So before the universe existed, there was ?????
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I've heard the call. I believe God wants me to run for president."
- George W. Bush, quoted in George Magazine, September, 2000
"God gave the savior to the German people. We have faith,
deep and unshakeable faith, that he was sent to us by
God to save Germany."
- Hermann Goering, speaking of Hitler
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
05 Nov 2006 07:26:19 AM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
So before the universe existed, there was ?????
there wasn't even a "before"...
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: _Nothing_ really changes because true randomness couldn't possibly exist. |
06 Nov 2006 12:01:43 AM |
|
|
Hi Mr. Infinity, You asked, " Is there such a thing as... NOTHING ? "
Sure, _Nothing_ really changes because true randomness couldn't possibly exist.
Therefore, all changes ( including so-called " choices " ) are _Virtual_.
Where are the _Real_ choices ? To Live/Die faster or slower ? no.
Each is imprisoned in a virtual casino... in then end, the house takes all.
When discussing the word " god ", I say:
The cosmic _God_ ( infinite in power and knoweldge ) is infinitely remote.
A God/Devil is whatever has Life/Death control over something.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: _Nothing_ really changes because true randomness couldn't possibly exist. |
06 Nov 2006 01:16:34 AM |
|
|
Jeff...Relf wrote:
[snip stupid *****]
Look who is posting worthless ***** yet again! Why don't you go away?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
03 Nov 2006 03:55:02 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics "Infinity (TEXT & HTML)" <Infinity@warez.bofh.org.uk> wrote:
Nothing.
So, yes.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
03 Nov 2006 12:36:14 PM |
|
|
Infinity (TEXT & HTML) schreef:
Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
There must be, but it cannot be..???
The answer would be very helpful,...
Especially in the study of "Black Holes".
God's Creator!
(That was my only sin...) :-(
Nothing is a spirtual enitity
that is, it's something that only exists in our minds.
One tends to get into a lot of logical problems,
if one does not distingish them from material enities.
So creating nothing may be another sin of yours:)
Peter van Velzen
November 2006
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "xray4abc" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
07 Nov 2006 11:08:43 AM |
|
|
Infinity (TEXT & HTML) wrote:
Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
There must be, but it cannot be..???
The answer would be very helpful,...
Especially in the study of "Black Holes".
God's Creator!
(That was my only sin...) :-(
..............
Let's see!
U...........m! Yep, I've found it!
If there is a Nothing, that makes a "Something".
(This is a unity of contraries thing.)
So, a Nothing itself is a Something and, viceversa,
a Something can be in a particular case a Nothing.
LL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Infinity TEXT & HTML" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
07 Nov 2006 01:19:23 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010300090506030502060800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
xray4abc wrote:
Infinity (TEXT & HTML) wrote:
Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
There must be, but it cannot be..???
The answer would be very helpful,...
Especially in the study of "Black Holes".
God's Creator!
(That was my only sin...) :-(
.............
Let's see!
U...........m! Yep, I've found it!
If there is a Nothing, that makes a "Something".
(This is a unity of contraries thing.)
So, a Nothing itself is a Something and, viceversa,
a Something can be in a particular case a Nothing.
LL
Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
You got it!
All things are manifestations of the "Same Thing".
The "Same Thing" paradox is... the entire Universe, and
the Universe.... (Are you ready for this?)...
is "infinitely" changing... LIFE & DEATH.
What ever the heck LIFE & DEATH is... :-\
May your next morphing/mutation be... Peaceful.
God's Creator!
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wise men study the unknown and mysterious things, to enhance their wisdom.
While frightened men shout, kneel down, close their eyes and mumble...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--------------010300090506030502060800
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body link="#0000ee" alink="#ee0000" bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"
vlink="#551a8b">
<font color="#3333ff"><big><big><b>xray4abc wrote:</b></big></big></font>
<blockquote
cite="mid1162919320.883976.102530@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><font color="#993399"><big><b>Infinity (TEXT & HTML) wrote:</b></big></font>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
There must be, but it cannot be..???
The answer would be very helpful,...
Especially in the study of "Black Holes".
<font color="#993399"><big><b>God's Creator!</b></big></font>
(<font color="#cc0000">That was my only sin...</font>) <span
class="moz-smiley-s2"><span> :-( </span></span>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->.............
Let's see!
U...........m! Yep, I've found it!
If there is a Nothing, that makes a "Something".
(This is a unity of contraries thing.)
So, a Nothing itself is a Something and, viceversa,
a Something can be in a particular case a Nothing.
<font color="#3333ff"><big><big><b>LL</b></big></big></font>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div align="center"><font color="#009900"><big><b>Thus Spake: *G* *O*
*D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*</b></big></font><br>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<div align="center"><font color="#3333ff"><b><big><big><big>You got it!</big></big></big></b></font><br>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<b>All things are manifestations of the "Same Thing".<br>
<br>
The "Same Thing" paradox is... the entire Universe, and<br>
the Universe.... (Are you ready for this?)... <br>
is "infinitely" changing... </b><b>LIFE & DEATH.<br>
</b><br>
What ever the heck <b><u>LIFE & DEATH </u></b>is...<span
class="moz-smiley-s7"><span> :-\ </span></span><br>
<br>
<i><big><b>May your next morphing/mutation be...
Peaceful. </b></big></i><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div align="center"><font color="#009900"><big><b>God's Creator! </b></big></font><br>
</div>
<br>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>
<big><b>Wise men study the unknown and mysterious things, to enhance
their wisdom.<br>
While frightened men shout, kneel down, close their eyes and mumble...</b></big><br>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------010300090506030502060800--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Infinity TEXT & HTML" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? Yes: Me. |
07 Nov 2006 05:18:27 PM |
|
|
That's right - I am NOTHING! Never have been, never will be - nothing
and nobody.
Yes, it hurts; I always dreamed of being somebody and in fact I still
do. I even TELL myself that I am, and try and convince myself that
someone, somewhere considers me worthwhile.
But deep down I know it's true; I really am a worthless nothing.
Where's my security blanket, I think I'm going to have a little cry ...
Greasdoctor
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
03 Nov 2006 04:51:38 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:36:10 -0800, "Infinity (TEXT & HTML)"
<Infinity@warez.bofh.org.uk> wrote:
- Refer: <1tKdnUAc4_mX49bYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com>
Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
There must be, but it cannot be..???
The answer would be very helpful,...
Especially in the study of "Black Holes".
God's Creator!
(That was my only sin...) :-(
I'll be glad when school holidays are over...
--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
03 Nov 2006 01:36:07 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:36:10 -0800, "Infinity (TEXT & HTML)"
<Infinity@warez.bofh.org.uk> wrote:
Yes, and it can be found in abundance between your ears.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joel Edge" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there such a thing as... NOTHING? |
06 Nov 2006 06:11:34 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:36:07 -0500, John Baker wrote
(in article <gg6nk2pma6fm5ih3900nh17i9ajshi8n1i@4ax.com>):
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:36:10 -0800, "Infinity (TEXT & HTML)"
<Infinity@warez.bofh.org.uk> wrote:
Yes, and it can be found in abundance between your ears.
Damn, you beat me to it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
