| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
07 Sep 2006 09:17:45 PM |
| Object: |
JSH: We may have a problem |
Almost as a lark years ago I thought I'd play with mostly simple
algebra and use brainstorming to see if I couldn't figure out some neat
math stuff that got missed. Low-hanging fruit. I was going for
something simple but slightly subtle that might not have been noticed.
But something weird happened when I talked about math ideas on
Usenet--math people went after me.
The insults flew almost from the start and kept going until this day,
over ten years later.
Well, what would you do? I doggedly kept at it, and then found reasons
for the insults--the math people were full of hot air in key areas.
So I traced out several areas and if you look over my research you'll
find I answer things from supposed logical contradictions like the
so-called Liar's Paradox, to finding a super ring like my ring of
objects, which leads into abstruse areas.
BUT I found math people kept up the insults and lied about all of my
research, so I pondered the problem: what could I figure out that they
couldn't get away with lying about?
Easy answer--the factoring problem because it underlies Internet
security.
And I may have done it, or come close enough that others can build on
my research, but I'm not sure, and the same math people of course just
keep giving insults, and the usual mantra claiming I'm wrong.
So why is it our problem?
Well, these people don't just lie about dinky little crap like
randomness with prime numbers, where I'm sure many of you can see right
through the statistical arguments--like why use statistical arguments
against physics people?--to see why p mod 3 with p a prime greater than
3 is probably random like I say.
I fear that they are capable of lying about yet another clever idea
that can be used for factoring.
But hey, what can I do? I say they lie, they say they don't, and years
go by, so I put the information on my blog.
If they are right, no problem!!!
If not, you may go home one day to find your are broke, no matter who
you are.
If they are wrong on this one Bill Gates may wake up broke.
So that's the problem. I had this idea a bit over two and a half
months ago, and put it on my blog about two months ago, so hey, I'm
thinking, maybe no worries?
I may as well toss it in here as it's kind of short, or maybe not.
Does it really matter what the idea is?
The real point is it's not just an esoteric exercise if these math
people are actually lying about this prime stuff, as they may be lying
about much bigger stuff as well.
And the result may be that you are soon going to be really poor without
having had a chance to do a damn thing about it. Or maybe this is your
chance, but not really, as what can any of you really do?
I don't even know what I can do. The situation is bizarre beyond
belief. Oh yeah, I did send the idea to some ex-CIA guy and someone
with the U.S. Navy and they passed on it, so, no worries?
James Harris
.
|
|
| User: "Dr. Moria" |
|
| Title: Re: We may have a problem |
07 Sep 2006 11:43:52 PM |
|
|
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1157681865.599564.202980@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<SNIP CRAP>
James Harris
AGAIN I SAY, JSH DOES NOT HAVE A BACKGROUND IN PHYSICS!!
An extensive multi-year background in whining like a little girly-man,
because he is wrong, 100% of the time.
JSH is trivial,
anytime, bring it on, go learn algebra first.
--Dr. Moria
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SteveG" |
|
| Title: Re: We may have a problem |
08 Sep 2006 04:39:29 PM |
|
|
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1157681865.599564.202980@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Almost as a lark years ago I thought I'd play with mostly simple
algebra and use brainstorming to see if I couldn't figure out some neat
math stuff that got missed. Low-hanging fruit. I was going for
something simple but slightly subtle that might not have been noticed.
But something weird happened when I talked about math ideas on
Usenet--math people went after me.
because you were posting lies and *****, any normal person could tell you
are a troll.
The insults flew almost from the start and kept going until this day,
over ten years later.
Well, what would you do? I doggedly kept at it, and then found reasons
for the insults--the math people were full of hot air in key areas.
more lies..........
So I traced out several areas and if you look over my research you'll
find I answer things from supposed logical contradictions like the
so-called Liar's Paradox, to finding a super ring like my ring of
objects, which leads into abstruse areas.
leads nowhere, you admit you are NOT a mathematician
BUT I found math people kept up the insults and lied about all of my
research, so I pondered the problem: what could I figure out that they
couldn't get away with lying about?
"your research" is lies..............
Easy answer--the factoring problem because it underlies Internet
security.
And I may have done it, or come close enough that others can build on
my research, but I'm not sure, and the same math people of course just
keep giving insults, and the usual mantra claiming I'm wrong.
So why is it our problem?
it is your problem, just stop lying.
Well, these people don't just lie about dinky little crap like
randomness with prime numbers, where I'm sure many of you can see right
through the statistical arguments--like why use statistical arguments
against physics people?--to see why p mod 3 with p a prime greater than
3 is probably random like I say.
total BS, no proof provided
I fear that they are capable of lying about yet another clever idea
that can be used for factoring.
But hey, what can I do? I say they lie, they say they don't, and years
go by, so I put the information on my blog.
If they are right, no problem!!!
The only problem is you posting your lies.
If not, you may go home one day to find your are broke, no matter who
you are.
If they are wrong on this one Bill Gates may wake up broke.
sure, and you have a chicken suit on.
So that's the problem. I had this idea a bit over two and a half
months ago, and put it on my blog about two months ago, so hey, I'm
thinking, maybe no worries?
I may as well toss it in here as it's kind of short, or maybe not.
Does it really matter what the idea is?
go post your trash in => alt.math.trash.for.crackpots
The real point is it's not just an esoteric exercise if these math
people are actually lying about this prime stuff, as they may be lying
about much bigger stuff as well.
you may be lying right now, I prefer to believe that.
And the result may be that you are soon going to be really poor without
having had a chance to do a damn thing about it. Or maybe this is your
chance, but not really, as what can any of you really do?
do not post LIES, crank
I don't even know what I can do. The situation is bizarre beyond
belief. Oh yeah, I did send the idea to some ex-CIA guy and someone
with the U.S. Navy and they passed on it, so, no worries?
they pissed on it.
James Harris
the crackpot
.
|
|
|
| User: "Knows Everything" |
|
| Title: Re: We may have a problem |
08 Sep 2006 07:07:22 PM |
|
|
I don't even know what I can do. The situation is bizarre beyond
belief. Oh yeah, I did send the idea to some ex-CIA guy and someone
with the U.S. Navy and they passed on it, so, no worries?
they pissed on it.
MEDIC !!! MEDIC !!!
I going to DIE from rofLmAo !!
I sent that same guy a proof on trisecting angles and they gave me 6 months
at GITMO. Where's the justice ?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: We may have a problem |
07 Sep 2006 10:09:54 PM |
|
|
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1157681865.599564.202980@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Almost as a lark years ago I thought I'd play with mostly simple
| algebra and use brainstorming to see if I couldn't figure out some neat
| math stuff that got missed. Low-hanging fruit. I was going for
| something simple but slightly subtle that might not have been noticed.
|
| But something weird happened when I talked about math ideas on
| Usenet--math people went after me.
|
| The insults flew almost from the start and kept going until this day,
| over ten years later.
|
| Well, what would you do? I doggedly kept at it, and then found reasons
| for the insults--the math people were full of hot air in key areas.
|
| So I traced out several areas and if you look over my research you'll
| find I answer things from supposed logical contradictions like the
| so-called Liar's Paradox, to finding a super ring like my ring of
| objects, which leads into abstruse areas.
|
| BUT I found math people kept up the insults and lied about all of my
| research, so I pondered the problem: what could I figure out that they
| couldn't get away with lying about?
|
| Easy answer--the factoring problem because it underlies Internet
| security.
|
| And I may have done it, or come close enough that others can build on
| my research, but I'm not sure, and the same math people of course just
| keep giving insults, and the usual mantra claiming I'm wrong.
|
| So why is it our problem?
|
| Well, these people don't just lie about dinky little crap like
| randomness with prime numbers, where I'm sure many of you can see right
| through the statistical arguments--like why use statistical arguments
| against physics people?--to see why p mod 3 with p a prime greater than
| 3 is probably random like I say.
|
| I fear that they are capable of lying about yet another clever idea
| that can be used for factoring.
|
| But hey, what can I do? I say they lie, they say they don't, and years
| go by, so I put the information on my blog.
|
| If they are right, no problem!!!
|
| If not, you may go home one day to find your are broke, no matter who
| you are.
|
| If they are wrong on this one Bill Gates may wake up broke.
|
| So that's the problem. I had this idea a bit over two and a half
| months ago, and put it on my blog about two months ago, so hey, I'm
| thinking, maybe no worries?
|
| I may as well toss it in here as it's kind of short, or maybe not.
| Does it really matter what the idea is?
|
| The real point is it's not just an esoteric exercise if these math
| people are actually lying about this prime stuff, as they may be lying
| about much bigger stuff as well.
|
| And the result may be that you are soon going to be really poor without
| having had a chance to do a damn thing about it. Or maybe this is your
| chance, but not really, as what can any of you really do?
|
| I don't even know what I can do. The situation is bizarre beyond
| belief. Oh yeah, I did send the idea to some ex-CIA guy and someone
| with the U.S. Navy and they passed on it, so, no worries?
|
|
| James Harris
< yawn>
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "Knows Everything" |
|
| Title: Re: We may have a problem |
07 Sep 2006 10:35:19 PM |
|
|
| I don't even know what I can do. The situation is bizarre beyond
| belief. Oh yeah, I did send the idea to some ex-CIA guy and someone
| with the U.S. Navy and they passed on it, so, no worries?
Good start, but not quite =TIMETRAVELLER= status. Here's a tip, "air force"
has nothing to do with flatulence. It's part of the military.
| James Harris
< yawn>
Androcles
Hey James - if you want to really ***** someone off you should take the ideas
from
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
and publish it in the form of a pamphlet or short book.
Then distribute widely.
I will gwuar-on-teeee you that you'll ruffle some feathers !!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: JSH: We may have a problem |
07 Sep 2006 09:25:41 PM |
|
|
wrote:
[snip blather]
sci.physics is not your blog.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Knows Everything" |
|
| Title: Re: JSH: We may have a problem |
07 Sep 2006 10:14:40 PM |
|
|
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
Silly ***** - how about formalizing your integral ?
C'mon man - maybe a decent quantized or probabilistic epsilon delta type of
apparatus or something.. Then there's Harris div grad and curl. There is
much real work ahead of you James. Infinite sums and infinite products with
trivials etc etc. Whatever.
I'm totally serious.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
You've got an integral that bears your name. Maybe now they'll give you an
AMEX card.
We need to push this stuff. I mean, playing around with non-existent things
is certainly not valid math. But, the existence of a trivial is arbitrary.
So, trivials must be allowable in some context. What's up ?
Lefty
=I=DID=NOT= have sex with that CPR training dummy !
undersecretary to the alpha cube
Man Old As Coal
My real name is Joseph Min.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|