| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"dedanoe" |
| Date: |
20 Sep 2007 11:05:13 PM |
| Object: |
KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i! |
KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i!
This is the gravity law: GRR=gM_1M_2; This is the Coulomb's law: CRR=-
kQ_1Q_2; Every particle must have both electric charge and mass
because without electric charge the mass will colapse and without mass
the electric charge will disperse. So, if one of the above law is
active so is the other and therefore they can be unified this way:
URR=gM_1M_2-kQ_1Q_2. Now, the most interesting outcome from this type
of unification are charge-mass conversions when the change of mass is
simultaneous with change of electric charge:
dM_2=(k/g)(Q_1/M_1)dQ_2.
Knowing that k=9e9N(m/C)^2; g=6.7e-11N(m/kg)^2; Q_1=1.6e-19C and
M_1=9.1e-31kg comes that for change of the electric charge of
dQ_2=1.6e-19C the change of mass will be entire dM_2=3.8e12kg, which
is four trillions kg of mass in one tiny particle. Assuming two such
extra massive particles interact on 1e-12m the gravitational force
alone between them will be U=6.7e-11(3.8e12/1e-12)^2=9.7e38N. Ain't
that force enough?
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i! |
21 Sep 2007 01:48:53 PM |
|
|
On Sep 21, 12:05 am, dedanoe <deda...@gmail.com> wrote:
Assuming two such
extra massive particles interact on 1e-12m the gravitational force
alone between them will be U=6.7e-11(3.8e12/1e-12)^2=9.7e38N. Ain't
that force enough?
not enough for my KING SIZE MATRESS.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "neilist" |
|
| Title: Re: KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i! |
21 Sep 2007 08:54:24 AM |
|
|
On Sep 21, 12:05 am, dedanoe <deda...@gmail.com> wrote:
KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i!
This is the gravity law: GRR=gM_1M_2;
No, that is the less accurate Newton's gravity law.
Haven't you heard of some dude named Einstein and his Theory of
General Relativity?
Thus, the rest of your post is drivel based on outdated physics.
Unification. Ha!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i! |
21 Sep 2007 01:15:17 PM |
|
|
dedanoe wrote:
KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i!
This is the gravity law: GRR=gM_1M_2; This is the Coulomb's law: CRR=-
kQ_1Q_2; Every particle must have both electric charge and mass
because without electric charge the mass will colapse and without mass
the electric charge will disperse.
Hey git - what is the charge of the photon?
Hey git - what is the mass of the photon?
Hey git - what is the charge of the neutrino?
Hey git - what happens if a masseless charge propagating at lightspeed
passes coaxially through a shorted solenoid?
So, if one of the above law is
active so is the other and therefore they can be unified this way:
URR=gM_1M_2-kQ_1Q_2.
Idiot. Reconcile spin-1 vector boson virtual force propagation for EM
with spin-2 tensor boson virtual force propagation for gravitation.
[snip rest of crap]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
| User: "Y.Porat" |
|
| Title: Re: KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i! |
26 Sep 2007 03:50:46 AM |
|
|
On Sep 21, 8:15 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
dedanoe wrote:
KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i!
This is the gravity law: GRR=gM_1M_2; This is the Coulomb's law: CRR=-
kQ_1Q_2; Every particle must have both electric charge and mass
because without electric charge the mass will colapse and without mass
the electric charge will disperse.
Hey git - what is the charge of the photon?
Hey git - what is the mass of the photon?
Hey git - what is the charge of the neutrino?
Hey git - what happens if a masseless charge propagating at lightspeed
passes coaxially through a shorted solenoid?
So, if one of the above law is
active so is the other and therefore they can be unified this way:
URR=gM_1M_2-kQ_1Q_2.
Idiot. Reconcile spin-1 vector boson virtual force propagation for EM
with spin-2 tensor boson virtual force propagation for gravitation.
[snip rest of crap]
--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
-----------
psychopath crook mumbler !!!!
======================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dedanoe" |
|
| Title: Re: KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i! |
21 Sep 2007 10:46:54 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al :
dedanoe wrote:
KING SIZE UNIFICATION!i!
This is the gravity law: GRR=gM_1M_2; This is the Coulomb's law: CRR=-
kQ_1Q_2; Every particle must have both electric charge and mass
because without electric charge the mass will colapse and without mass
the electric charge will disperse.
Hey git - what is the charge of the photon?
Hey git - what is the mass of the photon?
Hey git - what is the charge of the neutrino?
Hey git - what happens if a masseless charge propagating at lightspeed
passes coaxially through a shorted solenoid?
So, if one of the above law is
active so is the other and therefore they can be unified this way:
URR=gM_1M_2-kQ_1Q_2.
Idiot. Reconcile spin-1 vector boson virtual force propagation for EM
with spin-2 tensor boson virtual force propagation for gravitation.
[snip rest of crap]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
every photon is a-WORD, but not every word is a-PHOTON. if a particle
has charge only and no mass then it must disperse because that
particle can be observed as union of two halves on prety small
distance because of which the coulonbs force is huge. seme with mass
without charge; the mass will colapse in one point.
by the way in my leverian physics (http://dedanoe.googlepages.com/
knigata.pdf) there are no charges and no masses cause they are simple
analogy for force. i work only with forces, distances and phases of
oscillations.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=98=A0Relf?=" |
|
| Title: The energy in mass is gyroscopic. |
26 Sep 2007 12:48:46 AM |
|
|
Uncle Albert asked: “ What's the charge of the photon ? ”.
Although the photon --> Nets <-- to zero,
it's constantly transitioning from positive to negative.
“ What's the mass of the photon ? ”
Wrong question. c is just a speed,
photons have momentum just as surely as a moving car does.
“ Gravity + Entropy == Energy + Mass ”,
where “ Energy + Mass ” is a constant
and the energy in mass is gyroscopic.
Entropy is the energy you can't use, a.k.a. spontaneous dissipation,
and it only goes up. “ Dark Energy ” is just cosmic entropy.
Ignorant, time seems directional and nature is a virtual casino.
Time can be/is modeled as a fourth --> spatial <-- dimension
for sufficiently predictable systems like atomic clocks,
where the second is also a length.
Everything you ever did or ever will do couldn't be any other way.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The energy in mass is gyroscopic. |
26 Sep 2007 12:19:09 PM |
|
|
Jeff?Relf wrote:
Uncle Albert asked: “ What's the charge of the photon ? ”.
Although the photon --> Nets <-- to zero,
it's constantly transitioning from positive to negative.
[snip crap]
Fucking imbecile. No photon mass, no photon charge, no photon dipole
moment, no photon quadrupole moment, no photon magnetic moment.
Hey stooopid Jeff?Relf, name one charged particle with zero rest mass.
Hey stooopid Jeff?Relf, tell us what happens when a charged particle
with zero rest mass passes coaxially through a shorted solenoid.
Idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: The energy in mass is gyroscopic. |
30 Sep 2007 09:00:39 AM |
|
|
Uncle Al (of Irvine) My "Spin is in Theory" gives the spinning electron
cloud a gyro effect. I find this interesting. "We feel the field of
magnetisim the same way we feel the force of a gyroscope". An
electron must have a spin axis. An electron according my theory is
spinning at 'c' The theory answers hard questions. Is short.
Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=98=A0Relf?=" |
|
| Title: An attractive or repulsive gravitomagnetic component. |
01 Oct 2007 03:13:42 AM |
|
|
Quoting WikiPedia on Gravitomagnetism:
“ If two wheels are spun on a common axis,
the mutual gravitational attraction between the two wheels
arguably ought to be greater if they spin in opposite directions [...]
This can be expressed as
an attractive or repulsive gravitomagnetic component. ”
.....
“ This prediction, often loosely referred to as a gravitomagnetic effect,
is among the last basic predictions of general relativity
yet to be directly tested. ”
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Y.Porat" |
|
| Title: Re: The energy in mass is gyroscopic. |
26 Sep 2007 04:01:56 AM |
|
|
On Sep 26, 7:48 am, Jeff Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:
Uncle Albert asked: " What's the charge of the photon ? ".
Although the photon --> Nets <-- to zero,
it's constantly transitioning from positive to negative.
" What's the mass of the photon ? "
Wrong question. c is just a speed,
photons have momentum just as surely as a moving car does.
" Gravity + Entropy == Energy + Mass ",
where " Energy + Mass " is a constant
and the energy in mass is gyroscopic.
Entropy is the energy you can't use, a.k.a. spontaneous dissipation,
and it only goes up. " Dark Energy " is just cosmic entropy.
Ignorant, time seems directional and nature is a virtual casino.
Time can be/is modeled as a fourth --> spatial <-- dimension
for sufficiently predictable systems like atomic clocks,
where the second is also a length.
Everything you ever did or ever will do couldn't be any other way.
----------------
i dont know what Jeff i smumbling
anyway i like the title he gave it
'energy in mass --is gyroscopic'
since energy is mass in motion
and you take rest mass
and nothing is fowing out of it
th e uinevitable conclusion is that
**the eenrgy of rest mass is in closed movement**
ie
in some rotational movement!!
that is probablt one of the reasons why people
adopted in past so eysily the notion
of eelctrons orbitingt around the nuc
any way the rearl story is apprently much less
over simplified
and still the general idea i s right
there must be something there
that is in a perpetual circular movement!
if you dont mind
see my 'Circlon;' Idea ....
Y.Porat
------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
